Despite the sticky flag is part of our development compiz is not. And
for now, we're not supporting compiz integration into our core.
Many thanks for the comments.
** Changed in: gdesklets (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Invalid
--
gdesklets does not appear on every desktop when using com
Should we mark this as INVALID? This is a old report.
--
python in background uses too much cpu
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/71085
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.c
I don't understand, why this bug was set as "Fix Released" if the
problem is related to bug #83922 ?
--
Dependencies for gdesklets are no longer fulfilled
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/336200
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubun
If this so, I would encourage you to this bug should be close as invalid
then. If you close this as "Fix Released", it's supposed that some
characteristic has been included and commited but as far as I have
understood, it's not the case.
Thanks.
--
Dependencies for gdesklets are no longer fulfil
you wrote: "Ubuntu changes (removal of extra mime files) have been
incorporated upstream." I ask: "when did it happen?"
--
Please sync gdesklets 0.36-4 (universe) from Debian unstable (main).
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/263994
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubu
You're right Christian, however lots of bugs complain to us because the
ubuntu package sucks. AFAIK that's not our direct responsibility.
--
gdesklets does not start amd64
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/83922
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is su
siege crash even without complex arguments
** Attachment added: "siege crash"
http://librarian.launchpad.net/4932707/_usr_bin_siege.1000.crash
--
Entire Crash
https://launchpad.net/bugs/60091
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo
Public bug reported:
When gimp finished to save an image (xcf.gz type) I saved a copy in jpg
format. After that, gimp crashed. Take a look to the attach please.
** Affects: gimp (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: Unconfirmed
--
crash when I saved a jpg file
https://launchpad.
Public bug reported:
I just executed siege +
I've got a big file created by a widged named "Program Crash
Detected" (size 16k) How can I send this to you?
ProblemType: Crash
CrashCounter: 3
Date: Tue Sep 12 10:55:38 2006
Dependencies:
debconf 1.5.2ubuntu2
libtext-iconv-perl 1.4-3
debconf-
On 12/09/06, Michael Bienia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Attach it simply to your bug report.
>
Wooh! I didn't see it :) thanks!
=
>
--
http://www.advogato.org/person/mgonzalez/
--
Entire Crash
https://launchpad.net/bugs/60091
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
http
No reply any more from the user who reported this.
** Changed in: gdesklets (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
gdesklets turn off when i restart
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/202471
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu
+1
IMO we should close this and add it as a task but in 0.40
--
gdesklets does not appear on every desktop when using compiz
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/103049
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: file-roller
If you press the Cancel button when file-roller is creating a big file
the widget close but the process is still running. It can be checked
with top
** Affects: file-roller (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: Unconfirmed
--
On 25/10/06, Sebastien Bacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nothing is attach to the bug. What version of Ubuntu do you use? Could
> you get a crash file or a backtrace for the issue?
>
yes but it size (gzipped) is about 8m, I couldn't uploaded to
launchpad;
I saved the full backtrace, try with
On 25/10/06, Sebastien Bacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Where did you click to get the issue? Can you get it again with some
> steps or that was a one time issue?
>
Gimp started to export my file to jpg format, I was waiting only and
that happened. I did something like:
First time:
Right B
** Attachment added: "bug-firefox"
http://librarian.launchpad.net/7121787/bug-firefox
--
firefox flash problem
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102053
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: firefox-dbg
a backtrace is attached. I think this is a flash problem
ProblemType: Bug
Architecture: amd64
Date: Mon Apr 2 16:03:17 2007
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 7.04
Uname: Linux mario 2.6.20-13-generic #2 SMP Sat Mar 24 23:12:02 UTC 2007 x86_64
GNU/Linu
On 03/04/07, Hilario J. Montoliu (hjmf) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thank you Mario for this report and the gdb log attached.
>
> Can you reproduce the crash? If so, can you indicate the steps.
>
Oops! for me mozilla-firefox doesn't work fine so I installed 32bits
firefox binary. Guilty? mozil
On 26/03/07, John Vivirito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thank you for the bug report. Could you please install the firefox-dbg
> package and try to obtain a backtrace (or crash report) by following the
> instructions on https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Bugs This will
> greatly aid us in tracking
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: firefox
With feisty I've got this bug. I had some firefox tabs open and then I
opened a new one with a flash content on it. I installed libflash-
mozplugin (0.4.13-9ubuntu1) because I've got a AMD64 CPU and adobe does
not provided a useful port yet.
Prob
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://librarian.launchpad.net/6949224/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: "Disassembly.txt"
http://librarian.launchpad.net/6949225/Disassembly.txt
** Attachment added: "ProcMaps.txt"
http://librarian.launchpad.net/6949226/ProcMaps.txt
** Attac
On 26/03/07, John Vivirito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Which flash package and version do you have installed?
libflash-mozplugin 0.4.13-9ubuntu1
> Which Java package and version do you have installed?
None
> Which video player and version do you have installed?
mplayer but this
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: axel
I just put a link and this was a broken link.
** Affects: axel (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: Unconfirmed
--
Crash after a broken link
https://launchpad.net/bugs/77203
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.c
** Attachment added: "Auto-generated crash file"
http://librarian.launchpad.net/5557677/_usr_bin_axel.1000.crash
--
Crash after a broken link
https://launchpad.net/bugs/77203
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
I got the same bug, however I had one connection opened then I chose
system objects.
I confirm it.
--
crash on displaying system objects
https://launchpad.net/bugs/78424
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: libc6
I've been doing some test in a postgresql tool, then I preesed CTRL+\
and I got a core dumped. A friend of my help me to find and reproduce
the bug.
#include
int main (int argc, char **argv) {
FILE *tty;
char foo[16];
tty = fopen("/d
On 19/12/06, didier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, thanks for your bug but I don't believe it's a glibc one. If the
> default line discipline for /dev/tty maps SIGQUIT signal to CTRL+\ it's
> the correct behavior.
>
but, I friend checked this in debian with libc6 2.3 and he hasn't
got the same
On 19/12/06, didier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > but, I friend checked this in debian with libc6 2.3 and he h
> I don't remember if POSIX defined a default line discipline but you shouldn't
> expect one.
>
ok
> > I was using psql. So, in the C code I wrote I'm doing anything with
> >signals,
On 21/12/06, ville palo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This seems to be a duplicate with Bug #67553. Do you agree?
>
I think so. Anyone know about a patch to fix this bug? siege is
useless
>
--
http://www.advogato.org/person/mgonzalez/
--
Entire Crash
https://launchpad.net/bugs/60091
--
u
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 67553 ***
On 21/12/06, ville palo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> *** This bug is a duplicate of bug 67553 ***
>
>
> That other bug report contained a patch. This patch has fixed this in feisty
> and there is already SRU request to get this to edgy too, but applyin
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: acpitool
I'm working with a HP420. I suspended it, turned on and the notebook
fan is running all the time. I haven't got any process eating all CPU
time, everything is 'normal'. This behaviour does not happen when I
shoot down and turn back the notebook
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/656512/+attachment/163/+files/Dependencies.txt
--
Segfault getting info about the fan
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/656512
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscr
Without parameters the result and backtrace is different. Hope it helps
(gdb) run
Starting program: /usr/bin/acpitool
Battery #1 : charged, 98.02%
AC adapter : on-line
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
Do_Thermal_Info (show_trip=0, verbose=0) at acpitool.cpp:247
2
It seems it *was* during some automatic apt update
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1961049
Title:
package initramfs-tools 0.136ubuntu6.7 failed to install/upgrade:
installed initramf
Public bug reported:
It wasn't during any upgrade or installation. The "System program
problem detected" just popped in. I just had the browser opened with a
few tabs.
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
Package: initramfs-tools 0.136ubuntu6.7
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-91.10
35 matches
Mail list logo
