Oct 24 23:57:39 richiter kernel: [13507.316061] usb 4-1: new full speed USB
device using uhci_hcd and address 3
Oct 24 23:57:39 richiter kernel: [13507.535457] usb 4-1: configuration #1
chosen from 1 choice
Oct 24 23:57:39 richiter kernel: [13507.539178] scsi3 : SCSI emulation for USB
Mass Stora
Same problem here.
$ uname -a
Linux richiter 2.6.28-12-generic #43-Ubuntu SMP Fri May 1 19:31:32 UTC 2009
x86_64 GNU/Linux
warzone2100 2.2.0, build from source. Ubuntu 9.04
00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation Mobile GM965/GL960
Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 03)
--
Black
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: qemu
Qemu package seems to be little broken. It fails to boot Lintrack image (some
linux distribution with kernel 2.6):
[ 876.950074] general protection fault: 0060 [#1]
[ 876.963982] Modules linked in:
[ 876.973812] CPU:0
[ 876.973850] EIP:0
I can't answer this question because I'm not using ubuntu any more. I
still think it is a great distro, but I don't have a way to test it.
--
Qemu issues.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/70939
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for
Workaround works for me, hovewer it should be in Power Manager for sure.
--
[Regression] No "do nothing" for laptop lid closed action
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/416236
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs
$cat /boot/config-2.6.31-20-generic | grep -i DSDT
CONFIG_ACPI_CUSTOM_DSDT_FILE=""
# CONFIG_ACPI_CUSTOM_DSDT is not set
$ uname -a
Linux richiter 2.6.31-20-generic #57-Ubuntu SMP Mon Feb 8 09:02:26 UTC 2010
x86_64 GNU/Linux
Can we get this back? It's very useful and compiling customer kernel is
a
I have also noticed this in both 9.10 and 10.04 pre release that I'm
currently using.
--
After suspend network-manager degrades wireless performance
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/552749
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
-
apport information
** Attachment added: "AplayDevices.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/45128239/AplayDevices.txt
--
ondemand cpufreq governor broken on core 2 duo cpu
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/475706
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
apport information
** Tags added: apport-collected
** Description changed:
I've installed fresh 9.10 and I'm with the defaults. This is how I've
noticed the following behaviour and I want to share it.
As I have two cores - I've setup two cpufreq scaling monitors applets.
By default my
apport information
** Attachment added: "ArecordDevices.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/45128241/ArecordDevices.txt
--
ondemand cpufreq governor broken on core 2 duo cpu
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/475706
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
apport information
** Attachment added: "BootDmesg.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/45128242/BootDmesg.txt
--
ondemand cpufreq governor broken on core 2 duo cpu
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/475706
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscr
apport information
** Attachment added: "Card0.Codecs.codec.0.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/45128246/Card0.Codecs.codec.0.txt
--
ondemand cpufreq governor broken on core 2 duo cpu
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/475706
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
apport information
** Attachment added: "Card0.Codecs.codec.1.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/45128252/Card0.Codecs.codec.1.txt
--
ondemand cpufreq governor broken on core 2 duo cpu
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/475706
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
apport information
** Attachment added: "Card0.Amixer.values.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/45128243/Card0.Amixer.values.txt
--
ondemand cpufreq governor broken on core 2 duo cpu
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/475706
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
B
apport information
** Attachment added: "Lsusb.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/45128262/Lsusb.txt
--
ondemand cpufreq governor broken on core 2 duo cpu
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/475706
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
Hi there.
I'm using 10.04 since beta2 and the problem is the same. I'm using:
echo 15 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/ondemand/up_threshold
echo 15 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/cpufreq/ondemand/up_threshold
in /etc/rc.local to help the system speed up when required.
I haven't really te
apport information
** Attachment added: "ProcInterrupts.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/45128267/ProcInterrupts.txt
--
ondemand cpufreq governor broken on core 2 duo cpu
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/475706
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
apport information
** Attachment added: "CurrentDmesg.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/45128258/CurrentDmesg.txt
--
ondemand cpufreq governor broken on core 2 duo cpu
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/475706
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
apport information
** Attachment added: "IwConfig.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/45128259/IwConfig.txt
--
ondemand cpufreq governor broken on core 2 duo cpu
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/475706
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscrib
apport information
** Attachment added: "Lspci.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/45128260/Lspci.txt
--
ondemand cpufreq governor broken on core 2 duo cpu
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/475706
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
apport information
** Attachment added: "ProcCpuinfo.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/45128265/ProcCpuinfo.txt
--
ondemand cpufreq governor broken on core 2 duo cpu
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/475706
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is su
apport information
** Attachment added: "PciMultimedia.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/45128264/PciMultimedia.txt
--
ondemand cpufreq governor broken on core 2 duo cpu
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/475706
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which i
apport information
** Attachment added: "ProcModules.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/45128285/ProcModules.txt
--
ondemand cpufreq governor broken on core 2 duo cpu
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/475706
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is su
apport information
** Attachment added: "UdevLog.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/45128290/UdevLog.txt
--
ondemand cpufreq governor broken on core 2 duo cpu
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/475706
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
apport information
** Attachment added: "UdevDb.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/45128287/UdevDb.txt
--
ondemand cpufreq governor broken on core 2 duo cpu
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/475706
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed t
Whe deciding about the importance of this particular bug please be aware
that this may create an impression that the Ubuntu performance is much
worse than it should really be.
--
ondemand cpufreq governor broken on core 2 duo cpu
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/475706
You received this bug notifi
Public bug reported:
I've installed fresh 9.10 and I'm with the defaults. This is how I've
noticed the following behaviour and I want to share it.
As I have two cores - I've setup two cpufreq scaling monitors applets.
By default my idle system is working on 1.00Ghz on both CPUs (cores to
be preci
** Attachment added: "AlsaDevices.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35184996/AlsaDevices.txt
** Attachment added: "AplayDevices.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35184998/AplayDevices.txt
** Attachment added: "ArecordDevices.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35184999/ArecordDevices.t
I've got similar problem (the same but with little differences). I
remember having it in some older Ubuntu as well. Recreating user was the
solution in the past.
After boot compiz.real process uses all the available cpu time (~99%).
I'm unable to debug or even use the appearance settings form as t
Nice piece of debug. :)
** Attachment added: "strace -p `pidof compiz.real`"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34152822/debug.err
--
Compiz.real 90%CPU/memory increasing
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/456374
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is sub
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34155048/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: "ExtensionSummary.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34155051/ExtensionSummary.txt
** Attachment added: "XsessionErrors.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34155052/Xsessi
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: firefox-3.5
My firefox started to hang on startup for around 15s. It seems to be
opening tabs, but I'm unable to do anything with it - nor menu, neither
content is working. After ~15s. it starts to respond.
I've started disabling firefox extensions one b
In the files? It was disabled when capturing the data. It's a bindwood
0.4.1 . I can provide the report with it enabled if required.
--
bindwood firefox extension slows down firefox startup
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/458397
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubunt
Hmmm. I haven't installed it - i thought it is installed by Ubuntu to
integrate it with CouchDB/Ubuntu One.
--
bindwood firefox extension slows down firefox startup
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/458397
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscrib
$ dpkg -S /usr/share/bindwood/chrome/bindwood.jar
bindwood: /usr/share/bindwood/chrome/bindwood.jar
--
bindwood firefox extension slows down firefox startup
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/458397
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ub
Architecture: amd64
AudioDevicesInUse: Error: command ['fuser', '-v', '/dev/dsp',
'/dev/snd/by-path', '/dev/snd/controlC0', '/dev/snd/pcmC0D6p',
'/dev/snd/pcmC0D6c', '/dev/snd/pcmC0D0c', '/dev/snd/pcmC0D1p',
'/dev/snd/pcmC0D0p', '/dev/snd/pcmC0D2c', '/dev/snd/seq', '/dev/snd/timer',
'/dev/seque
** Attachment added: "AlsaDevices.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31019375/AlsaDevices.txt
--
[karmic] No sound output with pulseaudio
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/408784
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubun
** Attachment added: "ArecordDevices.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31019378/ArecordDevices.txt
--
[karmic] No sound output with pulseaudio
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/408784
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
** Attachment added: "AplayDevices.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31019377/AplayDevices.txt
--
[karmic] No sound output with pulseaudio
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/408784
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ub
** Attachment added: "BootDmesg.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31019380/BootDmesg.txt
--
[karmic] No sound output with pulseaudio
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/408784
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-b
** Attachment added: "Card0.Amixer.values.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31019382/Card0.Amixer.values.txt
--
[karmic] No sound output with pulseaudio
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/408784
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to U
** Attachment added: "Card0.Codecs.codec.0.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31019383/Card0.Codecs.codec.0.txt
--
[karmic] No sound output with pulseaudio
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/408784
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
** Attachment added: "Card0.Codecs.codec.1.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31019384/Card0.Codecs.codec.1.txt
--
[karmic] No sound output with pulseaudio
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/408784
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
** Attachment added: "CurrentDmesg.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31019385/CurrentDmesg.txt
--
[karmic] No sound output with pulseaudio
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/408784
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ub
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31019386/Dependencies.txt
--
[karmic] No sound output with pulseaudio
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/408784
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ub
** Attachment added: "PciMultimedia.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31019387/PciMultimedia.txt
--
[karmic] No sound output with pulseaudio
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/408784
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
My problem descritpion:
ALSA works (flashplugin, mplayer with alsa output, alsamixer etc.). Pulseaudio
shows no real output devices (Sound Preferences) so "Null Output" is selected.
I've upgraded 9.04 to some alpha 9.10 and it is like this since then.
--
[karmic] No sound output with pulseaudio
http://www.mail-archive.com/ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com/msg1656268.html
This workaround have helped.
--
[karmic] No sound output with pulseaudio
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/408784
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
I've removed everything that was connected with compiz after:
find ~ -type d | grep compiz
--
Compiz.real 90%CPU/memory increasing
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/456374
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mai
... and it seems the problem is gone.
--
Compiz.real 90%CPU/memory increasing
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/456374
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.
Then I must be hitting something else, because my wifi (two different
usb cards; both from Pentagram; both using the same driver) are
affected. I lose network connection, and get my logs flooded.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
Public bug reported:
After upgrading to 12.10 I am affected by a following bug:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45071
This makes it effectively impossible to use me wifi connection.
Some more info:
https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/31658
Suggested solution:
include the patch in the U
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1063392
Title:
Buggy r8712u driver in 12.10 beta
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1063
At the moment of writing this comment the fix does not seem to work for
me.
I use lightdm and gnome-shell.
After I lock manually from command line:
gnome-screensaver-command -l
the "Lock screen" button starts working. But before this, I'm unable to
lock the screen normally (with a session-menu
Public bug reported:
The /etc/init/aiccu.conf is failing if in /etc/aiccu.conf there is no
"server" directive. The server directive is not neccessary and aiccu was
working fine without it (before init script was transitioned to
upstart). Please fix this.
If no server is specified in /etc/aiccu.co
** Summary changed:
- aiccu.conf does not need server command
+ aiccu.conf does not need server directive, while upstart scripts wants it
** Summary changed:
- aiccu.conf does not need server directive, while upstart scripts wants it
+ aiccu.conf does not need server directive, while upstart scr
If anybody is interested -- I think I've hacked some nice solution for
this. Seems to be working for me (I havn't tested it extensivly).
http://ucore.info/en/2011/03/faster-bash-completion-loading/
https://github.com/dpc/bash_completion
dpc@mutex:~$ time . /etc/bash_completion.orig
real0m2
I am sorry. I've performed the test for original code with additional
links. The real results should be:
dpc@mutex:~$ time . /etc/bash_completion.orig
real0m0.614s
user0m0.360s
sys 0m0.120s
dpc@mutex:~$ time . /etc/bash_completion.new
real0m0.168s
user0m0.120s
sys 0m0.010s
--
Yo
I think I know what is the problem.
When logging in the gnome-setting-manager with gdm's pid is still
active. This makes users gnome-settings-manager fail to start. After
some time gdm's one finally exits and users is left with gray theme.
The following in:
[mutex:/etc/gdm]% cat /etc/gdm/PostLog
59 matches
Mail list logo
