[Bug 1218625] Re: samsung galaxy ace i (gt-s5830i) not plus detected after upgrade.

2013-09-04 Thread Francesco Bonanno
I've upgrated yesterday and today (4-09-2013) works on both kernels (the latest and the lowlatency I usually use). I do daily the upgrades so before I set the bug to fix released if you don't have problems I'll try with the next upgrades of the kernel and co to see if the bug is still in the system

[Bug 1218625] Re: samsung galaxy ace i (gt-s5830i) not plus detected after upgrade.

2013-09-25 Thread Francesco Bonanno
Ok something strange, I've noticed that my phone isn't plus detected when the system upgrafe the dkms modules. So the next upgrade I'll add the logs of it. For this reason I don't knoe if I've to set this big as confirmed i change the target of it. -- You received this bug notification because yo

[Bug 1218625] [NEW] samsung galaxy ace i (gt-s5830i) not plus detected after upgrade.

2013-08-29 Thread Francesco Bonanno
Public bug reported: I've saucy on my netbook since the repositories for it were published (I use it for every dev branches of ubuntu). So I upgrade this installation every day. Before the 28th August 2013 (utc +1 timezone) I can use my device as storage device or debug, and I've had the notificat

[Bug 1218625] Re: samsung galaxy ace i (gt-s5830i) not plus detected after upgrade.

2013-08-29 Thread Francesco Bonanno
** Description changed: I've saucy on my netbook since the repositories for it were published (I use it for every dev branches of ubuntu). So I upgrade this installation every day. Before the 28th August 2013 (utc +1 timezone) I can use my device as storage device or debug, and I've had th

[Bug 1218625] Re: samsung galaxy ace i (gt-s5830i) not plus detected after upgrade.

2013-10-14 Thread Francesco Bonanno
It seems fixed so I change the status of the bug. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1218625 Title: samsung galaxy

[Bug 1088775] Re: gwibber does not refresh Facebook feeds

2013-01-14 Thread Francesco Bonanno
I guys . I've this problem with gwibber-service : gwibber-service -do root MainThread : INFO Logger initialized Service MainThread : INFO Service starting Service MainThread : INFO Running from the source tree /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/gobject/constants.py:24

[Bug 1088775] Re: gwibber does not refresh Facebook feeds

2013-01-14 Thread Francesco Bonanno
This with the suggest of Vampire (#16) works perfectly for me :) . -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1088775 Title: gwibber does not refresh Facebook feeds To manage notifications about

[Bug 1088775] Re: gwibber does not refresh Facebook feeds

2013-01-14 Thread Francesco Bonanno
In comment https://bugs.launchpad.net/gwibber/+bug/1088775/comments/45 , the lines are 38 and 39 (they aren't 39 and 40) . Sorry for the mistake XD . -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/10887

[Bug 1088775] Re: gwibber does not refresh Facebook feeds

2013-01-14 Thread Francesco Bonanno
Ok, but the problem was only with gwibber , so think it was of the group :D . Sorry for the mistake (but I've upgrade the OS at 4:30 pm) . -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1088775 Title:

[Bug 1088775] Re: gwibber does not refresh Facebook feeds

2013-01-15 Thread Francesco Bonanno
Oh, just a think , where are comments from 45 to 47 ? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1088775 Title: gwibber does not refresh Facebook feeds To manage notifications about this bug go

[Bug 1088775] Re: gwibber does not refresh Facebook feeds

2013-01-15 Thread Francesco Bonanno
Only a thing , where are comments form 45 to 47 ? Can I rewrite them ? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1088775 Title: gwibber does not refresh Facebook feeds To manage notifications a

[Bug 1110645] Re: lightdm-session fails with x-session-manager: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgdk-3.so.0: undefined symbol: wl_registry_interface

2013-01-30 Thread Francesco Bonanno
I've this bug too, only my machine it's a 32bit terminal . -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1110645 Title: lightdm-session fails with x-session-manager: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib/

[Bug 1018262] Re: [ASUS 1015cx] Retask single 3-pin jack as microphone

2012-07-30 Thread Francesco Bonanno
I've seen the patch, and well with those I can't use the stereo microphon, but I think I'll use more the jack headphone/microphone. I've seen you ( David Henningsson ) have created a ppa for this problem, but there aren't any packages in that. I've Ubuntu 12.10 developement branch so if it isn't a

[Bug 1018262] Re: [ASUS 1015cx] Retask single 3-pin jack as microphone

2012-07-30 Thread Francesco Bonanno
*Forever -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1018262 Title: [ASUS 1015cx] Retask single 3-pin jack as microphone To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/u

[Bug 1018262] Re: [ASUS 1015cx] Retask single 3-pin jack as microphone

2012-08-06 Thread Francesco Bonanno
Well, I have confused ideas now. This is for a little particular. The series of the asus eeepc 1001px have a lot of subseries, for example my eeepc is an asus eeepc 1001px-blk003x , but exist the asus eeepc 1001px- whi006s etc, so I'm sorry, but at the moment I'm not sure about my eeepc 1001px uses

[Bug 1018262] Re: [ASUS 1015cx] Retask single 3-pin jack as microphone

2012-07-29 Thread Francesco Bonanno
Hello everyone, i've the same problem; but my netbook is an ASUS EeePC 1001px and it uses a one 4-pin jack. I'd like to look the patch at the moment, but in your opinion I can use it ? I'd like to use a 3-pin jack headphone with integrated microphone and a 2-pin stereo microphone only. I've to add

[Bug 1018262] Re: [ASUS 1015cx] Retask single 3-pin jack as microphone

2012-08-11 Thread Francesco Bonanno
Nothing, nothing, is a 3-pin jack too :D , so when I've time, I'll download source code of Linux , the patches and I'll patch the kernel source and I'll start to compile it :D . Bye and thank you :D . -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscrib

[Bug 1018262] Re: [ASUS 1015cx] Retask single 3-pin jack as microphone

2012-08-11 Thread Francesco Bonanno
*"It is" , sorry for the error, I can speak and write in English very well, but my mother tongue is Italian, so when I'm inattentive, I'll make some mistakes, but I know in English the subject must be specified (the other hand, in Italian there is this possibility, this is the reason of my error :D

[Bug 927828] Re: sudo: pam_mount.c:417: modify_pm_count: Assertion `user != ((void *)0)' failed.

2012-05-15 Thread Francesco Bonanno
Well, excuse me for the last post that I wrote, but for me the problem was solved... Another time I'll don't do that. But now I have another problem, with uswsusp and the log says that: "Sessions still open, not unmounting pam_mount(spawn.c:128): error setting uid to 0 Sessions still open, not unmo

[Bug 927828] Re: sudo: pam_mount.c:417: modify_pm_count: Assertion `user != ((void *)0)' failed.

2012-05-15 Thread Francesco Bonanno
And sorry, but I have to chage the state of the bug. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/927828 Title: sudo: pam_mount.c:417: modify_pm_count: Assertion `user != ((void *)0)' failed. To

[Bug 927828] Re: sudo: pam_mount.c:417: modify_pm_count: Assertion `user != ((void *)0)' failed.

2012-05-15 Thread Francesco Bonanno
** Changed in: libpam-mount (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/927828 Title: sudo: pam_mount.c:417: modify_pm_count: Assertion `user != ((void

[Bug 999935] [NEW] asus eeepc 1001px doesn't resume after hibernate

2012-05-15 Thread Francesco Bonanno
Public bug reported: My netbook run Ubuntu precise 12.04. ** Affects: uswsusp (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/35 Title: a

[Bug 999935] Re: asus eeepc 1001px doesn't resume after hibernate

2012-05-15 Thread Francesco Bonanno
** Description changed: - My netbook run Ubuntu precise 12.04. + My netbook run Ubuntu precise 12.04. Uswsusp version is the + 1.0+20110509-2ubuntu1. I have 1GB of ram and 3.9 Gb of swap. The netbook + go in poweroff, but when I boot, uswsusp extract the image and stop; i + have to restart the PC.

[Bug 927828] Re: sudo: pam_mount.c:417: modify_pm_count: Assertion `user != ((void *)0)' failed.

2012-05-15 Thread Francesco Bonanno
I've just reported the bug in uswsusp package: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/uswsusp/+bug/35 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/927828 Title: sudo: pam_mount.c:417: modify

[Bug 999935] Re: asus eeepc 1001px doesn't resume after hibernate

2012-05-15 Thread Francesco Bonanno
And another comment : << PLESE HELP ME!!>>. I've looked for a solution for 1 month and an half ago! :C. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/35 Title: asus eeepc 1001px doesn't resu

[Bug 658755] Re: Samsung N230 with xubuntu 10.10 fresh installed does not resume after suspend

2012-05-16 Thread Francesco Bonanno
I have the same problem with an eeepc 1001px and Ubuntu 12.04 LTS, so I filed another bug for my eeepc https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/uswsusp/+bug/35, but I have to try to recompile the kernel 3.0 series on my netbook and run uswsusp; 'cos I think the problem is in the kernel. I have

[Bug 1041665] Re: gnome-disk-utility is missing palimpsest (renamed to gnome-disks)

2012-11-13 Thread Francesco Bonanno
A solution for me it's downgrade of gnome-disk-utility for the quantal to precise verison, the precise version contains the package with the "original" palimpsest and it works with no problem under quantal . -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is s

[Bug 1018262] Re: [ASUS 1015cx] Retask single 3-pin jack as microphone

2012-11-13 Thread Francesco Bonanno
More or less it works now . -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1018262 Title: [ASUS 1015cx] Retask single 3-pin jack as microphone To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://b

[Bug 927828] Re: sudo: pam_mount.c:417: modify_pm_count: Assertion `user != ((void *)0)' failed.

2012-03-06 Thread Francesco Bonanno
I've just solved this bug. To solve it, someone has to login in with root account with 'sudo bash' in a terminal emulator, and open /etc/pam.d/common-session-noninteractive with 'gedit /etc/pam.d/common- session-noninteractive', and he or she has to look for the line n°16 and he or she has to chang

[Bug 927828] Re: sudo: pam_mount.c:417: modify_pm_count: Assertion `user != ((void *)0)' failed.

2012-03-06 Thread Francesco Bonanno
I've just changed the status from "Comfirmed" to "Fix Released". -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/927828 Title: sudo: pam_mount.c:417: modify_pm_count: Assertion `user != ((void *)0)'