Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: ifupdown
This bug applies to Ubuntu 10.04. I have installed the Dell utility
biosdevname and the following /etc/udev/rules.d/86-biosdevname.rules
KERNEL=="eth*", ACTION=="add", PROGRAM="/usr/sbin/biosdevname
--policy=all_ethN -i %k", NAME="%c"
This work
On closer examination, this seems to be a pure udev problem.
** Changed in: ifupdown (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
** Package changed: ifupdown (Ubuntu) => udev (Ubuntu)
** Changed in: udev (Ubuntu)
Status: Invalid => New
--
Race condition using a udev helper program to name in
Jose Juan Montes wrote:
> As Michael Goetze stated, the RH Bugracker is for GigE over Fibre
> (5716S).
>
> This issue seems to be a duplicate of 400250:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/400250.
Yes, that is certainly a duplicate, at my workplace we are also u
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 435185 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/435185
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 435185
bnx2: Please support BCM5716 chipset
--
bnx2 Broadcom NetExtreme II driver too old for new hardware
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/400250
You receive
Hi Jerone,
> I have put together a dkms deb package for 8.04 to add support for the
> BCM5716 & BCM5716s. It will install & generate a new initramfs as well.
> After install reboot and your ready. Will also be submitting patches to
> get these into the next 8.04 SRU kernel.
first of all, thanks f
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: linux-image-2.6.24-24-generic
We are having trouble running Ubuntu 8.04 on Hardware with the new
BCM5716 chipset. Ubuntu boots but fails to recognize any network
devices. It should behave exactly the same as the BCM5709 chipset,
therefore the fix should b
Looking at the ttyX jobs as well as xinetd (a service started by a legacy
initscript), I've so far seen all of the following combinations:
- None started
- xinetd started, but none of the ttys
- both xinetd and all the ttys started
If this is caused by a race condition, then network-manager is not
This is a syslog with udev debugging of a R710 booting and exhibiting
the bug.
** Attachment added: "Syslog"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48273735/udev-fuckup.log
--
Race condition using a udev helper program to name interfaces
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/575244
You received this bug not
I tried to work around this bug by adding the following to
/etc/init/udevtrigger.conf:
pre-start exec udevadm control --max-childs=1
However, it still (sometimes!) doesn't work. And as a matter of fact, I
still see a lot of udevd processes (both with ps and in my logfiles), so
it seems that udeva
Martin Pitt wrote:
> Accepted linux into karmic-proposed, the package will build now and be
> available in a few hours. Please test and give feedback here. See
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how to
> enable and use -proposed. Thank you in advance!
Hm, karmic? Do
linux-image-2.6.24-27-server_2.6.24-27.69_amd64.deb
linux-image-2.6.24-27-server_2.6.24-27.69_i386.deb
both work for me on a Dell PowerEdge R210.
--
bnx2: Please support BCM5716 chipset
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/435185
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
B
Just so there's no confusion, that patch in the RH Bugtracker is for the
5716S (GigE over Fibre), whereas I need the 5716 (GigE over Copper). I
just couldn't find a patch adding exactly that (it probably came with a
new release of the Broadcom driver).
Thanks for looking into it!
--
bnx2: Ple
On 07/01/2010 10:18 AM, Wout wrote:
> So /dev/console exists but isn't immediately "ready for work". It appears it
> becomes fully functional later (otherwise it would not be possible to start
> the failing services manually).
> Can we figure out at what point /dev/console becomes functional?
>
> I
** Package changed: upstart (Ubuntu) => linux (Ubuntu)
--
CUPS and other system services not starting at boot
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/554172
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs
On 07/16/2010 04:34 PM, Don Myers wrote:
>I'll do the second machine tonight and keep you updated on how both are
doing.
Please don't. This is a bug report and not a personal support forum. I
have no idea how you Ubuntu users expect developers to sift through bug
reports when you constantly spa
15 matches
Mail list logo
