Public bug reported:
Since the move to salt running under Python 3, salt 'pip' states fail
with:
```
2018-02-20 11:11:29,176 [salt.loader ][ERROR ][13011] Failed to import
states pip_state, this is due most likely to a syntax error:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/lib/pyth
Public bug reported:
Since the move to salt running under Python 3, salt 'debconf' states
fail with:
```
[ERROR ] An exception occurred in this state: Traceback (most recent call
last):
File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/salt/state.py", line 1851, in call
**cdata['kwargs'])
File "/us
** Bug watch added: github.com/saltstack/salt/issues #46299
https://github.com/saltstack/salt/issues/46299
** Also affects: salt via
https://github.com/saltstack/salt/issues/46299
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member o
Public bug reported:
BIND 9.10.3+ has additional tuning options for recursive servers that
can be enabled at build time with --enable-fetchlimit. "These features
are intended to optimize recursive server behavior in favor of good
client queries, whilst at the same time limiting the impact of bad
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1626258 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1626258
I do not believe this is a duplicate of bug #1626258 as I continue to
experience the reported issue with salt:
```
python-pip:
Installed: 8.1.1-2ubuntu0.4
salt-minion:
Installed: 2015.8.8+ds-1
$ salt-c
Attached is a debian/patches version of salt pull #33180
(https://github.com/saltstack/salt/pull/33180/files) which corrects this
issue
** Patch added: "salt-33180.patch"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/salt/+bug/1586381/+attachment/4696851/+files/salt-33180.patch
--
You received t
Public bug reported:
Given a configuration of:
WSGIDaemonProcess X user=user group=group threads=10 python
path=/opt/redirect:/opt/landing:/opt/admin
apache's error log contains:
[Mon Jul 11 15:48:45.005148 2016] [mpm_event:notice] [pid 1654:tid
140660516243328] AH00489: Apache/2.4.18 (Ubuntu)
Public bug reported:
Calling unattended-upgrade from cron with an Unattended-Upgrade
::Automatic-Reboot-Time of "+5". This causes unattended-upgrades to
run:
'/sbin/shutdown -r +5'
Systemd's shutdown writes an acknowledgement message to stderr:
Shutdown scheduled for Wed 2016-05-18 04:37:49 BS
Public bug reported:
There is a known performance issue with 'prefetch', which is enabled by
default in 9.10:
https://kb.isc.org/article/AA-01315/0/prefetch-performance-in-
BIND-9.10.html
The fix diff appears to be minimal:
https://source.isc.org/cgi-
bin/gitweb.cgi?p=bind9.git;a=commit;h=05262
Public bug reported:
Pip changed an internal API, which was then cherry-picked into python-
pip (8.1.1-2ubuntu0.1). Salt relies on this API for the 'pip' states,
which now report:
[ERROR ] An exception occurred in this state: Traceback (most recent call
last):
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #781257
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=781257
** Also affects: debian via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=781257
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
** Package changed: debian => net-snmp (Debian)
--
You r
Public bug reported:
dhcpd no longer stops when sent a SIGTERM, but appears to lock up on a
futex.
Final few lines of strace:
--
sendto(6, "<182>Feb 24 15:12:38 dhcpd[1414]"..., 58, MSG_NOSIGNAL, NULL, 0) = 58
write(2, "Server starting service.", 24Server starting service.) = 24
write(2, "\n", 1
Public bug reported:
=
Description:Ubuntu Xenial Xerus (development branch)
Release:16.04
ifupdown:
Installed: 0.8.10ubuntu1
Candidate: 0.8.10ubuntu1
=
With an /etc/network/interfaces file containing:
auto eno16780032
iface eno16780032 inet dhcp
iface eno16780032 inet6 dhcp
On
Adding '-tentative' to the ip call in /lib/ifupdown/wait-for-ll6.sh
corrects this issue for me:
--- /lib/ifupdown/wait-for-ll6.sh.old 2016-02-08 23:58:02.341820711 +
+++ /lib/ifupdown/wait-for-ll6.sh 2016-02-09 00:01:18.128000560 +
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
delay=${IF_LL_INTERVAL:-0.1}
f
isc-dhcp 4.3.3-5ubuntu8 appears to fix bug #1549736, but not this issue.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1543794
Title:
isc-dhcp-server fails to start on second & further attempts with
Public bug reported:
virt-manager fails to start:
$ virt-manager --debug --no-fork
[Sun, 28 Feb 2016 19:18:22 virt-manager 7592] DEBUG (cli:256) Launched with
command line: /usr/share/virt-manager/virt-manager --debug --no-fork
[Sun, 28 Feb 2016 19:18:22 virt-manager 7592] DEBUG (virt-manager:14
Bug #1549330 ("dhcpd 4.3.3-5ubuntu7 aborts after getting stuck on futex
(bind 9.10 library interaction?)"), which has been marked a duplicate of
bug #1551351 is reporting the same symptoms - dhcpd doesn't respond to
SIGTERM and appears to be stuck on a futex. I think this is related to
the switch
The original primary issue (that pid files were not being written at
all) was resolved in isc-dhcp 4.3.3-5ubuntu9. However both isc-dhcp-
server & isc-dhcp-server6 systemd units continue to use the same
RuntimeDirectory, so that when either service is restarted (eg to
reconfigure), the pid file of
Public bug reported:
=
Description:Ubuntu Xenial Xerus (development branch)
Release:16.04
ifupdown:
Installed: 0.8.10ubuntu1
Candidate: 0.8.10ubuntu1
=
For the inet6 static method, interfaces(5) implies that only 'address'
is required (and thus netmask is optional), however settl
Public bug reported:
During the first start of isc-dhcp-server (using the systemd service
unit), a blank dhcpd.leases file is created (presumably owned by
root:root). dhcpd starts successfully (and then exits due to no subnet
definitions, that's expected).
Attempting to start the service again f
Public bug reported:
dhcpd reports 'Can't create PID file /run/dhcp-server/dhcpd.pid' (or
'/run/dhcp-server/dhcpd6.pid' for isc-dhcp-server6), and no file is
found /run/dhcp-server.
Additionally, both isc-dhcp-server & isc-dhcp-server6 service unit files
specify the RuntimeDirectory 'dhcp-server'
Public bug reported:
In some situations (a non-tiny zone size), BIND9.8 pre-9.8.2b1 fails to
correctly validate NSEC3 records covering wildcard names.
This is recorded in BIND's CHANGES:
3175. [bug] Fix how DNSSEC positive wildcard responses from a
NSEC3 signe
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1203976 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1203976
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1203976
DNS wildcards fail to resolve with DNSsec enabled
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribe
Public bug reported:
This is regarding the PPA version given by the source line:
deb http://ppa.launchpad.net/sssd/updates/ubuntu precise main
# lsb_release -rd
Description:Ubuntu 12.04.1 LTS
Release:12.04
# apt-cache policy sssd
sssd:
Installed: 1.8.5-0ubuntu0.1~precise1
Candida
Confirmation - 1.8.5-0ubuntu0.1~precise2 starts correctly. Thanks!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1073498
Title:
PPA version '1.8.5-0ubuntu0.1~precise1' will not start due to merge
25 matches
Mail list logo
