Actually, do we need to depend on the name in the Releases? If the
client knows the PPA name/username, can we encode that in the origin for
PPAs?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/731376
T
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 4:42 AM, Gary Lasker
wrote:
> Hey again Michael! Never mind the first part of my comment #12. I took a
> look at the your agent branch and I can see that you've implemented a
> "user_cancelled" property for this case, so I've added support for that
> in software-center in t
FWIW, I see the same behaviour on a fresh Oneiric install (on an Asus
1015PEM). Let me know if I can provide any further details (here or on
bugzilla).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/837
Hi Sebastian. I believe achuni and mvo agreed about copying the
license_key_path value into the package, but I'm not sure when that will
happen (and haven't yet seen a separate bug for it).
Regarding the validation we should include in the UI (it's just helping
devs identify early values that they
Hi Sebastian, there's work happening to automatically package the
tarballs, and in that case, we'll be ensuring the /opt/pkgname schema,
but not (necessarily) for tarballs that have valid debian package data
already. Although I don't think I understand why it would matter - if
the UI only allows a
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 9:47 PM, Sebastian Heinlein
<833...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote:
> Or a more basic question: Why don't you ship licenses in packages? It is
> just a static file.
Yep - I'd be keen to hear the discussion around that too. I was last
night thinking about a similar point from the
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/834537
Title:
"Connection established" after resume is faster than reality?
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubu
Public bug reported:
Steps to reproduce:
1) Suspend machine while connected to home wireless network
2) Relocate to a cafe to work and resume
ER: network manager checks for existence of previous connection before saying
"Connection established", or at least checks as soon as possible to identi
Thanks for including the discussion Anthony. The one question I think is
still unanswered though (and unsupported by our current implementation)
is:
Don't we also want to allow people to install a publically available
deb, and then purchase a license key to unlock functionality?
But maybe that's
A little more information (I just experienced this again and this time
left nm to see what would happen). network-manager continues to try
the previous (now unavailable) network until prompting for the
password, rather than switching to the other network (now available
from my phones portable hotsp
Public bug reported:
While upgrading another laptop, during the process I got a dialog
saying:
http://paste.ubuntu.com/693682/
After the upgrade finished I saw in the update manager terminal window:
Exception during pm.DoInstall(): E:Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an
error code (1), and it d
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/854622
Title:
Could not install libglib2.0
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/8
@mvo: That's fine - there is nothing stopping the packager/reviewer from
ensuring that the license_key_path is part of the package - as we don't
yet have pkgme doing the auto-packaging. Based on comment 5 above, I'd
recommend that the client checks the package for the XB-LicenseKeyPath,
and if it d
mvo has already fixed this on the server - see bug 709121.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/709024
Title:
Can't review applications with utf-8 names
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu
The cronscript has been running every minute for a few weeks now:
{{{
2010-10-20 00:03:05 INFOCreating lockfile:
/var/lock/launchpad-generate-ppa-htaccess.lock
2010-10-20 00:03:15 INFOStarting the PPA .htaccess generation
2010-10-20 00:03:15 INFOCommitting transaction...
2010-10-20 00
@Jane - yours is a slightly different issue. (This bug is for when the
purchase - including the creation of the LP subscription succeeds, but
then the software center client reports a 401 when it tries to access
the repository). Achuni - if you get a chance before me, Jane's issue is
the same one a
Thanks Adnane. I've just had a bit more time to look at this.
I can reproduce this error with the current software-center client trunk
r1492 (that is, after dismissing the error shown in
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/61572488/message-loop.png it re-appears
after a few seconds). Just to be clear, I
It's about handing over control of the feedback to the client. Currently
the client waits on the JS title-change event which only happens when
the purchase is complete/failed - we'd like that event to instead happen
when the purchase is initialised, and enabling the client to use the API
to check t
** Changed in: software-center-agent
Assignee: (unassigned) => Michael Nelson (michael.nelson)
** Changed in: software-center-agent
Status: Confirmed => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Hi Adnane! I can reproduce something like you've described above, but
not the exact details.
I'm running lucid. If I:
1. Open software-center, browse to "For Purchase"->Brukkon, and click Buy...
2. Log in
3. Click Cancel on the payment screen as in your screenshot (although my
payment screen
mvo, achuni: actually, is this even a bug in SCA? Isn't the behaviour
that I get above using software-center in lucid the expected behaviour?
(Note: we have talked about improving the way the errors are handled,
but AFAIK that requires the client polling the payment status itself,
rather than the
@Adnane - when you are running trunk USC, do you know whether it is
pointing to the production software center server, or staging?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/696861
Title:
Looping
Sorry - and the machine I tested above on was obviously maverick, not
lucid.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/696861
Title:
Looping messagebox if you cancel a purchase
--
ubuntu-bugs
Just updating to Confirmed as I'm seeing exactly the same output after a
fresh update on Natty.
** Changed in: fabric (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/
** Description changed:
Binary package hint: software-center
I'm able to post as many reviews as I please in Natty's software center.
There should be a limit, even if it's not only one, to how many reviews
one can post to prevent spamming.
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 1
QA'd as in the description above.
The only strangeness is that the USC client always displays 'Write
another review' even though the user has written a review already
(probably because we were going to allow subsequent reviews to update
previous ones initially).
--
You received this bug notifica
QA Notes:
I have fluendo-dvd installed, but am on natty. There is no natty version
published in the ppa, when clicking on "Be the first to review" I would see
only: "The origin of the application can not be detected. Entering a review is
not possible".
With mvo's suggestion, I temporarily updat
I could not get verify using partner either, as all the "Canonical"
items in USC simply say "Not found" when I click on more info.
I also tried reviewing the google talk plugin which I have installed,
and saw that first, when USC requested reviews for google talk, it
received:
ValidationException
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: software-center
Note: this may be simply because the packagee is not available for
natty, but if that's the case, it should not be displaying as an option
to install (as https://software-
center.ubuntu.com/apps/en/ubuntu/natty/amd64/ is empty, unlike http
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/741574
Title:
Unable to install free app Vendetta
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ub
** Attachment added: "Vendetta-install.png"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-center/+bug/741574/+attachment/1935818/+files/Vendetta-install.png
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpa
** Attachment added: "vendetta-install2.png"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-center/+bug/741574/+attachment/1935819/+files/vendetta-install2.png
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launch
** Description changed:
For natty final we want to support archive.canonical.com,
extras.ubuntu.com and the for-pay origins (in addition to the "regular"
origin).
To do that the server needs to be extended to support this, the client
already sends along the origin information that it
Verified this on the daily server using the above QA instructions. I
reviewed fluendo-dvd which I have installed:
http://184.82.116.62/reviews/api/1.0/reviews/filter/en/lp-ppa-
commercial-ppa-uploaders-fluendo-dvd/any/any/fluendo-dvd/
and Adobe reader from Canonical Partner:
http://184.82.116.62
I also tested a review of an app in extras by, in addition to the above
setup for QA, adding an /etc/apt/sources.list.d/extras.list with
deb http://extras.ubuntu.com/ubuntu maverick main
and re-running `sudo apt-get update`. When running USC, an extra
software category "Independent" is available
you're happy with it, we'll land it in the
agent, otherwise, let me know :)
** Also affects: software-center (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: software-center-agent
Assignee: (unassigned) => Michael Nelson (michael.nelson)
** Changed in: software
I've created a separate bug 776179 which may be a duplicate, but we'll
only know once we can confirm the payment cancellation.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/775591
Title:
Software Cen
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: software-center
This is probably a duplicate of bug 775591.
According to the sca log, since 2011-05-02 07:16:37 the
process_payment_notifications cron has been erroring when trying to
contact Launchpad via the API:
https://pastebin.canonical.com/47027/
Just confirming that the pay backend is indeed sending us lots of
EXPIRED notifications from the time during the outage:
https://pastebin.canonical.com/47029/
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/b
Actually, I just checked some of the expired payments from the above
pastebin, and it seems that the Bibit backend takes around 4 days to
expire the non-captured payments:
2011-04-30 14:30:34,182 - sca.models - INFO - subscription (id: 19699) by
https://login.ubuntu.com/+id/*** for World of G
LOSAs gracefulled our SCA frontends at 2011-05-03 08:06UTC which forced
sca to create a new LP api service connection. Purchasing is now working
as expected (I just purchased Monster RPG).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu
** Summary changed:
- please provide a (half-pulibc) test-mode for the purchase feature
+ please provide a (half-public) test-mode for the purchase feature
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bug
Currently bug 770718 means that when cancelling a purchase, the json in
the title is invalid (unparsable as json) which may cause the SC client
to leave the window open. This bug has been fixed, but not yet deployed
to staging.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubu
** Branch linked: lp:~michael.nelson/rnr-server/710458-two-reviews-for-
same-app
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/710458
Title:
A single user can write multiple reviews
--
ubuntu-bugs
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 1:28 PM, Matthew Paul Thomas wrote:
>> If you think it would be better to provide exact errors to the
> purchaser
>
> Providing exact errors would be better if (a) knowing more would make
> people more forgiving (for example, if it wasn't our fault), or (b) it
> would help p
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 11:17 AM, Matthew Paul Thomas wrote:
> Where would those strings appear?
These strings will appear in the Software Center client (not the
opened browser window).
>
> The first string is unsuitable as a window title, because it uses
> sentence case and punctuation; correct
** Also affects: software-center-agent
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: software-center-agent
Status: New => Confirmed
--
"Wallpaper to help testing software-center purchase" error
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/657109
You received this bug notification because
The 'Unauthorized' message is being caused when the privileged
'software-center-agent' Launchpad user that we use on the server tries
to call getArchiveSubscriptionURL() via the Launchpad API. It is being
rejected as unauthorized by the Launchpad API, even though the same
authentication has just be
I've found and updated the other bug that describes the issue Jane
experienced - bug 657109.
And I've checked the logs for Rick's purchase. The first update to the
brukkon PPAs htpasswd on the 22nd was around 16:12 GMT (12:12pm EST) and
the private access was updated within 1 minute as shown:
{{{
** Changed in: soyuz
Status: Triaged => In Progress
** Changed in: soyuz
Assignee: (unassigned) => Michael Nelson (michael.nelson)
--
Got a 401 on a fresh purchase
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/627608
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubunt
** Branch linked: lp:~michael.nelson/launchpad/627608-p3a-token-race
--
Got a 401 on a fresh purchase
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/627608
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.u
We've requested the cron job be updated to every minute (RT 41629) as
the soyuz workaround has reduced the actual cron update time to under a
second, although the setup/teardown still takes 25s.
--
Got a 401 on a fresh purchase
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/627608
You received this bug notifica
Just a note that the intermediate fix so that we can update the
.htpasswd files each minute has been committed to the Launchpad tree a
few days ago (see bug 628711) and will be rolled out with the 10.09
Launchpad rollout. Once we've confirmed the cron job is running faster
we then need to work with
** Also affects: soyuz
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
Got a 401 on a fresh purchase
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/627608
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubu
Looking at the logs for generate-ppa-htaccess, it currently takes around
2 minutes to run each time.
I checked with mthaddon, and he's hesitant to increase the frequency of
this script until it is faster, but not entirely against it.
I've created bug 628711 and added thoughts on how the script ca
Rick, indeed. I've started on bug 628711 an hour ago. I'm hoping to
improve the speed of the cronjob so we can run it at least every two
minutes, but hopefully every minute (as a short-term fix until we have
immediate updating of the htaccess files).
--
Got a 401 on a fresh purchase
https://bugs.
On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 10:58 AM, Robert Collins
<627...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote:
> Michael, have you considered having a work queue in parallel/instead
> of the cron job?
>
> The queue could simply say 'reevaluate PPA XXX', and would do one PPA.
> That should get the latency down fairly low.
Yea
201 - 257 of 257 matches
Mail list logo
