Re: [Bug 1189494] [NEW] cannot intall any ia32 libs because libgraphite2-3:i386 is broken

On 10 June 2013 22:34, Christian Smith <1189...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > The following packages have unmet dependencies: > libgraphite2-3 : Conflicts: libgraphite2-3:i386 but 1.2.1-1 is to be > installed. > libgraphite2-3:i386 : Conflicts: libgraphite2-3 but 1.2.1-1 is installed. > That is no

Re: [Bug 844245] Re: Apt should produce a more meaningful warning when different architectures have different versions of a multiarch package

On 25 May 2013 22:58, dino99 <844...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Releases > > ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) >Status: Confirmed => Invalid > Yes well this particular issue persists and the suggestion is useful. status confirmed ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) S

Re: [Bug 1014831] Re: can not remove ldlinux.sys; sudo rm -Rf ldlinux.sys

On 14 June 2013 04:30, ill <1014...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > It was already removed after I did the chattr command. > Next time, if someone asks for output from commands please take care that you do it before resolving the problem. Otherwise the output is useless. In any case, it is clear no

Re: [Bug 1093922] Re: removing modules causes network problems

ill, does the patch on bug 1084190 resolve the issue you report here or not? It is not constructive to change bug tags and status without answering these simple questions. On 13 June 2013 03:30, ill <1093...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > ** Tags added: kernel-unable-to-test-upstream > > ** Changed

[Bug 1093922] Re: removing modules causes network problems

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1084190 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1084190 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1084190 kernel panic when removing mceusb module -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubun

[Bug 1050240] Re: "aptitude install PATTERN" without ~r installs conflicting packages for all architectures

** Changed in: aptitude (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => In Progress ** Changed in: aptitude (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Daniel Hartwig (wigs) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchp

[Bug 1191389] Re: package linux-image-extra-3.8.0-25-generic 3.8.0-25.37 failed to install/upgrade: run-parts: /etc/kernel/postinst.d/initramfs-tools exited with return code 1

Redoubts, your issue may not be the same cause, so please file a new report using ‘ubuntu-bug’, including the information here, and also some comments on how you install and update software (e.g. apt-get, aptitude, software-center). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member o

[Bug 1191389] Re: package linux-image-extra-3.8.0-25-generic 3.8.0-25.37 failed to install/upgrade: run-parts: /etc/kernel/postinst.d/initramfs-tools exited with return code 1

Gary Shook, do you at all use aptitude or have unattended-upgrades installed? Please provide the output of: $ ls -lR boot -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1191389 Title: package linux-

[Bug 111566] Re: adept dist-upgrade now dialog needs choice for do_not_remind_me_again

** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 75332 aptitude has private package holds, should use dpkg -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/111566 Title: adept dist-upgrade now dialog nee

[Bug 75332] Re: Held back packages not ignored by update-manager

No program is encouraged to interface with aptitude holds, these are very soon to be replaced by the universal dpkg holds. ** Changed in: update-manager Status: New => Invalid ** Summary changed: - Held back packages not ignored by update-manager + aptitude has private package holds, shou

[Bug 63540] Re: don't show updates for locked packages

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 42178 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/42178 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 75332 aptitude has private package holds, should use dpkg ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 42178 synaptic: ‘Lock Version’ is broken; use dpkg hold

[Bug 113846] Re: Adept notifier with pinning

Daniel Hahler (blueyed) wrote on 2007-12-17: > This sounds like a duplicate of bug 72806 (pinned packages > are "held") and I'm marking it as such. No, apt_preferences(5) and package holds are two separate concepts with different use cases. Unmarking duplicate. It may however have been fixed in

[Bug 113846] Re: Adept notifier with pinning

Previous KDE bugwatch was not correct (related to held packages, not preferences). Further, if adept notifier is ignoring apt_preferences that is a bug, not wishlist item. ** Summary changed: - Adept notifier with pinning + Adept notifier with pinning; apt_preferences(5) -- You received this b

[Bug 185397] Re: adept: management of package versions in Kubuntu.

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 118474 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/118474 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 75332 aptitude has private package holds, should use dpkg ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 118474 Adept should allow to ignore updates -- You

[Bug 118474] Re: Adept should allow to ignore updates

Richard Birnie (rbirnie-deactivatedaccount) wrote on 2007-07-01: > What you're > describing is basically version pinning which has been requested in bug > 113846. The other bug is reporting that apt_preferences(5) are ignored. This request is to add a feature to the adept notifier interface so th

[Bug 923876] Re: FR: Limit and clean-up kernel images and headers automatically in LTS

Untested and dont care. ** Patch added: "aptitude-saucy.diff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/923876/+attachment/3705236/+files/aptitude-saucy.diff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.l

Re: [Bug 1186000] [NEW] I cannot properly update without errors

On 31 May 2013 04:33, Craig Olsen wrote: > Public bug reported: > > It says I have 1 broken package to remove, but when I manually search > for it, it doesnt show. Provide complete output from: $ sudo apt-get install -f status incomplete These type of thing are most likely a support issue, fo

[Bug 1166568] Re: [update-manager-core] do-release-upgrade removing pinned / locked version packages

What do you mean “locked version”? There are multiple programs and documents using this term to mean different things, please state exactly how you “locked” these packages. ** Tags removed: apt update-manager-core -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, w

[Bug 234184] Re: "aptitude remove --purge" does not purge package [aptitude has no --purge]

Aptitude has no option ‘--purge’, this command line actually triggers ‘--purge-unused’ whose behaviour is correct. In the future we will support ‘--purge’ as apt-get does and also fail for unrecognized options. This is importance: wishlist and not higher as there is no documented expectation for

[Bug 296982] Re: cli aptitude proxy settings don't update until terminal is restarted

Apt (and therefore aptitude) takes it proxy settings from apt.conf or environment. It is not possible to externally update aptitudes environment once it is running, so that can not be fixed. Changes in apt.conf could be found, but that is not usually how unix programs operate and so is unexpected

[Bug 240706] Re: aptitude l10n issue (unrecognized keys in Russian locale)

Yes aptitude cli has numerous i18n issues. Exactly yes–no prompts have been fixed in recent versions, but nothing more. ** Changed in: aptitude (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed ** Changed in: aptitude (Ubuntu) Assignee: Russian Ubuntu Translators (ubuntu-l10n-ru) => (unassigned) **

[Bug 296982] Re: cli aptitude proxy settings don't update until terminal is restarted

** Changed in: aptitude (Ubuntu) Status: New => Opinion -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/296982 Title: cli aptitude proxy settings don't update until terminal is restarted To ma

Re: [Bug 1166568] Re: [update-manager-core] do-release-upgrade removing pinned / locked version packages

On 31 May 2013 12:49, B Bobo <1166...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > Versions locked using Synaptic per Ubuntu Pinning Howto > https://help.ubuntu.com/community/PinningHowto#line-97 > and Ubuntu Apt Get Howto > https://help.ubuntu.com/community/AptGet/Howto#line-67 > [It seems the advise in those

Re: [Bug 1166568] Re: [update-manager-core] do-release-upgrade removing pinned / locked version packages

On 31 May 2013 13:15, Daniel Hartwig wrote: > After applying this hold, confirm the changes with e.g.: > $ dpkg -s harpia | grep Status > Status: hold ok installed At that point ‘apt-get upgrade’ should not remove the packages, and ‘apt-get dist-upgrade’ should give a warning. I le

Re: [Bug 42178] Re: apt-get doesn't use the same pinning as synaptic

ng. > > However, I think synaptic is actually much more confusing because of > that change! It confsued me, and I wasted time trying to deal with it > and filing bug #1166568. I agree with what Daniel Hartwig wrote in > comment #27. I too would like to see the 2004 change reverte

Re: [Bug 1166568] Re: [update-manager-core] do-release-upgrade removing pinned / locked version packages

On 31 May 2013 15:34, B Bobo <1166...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > Thank you for explaining that. > Once setting the holds with dpkg or apt-mark, does ‘do-release-upgrade’ work as expected? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubun

[Bug 42178] Re: synaptic: ‘Lock Version’ is broken; use dpkg hold

** Summary changed: - apt-get doesn't use the same pinning as synaptic + synaptic: ‘Lock Version’ is broken; use dpkg hold ** Description changed: + ‘Lock Version’ in Synaptic uses apt_preferences(5) (“pinning”). This is + never recognized by non-Apt tools, e.g. dpkg. Also, as these settings +

[Bug 844196] Re: --ignore-missing doesn't work on apt-get download

> For example "apt-get download > --ignore-missing htop ia33-libs" will stop on ia33-libs because the package > doesn't exist but htop will not be downloaded then too. Ignore missing applies to packages that fail to download correctly but are otherwise known to apt. The command issued is valid, b

[Bug 988772] Re: apt-get --only-upgrade install $PKG installs new packages

The documentation makes clear that ‘--only-upgrade’ applies its restriction to the packages specified on the command line only. Its purpose is to prevent the user accidentally asking for new software. It is not intended to restrict upgrades of existing software including e.g. if such an upgrade r

[Bug 844485] Re: apt-get man page language/grammar improvement for autoremove

** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/844485 Title: apt-get man page language/grammar improvement for autoremove To manage

Re: [Bug 844196] Re: --ignore-missing doesn't work on apt-get download

On 1 June 2013 16:21, Sworddragon <844...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > The command itself is not invalid because the package names are just > arguments. The arguments of ‘apt-get install’ are defined to be packages, ‘ia33-libs’ does not name any package, hence the command line /as a whole/ is inva

[Bug 1052864] Re: Behavior of apt-get autoremove with arguments

** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #548501 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=548501 ** Also affects: apt (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=548501 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you a

[Bug 823961] Re: synaptic ignores preferences files in /etc/apt/preferences.d/

** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 42178 synaptic: ‘Lock Version’ is broken; use dpkg hold -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/823961 Title: synaptic ignores preferences files

[Bug 1166568] Re: [update-manager-core] do-release-upgrade removing pinned / locked version packages

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 42178 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/42178 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 42178 synaptic: ‘Lock Version’ is broken; use dpkg hold -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to U

[Bug 576820] Re: Synaptic ignores pins in /etc/apt/preferences.d/

** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 42178 synaptic: ‘Lock Version’ is broken; use dpkg hold -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/576820 Title: Synaptic ignores pins in /etc/apt/p

[Bug 285749] Re: request: allow to lock/pid some packages from update-manager

This was marked as a duplicate of bug #42178, but that is wrong. ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 42178 synaptic: ‘Lock Version’ is broken; use dpkg hold -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launc

[Bug 823961] Re: synaptic ignores preferences files in /etc/apt/preferences.d/

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 628818 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/628818 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 628818 Synaptic doesn't honor pinning rules in /etc/apt/preferences.d/ -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which i

[Bug 628818] Re: Synaptic doesn't honor pinning rules in /etc/apt/preferences.d/

synaptic (0.75) unstable; urgency=low * common/rpackagecache.cc: - read pindir as well as the pinfile (LP: #628818) ** Project changed: synaptic => synaptic (Ubuntu) ** Changed in: synaptic (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because

[Bug 576820] Re: Synaptic ignores pins in /etc/apt/preferences.d/

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 628818 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/628818 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 628818 Synaptic doesn't honor pinning rules in /etc/apt/preferences.d/ -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which i

[Bug 341451] Re: Synaptic terminal window does not use system monospace font

Version: 0.80.2 ** Changed in: synaptic (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/341451 Title: Synaptic terminal window does not use system monospace f

[Bug 881192] Re: libre and open office conflict over dictionary-common

** Package changed: synaptic (Ubuntu) => dictionaries-common (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/881192 Title: libre and open office conflict over dictionary-common To manage not

[Bug 878876] Re: I cannot install mbox becouse mboxcheck-applet is broken

mboxcheck-applet is no longer provided. I dont see that a package named mbox ever was (in recent history). ** Changed in: synaptic (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.la

[Bug 1118677] Re: W: Falha ao obter http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/m/mono/libmono-posix2.0-cil_2.6.7-3ubuntu1_all.deb 404 Not Found [IP: 91.189.92.201 80]

This is normal a transient problem that goes away after a short while. You will have to refresh your software index (or ‘sudo apt-get update’) and try again. ** Changed in: synaptic (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu B

[Bug 1066259] Re: update-manager unable to upgrade from 10.10 to 11.04. packages

If you still have this problem please consult . ** Changed in: synaptic (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1066259 Tit

[Bug 1157194] Re: afni GUI opens but none of the analysis tools seem to work. ie 3dcalc 3dAFNItoNIFTI... etc...

Nothing to do with synaptic, and I dont see any package providing a program named “afni”. You should refile this under whatever package that is. ** Changed in: synaptic (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 19053] Re: Synaptic doesn't respect gnome menu and toolbar preferences

** Summary changed: - Synaptic doesn't respect gnome preferences + Synaptic doesn't respect gnome menu and toolbar preferences -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/19053 Title: Syn

[Bug 512481] Re: Synaptic claims whole system als "manually installed"

SimonP (peeters-simon) wrote: > the problem is here that synaptic automatically installs > ALL (also the dependencies of a selected package) packages > as being "manually installed" If that was ever true, it certainly is no longer the case. BeowulfOF (beowulfof) wrote: > But the whole system is n

[Bug 463822] Re: Provide list of manually selected packages

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 512481 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/512481 The problem is that in the past installing a new system left all many of the base packages marked manually installed. This number has been greatly reduced recently (see my comments in bug #512481), but it is

[Bug 615838] Re: [maverick] Synaptic no longer ever shows the "Installed (auto removable)" package status filter

Seems to work on 0.80.2. ** Changed in: synaptic (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/615838 Title: [maverick] Synaptic no longer ever shows the

[Bug 657620] Re: Ubuntu 10.10: Issues with synaptic

> Just after installing Ubuntu 10.4.1 (testing version of 10.10 that I've > downloaded yesterday morning: 2010, Oct the 9th). > I'm having abnormal issues when starting Synaptic like: > - critical error at startup: "dkpg was interrupted, you must run manually..." > - broken packages Yes, well its

[Bug 711535] Re: Breaks: libc6 (<2.12.1-0ubuntu10.2) but 2.12.1-0ubuntu10.1 is to be installed

You will have to elaborate on this. ** Changed in: synaptic (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/711535 Title: Breaks: libc6 (<2.12.1-0ubu

[Bug 897869] Re: proxy on APT Something wicked happened resolving 'slc-isa:8080' (-5 - No address associated with hostname)

> Hello i use some proxy setting in firefox and network proxy setting > from administrator menu, > then i change my location and i use internet with out proxy, any why after i > removie the proxy setting the APT is give me this error > Something wicked happened > resolving 'slc-isa:8080' (-5 - No

[Bug 749737] Re: not able to install update manager

> after removing my update manager from software center I am not able to > reinstall it. You will have to provide details of the error message you received. Probably you want to seek help on a support forum; see . ** Changed in: synaptic (Ubuntu) Status: New

[Bug 788824] Re: After removing Local origin package it still shows in Synaptic

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 13165 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/13165 > Then in synaptic select Origin and Complete remove bitdefender-scanner it > will ask do u want to remove also bitdefender-scanner-gui . Say yes. > Then apply and see that bitdefender-scanner-gui is still in sy

[Bug 904853] Re: Does not display the file list for packages installed with --force-acrchitecture

Multiarch works well now so such hacks are not necessary. If you use --force-architecture to install something, that means that apt (and thus synaptic) does not know about it. There is no need for synaptic to jump through hoops to support this, instead you should configure multiarch on this sy

[Bug 994152] Re: do-release-upgrade says it can not run the upgrade

> This started happening to me again when trying to upgrade to 13.04. What did? The problem with noexec? > status:New → Confirmed Again, please do not confirm your own bugs. It has already been explained that the issue on your system with noexec is not a bug. ** Changed in: ubuntu-re

Re: [Bug 1058790] Re: package does not uninstall

On 2 June 2013 15:02, ill <1058...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > apt-get is provided by the official ubuntu repos. > It has already been explained why apt is not at fault here and will not be adapted to handle this kind of breakage. The problem is in the package ‘brscan2’ which Ubuntu does not pro

[Bug 994152] Re: do-release-upgrade says it can not run the upgrade

The status of ‘new’ is for ubuntu-release-upgrader to verify the issue reported by Richard Cheung. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/994152 Title: do-release-upgrade says it can not run

[Bug 1084190] Re: ubuntu has kernel panic when manually removing modules

Please test the proposed fix. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1084190 Title: ubuntu has kernel panic when manually

[Bug 919521] Re: apturl says index is broken when it is not

You get this error with any URI, or only some specific ones? Please give an example of a failing URI. What is the output of running this command in a terminal: $ sudo apturl apt:tf ** Changed in: apturl (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification beca

[Bug 228264] Re: [MASTER] non-existing section 'web' added to sources.list by apturl (update gutsy to hardy fails cos archives not found)

** Changed in: apturl (Ubuntu) Assignee: j4v13r (j4v13r) => (unassigned) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/228264 Title: [MASTER] non-existing section 'web' added to sources.list by

[Bug 1093922] Re: removing modules causes network problems

> ever since 12.10, whenever I remove the module mceusb using rmmod mceusb, This sounds very similar to your report bug #1084190. On that report there is a patched kernel that you are yet to test. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Incomplete -- You received this bug no

[Bug 1035541] Re: machine locks up, requiring hard restart

You report similar issues as bug #1084190 and bug #1093922. Is this lock up also related to removing the mceusb module? If not, provide the information requested in comment #3. ** Changed in: ubuntu Assignee: Adrian Perez (apere125) => (unassigned) -- You received this bug notification b

Re: [Bug 994152] Re: do-release-upgrade says it can not run the upgrade

On 2 June 2013 15:59, Richard Cheung <994...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > Hi, > > I have found a solution. > > sudo apt-get install python-apt > After this, do-release-upgrade does work for you? Which version of python-apt did you upgrade from and to? -- You received this bug notification becau

[Bug 1014831] Re: can not remove ldlinux.sys; sudo rm -Rf ldlinux.sys

** Summary changed: - sudo rm -R filename does not remove a file + can not remove ldlinux.sys; sudo rm -Rf ldlinux.sys ** Changed in: ubuntu Status: Confirmed => New ** Package changed: ubuntu => coreutils (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 1014831] Re: can not remove ldlinux.sys; sudo rm -Rf ldlinux.sys

What filesystem is this drive using? Provide output from ‘mount’ to confirm. Provide the complete output from executing: $ sudo rm -f ldlinux.sys Operation not permitted? Most likely cause of that on this file is attribute immutable. Remove it with: $ sudo chattr -i ldlinux.sys ** Changed in

[Bug 930369] Re: apt-get update does not fix duplicat sources

> W: You may want to run apt-get update to correct these problems > > And it says that running apt-get update will fix these problems, but it does > not. The intent of that message — which is not completely clear — is that running ‘apt-get update’ may resolve general issues. It is not specificall

[Bug 1186441] Re: synaptic does not run

You must state the version of Ubuntu and synaptic you are using. What is the output of running: $ /usr/bin/synaptic-pkexec Does that command properly start synaptic? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launch

[Bug 1084190] Re: ubuntu has kernel panic when manually removing modules

Patch from . ** Patch added: "0001-mceusb-Fix-race-in-mceusb_dev_disconnect.patch" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1084190/+attachment/3694043/+files/0001-mceusb-Fix-race-in-mceusb_dev_disconnect.patch ** Tags added: patc

[Bug 994152] Re: do-release-upgrade says it can not run the upgrade

** Description changed: + I am also having this problem. + + $ sudo do-release-upgrade + Checking for a new Ubuntu release + Get:1 Upgrade tool signature [198 B] + Get:2 Upgrade tool [1,206 kB] + Fetched 1,206 kB in 0s (0 B/s) + authenticate 'raring.tar.gz' against 'raring.tar.gz.gpg' + extractin

[Bug 1084190] Re: kernel panic when removing mceusb module

** Summary changed: - ubuntu has kernel panic when manually removing modules + kernel panic when removing mceusb module -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1084190 Title: kernel panic whe

Re: [Bug 848668] Re: apt-get remove breaks system when removing Wine

> I discovered a possible bug in the apt-get remove command, it actually > broke my whole system, and removed all my packages. Well, you pretty much asked it to, so that is not a bug. status invalid > > I was trying to remove Wine 1.3 devel from my machine. This package > contains sever

Re: [Bug 1175637] Re: Kernel updates are being marked as manually installed

unattended-upgrade does not directly handle dependencies, and its only effective calls are to ‘mark_upgrade’. > 08:36 < slangasek> ah, there's a single call to >mark_install() in u-a, so that would >be nice and convenient if so In ‘upgrade_in_minimal_steps’

Re: [Bug 1175637] Re: Kernel updates are being marked as manually installed

On 6 June 2013 11:14, Daniel Hartwig wrote: > In ‘upgrade_in_minimal_steps’, but conditional on: > > elif not pkg.is_installed: > pkg.mark_install() Also unrelated, though this call should be removed based on my earlier reasoning that it is never used

[Bug 1175637] Re: Kernel updates are being marked as manually installed

** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #686726 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=686726 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1175637 Title: Kernel updates are being marked

[Bug 1175637] Re: Kernel updates are being marked as manually installed

** Bug watch removed: Debian Bug tracker #686726 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=686726 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1175637 Title: Kernel updates are being mark

[Bug 1075841] Re: read/write selections ("markings") causes loss of auto-installed status

Revert unexplained spam. ** Changed in: synaptic (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released => New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1075841 Title: read/write selections ("markings") causes l

[Bug 1175637] Re: Kernel updates are being marked as manually installed

‘MarkInstall’ has changed quite a bit since version in precise, including much in the ways of handling auto-installed. Can someone provide an apt log with Debug::pkgDepCache::Marker and Debug::pkgDepCache::AutoInstall set. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 1075366] Re: Never-MarkAuto-Sections:: oldlibs gives wrong behavior

Agreeing with Steve, this is an obviously incorrect application of Never-MarkAuto-Sections. ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/10

Re: [Bug 1188266] [NEW] K address book Program disappeared

On 7 June 2013 00:10, Sunflower <1188...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > Public bug reported: > > > I had 5-6 contacts in the K address book. This program would not open. Thus, > I uninstalled it, to reinstall. It will not. > You have not specified which version of synaptic and ubuntu you are using.

Re: [Bug 880003] Re: Synaptic displays "An error occurred"

On 27 June 2013 12:03, Flavio Martins Prado wrote: > The problem is probably caused by a configuration of synaptic saved on > the ROOT directory. After purging synaptic, the configuration files > should be removed, but they aren't... I coud find a .synaptic in root > and in my home directory. > >

Re: [Bug 1195069] Re: error when upgrade packages

2013/6/27 Daniel Letzeisen <1195...@bugs.launchpad.net>: > ** Package changed: nvidia-graphics-drivers (Ubuntu) => apt (Ubuntu) Some more effort in triage, please. Apt is not a dumping ground for bugs. BlackStarMI wrote (delocalized): > dpkg: error: file triggers record mentions illegal package

[Bug 1195568] [NEW] glib2.0 2.37.3-1ubuntu1: invalid changelog entry format

Public bug reported: The changelog entry for 2.37.3-1ubuntu1 is unterminated [1], flowing in to the next entry for the unreleased debian changes. The following does not conform to changelog format as defined by debian-policy [2]: glib2.0 (2.37.3-1ubuntu1) saucy; urgency=low * Resynchronise on

Re: [Bug 1195568] [NEW] glib2.0 2.37.3-1ubuntu1: invalid changelog entry format

On 28 June 2013 16:17, Iain Lane wrote: > I'm guessing you got that from the changes file (or Launchpad's view of > it)? Those aren't quite the same as Debian changelogs, although > obviously they are parsed from them. > Yes, from Launchpad. I see. Ok. -- You received this bug notification be

Re: [Bug 1186441] Re: synaptic does not run

On 29 June 2013 06:56, ill <1186...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > I just tried the command again, and now I get: # /usr/bin/synaptic-pkexec That command should be run as the desktop user, not root. The prompt (#) indicates running as root. If you run as the logged in user, then it should work as

Re: [Bug 1191389] Re: package linux-image-extra-3.8.0-25-generic 3.8.0-25.37 failed to install/upgrade: run-parts: /etc/kernel/postinst.d/initramfs-tools exited with return code 1

On 30 June 2013 04:28, Redoubts wrote: >>>To confuse matters, the kernel images include apparently more recent > images: 3.5.0-28-generic .. > > Technically, that's the older kernel from Ubuntu 12.10; note the 3.5, vs > 3.8 for others. > > Regarding your rhetorical part, we should also complain he

Re: [Bug 1178909] Re: Bottom of description window concealed in synaptic with Openbox

On 2 July 2013 16:36, Jane Atkinson <1178...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > I'm not observing this issue any more after recent updates. Thank you for the update. status invalid ** Changed in: synaptic (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are

Re: [Bug 1198586] Re: /etc/kernel/postinst.d/apt-auto-removal: uname: not found

On 20 July 2013 08:39, Toby Lambert wrote: > Seems better > > toby@toby-VPCCB15FG:~$ ls -l /bin/uname > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 27072 Nov 20 2012 /bin/uname Great. Now you should be able to finish installing kernel updates without issue. $ sudo apt-get install -f -- You received this bug noti

Re: [Bug 1198586] Re: /etc/kernel/postinst.d/apt-auto-removal: uname: not found

On 21/07/2013 7:00 AM, "Toby Lambert" wrote: > > Sweet all seemed to update without any problems > status invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1198586 Title: /etc/kernel/postinst.

Re: [Bug 1179446] Re: Cannot use apt-get because of error in exim4-base_4.76-3ubuntu3.2_amd64.deb

On 15 May 2013 09:43, Matt Heard wrote: > ** Package changed: ubuntu => apt (Ubuntu) No. This is not sufficient to indicate a fault in apt: >> post-removal script returned error code (1) >> dpkg error /var/cache/apt/archives/exim4-base_4.76-3ubuntu3.2_amd64.deb >> (--unpack) > It says somethin

Re: [Bug 1123710] Re: wine1.4:i386 not installable on raring amd64

On 15 May 2013 20:02, Daniel <1123...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > The following packages have unmet dependencies: >wine1.4 : Depends: wine1.4-i386 (= 1.4.1-0ubuntu5) but it is not > installable > So you probably want to enable i386 repositories to use wine: $ sudo dpkg --add-architecture

Re: [Bug 1123710] Re: wine1.4:i386 not installable on raring amd64

On 15 May 2013 22:22, Daniel <1123...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: >> sudo dpkg --add-architecture i386 > Is this the way that each Ubuntu user should go? I never saw this > command before and I think it should not be necessary for > packages from the universe repository. > Usually it is not require

[Bug 1199823] Re: A seemingly harmless assertion error, but ...

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1135687 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1135687 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1135687 GtkNotebook 0x114d4a0 is mapped but visible child GtkLabel 0x1450610 is not mapped -- You received this bug notification because you are a member

Re: [Bug 1201208] [NEW] aptitude FTBFS with missing google-mock

On 15 July 2013 06:40, Stephen Michael Kellat wrote: > Public bug reported: > > Imported from Debian bug http://bugs.debian.org/716828: > > Package: aptitude > Version: 0.6.8.2-1 > Severity: serious > > Hi, > > [building] aptitude in plain sid (both on mipsel and amd64) ends > with: Failing to bu

[Bug 1201279] [NEW] google-mock and libgtest-dev out of sync

Public bug reported: google-mock 1.6.0+svn437-0ubuntu1 gtest 1.6.0-1ubuntu6 The recent upload of this google-mock version continues to be out of sync and incompatible with the Debian packaging. The Debian package is setup to use the corresponding libgtest-dev package, which has to be in sync. T

[Bug 1201279] Re: google-mock and libgtest-dev out of sync

> google-mock 1.6.0+svn437-0ubuntu1 This version uses gtest r655 [1] that is recently uploaded to sid as gtest 1.7.0~svn20130629-2 [2]. Please merge this version of gtest to resolve the issue. [1] [2]

[Bug 1201279] Re: merge gtest 1.7.0~svn20130629-2

** Summary changed: - google-mock and libgtest-dev out of sync + merge gtest 1.7.0~svn20130629-2 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1201279 Title: merge gtest 1.7.0~svn20130629-2 To man

Re: [Bug 1202001] [NEW] aptitude show doesn't work for some existing packages

On 17 July 2013 07:40, Reuben Thomas wrote: > Public bug reported: > > Running "aptitude show fdflush" doesn't work, even though there's a > package "fdflush". I checked my spelling very carefully. "apt-cache > search fdflush" works fine. "aptitude show" works fine for other package > names I trie

[Bug 1198586] Re: /etc/kernel/postinst.d/apt-auto-removal: uname: not found

What is output of $ ls -l /bin/uname $ apt-cache policy coreutils ** Summary changed: - package linux-image-3.5.0-36-generic 3.5.0-36.57~precise1 failed to install/upgrade: run-parts: /etc/kernel/postinst.d/apt-auto-removal exited with return code 127 + /etc/kernel/postinst.d/apt-auto-removal

Re: [Bug 1202001] Re: aptitude show doesn't work for some existing packages

Assignee: (unassigned) => Daniel Hartwig (wigs) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1202001 Title: aptitude show doesn't work without architecture suffix even if the package is

<    2   3   4   5   6   7   8   >