I should mention as well that I've felt my connection has been "flaky"
with 2.1.2.0. It connects OK (not fast, but I wouldn't say slow... its
maybe a minute?), but I usually work via SSH & vim and regularly get
pauses of around 30 seconds.
I thought maybe it was the servers I was connected to at
Bryan: WPA2 (TKIP & AES) in one location and WPA/WPA2 with just one of
the ciphers in another location (forget if it was AES or TKIP, but only
one worked with an old 802.11b Thinkpad so probably WPA+TKIP? Ping me
again if you need to know).
At any rate, my card seems to work every now, and I have
Will putting an access pointer in WPA-only (not WPA2) mode workaround
this issue? My router/AP is running Tomato firmware which allows me to
select TKIP-only.
--
RaLink RT2860 won't connect to 802.11n WPA2 networks
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/344022
You received this bug notification because
Aviv: Sorry, I wasn't more specific. I have that configuration working
on my Tomato router, but I was wondering for non-Tomato routers/APs
which don't offer an easy way to select TKIP instead of TKIP+AES.
Will setting a router/AP to be WPA-only (as opposed to WPA/WPA2) work?
--
RaLink RT2860 wo
Vic: Interesting, rt2860sta 1.8.0.0 + NM 0.7 on Ubuntu Jaunty (so stock
kernel & NM) works fine for me with no-encryption and WPA2/TKIP.
Perhaps MSCHAPv2 is at fault?
--
RaLink RT2860 won't connect to 802.11n WPA2 networks
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/344022
You received this bug notification
Vic: Agreed on all counts. :-)
--
RaLink RT2860 won't connect to 802.11n WPA2 networks
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/344022
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
http
Suddenly started working for me on a WPA2 (TKIP and AES) network that it
failed on before. Not sure what changed, didn't notice any kernel or
networking related updates.
--
[Jaunty] wireless rt2860 not connecting to WPA
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/339891
You received this bug notification be
@Christian: How do I get that to work on Jaunty? Installing the deb
tells me a newer version of that driver is already installed. Thanks
for the link!
--
RaLink RT2860 won't connect to 802.11n WPA2 networks
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/344022
You received this bug notification because you ar
Same problem here. NetworkManager sees it and shows available networks,
but never connects. Can't get it to work with manual configuration
either.
Had it working under Ubuntu 8.10 by compiling Ralink's provided driver
by hand and manually configuring the interface via
/etc/network/interfaces.
m
** Attachment added: "Kernel log"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25275321/kern.log
--
RaLink Ra2860 not working
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/352268
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu
rt2860 not working in Jaunty using standard kernel linux-
image-2.6.28-11-generic version 2.6.28-11.41
Tried installing Stephane's ppa2 packages on a whim, rebooted, and still
nothing.
Is there anything else I should try? Any way I can help? The comment
thread is kind of epic, and I'm having a
Just to confirm on an Acer Extensa 4630Z that 2.1.2.0 (srcversion
355B81DA42995AB567BD9A0) compiled and installed by hand (along with
editing os/linux/config.mk for NM and copying RT2860STA.dat to
/etc/Wireless/RT2860STA) *works*
Using Ubuntu 9.04 and 2.6.28-12-generic kernel.
--
[Jaunty] wirel
Public bug reported:
Also: Possible missing firmware /lib/firmware/i915/skl_guc_ver6.bin for
module i915_bpo
Ubuntu 16.04 Xenial
Packages:
ii linux-firmware1.157.3 all Firmware for
Linux kernel drivers
ii linux-image-generic 4.4.0.36.38 amd64
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1313450 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1313450
FWIW, we hit the bug with Oracle Java 7u55, but as #1313450 has
illustrated this doesn't appear to be a Java specific bug.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, whi
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1313450 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1313450
I ran into this bug on AWS and installed Tim's debs as instructed --
except that I didn't install -extra as the server did not have -extra
packages installed before.
However on reboot I received the followi
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1313450 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1313450
It appears that no /boot/initrd.img-3.13.0-29-generic was generated, but
on a fresh system it was generated. I'm not sure why it wasn't generated
on the initial machine.
--
You received this bug notificati
I'm having the same issue - but only since upgrading from 14.04 to
14.10. I've been a long time gnome3-team ppa and gnome3 user.
The *big* difference I'm seeing is that it's not consistent. Maybe 1 out
of 10 boots the UI is so sluggish it's unusable.
Otherwise my issues match everyone else's: onc
Sorry for the double-post. Launchpad was giving me 500s and timeouts.
Please delete this and one of the duplicate comments.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1386721
Title:
Graphics Slow
I'm having the same issue - but only since upgrading from 14.04 to
14.10. I've been a long time gnome3-team ppa and gnome3 user.
The *big* difference I'm seeing is that it's not consistent. Maybe 1 out
of 10 boots the UI is so sluggish it's unusable.
Otherwise my issues match everyone else's: onc
apache2 and libc packages from lucid-proposed did *not* fix the issue
for me.
Neither did uninstalling libc6-686.
--
[SRU] client sent HTTP/1.1 request without hostname (see RFC2616 section 14.23)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/589611
You received this bug notification because you are a member
Using 32bit Ubuntu fwiw.
--
[SRU] client sent HTTP/1.1 request without hostname (see RFC2616 section 14.23)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/589611
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@l
Public bug reported:
The LIMITS.CONF(5) manual states:
All items support the values -1, unlimited or infinity indicating no
limit, except for priority and nice.
However, this line in limits.conf appears to have no affect:
*- nofile -1
Whereas this line works
22 matches
Mail list logo
