Re: [Bug 1198586] Re: /etc/kernel/postinst.d/apt-auto-removal: uname: not found

2013-07-19 Thread Daniel Hartwig
On 19 July 2013 14:27, Toby Lambert wrote: > toby@toby-VPCCB15FG:~$ ls -l /bin/uname > ls: cannot access /bin/uname: No such file or directory Uh oh. > Is that what you wanted? It is. Please try: $ sudo apt-get install --reinstall uname or otherwise use dpkg to reinstall that package. A sub

Re: [Bug 1198586] Re: /etc/kernel/postinst.d/apt-auto-removal: uname: not found

2013-07-19 Thread Daniel Hartwig
On 19 July 2013 15:39, Daniel Hartwig wrote: > $ sudo apt-get install --reinstall uname > That should be: $ sudo apt-get install --reinstall coreutils -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.ne

Re: [Bug 124895] Re: coreutils and debianutils dependency cycle on reinstall command

2013-05-23 Thread Daniel Hartwig
On 23 May 2013 23:05, piotr zimoch wrote: > ** Changed in: aptitude (Ubuntu) >Status: Triaged => New Why? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/124895 Title: coreutils and debianut

Re: [Bug 124895] Re: coreutils and debianutils dependency cycle on reinstall command

2013-05-24 Thread Daniel Hartwig
On 24 May 2013 15:31, Thomas Hotz <124...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > Daniel have you got enough information about this bug? Nothing that is not already in the report, which is sufficient to identify a real issue. > > ** Changed in: aptitude (Ubuntu) >Status: New => Incomplete > Again,

Re: [Bug 124895] Re: coreutils and debianutils dependency cycle on reinstall command

2013-05-24 Thread Daniel Hartwig
On 24 May 2013 15:51, Daniel Hartwig wrote: > On 24 May 2013 15:31, Thomas Hotz <124...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: >> Daniel have you got enough information about this bug? > > Nothing that is not already in the report, which is sufficient to > identify a real issue. >

[Bug 947639] Re: apt tries to unpack a Multi-Arch: no package for two architectures to satisfy the Recommends of a foreign-arch package

2013-05-25 Thread Daniel Hartwig
** Changed in: apt Importance: Unknown => Undecided ** Changed in: apt Remote watch: Debian Bug tracker #709661 => None ** Bug watch removed: Debian Bug tracker #709661 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=709661 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Bug 1184083] Re: glchess does not install

2013-05-27 Thread Daniel Hartwig
In raring, glchess has been renamed to gnome-chess, and the package glchess is *transitional*. The new command name is ‘gnome-chess’. ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 994152] Re: do-release-upgrade says it can not run the upgrade

2013-05-27 Thread Daniel Hartwig
> I have classified this bug as a bug in apt. No error messages in that output are from apt and do-release-upgrade is from ubuntu-release-upgrader-core not apt. Richard Cheung (richardcheung-hk) wrote on 2013-05-19: > Hi, > > I am also having this problem. > … > Can not run the upgrade > The erro

Re: [Bug 1179446] Re: Cannot use apt-get because of error in exim4-base_4.76-3ubuntu3.2_amd64.deb

2013-05-27 Thread Daniel Hartwig
On 15 May 2013 15:43, Marek Pietrucha wrote: > Adding full stack of apt-get -f install: > Ok. Still no indication of fault in apt. affects ubuntu/apt status invalid > Preconfiguring packages ... > exim4-base failed to preconfigure, with exit status 1 > (Reading database ... 45202 files and d

[Bug 1103541] Re: Please merge aptitude 0.6.8.2-1(main) from Debian unstable (main)

2013-05-28 Thread Daniel Hartwig
** Changed in: aptitude (Ubuntu) Assignee: Adam Stokes (adam-stokes) => (unassigned) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1103541 Title: Please merge aptitude 0.6.8.2-1(main) from Debi

[Bug 1033838] Re: ubuntu patch 05aptitude (aptitude) contains sudo setting also in 00aptitude (user-setup)

2013-05-28 Thread Daniel Hartwig
After a long period of disinterest I am delcaring user-setup ok. It is in aptitude that the duplicate config should be removed. ** Changed in: user-setup (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid ** Changed in: aptitude (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notificatio

[Bug 1185262] [NEW] ubuntu patch no-google-mock is obsolete

2013-05-28 Thread Daniel Hartwig
Public bug reported: google-mock is now in main, there is no reason for ubuntu builds to continue ignoring part of the test suite with no-google-mock patch ** Affects: aptitude (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a membe

[Bug 1185265] [NEW] significant deviation from debian packaging, upstream recommendation

2013-05-28 Thread Daniel Hartwig
Public bug reported: Package: google-mock Version: 1.6.0-0ubuntu3 This package represents significant and unwarranted deviation from the Debian package. For example, it does cause FTBFS with aptitude. Use of precompiled libgmock --- The Google C++ Mocking Framework use

Re: [Bug 1185278] [NEW] info field wrongly called "URI" in synaptic download window

2013-05-29 Thread Daniel Hartwig
B Bobo wrote: > You have been subscribed to a public bug: > > The last column is called "URI", but > this is wrong as it seems to be showing something more like Ubuntu > package location syntax, instead of properly formed URIs. > Please provide an example this data you consider to be mislabelled.

Re: [Bug 1207713] [NEW] in apt-get the options -y and --force-yes doesn't work with -f option too

2013-08-02 Thread Daniel Hartwig
On 2 August 2013 19:48, Xava Du wrote: > Public bug reported: > > I was trying to solve some unmet dependency problems, so running > > apt-get -f -y --force-yes install > -y and --force-yes are only for apt prompts. > i still have prompts like this, waiting for my input: > > Configuration file `

Re: [Bug 1103541] Re: Please merge aptitude 0.6.8.2-1(main) from Debian unstable (main)

2013-08-02 Thread Daniel Hartwig
On 2 August 2013 21:26, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote: > http://people.canonical.com/~stokes/aptitude_0.6.8.2-1ubuntu1.raring.debdiff > > gives me 404. Was this merge done or not? =) It did previously exist, however, the work was never completed. In a few days 0.6.10 will be uploaded to unstable. --

Re: [Bug 1026939] Re: epix should not be autoremoved

2013-08-05 Thread Daniel Hartwig
> I use epix but running > > >apt-get autoremove > > as suggested, it reports > > epix libglewmx1.5 > > will be removed. > > > Why? > What can I do to always keep epix installed? > Nothing here to indicate a bug. Use: $ sudo apt-mark unmarkauto epix status invalid -- You rece

Re: [Bug 1191389] Re: package linux-image-extra-3.8.0-25-generic 3.8.0-25.37 failed to install/upgrade: run-parts: /etc/kernel/postinst.d/initramfs-tools exited with return code 1

2013-06-18 Thread Daniel Hartwig
On 19/06/2013 8:51 AM, "Gary Shook" wrote: > > I do not use aptitude, and do not have unattended-upgrades installed. > > at this point, I get a system error on boot, and just need to fix it... I > cleaned up /boot it had no space left. How did you clean it up, by removing files or using apt-get t

Re: [Bug 1191389] Re: package linux-image-extra-3.8.0-25-generic 3.8.0-25.37 failed to install/upgrade: run-parts: /etc/kernel/postinst.d/initramfs-tools exited with return code 1

2013-06-19 Thread Daniel Hartwig
On 19 June 2013 09:41, Gary Shook wrote: > I cleaned it up using the following: > dpkg -l linux-* | awk '/^ii/{ print $2}' | grep -v -e `uname -r | cut -f1,2 > -d"-"` | grep -e [0-9] | xargs sudo apt-get -y purge > > I donn't have the output before cleanup, but I can tell you it was a bunch > of o

Re: [Bug 1191389] Re: package linux-image-extra-3.8.0-25-generic 3.8.0-25.37 failed to install/upgrade: run-parts: /etc/kernel/postinst.d/initramfs-tools exited with return code 1

2013-06-19 Thread Daniel Hartwig
On 19 June 2013 14:30, Michael McAndrew <1191...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > I then rebooted and did an 'ls -lR /boot' and a 'sudo aptitude-upgrade' As you are using aptitude to upgrade old kernel images will not be automatically removed (bug #923876). Those should be removed manually to free up

[Bug 1191973] Re: Spams *session log with Gtk-WARNING **: GtkNotebook 0x1e734d0 is mapped but visible child GtkLabel 0x1e86140 is not mapped

2013-06-19 Thread Daniel Hartwig
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1135687 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1135687 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1135687 GtkNotebook 0x114d4a0 is mapped but visible child GtkLabel 0x1450610 is not mapped -- You received this bug notification because you are a member

Re: [Bug 919216] Re: aptitude returns 0 exit status code even if the requested action is not successful

2013-06-20 Thread Daniel Hartwig
On 20 June 2013 13:41, Marshall McMullen <919...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > I'm still seeing this exact problem on ubuntu 13.04. So I don't see how > this is fixed. ‘Fix Committed’ and ‘Fix Released’ are different; there is no claim that this is fixed in Ubuntu. This particular issue is resolve

Re: [Bug 1191389] Re: package linux-image-extra-3.8.0-25-generic 3.8.0-25.37 failed to install/upgrade: run-parts: /etc/kernel/postinst.d/initramfs-tools exited with return code 1

2013-06-20 Thread Daniel Hartwig
On 19 June 2013 23:39, Daniel Hartwig wrote: > On 19 June 2013 09:41, Gary Shook wrote: >> I cleaned it up using the following: >> dpkg -l linux-* | awk '/^ii/{ print $2}' | grep -v -e `uname -r | cut -f1,2 >> -d"-"` | grep -e [0-9] | xargs sudo apt-ge

[Bug 923876] Re: FR: Limit and clean-up kernel images and headers automatically in LTS

2013-06-20 Thread Daniel Hartwig
apt 0.9.7.5ubuntu5.4 ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Quantal) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/923876 Title: FR: Limit and clean-up kernel image

Re: [Bug 923876] Re: FR: Limit and clean-up kernel images and headers automatically in LTS

2013-06-20 Thread Daniel Hartwig
On 21 June 2013 02:09, John Karahalis wrote: > Still have this issue on a fresh install of Raring. Note that kernel images installed before this change was made in apt 0.9.7.6ubuntu1 will still have to be removed manually. If you find that subsequent kernel images are not cleaned up, then please

[Bug 1193513] Re: updates do not install

2013-06-23 Thread Daniel Hartwig
** Package changed: apt (Ubuntu) => debconf (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1193513 Title: updates do not install To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.l

Re: [Bug 919521] Re: apturl says index is broken when it is not

2013-06-23 Thread Daniel Hartwig
On 22 June 2013 06:57, ill <919...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > I get a message saying package installation failed: > > man-db > subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 > Those two lines are the _complete_ output from the command? -- You received this bug notif

[Bug 919521] Re: apturl says index is broken when it is not

2013-06-23 Thread Daniel Hartwig
And I repeat my other queries: > [Do you] get this error with any URI, or only some specific ones? > Please give an example of a failing URI. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/919521 Tit

Re: [Bug 1186441] Re: synaptic does not run

2013-06-23 Thread Daniel Hartwig
On 22 June 2013 06:47, ill <1186...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > kubuntu 13.10, synaptic .80 > > yes the command starts synaptic. > Looks like an issue with kdesudo, or perhaps your terminal environment. Which terminal are you using (konsole, gnome-terminal, etc.)? affects ubuntu/synaptic stat

[Bug 919521] Re: apturl says index is broken when it is not

2013-06-23 Thread Daniel Hartwig
** Changed in: apturl (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/919521 Title: apturl says index is broken when it is not To manage notifications about

<    3   4   5   6   7   8