Fixed released and verified. Thanks everyone for all the info, sorry for
the disruption to reviews.
Before deploy: http://paste.ubuntu.com/6745216/
After deploy: http://paste.ubuntu.com/6749235/
Verified with USC on saucy that searching for skype and viewing details
displays the reviews.
** Chan
+1 Thanks mvo. One small but incredible useful feature that 1.5 brings
is the ability to loop over hashes in your playbook. In juju-world, this
enables you to loop over all your relations for a specific interface
very neatly.
[1] http://docs.ansible.com/playbooks_loops.html#looping-over-hashes
Th
This issue is fixed on Ubuntu 13.10, evoluion version
3.10.3-0ubuntu3~saucy1.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1246624
Title:
Reminders from Google are displayed as “This is an event re
Hi Marco,
I think you've already stated this, but this is specifically about the
skype deb package from the skype website correct? That is, the skype
debian package that is in the Ubuntu partner archive [1] seems to behave
as expected (see screenshot).
Perhaps it'd be best if whoever packaged the
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 8:28 PM, John Pugh wrote:
> >From #3 above, issue #2 is not present in 13.04 and is present in
> 13.10+. This would lead one to believe the problem is either in the SCA
> or in the software-center client (in one of the USC components).
Hi John. Yes, the issue that once it
On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 9:07 PM, Marco Cimmino wrote:
> Hi,
> yes I think John is right, the problem is: Skype is not interested in
> splitting the package into two different packages, this will make the user
> confused at our web site download page and we would like to still provide
> Ubuntu pa
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 7:03 PM, Marco Cimmino wrote:
>> Ultimately, I think you'd need two packages - one skype package that
> is arch-independent so that you always end up with a 'skype' package
> installed, and a skype-bin which installs the i386 binaries
>
> I guess I haven't been clear enough
$ uname -a
Linux michael-X201EP 3.10.0-031000-generic #201310011456 SMP Tue Oct 1 18:58:54
UTC 2013 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Also bad.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1213917
Tit
$ uname -a
Linux michael-X201EP 3.10.0-031000rc6-generic #201310091534 SMP Wed Oct 9
19:36:30 UTC 2013 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Good.
$ uname -a
Linux michael-X201EP 3.10.0-031000rc6-generic #201310101545 SMP Thu Oct 10
19:47:16 UTC 2013 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Also good (I'd half
$ uname -a
Linux michael-X201EP 3.10.0-031000-generic #201310151549 SMP Tue Oct 15
19:50:32 UTC 2013 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Good.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1213917
Title:
Surprise :/, here are the steps that I took (perhaps it'll give you some
information showing my mistake):
1) I downloaded and installed all the debs - note missing linux-tools:
https://pastebin.canonical.com/99199/
2) Tested:
$ uname -a
Linux michael-X201EP 3.11.0-12-generic #19~lp1213917v1 SMP
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 2:31 PM, Michael Vogt wrote:
> Fwiw, I tried to reproduce this issue using apt-clone and the system
> state file, but it did not work out, I could not hit this failure
> condition.
Thanks Michael. Here's the output of trying to update:
http://paste.ubuntu.com/69/
--
** Attachment added: "The file failing the checksum."
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/854622/+attachment/2445474/+files/libglib2.0-0%3Aamd64.md5sums
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
http
** Attachment added: "changelog.Debian.gz"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/854622/+attachment/2445515/+files/changelog.Debian.gz
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.n
Hi John, the info that the dev portal provides to the client already
includes which series each app is available for. You can see that the
available apps for oneiric is empty:
https://software-
center.ubuntu.com/api/2.0/applications/en/ubuntu/oneiric/i386/
while for natty, it lists quite a few:
Hi Dave, if this current bug 788158 is "Oneiric: 404 page when trying to
buy something", I'm not sure how the new bug 857268 is different? Or,
now that Kiwinote has fixed the client so it no-longer displays non-
purchasable apps in Oneiric, should we redefine this bug for software-
center-agent to
Hi kiwinote, the blank page that you linked to above is a 404 (if you
check the headers, or watch it with firebug) - we probably assumed
initially that the client would check the http response, but I'm
guessing you guys can't pick that up in the client as by that time
you've already gone into "wait
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 11:23 AM, Martin Pitt wrote:
> In such a situation, could you please give me the output of
>
> ls -l /usr/share/doc/*glib2.0*/changelog.Debian.gz
> dpkg -S /usr/share/doc/*glib2.0*/changelog.Debian.gz
$ ls -l /usr/share/doc/*glib2.0*/changelog.Debian.gz
-rw-r--r-- 1 root
@elachuni: Won't the maverick/natty versions of USC still be expecting
the icon_data (at least from the 1.0 api?) or has the change been SRU'd?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/830825
Tit
Public bug reported:
STR:
1) Suspend the computer
2) Resume so that screen lock dialog waits for password
3) Set correct keyboard layout and enter password
4) Returned to desktop
AR:
At step 3, no matter which keyboard layout I set (I have US and US-dvorak and
toggle with double-shift) the
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/872701
Title:
Cannot enter correct password after suspend
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-
** Summary changed:
- Cannot enter correct password after suspend
+ Not possible to enter correct password after screen lock
** Description changed:
STR:
- 1) Suspend the computer
- 2) Resume so that screen lock dialog waits for password
- 3) Set correct keyboard layout and enter password
-
** Changed in: software-center-agent
Assignee: (unassigned) => Michael Nelson (michael.nelson)
** Changed in: software-center-agent
Status: Confirmed => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
11:38 < noodles> mvo: Hi! Just wanting to confirm - is it the case that USC
only switched to the 2.0 api for the available apps with oneiric? (This is for
https://bugs.launchpad.net/software-center-agent/+bug/830825 )
11:46 < mvo> noodles: yes, currently thats the case, we need to SRU this
11:47
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 1:45 PM, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> Thank you for your bug report, could you run "gnome-screensaver --debug"
> and see what isl in the debug log when unlocking fails?
The following log is from:
1) lock screen
2) When password prompt appears, switch keyboard layout to correc
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 3:50 PM, Marc Deslauriers
wrote:
> Can you paste the appropriate section of your auth.log file?
>
> Also, could you paste the output of the following commands:
> ls -l /etc/shadow
> ls -l /dev/null
>
> Thanks!
Oct 13 15:24:19 michael-1015PEM unix_chkpwd[22678]: password ch
Public bug reported:
I'm just installing oneiric on a new netbook (Asus EeePC 1015PEM) which
has Windows 7 by default. When I get to the "Allocate drive space"
dialog, there are two things that may confuse:
1) The first option I see is 'Install Ubuntu inside Windows 7', but then the
helpful desc
Public bug reported:
Just a small text issue on the "Replace Windows 7 with Ubuntu" dialog on
Oneiric alpha 3: The options presented are "Quit", "Back", and "_Install
Now" (with an underscore).
** Affects: ubiquity (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bu
** Also affects: software-center (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/830825
Title:
AvailableApps API should not server icon_data inline
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/871850
Title:
Cannot shutdown via UI
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/871850/+subscrip
Public bug reported:
STR: Click on the top-right menu widget and select 'Shut Down...'
ER: machine shuts down
AR: I'm logged out and returned to the lightdm screen. Selecting Shut down from
the menu there brings up a confirmation dialog, but confirming that leaves the
system unchanged (ie. on th
Another point (thanks Anthony): although the sca fix above ensures that
buyers will no longer see a "Not available for your version" for
multiarch apps, when they click on the Install button:
* for i386 users, everything should work fine
* for amd64 users, they will currently see a Not found re
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 2:40 PM, James Westby wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Sep 2012 08:31:45 -0000, Michael Nelson
> <1052...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote:
>> We also discussed on irc [1] whether sca could potentially provide a
>> work-around for USC's "Reinstall previous p
@chris: I've just checked for the change you landed with r255, and see
it must have been removed at some point.
Is there a way we can have this included for apps.ubuntu.com and
software-center.ubuntu.com (or *.ubuntu.com so we can test the
functionality on our staging servers too)? Currently we ca
@mvo: I can't see any 404s on softwarecenteragent requesting volleybrawl
:/. Here are the ones I do see: https://pastebin.canonical.com/71628/
Nick's image (thanks Nick!) is showing that, at least when he got that
error, he'd already been redirected through to pay.ubuntu.com (but I
think the error
In fact, the blank screen *may* have been due to the same pay bug (bug
1033140). It may be best to check with ricardo if that is now resolved
(as the comment implies it would have been fixed yesterday).
Either way, if Nick or Alexander report back with either the URL
displaying the blank page, or
Thanks Alexander, I'll update the bug and see if we can get some of the
pay.ubuntu.com folk to investigate.
** Project changed: software-center-agent => canonical-payment-service
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https:/
@achuni: To save a bit of back-n-forth-ing, I took a look at the pay
logs and see this:
2012-08-07 19:42:26,642 INFO NEW payment created with id
'36682a0f9f5d9e03da0a651bf832d4fb' for user with openid '' as requested by
consumer 'SCA'.
2012-08-07 19:42:26,870 WARNING Payment '36682a0f9f5d9e03da0
** Also affects: software-center (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: software-center-agent
Assignee: Danny Tamez (zematynnad) => Łukasz Czyżykowski
(lukasz-czyzykowski)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is s
Public bug reported:
I seem to get about 1.5 songs out of Rhythm box until it freezes. I
haven't worked out the cause, only that it's consistent, and isn't
related to which music I play (although all my music is ogg).
I didn't watch to see if the following message appeared right when it
freezes,
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1011504
Title:
Rhythm box freezes consistently
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rhythmbox/+bug/10
** Changed in: software-center-agent
Assignee: (unassigned) => Michael Nelson (michael.nelson)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1020205
Title:
add support for a "click_u
Confirming that upgrading to libgtk-3-0 from proposed also allows me to
unlock using the selected layout. Thank-you to all involved!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/872701
Title:
Keybo
@ricardo: that would be ideal if sca could subscribe to such events.
In the mean-time, sca already (attempts to [1]) update to the current LP
username the next time the user initiates a purchase (which will update
the exported deblines for all purchases). We could use this same call
(check_or_crea
** Changed in: software-center-agent
Assignee: (unassigned) => Michael Nelson (michael.nelson)
** Changed in: software-center-agent
Status: Confirmed => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Another possible (?) solution mentioned by lukasz, was if Launchpad
keeps a record of merged accounts (and previous usernames), it could
include the auth details in the htpasswd for the old username as well.
This would mean no changes needed for the client at all.
--
You received this bug notific
Hi, I've just had enough of doing CTRL-ALT-F1 login, kill gnome-
screensaver etc., to look more into this and can confirm that, at least
for me:
With two keyboard layouts (layout1 and layout2)
1) lock the screen with CTRL-ALT-l
2) touch mouse to bring up screensaver dialog
3) switch keyboard layou
Right - here's the same bug as what I've described reported upstream
(but found on Ubuntu 11.10 also):
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=662992
** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #662992
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=662992
--
You received this bug notification becau
** Summary changed:
- Not possible to enter correct password after screen lock
+ Keyboard layout doesn't change
** Description changed:
- STR:
- 1) Lock the screen
- 2) Move mouse to force password dialog to appear
- 3) Set correct keyboard layout and enter password
- 4) Returned to desktop
** Changed in: software-center (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Michael Nelson (michael.nelson)
** Changed in: software-center (Ubuntu)
Status: New => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
ecture: all
ProcEnviron:
PATH=(custom, user)
LANG=en_US.UTF-8
SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: software-center
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to precise on 2012-01-16 (0 days ago)
** Affects: software-center (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Assignee: Michael Nelson (michael.nelson)
Statu
** Changed in: software-center (Ubuntu)
Status: New => In Progress
** Changed in: software-center (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Michael Nelson (michael.nelson)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
** Description changed:
STR:
- 1) Ensure you've got some purchases from previous distroseries
- 2) Run precise software-center
- 3) File->Reinstall Previous Purchases
+ 1) Ensure you've got some purchases from previous distroseries
+ 2) Run precise software-center
+ 3) File->Reinstall Prev
** Tags added: client-server
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/917137
Title:
Previous purchases empty in precise
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net
** Branch unlinked: lp:~michael.nelson/software-center/833982-purchased-
app-not-available
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/833982
Title:
No feedback when purchase in previous Ubuntu ve
After fixing bug 917137 I'm now able to try reproducing this, but I get
a different result:
At (6) when hitting the "Install" button, the application installs, even
though it is not available for precise. Checking the sources.list file
seems to indicate that USC enabled the *maverick* series and i
So, some pre-implementation thoughts for this bug.
The result shown in comment 1 above is because currently USC is adding
the deb_line that was created with the original purchase - in my case,
on maverick. So I assume we need to change that either way.
I can think of two ways to do this:
1) cons
** Changed in: software-center (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/917137
Title:
Previous purchases empty in precise
To manage notific
** Summary changed:
- Let SCA client handle subscription progress UI
+ Let SC client handle subscription progress UI
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/622732
Title:
Let SC client handle
** Tags added: client-server
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/783331
Title:
API to get reviews-count for a specific review per distroseries
To manage notifications about this bug go to
Public bug reported:
I was in the process of purchasing Gotye's latest album, I'd proceeded
to the checkout, my previously used credit card was selected already and
I clicked continue. After a few seconds, Banshee crashed, and
unfortunately couldn't collect debug info ("Your computer doesn't have
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/919119
Title:
Crash during purchase - purchased music not available
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+sou
Unfortunately I'd already restarted to see if my purchase was there... I
will retry the purchase and see if it happens again, and if so, attach
the log.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/91
Hrm, I retried the purchase and everything worked fine - good for me,
bad for the bug report :/
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/919119
Title:
Crash during purchase - purchased music no
** Description changed:
software-center-gtk3 trunk r2212, Ubuntu Ocelot
1. In Ubuntu 11.04 or earlier, purchase an item in USC that isn't available
for Ocelot.
2. Do a clean install of Ocelot.
3. Launch USC.
4. Choose "File" > "Reinstall Previous Purchases".
5. Select the item.
6
Just thinking about keeping services small, focused and resusable, I
wonder if a separate icons.ubuntu.com would be worthwhile.
It could import the icons from packages, but also enable other agents
(such as devportal) to submit icons for PPA packages or other sources
etc.
Also, regarding returnin
FWIW, I had also seen this behaviour on 12.10 on my Asus F201E, but not
as often (usually after a day or two it would stop suspending). I
upgraded to 13.04 and so far it's happened every time (only just
rebooted into 13.04), as Alex described. My log is a bit different,
attaching in full.
** Attac
I'm tagging this with regression-release, but the only last-working
version I can give is the precise version.
Info that I have:
* suspend was working fine with Precise (the OS the machine was purchased
with) and there are no updates at
http://asus.archive.canonical.com/updates/dists/precise-an
This was happening consistently when I reported the bug, but since
updating a few days ago, I've only noticed it once out of 4 or 5
suspends.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/933300
Title
Public bug reported:
STR:
1) Purchase some software in oneiric that isn't yet available for precise
2) Update to precise
ER:
* I should be warned appropriately about what will happen to the software that
I have purchased and installed
AR:
* not sure, but I assume USC just disables the commer
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 939461 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/939461
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 939461
commercial PPA's are not working after release-upgrade
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscri
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 3:57 PM, Richard Harding
<924...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote:
> Brad, Michael, I want to add this test into the wadllib set and wondered
> if you can paste or upload the test json and structure you guys were
> using for this?
Hi Richard - sorry for the delay (been sick). The
Public bug reported:
There have been reports recently (from jpugh, davmor2 and a dev) of for-
purchase apps not displaying in Software Center (the most recent being
https://apps.ubuntu.com/cat/applications/oneiric/nanoparticles/ ).
Apparently it was discussed recently (I wasn't involved) and diag
Public bug reported:
After an upgrade to 13.10, I rebooted to find a bunch of error reports
(see screenshot).
Hoping they might go away with another update, I tried that - which
resulted in the same errors [1]
[1] http://paste.ubuntu.com/5927929/
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 13.10
Pac
Public bug reported:
This might be considered a dupe of bug 1157435. I upgrade to saucy for
other reasons, but saw a chance to check if suspend was working with
v3.10 kernal.
The machine suspended, but when I tried to resume, the fan span but the
screen never changed from a blank one :)
[1]
http
@jsalisbury
I updated to saucy (for other reasons), and tried suspend with the v3.10
kernal. It suspended, but didn't resume. Details on bug 1206625. Thanks
to the team for looking at these!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubu
Public bug reported:
Steps to reproduce:
1) Start with an existing ubuntu installation [1] with an encrypted home
directory for 'username'
2) Create a bootable USB of 13.10, reboot to installer and choose the "upgrade
your existing ubuntu installation" (ie. keep the home directory)
3) When pr
Thanks Christopher. I updated to the latest bios, and tried again -
resumed perfectly.
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/
@jsalisbury
Sorry - update: After updating the bios to the latest version from Asus,
retrying with the v3.10 kernel resumed fine :) Thanks for your help!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/
Public bug reported:
Originally reported at http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-
bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=712819
I was using salt-minion from the salt PPA which is version 0.15.3, and
everything was fine. I then tried instead to use the 0.15.1 version
from the debian archive (well, a copy of the debian packa
This also affects other projects which try to detect the OS version to
display the most relevant application version for a user (ie.
apps.ubuntu.com).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/7872
** Tags added: proj-keys
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/833945
Title:
Allow to install system wide license keys
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.n
Public bug reported:
I've just created a key on an oneiric machine (`ssh-keygen -C devo`). I
then added this key to launchpad (copied across the id_rsa.pub) which
worked fine, but if I try to import my LP public keys, the new key is
concatenated together with another as below. I assume this is bec
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/885205
Title:
keys concatenated onto single line when imported from LP
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+
The actual exhibits list at:
https://software-center.ubuntu.com/api/2.0/exhibits/en/
is cached, but I'd be surprised if we were caching the banner urls
included there. I think we'll need to investigate a bit more to find out
why USC doesn't see the images.
One thought is that when the image is u
** Also affects: software-center (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: software-center-agent
Status: New => In Progress
** Changed in: software-center-agent
Assignee: (unassigned) => Michael Nelson (michael.nelson)
--
You received this bug notifi
** Changed in: software-center-agent
Status: New => In Progress
** Changed in: software-center-agent
Assignee: (unassigned) => Michael Nelson (michael.nelson)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
** Changed in: software-center-agent
Status: New => In Progress
** Changed in: software-center-agent
Assignee: (unassigned) => Michael Nelson (michael.nelson)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
The attached branch enables http for all uploaded media url's *except*
packages (banners, icons, screeshots). But the fix working is also
dependent on removing the redirection in the apache config, as per RT
49574.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, whi
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 3:39 AM, Steve Langasek
wrote:
> Please show 'ls -ld /usr/share/doc/libglib2.0*'. I'm pretty sure one of
> the directories is wrongly symlinked to the other, which means that
> unpacking libglib2.0-data after libglib2.0-0 *overwrites* the
> libglib2.0-0 changelog /on the f
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 12:51 PM, Michael Nelson
wrote:
>
> Not that I'm aware of (see below), but it is possible that I've sudo'd
> a symlink at some point - I don't remember doing so, and don't see why
> I would have (we do most our dev work in a virtual
Just a note that this can be done *really* easily without any javascript
for most modern browsers. Here's a branch for SCA which adds client side
validation (with a 40sec video demo'ing it):
https://code.launchpad.net/~michael.nelson/software-center-agent/860507
-basic-client-validation/+merge/771
** Also affects: canonical-payment-service
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/801841
Title:
Discover card not working
To manage notifications
I've added the payment service project as a target, as software center
agent just delegates to it.
I had a brief look at the payment code, and it seems that certain card-
types didn't work with the Bibit test service that we use (DISCOVER was
one of them), and were special-cased in specific scenar
Thanks Daniel! Confirming that with this package I can run our dev-
environment setup scripts.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/764310
Title:
Please sync fabric 0.9.3-1 from Debian sid
Selene, can we mark this as sa duplicate of bug 776179 if that was the
underlying issue (ie. has Niklas and others who experienced this
confirmed that their payments were cancelled after a few days? I know
you emailed everyone, but wasn't sure of the outcome). If that is the
case, we can then addre
** Branch linked: lp:~michael.nelson/rnr-server/731376-other-origins-2
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/731376
Title:
Support archive.canonical.com and for-pay as origin
--
ubuntu-bug
I don't think this requires changes on the server does it? Marking
invalid, but let me know if there are changes required.
** Changed in: rnr-server
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https:/
** Changed in: software-center-agent
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/696861
Title:
Looping messagebox if you cancel a purchase
--
ubuntu-b
Have I understood correctly that the 'origin', as it appears in the
Releases file, is *not* unique? That is, I could have:
username=one-two
ppa = three-four
and
username=one-two-three
ppa = four
and
username = one-two-three-four
ppa = ppa (default)
and all of these would have the origin: 'lp-p
101 - 200 of 257 matches
Mail list logo
