*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1545266 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1545266
** Description changed:
- f.lux also has no effect.
- also when i try to do
- sudo echo 50 > /sys/class/backlight/acpi_video0/brightness
- then it says 'bash: brightness: permission denied'.
+ If I go to
What is an LSB module?
** Description changed:
Trusty Tahr 14.04 LTS, seems to be fully updated.
The problem is: When I go to System Settings -> Brightness & Lock, the
slider has no effect. I can decrease the brightness slider to any level
and the actual brightness of the monitors app
ok, it is not ubuntu-docs. apparently an errant keystroke enabled me
to submit the bug before it was correct in any way. I'll try again (how
do I delete it? edit it? I'm the one who tried to make it! sorry!!)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
Public bug reported:
f.lux also has no effect.
also when i try to do
sudo echo 50 > /sys/class/backlight/acpi_video0/brightness
then it says 'bash: brightness: permission denied'.
Trusty Tahr 14.04 updated to current
** Affects: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status:
How do I delete this stupid erroneous mistaken typo bug report
** Changed in: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
** Converted to question:
https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-docs/+question/285285
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member
Public bug reported:
Trusty Tahr 14.04 LTS, seems to be fully updated
f.lux also has no effect.
Also when i try to do
sudo echo 50 > /sys/class/backlight/acpi_video0/brightness
then it says 'bash: brightness: permission denied'.
(From this page: http://pastebin.com/HzzHrS2g).
product: OptiPlex
I am not sure whether it should really be a question, or a bug. I have
found the little pencil, so that is progress.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1545264
Title:
screen brightness s
The steps outlined in the official documentation are working fine - I
have set up the two monitors, and both are usable in many ways. But I
can not find a way to use software to adjust the brightness of them.
I had another computer which was a laptop, and it worked to use f.lux on
the external mo
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1545266 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1545266
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1545266
screen brightness slider has no effect
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu
https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-docs/+question/285285
Supposedly this is answered, but I think it was because of the duplication.
Here's the output of this command
$sudo dmidecode -t 1; lsb_release -a; uname -a
# dmidecode 2.12
SMBIOS 2.7 present.
Handle 0x0001, DMI type
When I try to change the brightness, it is System Settings -> Brightness & Lock
I have identified the package as unity-control-center, not ubuntu docs as I
reported erroneously at first.
It is not a bug against ubuntu-docs that I know of.
** Package changed: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu) => unity-contro
** Description changed:
- Trusty Tahr 14.04 LTS, seems to be fully updated
+ Trusty Tahr 14.04 LTS, seems to be fully updated.
+
+ The problem is: When I go to System Settings -> Brightness & Lock, the
+ slider has no effect. I can decrease the brightness slider to any level
+ and the actual bri
What would be a good place to look to find definitive information on
"file-in-etc-not-marked-as-conffile"? (In case I am paranoid and don't
trust Google packages much or forum contributions from people not very
well known to me, or interested to know where definitive documentation
can be found in
How can there be a security bug in a French language pack? It looks like
all these links go to this same page? The original problem description
doesn't seem to have anything related to data in a French language pack.
What's up?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubu
After a little more study, I think what happened is this:
The links on this page lead to this long complicated discussion.
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=796839
Is this a correct interpretation : ?
The security fix broke the language packs, so now they have to fix the language
pac
15 matches
Mail list logo
