[Bug 16953] Re: Aptitude: should accept both "Si" and "Sí" (when asking for confirmation)

** Changed in: aptitude (Ubuntu) Assignee: Abhishek kumar singh (abhishekkumarsingh-cse) => (unassigned) ** Changed in: aptitude (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug rep

[Bug 880277] Re: aptitude always wants to install libnspr4-0d which is neither required nor recommended by any installed package

This issue should have expired by now. ** Changed in: aptitude (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/880277 Title: aptitude always wants to ins

[Bug 595719] Re: aptitude crashed with SIGSEGV in __fprintf_chk()

** Changed in: aptitude (Ubuntu) Assignee: Abhishek kumar singh (abhishekkumarsingh-cse) => (unassigned) ** Changed in: aptitude (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. htt

[Bug 234184] Re: "aptitude remove --purge" does not purge package

** Changed in: aptitude (Ubuntu) Assignee: Abhishek kumar singh (abhishekkumarsingh-cse) => (unassigned) ** Changed in: aptitude (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://b

[Bug 667468] Re: apt-get autoremove don't find all packages

[Clarification for future bug archaeologists] Invalid – as per comment from juliank (hint: maintainer). There was no fix released to address this report because a bug was never identified. Assuming use of the correct, documented commands: # apt-get remove PKG # apt-get autoremove not enough inf

Re: [Bug 667468] Re: apt-get autoremove don't find all packages

I have some final comments, I don't wish to start a dialog here since there is a non-issue and I am glad for it to be closed. On 19 September 2012 13:41, Sworddragon <667...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > This all is now ~2 years ago and the dependencies of alsa-utils has > changed so that I had to

[Bug 1052927] Re: Ubuntu Software Center could not determine package or source package name

The program is Terminal, you can type those commands in there. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1052927 Title: Ubuntu Software Center could not determine package or source package nam

[Bug 819842] Re: Commands in the background are terminated after closing the terminal

Comment #1 is correct. This is the intended behaviour of the system. When you start a process it is always as a child of another, usually some session. Graphically, you log in to a desktop session. When you start gnome-terminal you are beginning a separate shell session and any programs started

[Bug 819842] Re: Commands in the background are terminated after closing the terminal

> The same problem appears in LXTerminal too. Maybe a > shared component is affected by this problem. FYI the shared component in this case is the shell (usually /usr/bin/bash or similar) which is run by these terminal programs. Processes started by a shell are (typically) terminated when that sh

[Bug 819842] Re: Commands in the background are terminated after closing the terminal

Bug #376147 tracks the issue of gnome-terminal not warning that closing the terminal will terminate background processes. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/819842 Title: Commands in the

Re: [Bug 819842] Re: Commands in the background are terminated after closing the terminal

On 20 September 2012 18:29, Sworddragon <819...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > Are you sure that this is the correct behavior? Yes. > Some time before I have > opened this ticket it worked like expected: If I have started an > application in the background I could close the terminal without closing

Re: [Bug 819842] Re: Commands in the background are terminated after closing the terminal

On 20 September 2012 19:17, Sworddragon <819...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > I don't know it but with nohup the process will be a direct child of > init after closing the terminal. If so then do not use nohup for this purpose. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubu

Re: [Bug 819842] Re: Commands in the background are terminated after closing the terminal

On 20 September 2012 19:48, Sworddragon <819...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > So there is no difference for me. My mistake then. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/819842 Title: Commands

[Bug 1053429] Re: disk drive for / is not ready yet or not present

As this service is not really for technical support you will probably have more success finding help to fix your system elsewhere. In any case, the report needs more details about the upgrade, at least: - which release you upgraded from; - attach a copy of /var/log/dist-upgrade; - details about th

[Bug 1053429] Re: disk drive for / is not ready yet or not present

** Tags added: dist-upgrade precise -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1053429 Title: disk drive for / is not ready yet or not present To manage notifications about this bug go to: https

[Bug 1053776] [NEW] ubuntu patch uses unsupported search pattern, redundant

Public bug reported: Ubuntu changes to aptitude include the file 05aptitude containing this configuration item: aptitude::Keep-Unused-Pattern "^linux-image.*$ | ^linux-restricted- modules.*$ | ^linux-ubuntu-modules.*$"; First, the search terms used are implicit and this is unsupported for non-in

[Bug 1053785] [NEW] ubuntu patch 03_branding negatively effects localizations

Public bug reported: The ubuntu patch 03_branding changes various mentions of “Debian” to “Ubuntu.” This does not work well with translations. This patch has a negative effect on localization of aptitude in Ubuntu. The file section-descriptions is patched such that the description for section “b

[Bug 1053792] [NEW] ubuntu patch 04_changelog broken, ill-defined scope, out-of-date

Public bug reported: ubuntu patch 04_changelog This change is completely broken: --- a/src/apt_options.cc +++ b/src/apt_options.cc - "http://cgi.debian.org/cgi-bin/get-changelog?package=%s";), + "http://changelogs.ubuntu.com/changelogs/pool/%s/%s/%s/%s_%s/changelog";),

[Bug 1053796] [NEW] ubuntu branding changes do not cover all

Public bug reported: between ubuntu patches 03_branding and 04_changelog this string is missed: src/view_changelog.cc:274: string desclabel = _("View the list of changes made to this Debian package."); and all occurances in src/gtk/changelog.cc. -- Package: aptitude Version: 0.6.8ubuntu1 ** A

[Bug 1071566] Re: delete button does not delete anything in aptitude

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1071565 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1071565 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1071565 delete button does not delete anything -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu

[Bug 1071565] Re: delete button does not delete anything

Due to key bindings in cwidget, “delete” behaves the same as “backspace.” This is fixed in cwidget/0.5.16-3.3 (quantal). ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #493320 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=493320 ** Also affects: cwidget (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bi

[Bug 667501] Re: Components without translations

cwidget (0.5.16-3.3) unstable; urgency=low * Actually display translated strings: cherry-pick c65cae upstream, and use libcwidget3 as domain name in src/cwidget/generic/util/i18n.h and po/Makevars; install usr/share/locale files. (Closes: #559738) ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker

Re: [Bug 1071565] Re: delete button does not delete anything

On 27 October 2012 00:28, mikhail-777 wrote: > But patch in the mail dialog is about 2010 year. True. However it was only applied in June 2012, which is too late to be included in Ubuntu 12.04. > I don't very believe in phrases like "We believe that the bug you > reported is fixed in the latest

[Bug 824708] Re: aptitude can no longer show changelogs: "Changelog download failed: Download queue destroyed."

sunyucong: you must enable the -proposed repository first. See the instructions referred to in comment #28. Restoring previous tags. ** Tags removed: verification-needed ** Tags added: verification-done -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is sub

[Bug 954029] Re: gettext fails to install; package relationships should be with "gettext:any", "gettext-base:any", or are not required/useful at all

Recently brought up on debian-devel@ [1]. Wine maintainers, your “Recommends: gettext” is most likely incorrect. Please attend to this issue. [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2012/10/msg00410.html -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is su

[Bug 1071479] Re: package libapt-pkg4.12 0.8.16~exp12ubuntu10.5 failed to install/upgrade: './usr/share/locale/sk/LC_MESSAGES/libapt-pkg4.12.mo' is different from the same file on the system

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1039685 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1039685 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1039685 package libapt-pkg4.12 0.8.16~exp12ubuntu10.3 failed to install/upgrade: './usr/share/locale/sk/LC_MESSAGES/libapt-pkg4.12.mo' is different from the

[Bug 1071161] Re: failed to install/upgrade: libapt-pkg4.12:amd64 0.8.16~exp12ubuntu10.3 cannot be configured because libapt-pkg4.12

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1039685 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1039685 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1039685 package libapt-pkg4.12 0.8.16~exp12ubuntu10.3 failed to install/upgrade: './usr/share/locale/sk/LC_MESSAGES/libapt-pkg4.12.mo' is different from the

[Bug 954029] Re: gettext fails to install; package relationships should be with "gettext:any", "gettext-base:any", or are not required/useful at all

> I am double-checking with > upstream now though. Appreciated. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/954029 Title: gettext fails to install; package relationships should be with "gettext

[Bug 1051690] Re: update manager will not start

> Hit http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise/universe i386 Packages > […] > W: GPG error: http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise Release: The following > signatures were invalid: BADSIG 40976EAF437D05B5 Ubuntu Archive Automatic > Signing Key > E: Encountered a section with no Package: header > E: Pr

[Bug 884026] Re: aptitude does not return to command-line prompt

> It's become reproducible almost 100% of the time recently. This claim is also made on the linked report. It remains a mystery to me as I have never reproduced it and examining the code paths involved does not reveal an obvious error. Which versions of aptitude, apt, dpkg? Can you also provide

Re: [Bug 884026] Re: aptitude does not return to command-line prompt

Thanks for the extra info. On 26 September 2012 00:39, Rolf Leggewie <884...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > I have started to wonder if this might have something to do with the > etckeeper hooks? aptitude hangs always after installing or updating > some packages. Possible, however I would expect a

[Bug 1044561] Re: package gettext 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: gettext:i386 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 (Multi-Arch

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 954029 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/954029 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1006016 package gettext-base 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: gettext-base:i386 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 (Multi-Arch ** This bug has been marked a duplicate

[Bug 1040842] Re: package gettext-base 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: gettext-base:i386 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 (Multi-Arch

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 954029 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/954029 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1006016 package gettext-base 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: gettext-base:i386 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 (Multi-Arch ** This bug has been marked a duplicate

[Bug 1032127] Re: package gettext-base 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: gettext-base:i386 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 (Multi-Arch

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 954029 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/954029 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1006016 package gettext-base 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: gettext-base:i386 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 (Multi-Arch ** This bug has been marked a duplicate

[Bug 1016011] Re: Software center didn't install Wine

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 954029 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/954029 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1006016 package gettext-base 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: gettext-base:i386 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 (Multi-Arch ** This bug has been marked a duplicate

[Bug 1010086] Re: package gettext-base 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: gettext-base:i386 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 (Multi-Arch

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 954029 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/954029 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 954029 package gettext 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: gettext:i386 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 (Multi-Arch -- You received this bug notification because

[Bug 1009203] Re: package gettext-base 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: gettext-base:i386 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 (Multi-Arch

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 954029 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/954029 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 954029 package gettext 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: gettext:i386 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 (Multi-Arch -- You received this bug notification because

[Bug 1006687] Re: wine install, package gettext 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: gettext:i386 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 (Multi-Arch

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 954029 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/954029 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 954029 package gettext 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: gettext:i386 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 (Multi-Arch -- You received this bug notification because

[Bug 1006016] Re: package gettext-base 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: gettext-base:i386 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 (Multi-Arch

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 954029 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/954029 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 954029 package gettext 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: gettext:i386 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 (Multi-Arch -- You received this bug notification because

[Bug 1005848] Re: package gettext-base 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: gettext-base:i386 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 (Multi-Arch

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 954029 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/954029 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 954029 package gettext 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: gettext:i386 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 (Multi-Arch -- You received this bug notification because

[Bug 1001905] Re: package gettext-base 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: gettext-base:i386 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 (Multi-Arch

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 954029 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/954029 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 954029 package gettext 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: gettext:i386 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 (Multi-Arch -- You received this bug notification because

[Bug 1012366] Re: package gettext-base 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: gettext-base:i386 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 (Multi-Arch

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 954029 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/954029 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1012345 package gettext 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: gettext:i386 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 (Multi-Arch ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 95

[Bug 1012359] Re: package gettext-base 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: gettext-base:i386 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 (Multi-Arch

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 954029 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/954029 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1012345 package gettext 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: gettext:i386 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 (Multi-Arch ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 95

[Bug 1012345] Re: package gettext 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: gettext:i386 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 (Multi-Arch

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 954029 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/954029 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 954029 package gettext 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: gettext:i386 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 (Multi-Arch -- You received this bug notification because

[Bug 1039685] Re: package libapt-pkg4.12 0.8.16~exp12ubuntu10.3 failed to install/upgrade: './usr/share/locale/sk/LC_MESSAGES/libapt-pkg4.12.mo' is different from the same file on the system

This is [1] affecting multiple packages and fixed in gettext 0.18.1.1-8. The fix should be SRU to Precise and all affected packages will need to be rebuilt. [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=671257 ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #669985 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin

[Bug 1039685] Re: package libapt-pkg4.12 0.8.16~exp12ubuntu10.3 failed to install/upgrade: './usr/share/locale/sk/LC_MESSAGES/libapt-pkg4.12.mo' is different from the same file on the system

See also bug #924628 which has similar symptoms but is already addressed. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1039685 Title: package libapt-pkg4.12 0.8.16~exp12ubuntu10.3 failed to insta

[Bug 1014431] Re: Trying to update, no window control on the top (ie minimize close), left control key won't work (right ctrl key still does), stuck in 640x480, I'm running a 64bit system with Ubunutu

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 954029 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/954029 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 954029 package gettext 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: gettext:i386 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 (Multi-Arch -- You received this bug notification because

[Bug 1039685] Re: package libapt-pkg4.12 0.8.16~exp12ubuntu10.3 failed to install/upgrade: './usr/share/locale/sk/LC_MESSAGES/libapt-pkg4.12.mo' is different from the same file on the system

** Attachment added: "06-msgfmt-default-little-endian" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gettext/+bug/1039685/+attachment/3363497/+files/06-msgfmt-default-little-endian ** Summary changed: - package libapt-pkg4.12 0.8.16~exp12ubuntu10.3 failed to install/upgrade: './usr/share/locale/

[Bug 1039685] Re: gettext: msgfmt output format prevents multiarch migration [affecting apt in precise; fixed in sid, quantal]

Scratch that. Since the archs involved are i386 and amd64 this is probably just bug #924628 again. ** No longer affects: gettext (Ubuntu) ** No longer affects: gettext ** Summary changed: - gettext: msgfmt output format prevents multiarch migration [affecting apt in precise; fixed in sid, qu

[Bug 1003556] Re: package libcdparanoia0 3.10.2+debian-10ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: './usr/share/doc/libcdparanoia0/README.gz' is different from the same file on the system

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 871083 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/871083 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 871083 gzip -9n sometimes generates a different output file on different architectures -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubu

[Bug 871083] Re: gzip -9n sometimes generates a different output file on different architectures

** Also affects: cdparanoia (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/871083 Title: gzip -9n sometimes generates a different output file on d

[Bug 989166] Re: package libappindicator0.1-cil 0.4.92-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: dependency problems - leaving unconfigured

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 974934 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/974934 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 974934 package libappindicator0.1-cil 0.4.92-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: dependency problems - leaving unconfigured -- You received th

[Bug 937133] Re: package libgtk2.0-0 2.24.10-0ubuntu1 [modified: usr/share/doc/libgtk2.0-0/changelog.gz] failed to install/upgrade: './usr/share/doc/libgtk2.0-0/changelog.gz' is different from the sam

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 899316 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/899316 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 899316 package gtk2-engines-pixbuf 2.24.8-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: './usr/share/doc/gtk2-engines-pixbuf/NEWS.gz' is different from the same file o

[Bug 997524] Re: package gcc-4.4-base (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: './usr/share/doc/gcc-4.4-base/README.Debian.gz' is different from the same file on the system

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 985842 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/985842 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 985842 package gcc-4.4-base 4.4.7-1ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: './usr/share/doc/gcc-4.4-base/README.Debian.gz' is different from the same file on the

[Bug 992072] Re: package gcc-4.4-base (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: './usr/share/doc/gcc-4.4-base/README.Debian.gz' is different from the same file on the system

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 985842 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/985842 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 985842 package gcc-4.4-base 4.4.7-1ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: './usr/share/doc/gcc-4.4-base/README.Debian.gz' is different from the same file on the

[Bug 876377] Re: package libdb4.8 4.8.30-5ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: './usr/share/doc/libdb4.8/changelog.Debian.gz' is different from the same file on the system

This is due to bug #871083 in gzip, now fixed. Packages in Precise for db4.8 4.8.30-5ubuntu2 are ok now. ** Changed in: db4.8 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.l

[Bug 985842] Re: package gcc-4.4-base 4.4.7-1ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: './usr/share/doc/gcc-4.4-base/README.Debian.gz' is different from the same file on the system: removing the file fixes t

Fixed in 4.4.7-2. ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #650102 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=650102 ** Also affects: gcc-4.4 (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=650102 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Changed in: gcc-4.4 (Ubunt

[Bug 985842] Re: package gcc-4.4-base 4.4.7-1ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: './usr/share/doc/gcc-4.4-base/README.Debian.gz' is different from the same file on the system: removing the file fixes t

** Description changed: + [Impact] + + The contents of README.Debian.gz are arch-specific (see debbugs + #650102). Even though it is Multi-Arch: same, the package gcc-4.4-base + can not be co-installed with itself. + + The fix is renaming README.Debian to README.Debian.$(DEB_TARGET_ARCH). + +

[Bug 985842] Re: package gcc-4.4-base 4.4.7-1ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: './usr/share/doc/gcc-4.4-base/README.Debian.gz' is different from the same file on the system: removing the file fixes t

** Patch added: "r6092-arch-readme.patch" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gcc-4.4/+bug/985842/+attachment/3364370/+files/r6092-arch-readme.patch ** Summary changed: - package gcc-4.4-base 4.4.7-1ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: './usr/share/doc/gcc-4.4-base/README.Debian.gz' is d

[Bug 948863] Re: package libsoup2.4-1 2.37.90-0ubuntu1 [modified: usr/share/doc/libsoup2.4-1/NEWS.gz usr/share/doc/libsoup2.4-1/changelog.Debian.gz] failed to install/upgrade: libsoup2.4-1:amd64 2.37.

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 948001 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/948001 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 948001 package libsoup2.4-1 2.37.90-0ubuntu1 [modified: usr/share/doc/libsoup2.4-1/NEWS.gz usr/share/doc/libsoup2.4-1/changelog.Debian.gz] failed to install/

[Bug 971985] Re: package libsoup2.4-1 2.38.0-1 [modified: usr/share/doc/libsoup2.4-1/changelog.Debian.gz] failed to install/upgrade: './usr/share/doc/libsoup2.4-1/changelog.Debian.gz' is different fro

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 948001 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/948001 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 948001 package libsoup2.4-1 2.37.90-0ubuntu1 [modified: usr/share/doc/libsoup2.4-1/NEWS.gz usr/share/doc/libsoup2.4-1/changelog.Debian.gz] failed to install/

[Bug 991519] Re: package libsoup2.4-1 2.38.0-1 [modified: usr/share/doc/libsoup2.4-1/changelog.Debian.gz] failed to install/upgrade: libsoup2.4-1:amd64 2.38.0-1 cannot be configured because libsoup2.4

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 948001 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/948001 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 986448 package libsoup2.4-1 2.38.0-1 [modified: usr/share/doc/libsoup2.4-1/changelog.Debian.gz] failed to install/upgrade: libsoup2.4-1:amd64 2.38.0-1 cannot be

[Bug 986448] Re: package libsoup2.4-1 2.38.0-1 [modified: usr/share/doc/libsoup2.4-1/changelog.Debian.gz] failed to install/upgrade: libsoup2.4-1:amd64 2.38.0-1 cannot be configured because libsoup2.4

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 948001 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/948001 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 948001 package libsoup2.4-1 2.37.90-0ubuntu1 [modified: usr/share/doc/libsoup2.4-1/NEWS.gz usr/share/doc/libsoup2.4-1/changelog.Debian.gz] failed to install/

[Bug 973309] Re: package libsoup2.4-1 2.38.0-1 [modified: usr/share/doc/libsoup2.4-1/changelog.Debian.gz] failed to install/upgrade: libsoup2.4-1:amd64 2.38.0-1 cannot be configured because libsoup2.4

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 948001 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/948001 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 948001 package libsoup2.4-1 2.37.90-0ubuntu1 [modified: usr/share/doc/libsoup2.4-1/NEWS.gz usr/share/doc/libsoup2.4-1/changelog.Debian.gz] failed to install/

[Bug 1037390] Re: package libgail18 2.24.10-0ubuntu6 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: './usr/share/doc/libgail18/changelog.gz' is different from the same file on the system

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 871083 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/871083 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 871083 gzip -9n sometimes generates a different output file on different architectures -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubu

[Bug 937133] Re: package libgtk2.0-0 2.24.10-0ubuntu1 [modified: usr/share/doc/libgtk2.0-0/changelog.gz] failed to install/upgrade: './usr/share/doc/libgtk2.0-0/changelog.gz' is different from the sam

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 871083 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/871083 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 899316 package gtk2-engines-pixbuf 2.24.8-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: './usr/share/doc/gtk2-engines-pixbuf/NEWS.gz' is different from the same file on t

[Bug 899706] Re: package gtk2-engines-pixbuf 2.24.8-0ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: './usr/share/doc/gtk2-engines-pixbuf/NEWS.gz' is different from the same file on the system

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 871083 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/871083 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 899316 package gtk2-engines-pixbuf 2.24.8-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: './usr/share/doc/gtk2-engines-pixbuf/NEWS.gz' is different from the same file on t

[Bug 899482] Re: package gtk2-engines-pixbuf 2.24.8-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: './usr/share/doc/gtk2-engines-pixbuf/NEWS.gz' is different from the same file on the system

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 871083 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/871083 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 899316 package gtk2-engines-pixbuf 2.24.8-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: './usr/share/doc/gtk2-engines-pixbuf/NEWS.gz' is different from the same file on t

[Bug 899316] Re: package gtk2-engines-pixbuf 2.24.8-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: './usr/share/doc/gtk2-engines-pixbuf/NEWS.gz' is different from the same file on the system

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 871083 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/871083 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 871083 gzip -9n sometimes generates a different output file on different architectures -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubu

[Bug 871083] Re: gzip -9n sometimes generates a different output file on different architectures

** No longer affects: cdparanoia (Ubuntu) ** No longer affects: cdparanoia (Ubuntu Precise) ** No longer affects: cdparanoia (Ubuntu Oneiric) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/871083 Tit

Re: [Bug 831768] Re: aptitude cannot handle conflicts with multiarch enabled

On 3 October 2012 03:27, YAFU <831...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > Sorry, I've rushed. > Now "aptitude" v0.6.8.1 on Precise can not resolve dependencies when trying > to install Google Earth: > http://pastebin.com/eu2ua79c The proposed solution there looks fine to me, remove some -dev and misc.

Re: [Bug 831768] Re: aptitude cannot handle conflicts with multiarch enabled

On 4 October 2012 22:14, Michael Terry wrote: > So after some quick smoke tests of my own, I've uploaded it > to quantal. Appreciated. > According to comment 104, SRUs are not necessarily requested by this > bug. >From that comment, with emphasis added: > This is *currently* only a request to

Re: [Bug 1058790] Re: package does not uninstall

On 5 October 2012 03:27, Marc Deslauriers wrote: > ** Package changed: ubuntu => apt (Ubuntu) The dpkg output makes it clear that the issue is with the maintainer script of this “brscan2” package. I do not see that Ubuntu provides such a package. status invalid @ill: Report this issue to the

[Bug 1057148] Re: package libapt-inst1.4 0.8.16~exp12ubuntu10.2 failed to install/upgrade: './usr/share/locale/pt_BR/LC_MESSAGES/libapt-inst1.4.mo' is different from the same file on the system

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1039685 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1039685 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1039685 package libapt-pkg4.12 0.8.16~exp12ubuntu10.3 failed to install/upgrade: './usr/share/locale/sk/LC_MESSAGES/libapt-pkg4.12.mo' is different from the

[Bug 441059] Re: incorrect problem resolution

Rolf, I think your report may have been the situation described here: http://bugs.debian.org/511366 which applies to using full-upgrade when the only upgrades available result in breakage. ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #511366 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=511366

[Bug 1057860] Re: package libapt-inst1.4 0.8.16~exp12ubuntu10.2 [modified: usr/share/locale/ar/LC_MESSAGES/libapt-inst1.4.mo usr/share/locale/ast/LC_MESSAGES/libapt-inst1.4.mo usr/share/locale/bg/LC_M

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1039685 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1039685 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1039685 package libapt-pkg4.12 0.8.16~exp12ubuntu10.3 failed to install/upgrade: './usr/share/locale/sk/LC_MESSAGES/libapt-pkg4.12.mo' is different from the

[Bug 1057916] Re: aptitude died with SIGSEGV while updating repositories

Needs stack trace. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebuggingProgramCrash or something. ** Changed in: aptitude (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1057

[Bug 1058790] Re: package does not uninstall

> status:Invalid → Confirmed Please do not confirm your own reports. > It is still apt's bug if it is unable to uninstall it. No, it isn't. See bug #12508, for example, and . The package maintainer scripts contain instr

[Bug 1063481] Re: Conflict with gettext-base:i386, who is needed by wine

> There are conflicts with: > - gettext and gettext:i386 > - gettext-base and gettext-base:i386 Please provide the output from apt/dpkg showing the actual error. Is it the same error as bug #954029? ** Changed in: gettext (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notif

[Bug 954029] Re: package gettext 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: gettext:i386 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 (Multi-Arch

** Also affects: wine1.4 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/954029 Title: package gettext 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade:

[Bug 954029] Re: package gettext 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: gettext:i386 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 (Multi-Arch

Almost all duplicates here have wine1.4 packages involved. Binary packages wine1.4-i386 and wine1.4-amd64 both have “Recommends: gettext”, which is Multi-Arch: allowed. As a result the system attempts to install both gettext:i386 and gettext:amd64, which is not allowed. The wine1.4 packages shoul

[Bug 954029] Re: package gettext 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: gettext:i386 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 (Multi-Arch

> install both gettext:i386 and gettext:amd64, which is not allowed. The > wine1.4 packages should *consider* whether they actually use the package > gettext … -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net

[Bug 954029] Re: package gettext 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: gettext:i386 0.18.1.1-5ubuntu3 (Multi-Arch

At this point the issue is invalid for gettext. This actual cause is other packages declaring inappropriate relationships with gettext. See previous comment. ** Changed in: gettext (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ub

[Bug 1063481] Re: Conflict with gettext-base:i386, who is needed by wine

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 954029 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/954029 > Please provide the output from apt/dpkg showing the actual error. Is it > the same error as bug #954029? Never mind. That bug (and it's duplicates) all involve wine1.4 packages, so this is definitely a dup

[Bug 954029] Re: gettext fails to install; package relationships should be with "gettext:any" or are not required/useful

At least one report here (bug #977078) features playonlinux which depends on gettext-base. That report also contains the wine1.4 packages which are problematic, though since playonlinux is arch: all and appears to be using gettext-base for it's shell script support the dependency in playonlinux co

[Bug 1007773] Re: wine installation requires removal of google earth

> The following packages will be REMOVED: > alien debhelper gettext google-earth-stable intltool-debian > lsb-core po-debconf All these packages eventually depend on gettext. Please see bug #954029. Directly depending packages: intltool-debian po-debconf. These are both arch: all and should n

[Bug 954029] Re: gettext fails to install; package relationships should be with "gettext:any", "gettext-base:any", or are not required/useful at all

Structure of gettext packaging in Debian is currently being discussed , and it is likely this will no longer be an issue for playonlinux. The wine1.4 recommends still needs to be examined. ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #683751 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-

[Bug 954029] Re: gettext fails to install; package relationships should be with "gettext:any", "gettext-base:any", or are not required/useful at all

** No longer affects: playonlinux (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/954029 Title: gettext fails to install; package relationships should be with "gettext:any", "gettext-base:a

Re: [Bug 973277] Re: Default MaxReports of 3 skews statistics in error database

> Where can I setup APT::Apport::MaxReports ? > apt.conf(5) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/973277 Title: Default MaxReports of 3 skews statistics in error database To manage notific

[Bug 831768] Re: aptitude cannot handle conflicts with multiarch enabled

Dealing with the problem resolver is difficult and time consuming. A project has been start on fossfactory.org to fund work on this bug. The aim of fossfactory.org is for interested users to pledge funds to attract developers to work on the projects they care about. When a particular feature or

[Bug 722504] Re: Aptitude prompts localized yes/no but only accepts English yes/no response

fixed in either 0.6.5 or 0.6.6 ** Changed in: aptitude (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/722504 Title: Aptitude prompts localized yes/

[Bug 428545] Re: aptitude Silently ignores invalid Default-Release.

This appears fixed in recent versions on my Debian system: # ./aptitude install tf E: The value 'etch' is invalid for APT::Default-Release as such a release is not available in the sources Does this still affect you? ** Changed in: aptitude (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You re

[Bug 451053] Re: aptitude update returns 255 although new packages are available

Can you still reproduce this on a more recent version (> 0.6.4)? ** Changed in: aptitude (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/451053 Title: aptitu

[Bug 981816] Re: aptitude -d install freezes

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 975793 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/975793 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 975793 'aptitude safe-upgrade -d -y' enters infinite loop -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed

[Bug 960525] Re: aptitude -d Failed to write temporary StateFile /var/lib/apt/extended_states.tmp - also consumes CPU power and takes a while to finish the operation after download

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 975793 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/975793 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 975793 'aptitude safe-upgrade -d -y' enters infinite loop -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed

[Bug 471467] Re: aptitude reinstall option isn't working

# apt-cache policy aptitude aptitude: Installed: 0.6.6-1+b1 Candidate: 0.6.6-1+b1 Version table: *** 0.6.6-1+b1 0 500 http://ftp.iinet.net.au/debian/debian/ sid/main i386 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status # aptitude reinstall tf The following packages will be REINSTALLED:

[Bug 295617] Re: error message when use sudo aptitude update in pt_BR

Changelog says this is fixed in 0.4.11.4-1 ** Changed in: aptitude (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/295617 Title: error message when u

[Bug 305504] Re: aptitude does not automatically remove unused packages

** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #637483 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=637483 ** Also affects: aptitude (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=637483 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because

[Bug 492797] Re: aptitude segfaults with --show-why -v

Can not reproduce this with 0.6.6. Please confirm if still valid. ** Changed in: aptitude (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/492797 Title:

[Bug 1027421] Re: Package manager broken Ubuntu 12.10

Provide the name of the program and the precise text of the error message. What actions have you taken to try resolving the issue? ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to U

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   >