No, as apparently nobody is interested in implementing it. But feel free
to find someone who is interested. apt-transport-debtorrent shows that
out-of-tree methods can be done, you just need someone to do it…
And we are not the U.N. as Julian already said, we are three people
working on APT. The U
Which version of APT we are talking about?
I at least can't reproduce it here with 0.8.13.3 (unreleased debian
version) and we have a testcase checking this (beside other things
test/integration/test-apt-get-autoremove).
I think I have fixed this issue before the release of 0.8 but can't find
a c
I don't know what "reopen" means here, but if it uses pkgCacheFile it
should throw away the entry instance and create a new one. pkgCache,
depCache and all the others are using IDs to reference
packages/versions/descriptions/whatever which are not stable between
binary cache regenerations. If it do
The question is not if its another application at fault - it a message
from APT all front-ends see if the conditions are meet. The question is
just if these conditions are likely to be hit: The answer to this is no
as this message was already changed "recently" (2009) to include the
errno and the s
Please push your changes upstream - or in this case even think about becoming
maintainer of this translation as it is untouched for more than two years now
in the apt branch!
The statistic says:
fi.po: 506 translated messages, 60 fuzzy translations, 53 untranslated messages.
Thats a bit more tha
And i don't know what APT should make different here. I mean, we can't
read the file, so we can't know all sources, so the Cache will be
incomplete, so the solution will be incomplete - if we found any. But
most likely we will "just" miss important security updates or alike.
So, if we have such a
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #602354
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=602354
** Also affects: apt via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=602354
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
apt-get automatically starts and uses 100% CPU forever af
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 665580 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/665580
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 665580
apt-get automatically starts and uses 100% CPU forever after each boot
* You can subscribe to bug 665580 by following this link:
https://bugs.launchpa
Many applications are involved in an apt-get run. The application showing you
this question is for example debconf which is responsible for asking questions
for the package dpkg works on which is called by apt-get. The --force-yes only
influences the questions APT will ask you - questions dpkg w
This directory is auto-created in upstream since version 0.8.2 which should
boil down to version 0.8.3ubuntu1.
So this issue should be at least fixed after an upgrade to maverick.
Note through that you are the first user reporting a segfault in this
case: APT normally printed an error complaining
XML? Thats nothing what APT could provide. Thats repository related stuff and
very unlikely that all will publish them.
Debian extracts the changelogs and make it available through the PTS, i think
in launchpad you can read the same for package. Maybe you could even use that
data to build an app
> Or a better -more direct- way to contact the developers?
The better way would be to grab the source and patch it if it is that
easy as you say (haven't checked). Checking all reverse dependencies and
whatever you can find on the internet parsing APT output wouldn't hurt,
too (or is strongly advi
The pattern you can specify here is a full-blown regex (=regular
expression) one and NOT a wildcard style one you know maybe from e.g.
bash.
Thats a feature, not a bug and completely expected.
$ apt-get remove gnome*
will not only remove gnome and gnome-desktop but also libgnome0 (note that it
d
The changelogs are already extracted, e.g.:
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+changelog
http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/a/apt/current/changelog
(raw:
http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/a/apt/current/changelog.txt )
A better place to discuss that is properly i
What you want is pinning the package to -1 (never install this version)
instead of 1001 (always install this version)
That it worked previously (sometimes) with 1001 was a bug, not a
feature…
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
apt-pinning is ignored though it is shown
jftr: I removed this if in git commit
938889b20268ec92be1bff67750f7adf03f52c1b, which was shipped with 2.1.12
– that might explain why it isn't effecting releases with later versions
and why it was missed.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is sub
Not sure who all the upstream(s) involved might be, but from my personal
PoV at least you can add all the options you like… the topic gets harder
if we talk defaults & changing (e.g.) the lists completely (like that
tabular verbose-explosion thingy from apk or whatever it was). At some
point it mig
https://salsa.debian.org/apt-
team/apt/-/commit/633f6d67a28b375cf1f225f14d3c926e618d46af
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Committed
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => David Kalnischkies (donkult)
--
You received this bug notification because y
As the requirement for reproducing is "being offline" it could be that
this remove command wants to download packages, which fails.
Yes, remove can install packages – specifically the problem resolver can
try to fix a broken dependency by installing another provider/or-group
member. Controlled by
fwiw it is "invalid" here as apt has nothing to do with it, as it did
what it is supposed to do, upgrade a package: It has no business in the
contents, similar to a parcel deliverer. It is probably more productive
you figure out what exactly is not working in foo.deb vs. foo.snap and
report this to
+
Yes, "1" is a valid expression to say "yes", as is "+" – at least in my
(german) locale, and perhaps in yours, too. You can check with `locale
yesexpr` – the output is a regex expression. For me it prints
"^[+1jJyY]" (without the quotes), so anything starting (^) with either
of the characters in
> Ign:3 https://repo.mongodb.org/apt/ubuntu focal/mongodb-org/4.4
InRelease
triggers the fallback to download the files Release & Release.gpg, but
as the Release file (5) is a Hit apt skips the attempt to acquire
Release.gpg (8) and continues on with the reverify step which doesn't
emit a message.
apt contacts the squid proxy (which is on your local machine) hence the ipv6
from your machine. The "Forbidden" is the reply from the proxy for the request.
squid-deb-proxy hardcodes an allowlist for mirrors and sources to contact and
ips that can contact the proxy. I would presume that either (
"minimal potential for causing regressions" is a big claim given I had
to fix regressions in later commits like
149b23c2b9697bc262c0af1934c7a3f6114d903f and
2b0369a5d1673d9e40f2af4db7677b040a26ee58. There might be more, that is
just what I remember directly. It is certainly not the most complicated
apt 1.2~exp1 came with the follow NEWS entry:
[ Automatic removal of debs after install ]
After packages are successfully installed by apt(8),
the corresponding .deb package files will be
removed from the /var/cache/apt/archives cache directory.
This can be changed by setting the apt con
Can you provide a complete (preferably real) example of what output you
would expect?
Honestly, I don't see this working as in the general case the reason is
not simple – its at least my experience from staring at debug output for
hours to figure such things out in the development branches of a
di
Note the remark ", including virtual package names." in the manpage.
bindgen-0.65 has a "Provides: bindgen" (with a version), so it has
(also) the virtual package name "bindgen" and that perfectly matches
your regex. So, working as intended & documented and hence I am changing
the status to opinio
> I believe Flatpak does not need libfuse2 to function
I believe it does.
You can check for yourself with "apt-cache show flatpak" – look for the
mentioning of libfuse2 in the Depends line (or use grep).
(Not running Ubuntu myself, but I checked against the jammy universe
Packages file on a mirr
201 - 228 of 228 matches
Mail list logo
