Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: ia32-libs
After installing VMware-server-1.0.6-91891 and vmware-any-any-116 on an
8.04 system the VMware console will not work. Apparently VMware's
distribution has issues with libx11-6. The symptoms include:
# vmware
/usr/lib/vmware/bin/vmware: /us
> Was this an upgrade from before-8.04 to 8.04 or are you reporting that a
> recent upgrade has broken what was working on 8.04 previously?
In this particular case it was an upgrade from 7.10. The same bug(s),
however, are present in both 8.X upgrades and new installs.
--
8.04 upgrade breaks vm
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: aptitude
Upgrading previously installed software fails to check whether the
package's rc scripts have been disabled and enables them regardless. If
an rc script has been disabled (update-rc.d -f remove) it should remain
disabled across upgrades (and "saf
Public bug reported:
The apache2 package fails to check whether rc scripts have been modified
when performing an upgrade. As a result admins who have disabled boot-
time invokation (update-rc.d -f apache2 remove) will be surprised to
find that system, package, and other upgrades not only override
> Did you rebuild the VMWare module after the kernel upgrade?
You'll make no progress on this bug until you reproduce the problem.
That's where you need to start.
The error messages listed below are completely different from the error
messages of not having a requisite kernel module.
Roger
> -
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: miro
On first run Miro (attempts to) connect to a number of multimedia providers
without first asking the user or checking for an http_proxy. This is a
non-trivial privacy issue.
Depends on Firefox (v2) without checking whether a different browser or
Public bug reported:
Application website says it plays all file formats but the app cannot play
Flash video on 64bit Ubuntu (7).
The Flash incompatibility is Adobe's fault, but Miro should not advertise
capabilities which is does not have.
** Affects: ubuntu
Importance: Undecided
Public bug reported:
Trying to enable monitor power saving (which worked in earlier versions
of KDE) via control center -> monitor & display -> power saving: [x]
enabled, switch off after [20 minutes], [apply] seems to work, but
something reverts the [enabled] setting randomly. Logging in to
Adm
> At least some of these problems aren't apparent in the Hardy package.
> Which version of Miro and Ubuntu are you using, and where are you
> getting Miro from?
Chris,
Miro (0.9.8.1-0ubuntu5) was installed using synaptic.
#grep -i code /etc/lsb-release
DISTRIB_CODENAME=gutsy
Thanks,
Roger
--
> Do you use Feisty or Hardy?
Still running Gutsy, until Hardy is out of beta.
Roger
--
Miro doesn't play Flash on 64bit systems
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/214433
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mai
> Please run kdesudo displayconfig in a console window, try to set it, and
> paste any terminal output to the bug.
Scott,
It runs the same from displayconfig as from the KDE menu i.e., no errors,
warnings, logs, or other output. Will let you know if it stays set any
longer.
Roger
--
KDE (3.5.8
>> Please run kdesudo displayconfig in a console window, try to set it, and
>> paste any terminal output to the bug.
>
> Scott,
>
> It runs the same from displayconfig as from the KDE menu i.e., no errors,
> warnings, logs, or other output. Will let you know if it stays set any
> longer.
Apparentl
You can work around this bug by physically removing the modem from the
machine before installing/updating. I suspect most if not all of the
people experiencing this have "soft" or "win" modems by Lucent and some
other companies. The installation hangs when "configuring wvdial" as it
tries to commun
> Thanks for letting me know, I was wondering how you removed it from
> booting? Did you remove the script from /etc/init.d? Or the /etc/rc2.d
> script or used update-rc.d?
Chuck,
Personally I run update-rc.d.
Thanks!
Roger
--
Apache doesn't honor existing bootscripts
https://bugs.launchpad.ne
This solution violates the principle of least surprise.
If an installed package has an init script that has been disabled it is
obvious that the individual/s who manage the system want it disabled.
The current upgrade script blindly assumes either the sysadmin did not
know what they were doing or
15 matches
Mail list logo