[Bug 1648017] Re: linux: 4.4.0-54.75 -proposed tracker

2016-12-10 Thread Luis Henriques
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1648867 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1648867 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1648579 linux: 4.4.0-56.77 -proposed tracker ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1648867 linux: 4.4.0-57.78 -proposed tracker -- You received th

[Bug 1646157] Re: linux-lts-xenial: 4.4.0-52.73~14.04.1 -proposed tracker

2016-12-10 Thread Luis Henriques
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1648876 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1648876 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1648586 linux-lts-xenial: 4.4.0-56.77~14.04.1 -proposed tracker ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1648876 linux-lts-xenial: 4.4.0-57.78~14.04.1

[Bug 1646154] Re: linux-raspi2: -proposed tracker

2016-12-10 Thread Luis Henriques
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1648872 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1648872 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1648582 linux-raspi2: 4.4.0-1037.44 -proposed tracker ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1648872 linux-raspi2: -proposed tracker -- You receiv

[Bug 1648020] Re: linux-raspi2: -proposed tracker

2016-12-10 Thread Luis Henriques
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1648872 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1648872 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1648582 linux-raspi2: 4.4.0-1037.44 -proposed tracker ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1648872 linux-raspi2: -proposed tracker -- You receiv

[Bug 1648511] Re: linux-raspi2: 4.4.0-1036.43 -proposed tracker

2016-12-10 Thread Luis Henriques
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1648872 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1648872 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1648582 linux-raspi2: 4.4.0-1037.44 -proposed tracker ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1648872 linux-raspi2: -proposed tracker -- You receiv

[Bug 1644614] Re: linux-raspi2: -proposed tracker

2016-12-10 Thread Luis Henriques
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1648872 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1648872 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1648582 linux-raspi2: 4.4.0-1037.44 -proposed tracker ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1648872 linux-raspi2: -proposed tracker -- You receiv

[Bug 1640513] Re: linux-raspi2: 4.4.0-1035.42 -proposed tracker

2016-12-10 Thread Luis Henriques
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1648872 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1648872 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1648582 linux-raspi2: 4.4.0-1037.44 -proposed tracker ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1648872 linux-raspi2: -proposed tracker -- You receiv

[Bug 1648507] Re: linux-raspi2: -proposed tracker

2016-12-10 Thread Luis Henriques
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1648872 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1648872 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1648582 linux-raspi2: 4.4.0-1037.44 -proposed tracker ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1648872 linux-raspi2: -proposed tracker -- You receiv

[Bug 1636946] Re: linux-raspi2: 4.4.0-1031.38 -proposed tracker

2016-12-10 Thread Luis Henriques
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1648872 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1648872 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1648582 linux-raspi2: 4.4.0-1037.44 -proposed tracker ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1648872 linux-raspi2: -proposed tracker -- You receiv

[Bug 1648582] Re: linux-raspi2: 4.4.0-1037.44 -proposed tracker

2016-12-10 Thread Luis Henriques
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1648872 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1648872 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1648872 linux-raspi2: -proposed tracker -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. http

[Bug 1640927] Re: linux-raspi2: -proposed tracker

2016-12-10 Thread Luis Henriques
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1648872 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1648872 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1648582 linux-raspi2: 4.4.0-1037.44 -proposed tracker ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1648872 linux-raspi2: -proposed tracker -- You receiv

[Bug 1644181] Re: linux-raspi2: -proposed tracker

2016-12-10 Thread Luis Henriques
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1648872 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1648872 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1648582 linux-raspi2: 4.4.0-1037.44 -proposed tracker ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1648872 linux-raspi2: -proposed tracker -- You receiv

[Bug 1640763] Re: linux-raspi2: -proposed tracker

2016-12-10 Thread Luis Henriques
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1648872 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1648872 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1648582 linux-raspi2: 4.4.0-1037.44 -proposed tracker ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1648872 linux-raspi2: -proposed tracker -- You receiv

[Bug 1635246] Re: linux-raspi2: 4.4.0-1030.37 -proposed tracker

2016-12-10 Thread Luis Henriques
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1648872 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1648872 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1648582 linux-raspi2: 4.4.0-1037.44 -proposed tracker ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1648872 linux-raspi2: -proposed tracker -- You receiv

[Bug 1633419] Re: linux-raspi2: 4.4.0-1028.34 -proposed tracker

2016-12-10 Thread Luis Henriques
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1648872 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1648872 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1648582 linux-raspi2: 4.4.0-1037.44 -proposed tracker ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1648872 linux-raspi2: -proposed tracker -- You receiv

[Bug 1648872] Re: linux-raspi2: 4.4.0-1038.45 -proposed tracker

2016-12-10 Thread Luis Henriques
** Summary changed: - linux-raspi2: -proposed tracker + linux-raspi2: 4.4.0-1038.45 -proposed tracker -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1648872 Title: linux-raspi2: 4.4.0-1038.45 -prop

[Bug 1648512] Re: linux-snapdragon: 4.4.0-1041.45 -proposed tracker

2016-12-10 Thread Luis Henriques
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1648875 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1648875 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1648875 linux-snapdragon: -proposed tracker -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1640928] Re: linux-snapdragon: 4.4.0-1036.40 -proposed tracker

2016-12-10 Thread Luis Henriques
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1648875 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1648875 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1648512 linux-snapdragon: 4.4.0-1041.45 -proposed tracker ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1648875 linux-snapdragon: -proposed tracker -- Yo

[Bug 1648583] Re: linux-snapdragon: -proposed tracker

2016-12-10 Thread Luis Henriques
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1648875 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1648875 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1648875 linux-snapdragon: -proposed tracker -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1640520] Re: linux-snapdragon: 4.4.0-1035.39 -proposed tracker

2016-12-10 Thread Luis Henriques
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1648875 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1648875 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1648512 linux-snapdragon: 4.4.0-1041.45 -proposed tracker ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1648875 linux-snapdragon: -proposed tracker -- Yo

[Bug 1644615] Re: linux-snapdragon: 4.4.0-1038.42 -proposed tracker

2016-12-10 Thread Luis Henriques
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1648875 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1648875 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1648512 linux-snapdragon: 4.4.0-1041.45 -proposed tracker ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1648875 linux-snapdragon: -proposed tracker -- Yo

[Bug 1648508] Re: linux-snapdragon: -proposed tracker

2016-12-10 Thread Luis Henriques
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1648875 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1648875 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1648512 linux-snapdragon: 4.4.0-1041.45 -proposed tracker ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1648875 linux-snapdragon: -proposed tracker -- Yo

[Bug 1636948] Re: linux-snapdragon: 4.4.0-1034.38 -proposed tracker

2016-12-10 Thread Luis Henriques
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1648875 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1648875 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1648512 linux-snapdragon: 4.4.0-1041.45 -proposed tracker ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1648875 linux-snapdragon: -proposed tracker -- Yo

[Bug 1635247] Re: linux-snapdragon: 4.4.0-1033.37 -proposed tracker

2016-12-10 Thread Luis Henriques
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1648875 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1648875 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1648512 linux-snapdragon: 4.4.0-1041.45 -proposed tracker ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1648875 linux-snapdragon: -proposed tracker -- Yo

[Bug 1646155] Re: linux-snapdragon: -proposed tracker

2016-12-10 Thread Luis Henriques
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1648875 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1648875 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1648512 linux-snapdragon: 4.4.0-1041.45 -proposed tracker ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1648875 linux-snapdragon: -proposed tracker -- Yo

[Bug 1648021] Re: linux-snapdragon: 4.4.0-1040.44 -proposed tracker

2016-12-10 Thread Luis Henriques
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1648875 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1648875 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1648512 linux-snapdragon: 4.4.0-1041.45 -proposed tracker ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1648875 linux-snapdragon: -proposed tracker -- Yo

[Bug 1640764] Re: linux-snapdragon: -proposed tracker

2016-12-10 Thread Luis Henriques
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1648875 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1648875 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1648512 linux-snapdragon: 4.4.0-1041.45 -proposed tracker ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1648875 linux-snapdragon: -proposed tracker -- Yo

[Bug 1644182] Re: linux-snapdragon: 4.4.0-1037.41 -proposed tracker

2016-12-10 Thread Luis Henriques
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1648875 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1648875 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1648512 linux-snapdragon: 4.4.0-1041.45 -proposed tracker ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1648875 linux-snapdragon: -proposed tracker -- Yo

[Bug 1633421] Re: linux-snapdragon: 4.4.0-1031.34 -proposed tracker

2016-12-10 Thread Luis Henriques
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1648875 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1648875 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1648512 linux-snapdragon: 4.4.0-1041.45 -proposed tracker ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1648875 linux-snapdragon: -proposed tracker -- Yo

[Bug 1648875] Re: linux-snapdragon: 4.4.0-1042.46 -proposed tracker

2016-12-10 Thread Luis Henriques
** Summary changed: - linux-snapdragon: -proposed tracker + linux-snapdragon: 4.4.0-1042.46 -proposed tracker -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1648875 Title: linux-snapdragon: 4.4.0-1

[Bug 1631287] Re: CVE-2016-7039 and CVE-2016-8666

2016-12-12 Thread Luis Henriques
This was revert + application of the upstream fix from a stable release. Tagging as verified. ** Tags removed: verification-needed-yakkety ** Tags added: verification-done-yakkety -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https:

[Bug 1645278] Re: Upstream stable 4.4.34 and 4.8.10 regression

2016-12-12 Thread Luis Henriques
The fix was picked from the upstream stable kernel, thus I'm tagging it as verified. ** Tags removed: verification-needed-yakkety ** Tags added: verification-done-yakkety -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.la

[Bug 1648662] Re: Vulnerability picked up from 4.8.10 stable kernel

2016-12-12 Thread Luis Henriques
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Yakkety) Assignee: (unassigned) => Luis Henriques (henrix) ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Yakkety) Assignee: Luis Henriques (henrix) => Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo (cascardo) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubunt

[Bug 1648662] Re: Vulnerability picked up from 4.8.10 stable kernel

2016-12-13 Thread Luis Henriques
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Yakkety) Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1648662 Title: Vulnerability picked up from 4.8.10 stable kernel To man

[Bug 1649358] Re: linux: 4.8.0-32.34 -proposed tracker

2016-12-13 Thread Luis Henriques
** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Yakkety) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1649358 Title: linux: 4.8.0-32.34 -proposed tracker To manage notif

[Bug 1648038] Re: linux-hwe-edge: 4.8.0-31.33~16.04.1 -proposed tracker

2016-12-13 Thread Luis Henriques
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1649361 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1649361 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1649361 linux-hwe-edge: 4.8.0-32.34~16.04.1 -proposed tracker -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subsc

[Bug 1648034] Re: linux: 4.8.0-31.33 -proposed tracker

2016-12-13 Thread Luis Henriques
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1649358 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1649358 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1649358 linux: 4.8.0-32.34 -proposed tracker -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1646194] Re: linux: 4.8.0-29.31 -proposed tracker

2016-12-13 Thread Luis Henriques
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1649358 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1649358 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1648034 linux: 4.8.0-31.33 -proposed tracker ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1649358 linux: 4.8.0-32.34 -proposed tracker -- You received th

[Bug 1646195] Re: linux-hwe-edge: 4.8.0-29.31~16.04.1 -proposed tracker

2016-12-13 Thread Luis Henriques
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1649361 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1649361 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1648038 linux-hwe-edge: 4.8.0-31.33~16.04.1 -proposed tracker ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1649361 linux-hwe-edge: 4.8.0-32.34~16.04.1 -pro

[Bug 1563345] [NEW] Trusty update to 3.16.7-ckt26 stable release

2016-03-29 Thread Luis Henriques
Public bug reported: SRU Justification Impact:    The upstream process for stable tree updates is quite similar    in scope to the Ubuntu SRU process, e.g., each patch has to    demonstrably fix a bug, and each patch is vetted by upstream    by originating either directly from

[Bug 1563345] Re: Trusty update to 3.16.7-ckt26 stable release

2016-03-29 Thread Luis Henriques
** Changed in: linux-lts-utopic (Ubuntu Trusty) Status: New => Fix Committed ** Changed in: linux-lts-utopic (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs

[Bug 1563914] [NEW] Precise update to 3.2.78 stable release

2016-03-30 Thread Luis Henriques
Public bug reported: SRU Justification Impact: The upstream process for stable tree updates is quite similar in scope to the Ubuntu SRU process, e.g., each patch has to demonstrably fix a bug, and each patch is vetted by upstream by originating either directly

[Bug 1563911] [NEW] Precise update to 3.2.77 stable release

2016-03-30 Thread Luis Henriques
Public bug reported: SRU Justification Impact: The upstream process for stable tree updates is quite similar in scope to the Ubuntu SRU process, e.g., each patch has to demonstrably fix a bug, and each patch is vetted by upstream by originating either directly

[Bug 1563911] Re: Precise update to 3.2.77 stable release

2016-03-30 Thread Luis Henriques
** Description changed: + SRU Justification - SRU Justification + Impact: +    The upstream process for stable tree updates is quite similar +    in scope to the Ubuntu SRU process, e.g., each patch has to +    demonstrably fix a bug, and each patch is vetted by upstream +  

[Bug 1563914] Re: Precise update to 3.2.78 stable release

2016-03-30 Thread Luis Henriques
** Description changed: + SRU Justification - SRU Justification + Impact: +    The upstream process for stable tree updates is quite similar +    in scope to the Ubuntu SRU process, e.g., each patch has to +    demonstrably fix a bug, and each patch is vetted by upstream +  

[Bug 1563914] Re: Precise update to 3.2.78 stable release

2016-03-30 Thread Luis Henriques
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Precise) Status: New => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1563914 Title: Precise update to 3.2.78 stable release To manage notification

[Bug 1563911] Re: Precise update to 3.2.77 stable release

2016-03-30 Thread Luis Henriques
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Precise) Status: New => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1563911 Title: Precise update to 3.2.77 stable release To manage notification

[Bug 1564815] [NEW] Precise update to 3.2.79 stable release

2016-04-01 Thread Luis Henriques
Public bug reported: SRU Justification Impact:    The upstream process for stable tree updates is quite similar    in scope to the Ubuntu SRU process, e.g., each patch has to    demonstrably fix a bug, and each patch is vetted by upstream    by originating either directly from

[Bug 1564815] Re: Precise update to 3.2.79 stable release

2016-04-01 Thread Luis Henriques
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Precise) Status: New => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1564815 Title: Precise update to 3.2.79 stable release To manage notification

[Bug 1627052] [NEW] 4.8.0-16.17: genirq: Flags mismatch serial vs goldfish_pdev_bus

2016-09-23 Thread Luis Henriques
Public bug reported: I usually run kvm with '-serial stdio' after adding GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX_DEFAULT="console=ttyS0" to /etc/default/grub. This will give me a serial console where I can login and, more important, get kernel logs. After install 4.8.0-16.17 I'm unable to login in the serial console

[Bug 1627052] Re: 4.8.0-16.17: genirq: Flags mismatch serial vs goldfish_pdev_bus

2016-09-23 Thread Luis Henriques
Just for completeness, running a kernel compiled with CONFIG_GOLDFISH=n fixed the issue. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1627052 Title: 4.8.0-16.17: genirq: Flags mismatch serial vs go

[Bug 1570872] [NEW] Trusty update to 3.16.7-ckt27 stable release

2016-04-15 Thread Luis Henriques
Public bug reported: SRU Justification Impact:    The upstream process for stable tree updates is quite similar    in scope to the Ubuntu SRU process, e.g., each patch has to    demonstrably fix a bug, and each patch is vetted by upstream    by originating either directly from

[Bug 1570872] Re: Trusty update to 3.16.7-ckt27 stable release

2016-04-15 Thread Luis Henriques
** Changed in: linux-lts-utopic (Ubuntu Trusty) Status: New => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1570872 Title: Trusty update to 3.16.7-ckt27 stable release To mana

[Bug 973111] Re: System fails to boot after installing linux-image-3.0.0-18-generic

2012-04-05 Thread Luis Henriques
Hi Bogdan, could you please test the kernel at http://people.canonical.com/~henrix/lp973111/ ? We suspect you're hitting a bug that has been already fixed with the extra commit in this test kernel: c9651e70ad0aa499814817cbf3cc1d0b806ed3a1, "ASPM: Fix pcie devices with non-pcie children". -- You

[Bug 973444] Re: can't boot into kernel 3.0.0-18

2012-04-05 Thread Luis Henriques
Could you please test the kernel at http://people.canonical.com/~henrix/lp973111/ ? We suspect you're hitting a bug that has been already fixed with the extra commit in this test kernel: c9651e70ad0aa499814817cbf3cc1d0b806ed3a1, "ASPM: Fix pcie devices with non-pcie children". -- You received thi

[Bug 973637] Re: chrome and chromium fail with Segmentation fault

2012-04-05 Thread Luis Henriques
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 972821 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/972821 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 972821 [oneiric-proposed] linux-image-3.0.0-18-generic makes apport-gtk and chromium-browser segfault on startup -- You received this bug notification becau

[Bug 972285] Re: segmentation fault when start on linux 3.0.0-18-generic

2012-04-05 Thread Luis Henriques
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 972821 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/972821 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 972821 [oneiric-proposed] linux-image-3.0.0-18-generic makes apport-gtk and chromium-browser segfault on startup -- You received this bug notification becau

[Bug 974368] [NEW] linux: 3.0.0-19.32 -proposed tracker

2012-04-05 Thread Luis Henriques
Public bug reported: This bug is for tracking the 3.0.0-19.32 upload package. This bug will contain status and testing results related to that upload. For an explanation of the tasks and the associated workflow see: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/kernel-sru-workflow kernel-stable-Prepare-package

[Bug 974368] Re: linux: 3.0.0-19.32 -proposed tracker

2012-04-05 Thread Luis Henriques
** Changed in: kernel-sru-workflow/prepare-package Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: kernel-sru-workflow/prepare-package Assignee: Canonical Kernel Team (canonical-kernel-team) => Luis Henriques (henrix) ** Changed in: kernel-sru-workflow/prepare-package-lbm

[Bug 984387] Re: [Dell Studio XPS 1340, Alienware m17x] Kernel panic with 3.0.0-19 and 3.2.0-18 on boot

2012-04-20 Thread Luis Henriques
This bug is awaiting verification that the kernel for Oneiric in -proposed solves the problem (3.0.0-19.33). Please test the kernel and update this bug with the results. If the problem is solved, change the tag 'verification-needed-oneiric' to 'verification-done-oneiric'. If verification is not do

[Bug 986139] Re: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 00000000000000f0

2012-04-20 Thread Luis Henriques
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 922906 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/922906 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 922906 Kernel Oops - BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 009c; EIP is at __ticket_spin_lock+0x8/0x30 -- You received this bug notif

[Bug 986106] Re: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000009c

2012-04-20 Thread Luis Henriques
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 922906 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/922906 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 922906 Kernel Oops - BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 009c; EIP is at __ticket_spin_lock+0x8/0x30 -- You received this bug notif

[Bug 984387] Re: [Dell Studio XPS 1340, Alienware m17x] Kernel panic with 3.0.0-19 and 3.2.0-18 on boot

2012-04-20 Thread Luis Henriques
Daniel, that's great. Thanks for testing. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/984387 Title: [Dell Studio XPS 1340,Alienware m17x] Kernel panic with 3.0.0-19 and 3.2.0-18 on boot To man

[Bug 985736] Re: linux: 3.0.0-19.33 -proposed tracker

2012-04-20 Thread Luis Henriques
** Changed in: kernel-sru-workflow/verification-testing Status: In Progress => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/985736 Title: linux: 3.0.0-19.33 -proposed tracker T

[Bug 979253] Re: BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at c00fdd20

2012-04-20 Thread Luis Henriques
Hi, you have never reported back about my last suggestion, i.e., to try the wistron_btns driver as described in comment #14. Have you had some time to try that? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.ne

[Bug 986000] Re: linux-lts-backport-oneiric: 3.0.0-19.33~lucid1 -proposed tracker

2012-04-23 Thread Luis Henriques
** Changed in: kernel-sru-workflow/verification-testing Status: In Progress => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/986000 Title: linux-lts-backport-oneiric: 3.0.0-19.33

[Bug 987281] [NEW] linux: 2.6.38-15.59 -proposed tracker

2012-04-23 Thread Luis Henriques
: Undecided Assignee: Canonical Hardware Certification (canonical-hw-cert) Status: Invalid ** Affects: kernel-sru-workflow/prepare-package Importance: Undecided Assignee: Luis Henriques (henrix) Status: In Progress ** Affects: kernel-sru-workflow/prepare-package-lbm

[Bug 922906] Re: Kernel Oops - BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000009c; EIP is at __ticket_spin_lock+0x8/0x30

2012-04-24 Thread Luis Henriques
@uusijani, the problem you're facing seems to be a different one. The original one was a race condition on the fsnotify that caused a NULL pointer. Your current log points to a different issue related with poll()'ing, probably a duplicated of one of bugs #968825, #974014, #975047, #947958, ... @

[Bug 990208] Re: linux-lts-backport-natty: 2.6.38-15.59~lucid1 -proposed tracker

2012-04-30 Thread Luis Henriques
** Changed in: kernel-sru-workflow/prepare-package Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: kernel-sru-workflow/prepare-package Assignee: Canonical Kernel Team (canonical-kernel-team) => Luis Henriques (henrix) ** Changed in: kernel-sru-workflow/prepare-package-meta

[Bug 885744] Re: pathconf() does not reflect reality

2012-04-02 Thread Luis Henriques
This bug is awaiting verification that the kernel for Lucid in -proposed solves the problem (2.6.32-41.88). Please test the kernel and update this bug with the results. If the problem is solved, change the tag 'verification-needed-lucid' to 'verification-done-lucid'. If verification is not done by

[Bug 946928] Re: sysfs: can not remove 'bsg', no directory

2012-04-02 Thread Luis Henriques
The commit for this issue came in via a stable upstream release. As such it is not subject to the standard bug verification process. ** Tags added: verification-done-lucid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.l

[Bug 745836] Re: encrypted swap corrupts application stack/heap [was: soffice.bin SIGSEGV cppu::throwException()]

2012-04-02 Thread Luis Henriques
This bug is awaiting verification that the kernel for Lucid in -proposed solves the problem (2.6.32-41.88). Please test the kernel and update this bug with the results. If the problem is solved, change the tag 'verification-needed-lucid' to 'verification-done-lucid'. If verification is not done by

[Bug 624510] Re: Copying To USB Is Very Slow

2012-04-02 Thread Luis Henriques
This bug is awaiting verification that the kernel for Lucid in -proposed solves the problem (2.6.32-41.88). Please test the kernel and update this bug with the results. If the problem is solved, change the tag 'verification-needed-lucid' to 'verification-done-lucid'. If verification is not done by

[Bug 946928] Re: sysfs: can not remove 'bsg', no directory

2012-04-02 Thread Luis Henriques
** Tags added: verification-done-maverick ** Tags added: verification-done-natty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/946928 Title: sysfs: can not remove 'bsg', no directory To manage not

[Bug 885744] Re: pathconf() does not reflect reality

2012-04-02 Thread Luis Henriques
This bug is awaiting verification that the kernel for Oneiric in -proposed solves the problem ( 3.0.0-18.31). Please test the kernel and update this bug with the results. If the problem is solved, change the tag 'verification-needed-oneiric' to 'verification-done-oneiric'. If verification is not d

[Bug 967068] Re: linux-lts-backport-maverick: 2.6.35-32.68~lucid1 -proposed tracker

2012-04-02 Thread Luis Henriques
** Changed in: kernel-sru-workflow/verification-testing Status: In Progress => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/967068 Title: linux-lts-backport-maverick: 2.6.35-32.

[Bug 965065] Re: linux: 2.6.35-32.68 -proposed tracker

2012-04-02 Thread Luis Henriques
** Changed in: kernel-sru-workflow/verification-testing Status: In Progress => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/965065 Title: linux: 2.6.35-32.68 -proposed tracker

[Bug 965346] Re: linux: 2.6.38-14.58 -proposed tracker

2012-04-02 Thread Luis Henriques
** Changed in: kernel-sru-workflow/verification-testing Status: In Progress => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/965346 Title: linux: 2.6.38-14.58 -proposed tracker

[Bug 965586] Re: Fix a Linux kernel TSC calibration issue in the presence of SMI

2012-04-10 Thread Luis Henriques
This bug is awaiting verification that the kernel for Oneiric in -proposed solves the problem ( 3.0.0-19.32). Please test the kernel and update this bug with the results. If the problem is solved, change the tag 'verification-needed-oneiric' to 'verification-done-oneiric'. If verification is not d

[Bug 886850] Re: Very slow suspend (3-4 mins)

2012-04-10 Thread Luis Henriques
This bug is awaiting verification that the kernel for Oneiric in -proposed solves the problem ( 3.0.0-19.32). Please test the kernel and update this bug with the results. If the problem is solved, change the tag 'verification-needed-oneiric' to 'verification-done-oneiric'. If verification is not d

[Bug 875893] Re: Samsung N150 Plus backlight does not work with ACPI driver

2012-04-10 Thread Luis Henriques
** Tags removed: verification-needed-oneiric ** Tags added: verification-done-oneiric -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/875893 Title: Samsung N150 Plus backlight does not work with ACPI

[Bug 638939] Re: Desktop is larger than screen

2012-04-10 Thread Luis Henriques
This bug is awaiting verification that the kernel for Oneiric in -proposed solves the problem ( 3.0.0-19.32). Please test the kernel and update this bug with the results. If the problem is solved, change the tag 'verification-needed-oneiric' to 'verification-done-oneiric'. If verification is not d

[Bug 961482] Re: 3.2.0-19 kernel fails to boot (-18 OK)

2012-04-10 Thread Luis Henriques
This bug is awaiting verification that the kernel for Oneiric in -proposed solves the problem ( 3.0.0-19.32). Please test the kernel and update this bug with the results. If the problem is solved, change the tag 'verification-needed-oneiric' to 'verification-done-oneiric'. If verification is not d

[Bug 949311] Re: [PATCH] Fn+F* keys don't work on MSI Wind U100Plus since Ubuntu 10.04

2012-04-10 Thread Luis Henriques
This bug is awaiting verification that the kernel for Oneiric in -proposed solves the problem ( 3.0.0-19.32). Please test the kernel and update this bug with the results. If the problem is solved, change the tag 'verification-needed-oneiric' to 'verification-done-oneiric'. If verification is not d

[Bug 883441] Re: Kernel 3.0 (11.10 default kernel) won't boot unless acpi=off, worked fine with the default kernels of the 3 previous releases

2012-04-10 Thread Luis Henriques
This bug is awaiting verification that the kernel for Oneiric in -proposed solves the problem ( 3.0.0-19.32). Please test the kernel and update this bug with the results. If the problem is solved, change the tag 'verification-needed-oneiric' to 'verification-done-oneiric'. If verification is not d

[Bug 977565] Re: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000009c

2012-04-10 Thread Luis Henriques
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 922906 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/922906 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 922906 Kernel Oops - BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 009c; EIP is at __ticket_spin_lock+0x8/0x30 -- You received this bug notif

[Bug 978381] Re: writing files fails on usb drives with FAT file system

2012-04-11 Thread Luis Henriques
>From the logs, this seems to be an issue with suspend/resume. Can you confirm you have performed this operation? Also, can you reproduce the issue easily, or did it happen once only? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. h

[Bug 988088] Re: “Missed a PM interrupt” in syslog

2012-04-25 Thread Luis Henriques
>From the logs (CurrentDmesg.txt and WifiSyslog.txt) it looks like this is an upstreams issue. There's a bug report here: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42907 And some discussion here: https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/9/2/342 Unfortunately, the logs are not conclusive as they are not co

[Bug 979253] Re: BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at c00fdd20

2012-04-25 Thread Luis Henriques
>From your comments #3 and #4, you claimed that the workaround 'noexec=off' was working. In the meantime you have re-installed your system and right now it doesn't work again, right? Did it ever worked after the system re-installation? Also, I would like to ask you some more information. Could

[Bug 979253] Re: BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at c00fdd20

2012-04-26 Thread Luis Henriques
When you said you had reinstalled your system I assumed you were running the default kernel, but it looks like you re-installed again the test kernel that included the amilo-rfkill driver. You are right, this driver does not support your system. So, when booting your system, could you please go t

[Bug 968717] Re: linux-lts-backport-oneiric: 3.0.0-18.31~lucid1 -proposed tracker

2012-04-02 Thread Luis Henriques
** Changed in: kernel-sru-workflow/verification-testing Status: In Progress => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/968717 Title: linux-lts-backport-oneiric: 3.0.0-18.31

[Bug 967823] Re: linux-lts-backport-natty: 2.6.38-14.58~lucid1 -proposed tracker

2012-04-02 Thread Luis Henriques
** Changed in: kernel-sru-workflow/verification-testing Status: In Progress => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/967823 Title: linux-lts-backport-natty: 2.6.38-14.58~

[Bug 963685] Re: Please consider backporting killable request_module() patchset

2012-04-02 Thread Luis Henriques
This bug is awaiting verification that the kernel for Lucid in -proposed solves the problem (2.6.32-41.88). Please test the kernel and update this bug with the results. If the problem is solved, change the tag 'verification-needed-lucid' to 'verification-done-lucid'. If verification is not done by

[Bug 925350] Re: Display problem (thin fading white vertical lines) after kernel upgrade to 3.0.0.15, no login window

2012-04-02 Thread Luis Henriques
This bug is awaiting verification that the kernel for Oneiric in -proposed solves the problem (3.0.0-18.31). Please test the kernel and update this bug with the results. If the problem is solved, change the tag 'verification-needed-oneiric' to 'verification-done-oneiric'. If verification is not do

[Bug 900802] Re: PATCH: Got the USB tethering of the iPhone 4S working

2012-04-02 Thread Luis Henriques
This bug is awaiting verification that the kernel for Oneiric in -proposed solves the problem ( 3.0.0-18.31). Please test the kernel and update this bug with the results. If the problem is solved, change the tag 'verification-needed-oneiric' to 'verification-done-oneiric'. If verification is not d

[Bug 872044] Re: Bluetooth 'Send files' returns permission denied error

2012-04-02 Thread Luis Henriques
This bug is awaiting verification that the kernel for Oneiric in -proposed solves the problem (3.0.0-18.31). Please test the kernel and update this bug with the results. If the problem is solved, change the tag 'verification-needed-oneiric' to 'verification-done-oneiric'. If verification is not do

[Bug 968675] Re: Kernel Panic during system startup

2012-04-03 Thread Luis Henriques
I'm attaching the full dmesg from the crashdump report. It looks like an issue with the snd_hda_intel module, but still under investigation. ** Attachment added: "full-dmesg" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/968675/+attachment/2995051/+files/full-dmesg -- You received th

[Bug 972529] Re: 3.0.0-18 "everything crashing" regression

2012-04-03 Thread Luis Henriques
I have build a test kernel that we would like you to test if possible. The only addition commit on this test kernel is 93dc6107a76daed81c07f50215fa6ae77691634f "Don't limit non-nested epoll paths". Could you please check if it solves the issues you're having and report back? You can get this kern

[Bug 972285] Re: segmentation fault when start on linux 3.0.0-18-generic

2012-04-03 Thread Luis Henriques
I have build a test kernel that we would like you to test if possible. The only addition commit on this test kernel is 93dc6107a76daed81c07f50215fa6ae77691634f "Don't limit non-nested epoll paths". Could you please check if it solves the issues you're having and report back? You can get this kerne

[Bug 972173] Re: Upgrading to 3.0.0-18 causing multiple failures

2012-04-03 Thread Luis Henriques
I have build a test kernel that we would like you to test if possible. The only addition commit on this test kernel is 93dc6107a76daed81c07f50215fa6ae77691634f "Don't limit non-nested epoll paths". Could you please check if it solves the issues you're having and report back? You can get this kerne

<    3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   >