everyone seems to know what to do with this attachment, however I only
know about .deb packages, someone kindly help out the clueless ?
--
Really Slick Screensavers use 100% CPU
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/129142
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, whic
ok, here we go again, I think I know what it is. but more importantly I
know that its not an installable update. why can't we get fixes for bug
in .deb packages guys ? common, I'm not a developer, I'm a user and I
use hardy right now, its beyond me how a fix for a problem this big is
only being tal
lol, ok guys, I'll be patientdo you think it will be ready in the
next hour or so ? *grin* ( thanks for letting me know.)
--
Really Slick Screensavers use 100% CPU
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/129142
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subsc
no, I don't have your issue. My problem started AFTER there was an
update, I never got it working right after that update. So I decided to
do a fresh new install because it was working before the update, but not
after that update. After the fresh install, the problem has not re-
appeared. It is ho
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: network-manager
I'm getting frequent wireless disconnects in 8.10 running prism54pci
drivers when other wireless clients are not losing connections. I have
adjusted the beacon interval and DTIM values in the router with no
success. I have seen others with
this is a duplicate of bug #114079 . I have been waiting for the fix for
this for over a year now.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gstreamer0.10-pitfdll/+bug/114079
--
amd64 version of gstreamer0.10-pitfdll?
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/172258
You received this bug notification beca
I'm not experiencing this problem on ANY install or upgrade of intrepid
8.10.
--
compiz fails to start
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/222002
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.
JUST an FYI to Alberto and anyone with an older NV11 or so GPU, I
installed the Nvidia driver that was posted in this thread late last
week(96.x), directly from the nvidia web site per the instructions that
were posted here. then Alberto strongly suggested that we wait for the
ubuntu deb package, b
Ii should clarify my point, in the past the 96.x drivers would not
install or enable on my GeForce2 Go laptop, so I was forced to use the
71.x drivers. This time however the 96.xx drivers installed without
complaint - even if it was directly from the Nvidia web site using the
Nvidia installer. So,
I am having this problem on every computer I have installed 8.10 on. I
have some computers connected to a KVM, but others ARE NOT. my laptop IS
NOT connected to a KVM and the same problem exist. This problem existed
in 7.04 and was finally corrected in 7.10 and 8.04, but now its back. it
does not m
@dgjones
For reference I have your same exact GPU, I get 440+ FPS while compiz is
running with an 850mhz CPU. I do nothing special in setup and as I
recall, SBA and FW's are not supported on that card, so there's no
tweaking.
code:
cat /proc/driver/nvidia/agp/status
or
cat /proc/driver/nvidia/
@dgjones
wow ! those commands no longer work, and I have no clue what new commands
provide the info that we need. sorry, maybe someone else knows the new commands
?
--
[Intrepid] nvidia_drv.so: undefined symbol: AllocateScreenPrivateIndex
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/251107
You received this
these two work:
cat /proc/driver/nvidia/registry
or
cat /proc/driver/nvidia/version
you should get what you need there:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ glxgears
2088 frames in 5.0 seconds = 417.542 FPS
2207 frames in 5.0 seconds = 441.245 FPS
2226 frames in 5.0 seconds = 444.931 FPS
2132 frames in 5.0 se
I read something above about this being fixed..humm, nope its not
fixed on kernel 2.6.27
--
Keyboard keys get stuck and repeat (Feisty, Gutsy)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/124406
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
nearly two months later and testing ubuntu 8.10 RC this new version of
RSS-GLX 0.8.2 is still not showing up in the repos. The RC version of
RSS-GLX is 0.8.1-10ubuntu2. How much longer before this critical fix is
available ?
--
Really Slick Screensavers use 100% CPU
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bug
I did lots of searching on the net regarding this problem, what I found
is that 2.6.27 has been out there for months and this OLD driver has
been known for a good long while. several distros have been "waiting"
for months for this updated old drivers release. Alberto makes it seem
like it just arou
just to be clear, several people here said just be patient and wait, it
will be fixed and old drivers updated by Nvidiamy point was that
several distros have been waiting already for months for this bug fix
for the old drivers and they are still waiting. Telling people to be
patient implies th
and Alberto, you do an awesome job ! there was no dissatisfaction with
your work regarding this, it was the absence of statements about this
problem and concerns about how to know if we should upgrade or not if we
have a working accelerated driver in hardy.
This is really frustrating as the new 8.
guess I'll have to wait for Alberto too, no clue how to grab it and get
it installed/working. However I did not see anything posted about which
legacy cards were supported. I have a notebook with a Geforce2 Go and
had to use the 71.xx legacy driver in hardy, I see nothing about this
new driver sup
actually I posted at the same time as the post with instructions above,
new drivers are installed and working just fine for a Geforce2 Go. One
little issue, compiz will not enable ( desktop effects ) but I believe
that the compiz test says the old card just does not meet minimal
requirements (32mb
and no one even bothered to read my comments about this bug
--
Keyboard stops responding in X
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/195805
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubun
chris,
I think I do not know enough about linux..the script above produces errors
when I run it, it can't find vmware-server-kernel-modules or
build-essentials... however I believe build-essentials is already installed,
there are other errors as follows :
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo bash
[EM
cancel that, I found a tutorial that was simple and easy to follow. I
now have vmware-server 1.0.7 installed and functioning on 8.0.4
--
No vmnet module for -386er Kernel
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/185415
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is su
where is this fix ? I have been waiting for some time now for the 64 bit
fix to this problem and I still do not see a pitfdll for hardy 64bit
anywhere.
** Changed in: gstreamer0.10-pitfdll (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Released => Incomplete
--
GstFFMpegCsp: subclass did not specify output siz
I just want to remind the devs that this bug showed up for the first
time when compiz was added to ubuntu. this bug did not exist prior to
the effects addition leading one to believe that the OGL rendering seems
to be getting in the way of saving the preferences.
--
synaptic manager preferences n
with the new vmware server version 1.0.6, the any-any update is no
longer needed, so when will we see vmware returned to the repros ? I
have searched and searched and find nothing about when we can expect
anything at all in the partners repro. Can we get some kind of comment
from ubuntu or a dev th
where is vmware for hardy ? I learned that the any-any update was
causing ubuntu some issues for support, but now vmware server 1.0.6 is
out and the any-any update is no longer needed to install. when can we
expect to see vmware return to the repo ? we need some kind of comment
from the devs or fro
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 174191 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/174191
The bug is that the screensavers use way too many resources and send the
CPU usage to 100%. And if the end user does not monitor his system CPU
then the screensavers prevent copy commands and other such opera
Thormod,
I really do not believe that I installed the packages you want me to
uninstall.actually, I just did a search in synaptic and see that neither
one of the packages you want me to uninstall are installed. I'm not trying to
contradict you, but there is nothing for me to uninstall at the
wow, that was a mistake, I just installed the 2 packages mentioned above
and half locked the computer requiring a hard reset. IMO they should be
removed from the repo until they do not present this condition. but
thats just my opinion. this test was preformed on a dual-cpu 2.0 ghtz
(not dual-core)
hu, I'm not sure I agree. As I stated above, I have seen this high
CPU racing condition every since I started using Ubuntu 4 years ago. Its
not something new. its there with each and every driver that Nvidia has
released to the linux community. I do not agree that this is a driver
issue as I h
here is the web site that the screensavers I am talking about come from:
http://www.reallyslick.com/. these are the very same screensavers that
are offered in the Debian/Ubuntu repro as I run on windows. run these
screensavers in windows and you get the very same CPU racing condition
as you do here
I'd like to take one minute to make sure that I am not giving out the
wrong impression, I'm simply trying to get to the bottom of the 100% CPU
racing condition on screensavers. I'm not knocking any code or anyones
coding skills.
I am not reporting any lock-up issues here, I simply wanted to mentio
below I copy and pasted an email that I received from the author of
these screensavers, it turns out that this is expected behavior. however
he said that there are options to help moderate this issue, but since we
have no configuration dialog in the screensavers dialog, we can not do
anything about
yep !! that works( at least in a windowed setting, the real test is does
it work in native full screen mode ? ), now how do I get that to do the
same thing whenever a random SS starts ? where are these .desktop files
you are referring to ? I will be happy to do some experiments to find a
good balan
ok, I just completed making adjustments to the .desktop files and I seem
to have had success looking at the system resource monitor(the CPU usage
)..grrr, but when I re-run the benchmark test as described in the
wiki link above to compare old results with new results, it looks like
the .desktop
ok, here are the values I used in the .desktop files that look like they
produce CPU usage lower than 30%, but again, I was just doing visual
monitoring, not actual CPU values:
gene 6417 68.4 0.3 39424 6492 pts/0 RL 22:31 0:20
/usr/lib/xscreensaver/sundancer2- fixed -n <-
gene 6104 7
well, I ran the first one...LOL, it ran for 2 hours and I just now
killed the prossesgrrr. you said don't touch the keyboard or mouse
so I followed directions and just let it run. (please don't tell me to
follow you over the cliff - LOL ) no output in the log file, but got all
kind of output fr
I cannot determine which column is the CPU usage in the new batch
command. I have output, but don't see anything that resembles a % of
100. below are the results of the sort after running, it does not look
like the batch ends itself, I had to ctrl+c to end the loop.
0 1000 8708 6464 30 10 3
I could not figure out how to add my results to that link. I could not
run full screen because the full screen locked up requiring power off,
no keyboard or mouse.
USER PID %CPU %MEMVSZ RSS TTY STAT START TIME COMMAND
-
I'm sorry, I don't see how this is a work around... I still do not see
any vmware packages in the repros. how does this work around add them to
the package manager so that they can be installed ? I thought the
sources.list was responsible for adding new repros to synaptic ?
--
No vmnet module for
"In jaunty you have a checkbox" well, that's nice, however this is an
issue with intrepid and this bug was reported for intrepid. Can we
please keep THIS bug post limited to intrepid and open a bug report for
jaunty when it is released ? We are here looking for solutions to a
current release OS bug
I too have this problem, however I am not sure the details are the same.
As stated, when system setting is checked for a wireless connection,
upon reboot the status is reverted to the previous state where its
unchecked. this results in frequent connection/disconnection from the
AP. The symptom ho
I thought this problem was resolved for me by simply doing a fresh
install, however this does not appear to be the case. I found another
bug report that is similar to this bug report and posted to that bug
report:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-manager/+bug/281711
I don't do co
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 156085 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/156085
I for one am getting tired of getting this message, can someone figure
out why this error from virtualbox never get looked at or fixed in
ubuntu ? running virtualbox version 2.10 STILL gets this error( and
sta
I'm not finding that this ppa has fixed the disconnect issues in 8.10. I
just can't get the wireless to stay connected.
--
network-manager issues with system settings AND secrets (Was: doesn't save wep
key on a "system setting" connection)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/281711
You received this
I installed and tested on both 32bit and 64bit, installs just fine, I
did get a warning that the sanity check could not be preformed due to
multiple nvidia.ko's found in the kernel 2.6.24.19(32 bit pc), however
it did not seem to cause problems. ( I thought I had removed previous
kernels completely
I'm having a keyboard problem on a dell latitude C800 laptop. I get dead
keys. they seem to "go dead" when the laptop lid is shut while the
system is up and running as best I can tell. I had assumed that the
notebook keyboard needed to be replaced because sometimes they dead keys
come back to life
I'm not entirely sure what the fix was that was released. however I have
insured that I have ALL updates and my problem showed up again a month
after this fix was released and bug report was closed.
** Changed in: ubuntu
Assignee: (unassigned) => firefeather (firefeather)
Status: Fix R
yes, this bug is resolved.
It seems that when each ubuntu flavor finally upgrades xorg to 7.2 or
higher video detection problems go away. BTW 7.10 rocks !!! good job
guys ! pass this on to who ever for a well deserved pat on the back.
there are some small problems with 7.10 video configuration,
can someone get this bug added to ubuntu ?
** Changed in: emerald (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Confirmed
--
emerald themer doesn't work
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/203791
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
I can confirm this problem still exists in 8.04. I went thru all the
above tests and trials all to no avail. vboxdrv is clearly not getting
installed. With no VMWare available, I decided to try VBOX, my uname -r
is : 2.6.24-17-generic which differs from the above which indicates
kernel 2.6.24-16-ge
I am writing this 16 hours after the post directly above this post, so
it looks like 16 hours later the 24.0.1 version is still not there ( no
.17 kernel ) is that right ?
--
no module built for 2.6.24-17-generic
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/226753
You received this bug notification because yo
most sincere apologies, I had no clue but I do understand. Not to be
making a big issue, but I do not consider a small minor revision change
to be hi-jacking. Its these kinds of comments that turns off new linux
users from reporting bugs. The more correct way of handling minor kernel
change issues
@Daniel
my tone above did not come out like I had intended, I can't edit, I understand,
I was just hoping for more guidence for future posting, I really did/do think I
was correctly posting for this bug. thanks for the link to the right bug tho :)
--
virtualbox cannot initiate due to vboxdrv mi
I was aware that I was using the proposed.yes, my doing. This
was the first time that it had actually bit me like this, I knew the
risk...lol, I just did not know that my kernel version 17 came from that
repo. it was no big deal for me 'cause I do mainly testing, however I
see now that it w
@Daniel
I just checked to see if the release is available yet and it does not look like
it is. your links show that it was compiled last night or the job ran, I'm not
real sure if it ran clean or not, there was too much for me to understand in
the logs. anyway, I'm not rushing because I took you
I can confirm this to be a problem. There is no way to create a share
out of the box with the release of 8.04 hardy. This WAS working
wonderfully in Gutsy 7.10. There was a folder sharing GUI on the admin
menu under system tools, this seems to have been removed from Hardy
8.04.
I happen to agree
see screenshot attachment:
This is just plain too much of a hassle: no one should have to go thru
this just to share some files on his computer. Help me use linux, not
hassle me when I try to use it. someone above suggested to install
nautilus-share, where in this distro does it say that there is
Public bug reported:
As described in the title, file and folder sharing is now broke in hardy
release version of 8.04. There seems to be a bug about this reported in
bug# 215810, where I have confirmed and added comments. This does not
appear to be a nautilus-share problem, it appears that folder
** Attachment added: "Screenshot.png"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13898937/Screenshot.png
--
folder/file sharing does not work
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/221978
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs m
Public bug reported:
on fresh installs of 32/64 bit (hardy heron) final release compiz fails
to start. This is also a problem when upgrading to hardy 8.04 from 7.10,
the path gets changed. I had a fully functional 7.10 with all compiz
effects enabled and working like a champ. after the upgrade com
for crying out loud, I was trying to share a folder in my home directory
! I am god for my home folder, I would expect to have permissions to do
anything I want for folders in my home folder.
Second, if it was resolved I would not have just reported it one hour
ago. file and folder sharing DOES NO
My statement is that the folder sharing service that WAS installed by
default in ubuntu 7.10 has been removed from hardy 8.04. The bug you are
trying to get me to go look at does not apply to this bug. I have
installed 2 copies of the final release of hardy heron and this service
that existed in 7
I strongly suggest you understand a bug before you just close it. if it
was fixed, I would not have reported the bug an hour ago for a fresh
install of the newly released hardy heron.
** Changed in: nautilus-share (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Patrice Vetsel (vetsel-patrice)
Statu
@trollord
funny, your reaction is close to alberto milone's of Envy who thought it was
weird
what is more interesting to me is that on a fourth computer, a lap-top, this
problem DID NOT happen. that lap-top did not have nvidia card, it was intel
I945gml video. On my 3 computers where the pro
oh, and one other thing, I don't use fglrx, I use nvidia. I stated that
in my bug report.
--
compiz fails to start
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/222002
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu
There is only one problem with that article..it does not apply to
this bug and you changed the status to invalid I did 2 fresh
installs and one upgrade, all 3 had the same result. the article
specifically says UPGRADES.
** Changed in: compiz (Ubuntu)
Status: Invalid => New
--
com
opps, looks like I stated Nvidia in a follow-up reply above, not the
OP.
--
compiz fails to start
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/222002
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubun
The article also says: "Remember, this is why you should only install
such drivers from Ubuntu." and I did install my Nvidia drivers using
Ubuntu restricted drivers manger!
--
compiz fails to start
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/222002
You received this bug notification because you are a member
ok, this is the contents of that file:
# Ubuntu specifc compiz-manager configuration file
# goes into /etc/xdg/compiz/compiz-manager
# works with git://anongit.compiz-fusion.org/fusion/misc/compiz-manager
COMPIZ_BIN_PATH="/usr/bin/"
PLUGIN_PATH="/usr/lib/compiz/"
COMPIZ_NAME="compiz.real"
plea
I can confirm this bug in Final release of Hardy Heron. Emerald does
nothing after installed from synaptic. Issuing the following command:
emerald --replace &
followed by a command "exit" in the terminal window will enable emerald
functionality ONLY until reboot occurs. following the boot, have t
@ Andrew
I had already tried the alt-F2 path, but that did not work, the reason as far
as I can tell, is that it looks like the & was needed at the end of the command
( I have no idea what it is or does ) . if the emerald --replace is issued in a
command window and exit is not then entered after
ok, its finally there, however I get the following error when trying to
retrieve from synaptic : W: Failed to fetch
http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/universe/v/virtualbox-ose-modules/virtualbox-ose-modules-generic_24.0.1_amd64.deb
404 Not Found [IP: 91.189.88.46 80]
--
no module built
ok, IP is now found and package was installed. However not successfully
installed. To get VirtualBox to run, I had to issue the following
command : sudo insmod /lib/modules/2.6.24-17-generic/misc/vboxdrv.ko
that I found in another thread which solved my problem and VirtualBox is
now running on .17
after rebooting I get the following error:
VirtualBox kernel driver not installed. The vboxdrv kernel module was either
not loaded or /dev/vboxdrv was not created for some reason. Please install the
virtualbox-ose-modules package for your kernel, e.g.
virtualbox-ose-modules-generic..
VBox statu
ok, so I ran sudo insmod /lib/modules/2.6.24-17-generic/misc/vboxdrv.ko again
to get virtualbox working again then your command :
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ modprobe -r vboxdrv
FATAL: Error removing vboxdrv (/lib/modules/2.6.24-17-generic/misc/vboxdrv.ko):
Operation not permitted
so I guess that I am
@daniel
this is the output of your request:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo depmod
[sudo] password for gene:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ modprobe -r vboxdrv
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ modprobe vboxdrv
FATAL: Error inserting vboxdrv
(/lib/modules/2.6.24-17-generic/misc/vboxdrv.ko): Operation not permitted
--
no
@Daniel
hummm, ok, so I decided to see if I could survive reboots after the "sudo
insmod /lib/modules/2.6.24-17-generic/misc/vboxdrv.ko" now that I ran "sudo
depmod" manually and it actually does survive reboots nowI booted twice and
virtualbox is working without errors now,,,
@Lucian
ok, I can confirm that the NM update as well as the gnome-N-M update
that came out several weeks ago DID NOT resolve the problem I am having
with hidden SSID AP's, however I seem to recall that the wireless
drivers had to be updated to accept or pass some new Variable that was
needed. I really did
I received an email message this morning stating :
** Changed in: network-manager
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
So I did a manual update of the affected computer and nothing was
updated. If this bug fix has been released, then why would there be no
NM updates today ? Also, this will be
, my bad.hummm, no way to edit. I did not realize how this
launchpad thing was setup, it looks like I did not understand that this
was not a Ubuntu bug reporting tool, but rather a common location for
affected distros ? is that correct ?
I guess that really answers my next question, I
I would be the very last person on earth to contradict anyone who has
Linux expertise as I have so little that I'm just not going to go
there.however, I have been using Ubuntu since 5.04 and I use only
Nvidia cards, and not one single release since 5.04 had good drivers
then according to the co
I have this very same problembut I did not see in this bug report
that NM see's the AP but refuses to connect if SSID broadcast is turned
off. I can understand why it might be a problem connecting if the AP is
hidden, but for Gutsy (NM) to know the AP is there, display the hidden
AP as a choice
Fabien,
The package you have attached is for i386, and will not install on 64bit
Ubuntu. is there a work around ?
And I have one question, I am not completely clear as to why we need to
wait till Hardy gets released to have this confirmed bug corrected in
the repo's, that blows me away. Can some
done loads of trouble shooting.
Gene Caldwell
-Original Message-
From: Bryce Harrington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Bug 103530 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Bug 103530] Re: continuing Install problems, no video
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 23:01:41 -
**
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: gnome-screensaver
I have been running Ubuntu for 3 years now and have waited patiently for
the screen savers to get much needed attention. I have been experiencing
100% CPU usage for the majority of the installed screen savers and can't
believe no one has
I am having a laptop shutdown problem also that does not appear to be
heat related to me at all, so that is why I am adding to this bug
report. Unlike the author of this bug report, I am running Gutsy, did a
fresh install, was running Win2kSP4 prior to this install and had no
heat problems at all.
Public bug reported:
I'm not real sure where this bug fits in, but I have had several
software crashes post live CD installation. I know that the crash
handler can catch a crash, but I'm not totally sure that it is with
Gutsy. When I have booted computer"S" with the live CD and proceeded to
instal
that depends on which computer you want to know about, its happening on
ALL my computers, though all computers have Nvidia cards in them. they
are all fresh installs of gutsy, newer Nvidia cards and slightly older
cardsGeforce fx 5500 through Geforce 7950 GT.
--
window decorator shadows
https
Actually you may very well be correct on my second part of the problem.
However I am not sure why that makes it less a bug because it only lasts
for 30 minutes before it goes to sleep ? why on earth would an
application designed to be "green" friendly race the CPU until it goes
to sleep ?
Second,
I should add that in each case, if I go to the window decorations plugin
and set the shadow effects to extreme settings of radius an intensity,
then i can get very dim shadows to display on the different sides of
windows, which shows that they are working, they are simply suppressed
or restricted s
gconftool-2 --recursive-unset /apps/compiz changed nothing...ran as
sudo, rebooted, no change.
--
window decorator shadows
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/174180
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs
I have absolutely no clue what that is you want me to run.I did
however use the advanced compiz-desktop-effects application and select
the reset to defaults option shown under preferences..it did indeed
change everything back to fresh install defaults except this one thing
with the drop sha
I don't have emerald, never did. I did try to get it installed on one
computer but could not figure out why it would not work.I should
repeat, this problem started happening about two weeks ago, first on one
computer, then another on, then on another one...its not like it
happened on all my com
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: synaptic
This bug seems to be similar to bug report:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/28250 .
Synaptic does not remember nor does it seem to check for a preference of
considering suggestions as dependencies. I have set this pr
here is the second, its sharper and more illustrative...
** Attachment added: "Screenshot-1.png"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/10753040/Screenshot-1.png
--
window decorator shadows
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/174180
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bug
No, I'm sorry, it doesn't answer my question. Though, it may very well
be more an issue that I disagree with. Why on earth would Ubuntu NOT
want to collect information about crashes that occur with Ubuntu
supplied software ? You have an automatic crash handler that CAN collect
crash reports for Ubu
ok, yes, but I'm going to have to change colors and backgrounds to make
it visible. give me a little bit to upload, should be easy, but its
not... LOL
--
window decorator shadows
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/174180
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, whi
What I am trying to show is that it looks like it has been designed to
be that way because its perfect in the one source origin light source,
however it did not function that way for the first 3 weeks. What I see
is that there are NO 3D desktop effect shadows on the bottom half of my
desk top, nor
1 - 100 of 174 matches
Mail list logo
