(By default) Mac OS X uses GPT-partitioning instead of MSDOS-
partitioning. I think fdisk doesn't know about GPT partitioning and
thus only sees the MSDOS compatibility MBR that GPT includes. If you
want to wipe the disk completely, you can write a new "disk label"
(partitioning format) to the di
I wonder if this happens on x86 with non-accelerated graphics too, or
whether the used rendering code is very slow on armel for some reason...
--
gpartedbin and Xorg starve mkfs of CPU time.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/378990
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubun
I tested it and it behaves as the reporter says, but I'm not 100% sure whether
it's intentional or not. Do we want the graphical control to jump around while
typing?
I'll file a bug in upstream bugzilla and link it here once GNOME bugzilla works
again...
@ Ian Hinder:
Please don't put 2 issues
** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #583888
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=583888
** Also affects: gparted via
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=583888
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
Resize/move dialogue does not unfade 'Resize' button when size enter
Tested with Jaunty package & latest upstream version and this bug still
exists.
** Changed in: gparted (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #583896
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=583896
** Also affects: gparted via
http://bugzilla.gnome.
I can reproduced this using latest upstream too, so I'll file a bug
there
** Changed in: gparted (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
gparted should not allow to create an extended partition on GPT disks
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/377702
You received this bug notification because you
** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #583906
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=583906
** Also affects: gparted via
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=583906
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
gparted should not allow to create an extended partition on GPT disk
The fact that GParted locks HAL automounting is intentional, because
automounting interferes with what GParted's is doing (there are several
bugs about that, both in Launchpad and in the upstream bugtracker).
--
HAL doesn't mount devices when gparted is running
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/363
On jaunty, synaptic freezes most of the times I try to save preferences.
Combined with another bug (reported elsewhere) that involves synaptic
"forgetting" certain settings between 2 runs, this is *really* annoying
and makes synaptic almost unusable.
--
Synaptic hangs when trying to save prefren
Op zaterdag 25-04-2009 om 07:43 uur [tijdzone +], schreef Richard
Strom:
> I'm interested in 0.4.4 too, because now, I can't create partition
> withint mmcblk0. 0.4.3 doesn't see mmc devices..
Try running it from the commandline with the MMC-device as a parame
But (un)mounting partitions inside GParted should still work?
--
HAL doesn't mount devices when gparted is running
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/363058
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu
Public bug reported:
Currently in In 'xorg-server-1.6.0/include/misc.h' MAXDEVICES is defined
as:
#define MAXDEVICES 20 /* input devices */
In older Xorg versions this was 128 (at least, that's what the upstream
Changelog says).
Now, because of that, the default Ubuntu doesn't work anymore
commit df2b55a25b7056ac92c1f6cbee9f16bd0a37ba8c
Author: Egbert Eich
Date: Tue Jul 6 14:37:48 2004 +
Separated Intel drivers from default DriDrivers to avoid building them on
IA64 (Egbert Eich).
Fixed wrong function prototype (Egbert Eich).
Don't test for generic VGA on I
I think it would be good to know exactly why this was changed later on
(memory usage?), and thus if it would be a problem for Ubuntu to change
the default or not.
--
MAXDEVICES too low for some purposes
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/364895
You received this bug notification because you are a me
Well, then GParted is working as it's supposed to work.
As far as I know, there is no way that GParted could cooperate with the
disk-mounter panel applet (that would require a common protocol designed
at freedesktop.org, which currently doesn't exist).
You might want to discuss this further on th
Okay, so maybe it has never been like that upstream, it would still be
useful to have it in Ubuntu.
The problem is, if you have a multiseat-system with 12 seats, that means
12 keyboard + 12 mice = 24 input devices ==> doesn't work with Ubuntu by
default... (but apparently this works with Debian,
As parted says, sda2 & sda3 overlap, which is wrong.
How did you partition this disk?
--
cant install ubuntu by specify partition manually
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/365752
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: xpn
The xpn package in jaunty (1.2.6-1) has an unneeded dependency on
python-pysqlite2.
It already depends on python >= 2.5, so the sqlite3 module (which is
tried first in the xpn code) is always available in the standard
library, and python-pysqlite2 wi
** Attachment added: "fix for superfluous dependency"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/23739893/xpn_1.2.6-1ubuntu1.debdiff
--
xpn package has an unneeded dependency on python-pysqlite2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/340837
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bu
** Changed in: xpn (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
xpn package has an unneeded dependency on python-pysqlite2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/340837
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
Public bug reported:
In "hardy", the idle metapackage should depend on the latest version of
the IDLE Python IDE, but it does't...
After some investigation at packages.ubuntu.com, it seems like this bug affects
feisty, gutsy, hardy & intrepid.
Debian has the same bug in etch, lenny & sid.
** Af
BTW: there is a diff to fix this attached to de Debian bug report.
** Description changed:
In "hardy", the idle metapackage should depend on the latest version of
the IDLE Python IDE, but it does't...
- (Maybe this is also true for some older Ubuntu-versions & for
- "intrepid".)
+ After so
** Bug watch added: freedesktop.org Bugzilla #15948
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15948
** Also affects: xkeyboard-config via
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15948
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
keyboard shortcut mixed when using several keymap
*** This bug is a security vulnerability ***
Public security bug reported:
Binary package hint: python-django
The Django project has released a one-line fix for a possible cross-site
scripting attack against the admin interface:
See: http://groups.google.com/group/django-
announce/browse_thread
This "bug" (I'd rather call it a UI inconsistency) happens between the
release of a package on the servers and the uploading of its
release/changes notes to another server. To reproduce it, try to read
this info for a package shortly after it got uploaded onto the (main)
Ubuntu download server.
-
Well, considering that nobody knows how that "web" ended up there
(although it must have been the result of a bug), it's hard to reproduce
that part, except by adding it manually...
About preserving unknown components: that behaviour still exists.
Actually, if I add a component named "web" to one
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: gnome-session
I can't resize the GNOME session properties window, which makes the
descriptions and some application names (partially) unreadable.
This is on Ubuntu 8.10 and using gnome-session 2.24.1-0ubuntu1
** Affects: gnome-session (Ubuntu)
Impo
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: update-manager
This is on on Ubuntu 8.10 with update-manager 1:0.93.35
When I clicked on the "update for ufw" item in update-manager, I got the
following message:
| The list of changes is not available yet.
|
| Please use http://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+so
Thanks, I added the upstream bug.
** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #554628
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=554628
** Also affects: gnome-session via
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=554628
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
can't resize GNOME session
@Theodore:
Please stop blaming this on binary drivers, they are not the only reason for
this happening; open source drivers aren't magically bug-free, power losses
happen and hardware breaks or starts to behave flaky...
--
Ext4 data loss
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/317781
You received this
@mkluwe:
Filesystems are databases by definition (they are structured sets of data).
But of course not all databases are/work equal, because they serve different
purposes...
Maybe it would be good to amend POSIX to provide an (optional?)
mechanism for guaranteed transactional integrity for some
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: kexec-tools
Currently if you use kexec and you select one of the "recovery" lines in
grub, then after that it will restart in recovery mode every time you
choose to restart your system (at least from the current GNOME UI etc.).
Maybe if 'single' is in '/
According to https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Importance "Wishlist" should
be used for "a request to add a new feature to one of the programs in
Ubuntu".
This bug is about a regression, not about a new feature.
(I personally think it should be marked at least "Medium", as it impacts
a core applicatio
@Dana: that would be another bug (please file a new bug report, if one
doesn't exist yet).
--
[Jaunty] Removal of Update Notifier is WRONG
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/332945
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-
I'm not sure yet if my problem is caused by the same bug, but my /home
which is on an "md" (raid 1) device doesn't get mounted automaticly
anymore since I upgraded to jaunty.
The strange thing is: at least sometimes I could see the md device
assembled when I looked at it, but /home wasn't mounted.
@C. Cooke: that would need to be (at least) 24h for security updates, as
many people delay installing fixes until the beginning or end of a day,
to minimize the interruptions...
@Matthew Paul Thomas: one problem with the "popup update-manager" method
is that it is not persistent. If I close that
Coren, I didn't test it, but I don't think your patch addresses this
bug. What this bug is about is that you can't optionally choose other
applications registered for the same file type (as is common in e.g.
nautilus).
(Sorry if I'm wrong about your patch.)
--
"Open With" dialog not user-friend
ill happen. That way you can make
sure that the wannabe experts that follow all those 'how to "fix"
ubuntu' blogs & websites will still install security updates...
--
Jan Claeys
--
[Jaunty] Update Notifier icon would provide useful status information
https://bug
ta so that something can display it, and provide at least a basic
"something" so that it actually gets shown. (Maybe it's possible to
include this in the new indicator-messages applet, I don't know.)
[*] not you personally of course, but the whole group of people involved
in this
** Changed in: gparted (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
gparted and ubuntu installer refuse to load
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/350404
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bu
Adam: by disconnecting & reconnecting, or uninstalling bluez, you reset
the device to work in a legacy compatibility mode (the BIOS & linux wil
see it as an USB keyboard & mouse). The result is that you can't use
bluetooth for e.g. connecting to your mobile phone.
This sounds like the same bug th
For those people who don't know how to get their machine to boot again
after this bug happened, I'll copy 2 lines from IRC here:
Press Option-Command-P-R until you hear two beeps, that will reset
the NVRAM
then see if it will boot, there is enough efi code in the NVRAM that
by resetting it you
This *is* a duplicate of https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/354240 (which
isn't marked invalid anymore--that was based on an incompletely uploaded
upgrade log).
vasilisc, please coordinate with doko and make sure one bug is marked as
a duplicate of the other ;)
--
package python3.0-minimal 3.0.1-0
GParted should not ask for the root password (there is none in default
Ubuntu), but it should ask for the user's password when started from the
menu (and it does that for me--unless you entered your password shortly
before, which is the default sudo/gksu behaviour in Ubuntu).
Also, formatting as N
What do you mean by "can't mount the partitions"?
(Please describe exactly what you do, what you expect that should
happen, and what happens on your system.)
** Changed in: gparted (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
[jaunty] can't mount/read ntfs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/354215
ome the
solution to get Ubuntu to behave in a sane way, then Ubuntu is doing
something seriously wrong in the usability area (I'm sure MPT will agree
with that ;) ). Never ever forget that medium to very experienced users
are Ubuntu users too, so "user-friendly" has to apply to them t
malware on your PC then obviously nothing can be
considered "authentic" anymore. But I think what Pausanias means is
that you can't put an icon there from outside your PC, e.g. using some
JavaScript on a web page, while websites opening a window is quite
common...
--
Jan Claeys
There should be information about what is wrong in the dialog that you
get when you double click the partition's line in the GParted main
window (I suspect the NTFS partition wasn't unmounted properly). You
can try to check the filesystem in GParted and see if that solves the
problem.
--
[jaunty
@techtonik: it has been in Jaunty since shortly after the GParted 0.4.3
release.
--
gparted need update to latest stable 0.4.4 in Ubuntu 9.04
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/356423
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubun
** Changed in: gparted (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Invalid
--
[jaunty] can't mount/read ntfs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/354215
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: apport
I reported a crash in Synaptic yesterday:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/synaptic/+bug/355415
Now, the "Apport retrace service" invalidated this bug because I don't have
scrollkeeper installed. But scrollkeeper is deprecated and repla
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 341358 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/341358
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 341358
crash report rejected due to wrong dependancy assumptions
--
Apport retrace service invalidates valid crasher bugs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/355
GParted has no official "linux raid" support yet (Curtis is working on
that currently), so upstream GParted doesn't show these devices.
GParted can put a filesystem on e.g. /dev/md0 (if it's not mounted at
that moment of course), and upstream GParted allows that if you launch
GParted with that dev
The problem with that is that GParted is also used on e.g. the live CD,
and there it would be mostly useless to create/edit /etc/fstab (it would
go away after you stop the live-CD. There would need to be a way to
tell which partition is part of which installation and then take into
account those p
BTW: if you have a good idea about how to implement this, please propose it on
the GParted forum:
http://gparted-forum.surf4.info/
--
gparted should support mount point management
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/356129
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, w
@Coren: there are often multiple applications for the same MIME-type
registered with the desktop-environment, but currently in Firefox there
is no way to select them from that list of registered applications, nor
does it allow you to select from the other registered applications (e.g.
because the M
Try right-clicking and choosing Information then?
--
[jaunty] can't mount/read ntfs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/354215
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://
I'm not sure this bug is in GParted (you say the installer is also
affected, and that uses libparted directly).
When you show parted's output, that means that there is no issue with
your hard disk at /dev/sda, but maybe the scanning for devices has a
problem with another device...
Could you provi
I think the suggestion in comment #8 to change 'gdebi' so that it
whitelists packages that are installed by it would help a lot?
--
System cleaner removes explicitly installed third-party packages
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/285746
You received this bug notification because you are a member o
GParted is not used during installation. Ubiquity uses libparted
directly, so I think the Ubiquity developers should look at this...
** Changed in: ubiquity (Ubuntu)
Sourcepackagename: gparted => ubiquity
--
Partitioning at install shows no progess 9.04 beta 5 AMD 64Bit
https://bugs.launchpad.n
There is no ext4-support in the version of GParted that comes with
Intrepid, and without specific ext4 support, there is no way to see the
difference between ext3 & ext4 (basically, ext4 is ext3 plus additional
features).
Ext4-support was added to version 0.4.1 of GParted (Jaunty has GParted
0.4.3
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 278964 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/278964
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 278964
gnome-session-properties window is very small and can't be resized
--
"Sessions Preferences" got problem in other language
https://bugs.launchpad.net/
I tested this on Ubuntu 9.04 and didn't have any problems.
@zipcodeman: maybe your drive was not unmounted cleanly or such?
** Changed in: gparted (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
gparted hangs with unmounted external drives
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/104235
You received this b
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 405022 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/405022
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 405022
gparted crashes on startup
--
crashes disklabel sector size 4096
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/408971
You received this bug notification because you
This is a known limitation/bug in libparted (and supposedly in many
other programs) which doesn't work with (hardware) sector sizes > 512
bytes.
Some explanations can be found when you look through the results of the
following search on their mailing list:
http://www.mail-archive.com/search?q=jim
@dotancohen:
I don't know all the details, but the default page in Firefox is simply a
configuration option, not a patch that changes or replaces a significant amount
of code. What (I think) the Ubuntu developers want is that the Mozilla/Firefox
developers either include this into Firefox and/o
** Also affects: gparted via
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=569921
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
Intrepid, Hardy: Gparted freezes with external USB HD
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/121943
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: gdm
After I upgraded from jaunty to karmic earlier today, the default
keyboard for both gdm and after login was "us" qwerty instead of the
"be" azerty configured before.
Also, the gdm keyboard selection widget at the bottom of gdm didn't
work.
The combi
parted is not gparted, moved to parted package
** Package changed: gparted (Ubuntu) => parted (Ubuntu)
--
parted takes 3 minutes to start up in karmic
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/384279
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
I think it would certainly be useful (if you still have it).
--
resize2fs doesn't notice the partition was fsck'ed
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/373409
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubunt
@andso: we know it's a serious issue, and this limitation of libparted
is probably not an issue if all partitions start at the beginning of a
sector; e.g. when the sector size is 2048 bytes and all partitions start
at a multiple of 2048 bytes, it might work (I can't test that myself
though, as I do
It would be useful if we could determine the number of unused blocks in
another way... :-/
As I told @gedakc on IRC before, it seems like the FAT filesystem header
(? I need to investigate some more) has an optional field that may store
that number, but the fact that it's optional doesn't sound l
The error message says:
/dev/sda1 is apparently in use by the system; will not make a
filesystem here!
I don't think this is related to bug #317709, it actually sounds like a
bug related to 'hal-lock' that is (supposed to be) fixed in jaunty's
GParted version.
So this is a bit weird.
Do you s
** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #571151
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=571151
** Also affects: gparted via
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=571151
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
gparted very slow resizing ntfs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/3899
This is fixed in upstream GParted 0.4.4 and later (karmic has GParted
0.4.5 now, so a backport would fix this).
** Changed in: gparted (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
gparted very slow resizing ntfs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/389956
You received this bug notification because you
You can try with an USB stick or something (I have an old 256 MiB one
that I use for test purposes).
** Changed in: gparted (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
[Jaunty Amd64] Gparted fails to format hard discs to either Ext3 or Ext4
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/390764
You received th
I can't reproduce this...
Did this happen once or always if you try?
** Changed in: gparted (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
remove boot flag on usb causes crash
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/396912
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
I don't use pan anymore at the moment (too many bugs & crashes, so I
moved on to something else...).
If you think it's more stable now, I might try to move back somewhere in
August and see how that goes...
--
'pan2' shouldn't replace 'pan' until it's more stable
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/8
@Theodore Ts'o
> his may be related to a a fundamental design flaw in the Ubuntu
installer
and
> The other was that Ubuntu didn't want to ask the user what time zone
> the user was in, or what the correct time was
The Ubuntu installer has always asked for time zones, so what exactly do
you mean
Well, it *is* an MS-DOS disk label... ;)
Calling it a PC partition label means that people will get confused in
the future when more and more PCs will use GPT by default (as Apple's
PCs already do).
Maybe calling it an "MS-DOS compatible disk label" would be the most
correct?
** Changed in: gpa
about the original report:
VFAT permissions are a mount option (and AFAIK udev sets those correctly
in Ubuntu ?).
---
about comment #2:
The default menu option uses the following command:
gksu --description /usr/share/applications/synaptic.desktop
/usr/sbin/synaptic
That should do the same a
I can see one use-case for keeping the data: if you hibernated before
booting from the live-CD and expect to be able to resume after
repartitioning, but I suppose supporting that is not what most people
expect (and it doesn't work with current GParted anyway, so this is
really a bug).
** Bug watc
Can the original reporter and maybe some of the other responents please
check if the problem they see/saw is related to the bug in Windows
described here:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=346046#c1
BTW: if somebody knows how to link to Microsoft's bugtracker as the
"upstream project"...
David, I'm pretty sure (but not 100% ;) ) that it is the same bug. It's
essentially about re-aligning existing partitions, which isn't really
necessary.
But I'll ask Curtis Gedak (the GParted developer) what he thinks.
--
gparted very slow resizing ntfs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/389956
Yo
Forcing everybody to install the tools for every filesystem imaginable
isn't a good idea of course, but maybe promoting these tools from
'suggested' to 'recommended' would be useful.
OTOH, in Debian they just recently moved some tools from recommended to
suggested:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/
David, did you try to resize that partition by moving the beginning or
by moving the end of it?
** Changed in: gparted (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Incomplete
--
gparted very slow resizing ntfs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/389956
You received this bug notification because you are a me
Thank for replying!
The problem with Windows's chkdsk is that it corrupts the bad clusters
file (& then ignores that corruption), but when you boot Ubuntu, it
fixes that file when it sees the corrupted values, after which Windows
chkdsk gets run because the filesystem was changed by the ntfstools
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 253303 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/253303
** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #575585
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=575585
** Also affects: gparted via
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=575585
Importance: Unknown
That confirms that the upstream bug I linked to is most likely the
culprit for what you saw.
** Changed in: gparted (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Confirmed
--
gparted very slow resizing ntfs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/389956
You received this bug notification because you are a membe
Can you try with parted from the commandline and see what that gives?
It's probably libparted that causes the crash, related to what the warning says?
(Maybe Ubuntu should remove that experimental code from libparted...)
--
gparted crashes on startup
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/405022
You re
> why we don't just find a tool which uses RBL's and be done with the
whole thing?
Because self-learning filters generally perform a lot better after being
trained, when considering both false negatives (no problem if there
aren't many) and false positives (even 1 might get you in trouble). As
(a
** Changed in: gnome-cups-manager (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
Name of "Configure Printers" wrong
https://launchpad.net/bugs/49893
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Not really a sollution for this problem, but why don't you use 'sudo -e
' instead of 'sudo vi ' ?
--
vim should populate skel/.viminfo so ownership is not affected by initial sudo
https://launchpad.net/bugs/58002
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/
Also, I wonder if setting the 'always_set_home' flag in sudoers would
have any bad effects (it's the same as always using the -H option)?
Because, I think, that way such problems won't happen for any program.
And I guess we don't want to add config files to '/etc/skel' for every
possible package...
This is a really *annoying* change, because:
1. It changes one of the most-used shortcuts with no good reason, and most
people won't find the about:config hack (especially not those that will be
confused the most).
2. You need two hands to press Alt+LeftArrow on many non-English keyboards
(i.e.
I have read several of their arguments, and none of them are convincing
IMHO. Why do you think this is a feature?
In my opinion, if hardcore unix users prefer the backspace = pageup
behaviour, they can easily change it, as they are experienced users and
will find the way how to do it, but breakin
@ Arwyn Hainsworth
Firefox doesn't go back to the previous page if you press backspace while
filling out a form, so there is no data loss. And saying that shortcuts are
not meant for average users is denigrating.
Also, consistency is something that often improves usability, but not if
you use i
Okay, you can have data loss if you make two accidental misses in a row,
one with your mouse, the other with your keyboard. It's much easier to
get data loss by making one accidental click on the back button or the
close button or by pressing Ctrl+W or Alt+F4, or ...
I think that Firefox should a
Upstream already rejected this AFAIK, and I don't think a fix by
Mozilla.org could be get before Edgy release anyway.
--
The backspace key pages up instead of going back in history
https://launchpad.net/bugs/60995
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com
Arwyn, do you really want to disable all potantially dangerous keys and
buttons? Firefox would become completely useless very fast if you go
that route...
The possibility for data loss thing is a bug that should be fixed in a
general way that doesn't harm usability; e.g. by asking the user if the
1 - 100 of 454 matches
Mail list logo
