What is it about Debian's strategy that is 'right'? Are they simply
packing up successive versions under different package names that can be
installed in parallel, and killing off versions as soon as practical?
What in the world do they do for maintenance? Cherry-picking patches
from modern Spider
Public bug reported:
I'm looking at libpthread from http://packages.ubuntu.com/lucid/libc6
2.11.1-0ubuntu7.1 amd64, whose sha1sum is:
29b0368a599cdd725078d2d2a932b416a6c81817 lib/libpthread-2.11.1.so
readelf -wf libpthread-2.11.1.so says, among other things:
1440 004c 1374 FDE cie=
Unless I've made a mistake, lucid-updates has the same libpthread.
--
libpthread has very strange .eh_frame contents
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/624945
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubun
The problem is in lib-src/etags.c's function absolute_filename. If
HAVE_MEMMOVE is not #defined, it uses strcpy to try to squeeze out
unnecessary '/./' sequences from the path name. However, strcpy behaves
unpredictably when the source and destination overlap.
The question to resolve is, why is H
