On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 8:48 AM, Daniel T Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This package no longer ships in Ubuntu post-dapper/edgy.
I noticed. Which is a shame, but I suppose if you need vserver you
should either do it yourself or run Debian :-)
--
No kernel-patch-vserver for feisty
https://bug
Hi René
I just took the latest version from packages.debian.org and compiled
it on the box. It has been working fine for several months now.
regards,
Izak
Ps. Korteklippe, interesting domain name, it means short stones? In
dutch it probably would, but I know short is "kurz auf Deutsch" so I'm
On 9/5/06, René Fleschenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Do you know what would be the
> right route to take to get the fix backported to Dapper?
Did a bit of research. Seems like we need to talk to the Masters of
the Universe:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU
--
Dnsmasq crashes when renewing non
Attached my patch to get it going on 2.6.18.
As far as I could determine the changes to fglrx/build_mod/make.sh and
fglrx/build_mod/firegl_public.c are only required for sufficiently new
kernels (where VM_SHM was removed and UTS_RELEASE was moved out of
linux/version.h). For earlier kernels you s
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: kernel-patch-vserver
Wish-list. I even did the work, find it here:
http://www.upfrontsystems.co.za/Members/izak/patch-2.6.20.3vs2.2.0-ubuntu.diff/download
Basically applied the patch for 2.6.20.11, fixed up a few failed
patches, and fixed up vfs calls
Wateenellende? That is funny :-)
Actually, I think this package might be obsolete. You can download
the driver from ATI, do some magic with it and it spits out a debian
package which includes kernel source code for the latest driver. This
actually worked out of the box for me.
Google tells me:
On Dec 29, 2007 1:06 PM, carrasclin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'am wondering if this issue has something to do with this other bug
> report I've posted recently https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source
> /module-assistant/+bug/178789
On further inspection, it seems your problems are actually n
On Dec 29, 2007 1:06 PM, carrasclin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'am wondering if this issue has something to do with this other bug
> report I've posted recently https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source
> /module-assistant/+bug/178789
Looks similar. A lot of drivers are affected by this change
I can confirm this problem (vs 2.2.0) and kernel 2.6.19. It goes away
if you use gcc-3.4, but it does not go away if you add -fno-stack-
protector to CFLAGS.
--
SEGFAULTs when running most tools
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/87075
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
The error you're getting is because the source for the module is for
kernel version 2.6.18 and later. It happens because UTS_RELEASE was
moved to a different header in newer kernels. Apply the attached patch
to make it work with kernels before 2.6.18 (tested with 2.6.17). The
patch simply avoids
It seems my previous note is wrong. Your problem seems to be exactly
the reverse, your kernel is newer than the sl-modem sour ce you're
using. To fix it, you could either get the latest version from
packages.debian.org and build it, or just #include utsrelease.h right
below version.h in the same
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: sysvinit
Upon shutdown, sendsigs will call usplash_down. initscripts does not
depend on usplash (which is a good thing) and should therefore not make
assumptions about it's availability.
Suggested fix:
--- /etc/init.d/sendsigs2006-10-06 13:34:1
12 matches
Mail list logo
