I'm running jaunty with everything up-to-date.
I was experiencing segfaults similar to those described in this ticket
when disk I/O was high. For example, when dd'ing a raw image file to an
LVM volume, when the image was about 60G, caused several kvm processes
to crash.
I was able to reproduce t
exe, OK. Nevertheless, the 1:84+dfsg-0ubuntu12.1~rc2ppa3 package has
been more stable for me on jaunty than 1:84+dfsg-0ubuntu11.
--
kvm segfaults
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359447
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
Dustin,
rc2 in the PPA (1:84+dfsg-0ubuntu12.1~rc2ppa3) appears to have already
fixed the segfault.
No segfaults in 3 days and I've applied some high disk I/O to the
machine.
I can't test rc4 right away b/c rc2 is on a production machine. Once I
can declare another maintenance window and reboot
No problem! Thanks for cherry-picking those fixes and providing us a
more stable kvm package.
--
kvm segfaults
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359447
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bu
I'm setting up a new jaunty box within the next few days. I will
install the jaunty-proposed version of kvm and report the results.
--
kvm segfaults
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359447
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
I enabled jaunty-proposed on a new jaunty box and upgraded kvm:
$ sudo apt-get install kvm
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Suggested packages:
ubuntu-vm-builder hal vd
Update:
No crashes on jaunty-proposed, although I have not stressed the box much
yet.
No crashes on RC2 (1:84+dfsg-0ubuntu12.1~rc2ppa3) in 11 days (since
upgrade to RC2), and I *have* stressed the box.
--
kvm segfaults
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359447
You received this bug notification be
Do you think it would have a good chance of being accepted as an SRU? I
know those are not taken lightly.
--
Emulated serial port does not work with FreeBSD 8.0 guest
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/518346
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subsc
+ *
debian/patches/qemu-serial-lost-tx-irqs-affecting-freebsd-new-uart-driver.patch:
+cherry-pick from upstream
+- Fixes qemu serial vs. FreeBSD 8.0 uart(4) not working properly
+
+ -- Garry Dolley Wed, 09 Dec 2009 03:53:31 -0800
+
