The 3.19.0-80 kernel build still has the defect. I purged it back off
our server. Booted back to 4.4.0-59.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1656605
Title:
No server console display afte
Yes that v3.13.0-108.155 kernel build boots up with the expected Ubuntu
splashscreen. Though would not boot up all the way cleanly... went
into busybox.
Received v4.4.0-62 via Xenial updates, so purging off both the
v3.13.0-108.155 and v4.4.0-59 kernel versions.
So yes, somewhere between 3.1
Build 3.16.0-23 has the reported defect. Purged back off.
Next build to evaluate, please...
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1656605
Title:
No server console display after Grub screen
Public bug reported:
We recently LTS upgraded our first server from 14.04 to 16.04. After
that upgrade, we are not seeing apt-listchanges attempt to send out
emails with the change log.
I have tried purging off package apt-listchanges, then reinstalled it.
Shortly apticron notified us of updates
There does not appear to be i386 files in that directory.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1656605
Title:
No server console display after Grub screen until fully booted and
pressing C
I went through the LTS upgrade on some Ubuntu Server machines w/o this
error from 12.04 to 14.04. Going through the LTS upgrade on the first of
the same systems from 14.04 to 16.04 I too am seeing this error.
I believe daemontools-run is used by djbdns, which our systems run.
--
You received thi
I got the package situation resolved that was caused due to performing a
14.04->16.04 LTS upgrade.
I removed the following packages:
dnscache-run
daemontools-run
Then reinstalled them from the raw .deb files I had downloaded to the
server.
$sudo dpkg -i daemontools-run_0.76-6ubuntu1_all.deb
$sud
** Attachment added: "lspci-vnvn.log"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-meta/+bug/1656605/+attachment/4804495/+files/lspci-vnvn.log
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/16566
** Attachment added: "linux-images.log"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-meta/+bug/1656605/+attachment/4804498/+files/linux-images.log
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1
Public bug reported:
Today I did our first production 14.04 to 16.04 LTS server upgrade. I
had done so a couple of times successfully on test server machines. Upon
booting up on the 16.04 system/kernel, after the Grub screen the server
console screen is completely blank.
Someone suggested using C
** Attachment added: "uname-a.log"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-meta/+bug/1656605/+attachment/4804496/+files/uname-a.log
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1656605
Ti
** Attachment added: "version.log"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-meta/+bug/1656605/+attachment/4804497/+files/version.log
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1656605
Ti
** Attachment added: "dmesg.log"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-meta/+bug/1656605/+attachment/4804494/+files/dmesg.log
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1656605
Title:
A friend advised me to check two more outputs between a 14.04 server and
16.04 impacted server. Attaching the following additional outputs:
mdlueck@ldslnx01:/srv/shares/data/Download/OpenSource/Ubuntu/Xenial/Bugs/1656605_ServerNoConsoleDisplay$
cat /proc/consoles > consoles.log
mdlueck@ldslnx01:/
** Attachment added: "cmdline.log"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1656605/+attachment/4804629/+files/cmdline.log
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1656605
Title:
Ah, a notable difference between the hardware spec of the test servers
and the real servers:
The test server is on a test machine which has a graphics board
installed in it: EVGA e-GeForce 8400 GS Graphics Card - 512 MB RAM
512-P3-1301-KR
The real servers are using the on-board Intel graphics.
N
@ the OP: "It's not clear where the bug is in this, but I was doing a
LTS release upgrade and svscan was already installed and running"
I would think the bug should be against the daemontools-run package,
that it is unable to apply an update to itself. Correct?
Seems to me a regression from the 1
Yes, working perfectly! Trying to remember how I set tags. Here is the
output of applying the test kernel:
mdlueck@ldslnx01:/srv/shares/data/Download/OpenSource/Ubuntu/Xenial/Bugs/1656605_ServerNoConsoleDisplay/v4.10-rc4$
sudo dpkg -i
linux-image-4.10.0-041000rc4-generic_4.10.0-041000rc4.201701
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1656605
Title:
No server console display after Grub screen until fully booted and
I found a workaround to this issue and logged it here:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/daemontools/+bug/1617691/comments/4
I got the package situation resolved that was caused due to performing a
14.04->16.04 LTS upgrade.
I removed the following packages:
dnscache-run
daemontools-run
T
Question: So is there hope of getting this fixed in the default kernel
version for the 16.04 release, or is it going to be addressed only with
the "Ubuntu 16.04.2 LTS Point Release Coming On Feb 2 With Linux Kernel
4.8" newer kernel?
No... Linux Kernel 4.4 vs Linux Kernel 4.10, so that is not Linu
Excellent, first try lucky. I downloaded all three requested kernel
packages. Started with the:
4.5 final: http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/mainline/v4.5-wily/
And this version already corrects the entire issue seen with the
4.4.0-59-generic official 16.04 version.
Here is the console output
So since it is stated that a fix is released for this issue... does that
mean that Ubuntu has agreed that it is incorrect to have to change the
configuration of this package from its installation default in order to
receive change log emails from apt?
--
You received this bug notification because
We have now built brand new servers with Ubuntu Server 16.04 x64. The
initial state of the /etc/default/grub file is:
GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX_DEFAULT=""
Must be that edit was missed in the LTS upgrade from 14.04 to 16.04.
I have modified our LTS upgraded 16.04 servers to this setting.
--
You receiv
@Joseph, Do you mean incomplete based on this bug report needing to
morph into an issue against the 14.04 to 16.04 LTS upgrade process?
How may I assist?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/
Issue confirmed resolved in Xubuntu daily 20160408 amd64 ISO. Thank you
so much! :-)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1533206
Title:
Blueman-applet crash on login: DBusException in call
I applied to Ubuntu Server 12.04 Samba update 2:3.6.25-0ubuntu0.12.04.3
and am pleased and relieved to see my test Windows XP client once again
able to login to the Samba NT4 style domain.
This update appears to resolve the defect I originally opened:
[Bug 1574228] Changes to Samba packages for Ap
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1572122 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1572122
(Cross posting final solution here...)
Michael Lueck (mlueck) wrote 9 hours ago: #39
I applied to Ubuntu Server 12.04 Samba update 2:3.6.25-0ubuntu0.12.04.3
and am pleased and relieved to see my
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1572122 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1572122
@John #7, no we do not make use of the LDAP backend, thus did not spot
the similarities with bug #1572122.
I suspect this is not directly related to/not to the presence of an LDAP
backend or not.
--
You r
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1572122 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1572122
@John #9, I had brought to my attention this:
https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba_4.2_Features_added/changed
New smb.conf options
I make use of both OS/2 which has a LANServer client integrated, and the
I have been getting this same blueman-applet crashed error on desktop
class hardware with no Bluetooth onboard.
Is there some way to disable blueman-applet from even running on systems
which have no Bluetooth in the first place?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of U
I have been getting this same blueman-applet crashed error on desktop
class hardware with no Bluetooth onboard.
Is there some way to disable blueman-applet from even running on systems
which have no Bluetooth in the first place?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of U
Rollback successful on all 12.04 servers to PHP build 5.3.10-1ubuntu3.
Websites are again working.
** Description changed:
This morning I applied the following updates to Ubuntu 12.04 webservers:
The following packages are currently pending an upgrade:
- apt 0.8.16~exp12ubuntu10.2
APT history.log
** Attachment added: "history.log"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/php5/+bug/1585614/+attachment/4670187/+files/history.log
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/
APT term.log
** Attachment added: "term.log"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/php5/+bug/1585614/+attachment/4670188/+files/term.log
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1585614
For our servers (12.04) manually restarting the Apache service would
cause the same error. Apache would not manually restart.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1585614
Title:
PHP Update
@Marc #12, perhaps so it was actually eglibc package. I tested
reapplying the PHP updates, IPL, and Apache stayed up. Evidently I
missed that eglibc and the subsequently required IPL.
We are now good with the latest packages for 12.04. Phew! :-)
--
You received this bug notification because you
Supposedly there is a way to configure the NVidia drivers to force use
of the NVidia chip always. Yes yes, that drains batteries more quickly.
"I do not care."
System76 knows the technique. I sent them an inquiry seeing that they
offer a laptop with the NVidia Geforce GTX 970M or 980M chips. Their
** Attachment added: "Log of successful Windows XP login running Samba 3.6.3"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1574228/+attachment/4645174/+files/log.good.mdlxp
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
ht
Public bug reported:
On Ubuntu 12.04 fully patched, this weekend I attempted to apply the
samba 2:3.6.25-0ubuntu0.12.04.2 updates. That resulted in a Samba NT4
PDC that downlevel Windows clients could no longer log in to. Logging
into said Windows machines with a local account and manually issuing
** Attachment added: "Log of failed Windows XP login running Samba 3.6.25"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1574228/+attachment/4645175/+files/log.error.mdlxp
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
http
** Attachment added: "Part of the smb.conf of one of the servers - complete
other than the shares"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1574228/+attachment/4645345/+files/smb.conf
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscrib
FYI, this is still an issue with the current 10.04 LTS x86 PAE kernel
build.
Linux ldslnx01 2.6.32-40-generic-pae #87-Ubuntu SMP Mon Mar 5 21:44:34
UTC 2012 i686 GNU/Linux
I still must run my fixext_backup.sh script to get the USB HDD to attach
via the USB 2.0 controller.
Any suggestions what is
@Christopher,
I do not have capabilities to test the latest Ubuntu on our production
servers. I will not be upgrading production servers until well after
12.04 LTS releases stable.
As indicated in this dupe report:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/625134
Upgrading to Ubuntu 10.10 resolved the pro
@John: Your steps appear to have gotten the drive connected via the USB
2.0 hub on my client's server. At least the output of lsusb shows it on
the same "Bus 001" which is the bus of the USB 2.0 controller. I
modified their "USB HDD fix script" to run these commands when they are
mounting their bac
@John, thank you for following up with that suggestion. Client reports a
snappy backup!
I worked up a bit of automation for the processes, as follows:
# fixext_backup.sh
#!/bin/bash -x
cd /sys/bus/pci/drivers/ehci_hcd
USBDRIVE=`/usr/bin/find ./ -name ":00:*"`
echo $USBDRIVE
echo $USBDRIVE
Public bug reported:
On our Ubuntu 10.04 LTS server running x86 code, this evening a kernel
update was ready for installation. I updated the kernel, rebooted
(IPL'ed), and proceeded with the backup which utilized xfsdump as we use
the xfs filesystem. Four of the xfsdump received a never before see
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/692848
Title:
Regression between 2.6.32-27 and 2.6.32-26 xfsdump SGI_FS_BULKSTAT errno = 22
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Yes Johannes, apparently the axfrdns ID is needed as well.
Ubuntu developers, please see: http://cr.yp.to/djbdns/axfrdns.html
To match the Ubuntu naming standard for the djbdns package, perhaps
Gaxfrdns
And the original developer's docs stating that Gtinydns ID is needed:
http://cr.yp.to/djbdns/
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: apticron
We have apticron installed on a VPS installation of Ubuntu 8.04 hosted
by Parallels Virtuozzo. When the cron.daily tries to run, we are
receiving the following error:
/etc/cron.daily/apticron:
RTNETLINK answers: Address family not supported by p
@Carl: That puts a whole new "light" on the issue you are seeing! ;-)
Yes I had come across that http://packages.ubuntu.com/lucid/usbmount
package looking for possibilities as to why the drives were not being
seen. I intend to use that package to try to mount drives to a
consistent mount point no
I think there are two sub-issues going on with this trouble attaching
USB mass storage devices to Ubuntu Server 10.04:
1) For our IOGear brand USB boxes, it is necessary to "wake up" Linux to
the drive's presence attached to a USB port. I tested a backup last
evening and it was speed-wise normal U
@David Mitchell #7, Thank you for posting your work-around solution.
That just helped me get a client's Western Digital 2.5" 500GB USB HDD to
attach.
lsusb alone would not alert the computer to the drive's presence.
Your step allowed lsusb to see the drive.
I did notice that AFTER running your co
I checked my server again - indeed lsusb still shows the USB 2.0 device
at the same time as the USB HDD.
The USB 2.0 controller disappearing on my client's server got me
suspicious to an additional observation which I think might be related.
Our backups are taking an EXTREMELY long time to complet
Public bug reported:
I see that the package of sql-ledger in Ubuntu 14.04 is recently old.
SQL Ledger project released an update five days ago. Please catch this
before 14.04 releases stable. Thanks!
http://www.sql-ledger.com/cgi-
bin/nav.pl?page=misc/whatsnew.html&title=What%27s%20New
Version D
A while ago I upgraded from Ubuntu Server 10.04 LTS to 12.04 LTS, and
the USB HDD is properly attached automatically to a USB2 controller
rather than USB 1.1. I no longer need the script posted in #23 to wake
up the USB subsystem back to reality.
--
You received this bug notification because you
@Vibhav, I have not seen an update to apticron distribute, nor do I see
at
http://changelogs.ubuntu.com/changelogs/pool/universe/a/apticron/apticron_1.1.20/changelog
an update newer than the version we already have installed. How is it
then that you changed the status to "Fix Released"?
--
You re
I used Xubuntu xenial-desktop-amd64.iso on 20160113 and in VirtualBox
PLEU 5.0.12 r104815 and the installer still gets hung after it has
ejected the ISO. I know it ejects as VirtualBox flips back from having
the ISO mounted to the drive being empty.
Should not it then get to some message about pre
Public bug reported:
Sound Juicer application will not start on my fully updated Xubuntu
14.04 x64 system today. I tried starting it from the terminal window,
and see this error while doing so:
$ sound-juicer
** (sound-juicer:18540): WARNING **: Couldn't connect to accessibility
bus: Failed to c
Based on #13, should I attempt another LTS upgrade to 14.04 with a
system having Nvidia graphics to see if the xorg.conf no longer gets
deleted? Just let me know, I have additional systems ready to test with
and would be happy to validate the fix.
--
You received this bug notification because you
I last loaded the test ThinkPad T540p with a Xubuntu 14.04 20140225 Beta
1 ISO. New HDD today, thus new Xubuntu ISO, and I cannot get the USB
mouse to light up (optical mouse) in either USB port on each side of the
unit.
How can I help test to resolve this critical bug?
--
You received this bug
I put the former drive back in. It appears to have only one kernel
update older than current, and the USB mouse works fine. Packages on
that drive are as follows:
$ dpkg -l | grep linux-
ii linux-firmware1.125
all Firmware for Lin
Frankly I had given up on customizing the stock sound schemes. It was
getting harder and harder to fight against the current and have custom
sounds. I now operate in silence... no start-up sound at all. Last I
recall, it was extremely hard to swap out one-off a particular sound to
an alternate soun
Back on 2010-02-28 I reported this issue resolved. Someone please ack
and close.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/510284
Title:
Lucid 10.04 Alpha 2 two existing NTFS partitions, will no
Public bug reported:
I have been advised that the ubiquity package is where this request
should end up.
Adding Linux to an existing hard drive with Windows / NTFS format
already present magically adds a partition type of NTFS to the "Use As"
pick list. Thus one can establish mount points for the
This is logged against a now very old version. This problem in my mind
is no longer valid. Please confirm and close this report.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/540015
Title:
X Fails t
Bug is not present in current versions of Ubuntu / Xubuntu. Old bug
against no longer supported versions.
** Changed in: grub2 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
** Changed in: ubiquity (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Marking Invalid since it was resolved a long time ago.
** Changed in: ubiquity (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/529654
Title:
Add Lucid Alp
** Changed in: ubiquity (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/510284
Title:
Lucid 10.04 Alpha 2 two existing NTFS partitions, will not create a
/boot
Public bug reported:
Hardware configuration is a ThinkPad T540p with GeForce GT 730M. I
understand that this graphics chip as some new fangled "Nvidia Optimus"
technology involved.
I began testing with Xubuntu 13.10 x64, then re-imaged the system with
the Alpha build of Xubuntu 14.04 x64 of 20140
Public bug reported:
I was running through the LTS upgrade of our last production 10.04
server, upgrading finally to 12.04. I have run into a repeat issue with
the do-release-upgrade LTS upgrade process.
Our configuration calls for the use of DJBDNS rather than Bind or some
other DNS implementati
Greetings Steve,
This evening I attempted to get it tested on my Xubuntu 12.04 x64
system. I ran into a snag.
I suspect what Aptitude was telling me is that the package python-uno
needs to also be updated and was not provided. Following is a text
screen dump of the dependency tangle. I had only l
@nobuto: How did you get it to install on precise? I just attempted
again and the instructions linked to from #68 for how to test a proposed
package lead to an utter aptitude nightmare... wants to remove all sorts
of packages for selecting the libreoffice/1:3.5.7-0ubuntu4 when starting
it via sudo
@nobuto: Thank you for sharing your steps to success. The apt-get
install step did the trick and did not complain about python-uno.
I can confirm the resolution to the problem I originally reported.
The relative font fatness in preview mode is seemingly identical to the
font fatness in presenta
I adjusted the speed to 400 per suggestion here:
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=2118805&p=12540305#post12540305
Then came to report success. It appears I am not alone in this change
request. Please get this one in, should be simple / safe enough, and
well enough community tested.
--
Y
I just finally upgraded to 10.04.3 x64 edition a few weeks ago.
I had forgotten what I did to generate unique filenames in PDF files.
The default behavior is to still not put the job number in the filename.
I finally found this old bug report. Appears the fix has been already
distributed.
Since
My system is currently running with package: 2011-10-11 04:10 cups-
pdf_2.5.0-17ubuntu1~lucid1_amd64.deb
I do not see unique filenames in the created PDF's.
I changed my configuration per the OP's suggestion and now at least get
the job number in the PDF filename.
Therefor I can not confirm what
Greetings Martin-Éric,
Per the bug title "All created pdf file have the same name"... I thought
"fixed" would mean that jobs now are given unique names.
Thank you for clarifying what actually was fixed. I was expecting
something unique in the filename such as the job number. I thought I was
seein
I was able to clean load 10.04.3 x64 from the LiveCD onto my machine, as
usual no POST once loaded.
Then I took the drive to the P4/945 based system, installed Lilo, got
that configured. I needed to update /etc/fstab back to using /dev
devices and not referring to partitions by their UUID. Then it
An associate I work with was able to correctly identify the trouble with
loads of Lucid, Oneiric, and the latest Debian. Turns out there is a HDD
geometry incompatibility with these newer distros.
The work-around that masked the situation was to partition the blank
drive with Ubuntu 9.04, then reb
The HDD BIOS settings in my computer are as follows:
ATA/IDE ModeNative (can not change this)
Configure SATA As AHCI
S.M.A.R.T. Enabled
SATA 1 - 4 They just autodetect - can not even arrow to these,
cursor position skips over them
Hard Disk Pre-Delay
I tried pulling down the alternate 10.04.3 ISO and installed from that,
hoping to select Lilo rather than Grub2. No question was presented,
Grub2 was installed, box will not IPL.
How is it possible to select Lilo rather than Grub2?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member o
@Ubuntu, I replied to your latest update, and along comes janitor and
expires the bug report. Reopening hopefully. This is still an issue with
the latest 10.04.4 x86 build.
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: Expired => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a m
@Christopher,
??? I am on Ubuntu Linux 10.04 x64, not Vista. "Gee that is great
that it is unreproducible with Vista."
Meanwhile I have switched my machines all to LibreOffice via the PPA
instructions found here:
http://www.ubuntugeek.com/install-libreoffice-in-ubuntu-11-0410-1010-04-using-p
I was able to load a blank hard drive successfully in this same system
with XUbuntu 12.04.1 x64 edition. I did not have to partition the drive
with Ubuntu 9.04 like I had to when loading 10.04 LTS.
I suppose it to be a bug in the specified editions of Linux around the
time of release of 10.04 LTS.
I was able to reproduce these odd behaviors with Xubuntu 12.04 x64.
Therefor it is probably not something Gnome specific as it happens with
Xcfe as well.
I have not installed Virtual Box on this system yet. So that rules out
all VM involvement.
I did a bit of research. These rss-glx screen savers
I checked back this evening on this topic. Now I see Samba package files
at the URL in #15.
However Samba does not show up here:
https://launchpad.net/~clint-fewbar/+archive/mogile
So not a surprise that I am not offered to move to that build of Samba.
More assistance please.
--
You received t
My LI installation just updated running Lucid 10.04.
Now I have:
LibreOffice 3.4.5
OOO340m1 (Build:502)
This bug is still present in this build.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/585910
@Phillip #9
Thank you for following up on this case.
What ever partitioner the Ubuntu LiveCD GUI installer uses to partition
the disk made a partition table which was incompatible with the latest
BIOS available from Intel for the motherboard in this system. Placing
the hard disk drive into a syst
Cross linking with UbuntuForums thread on the same topic...
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1856283
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/874698
Title:
Ubuntu Lucid prevents system
Public bug reported:
My trusty main Linux machine, still loaded with Ubuntu 9.04 x86.
Intel DG33BUC motherboard, latest BIOS rev
Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E8500
So to upgrade, I purchased a new drive:
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 0F10383 1TB 7200 RPM 32MB Cache SATA 3.0Gb/s
3.5" Internal Hard Dri
I am able to reproduce the same results when installing on the same
system the latest Ubuntu 11.10 (Oneiric Ocelot) x64 from the Desktop /
LiveCD. Updating bug description with the second release name.
Back to trusty Ubuntu 9.04 for the moment I guess. (shrug)
** Summary changed:
- Ubuntu Lucid
For another opinion I pulled down a copy of:
debian-6.0.3-amd64-netinst.iso
and installed a GUI desktop machine with that. Same thing, system will
not POST with an installation having been done to the HDD.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is s
I had to do:
$ sudo apt-get install python-software-properties
To be able to use the add-apt-repository command listed in #12.
That done, refreshed the package list several times, and am not finding
your updated Samba build you posted for me to test with. I will keep
clawing at the keyboard... O
FYI, I see no Samba packages under here:
http://ppa.launchpad.net/clint-fewbar/fixes/ubuntu/pool/main/
That just might be a problem... Chuck, could you please check on the
build machine? Thanks!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
How's progress getting this fixed in stable distribution? I just had to
"sudo rm /etc/motd.tail" on Lucid servers again. So I guess doing so is
not a one time manual fix. :-(
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs
Christopher Penalver, it is encouraging to see progress on one of my bug
reports. Thank YOU so much for your assistance on this report. :-)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/585910
Title:
Yes the tinydns component of djbdns needs that specific ID.
Per DJB (the author) three ID's are needed for a basic installation of
djbns.
Johannes Hessellund pointed out that a fourth ID is needed for an
optional step in the set up of djbdns, so I added that ID as well, and
references the URL's t
Very odd indeed! I found a method to get the current kernel build to see
the USB HDD box! The command line program lsusb seems to wake the kernel
up to the fact that a USB HDD box is attached to the server. See the
following:
use...@hostname:~$ lsusb
Bus 004 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundati
Aaahhh, excuse me, Chuck Short: How could this possibly be CUPS which is
causing these problems? The workstations print to Samba, which in turn
prints through CUPS. CUPS direct printing from Windows workstations
works. CUPS does not get involved until the print job reaches the
server, however we ar
301 - 400 of 485 matches
Mail list logo
