Marking as fixed based on my comment #9. See also bug #831768.
** Changed in: aptitude (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/968412
Title:
> Next you remove the added repository, by commenting the lines in the
> above added file out. Then
>
> apt-get clean all
> apt-get update
>
> Calling aptitude after will show no updates available.
Correct. “No updates” means that the current (installed) version is
more recent than any other.
>
> This clarifies some things to me, but ( :-) ) it is confusing,
> since in case the package vanishes from any repository the
> candidate is shown as "" (or "" in german),
> indicating there is no package with this name available any
> more
Right, that does seem inconsistent and I see in pkg_colum
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #620773
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=620773
** Also affects: distcc (Debian) via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=620773
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification because yo
postinst failed because daemon was already running (debian bug #620773)
** Changed in: distcc (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/822887
Titl
** Bug watch added: distcc bugs in google code #36
http://code.google.com/p/distcc/issues/detail?id=36
** Also affects: distcc via
http://code.google.com/p/distcc/issues/detail?id=36
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification because you are a membe
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #481951
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=481951
** Also affects: distcc (Debian) via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=481951
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
** Changed in: distcc
Remote watch: distcc bugs
** Bug watch added: distcc bugs in google code #43
http://code.google.com/p/distcc/issues/detail?id=43
** Changed in: distcc
Remote watch: distcc bugs in google code #34 => distcc bugs in google code #43
** Bug watch removed: distcc bugs in google code #34
http://code.google.com/p/distcc/i
>aptitude: error while loading shared libraries: libsigc-2.0.so.0: cannot open
> shared object file: No such file or directory
>
> Resinstalling doesn't help...
Did you try reinstalling aptitude, libsigc++-2.0-0c2a, or both?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubunt
** Changed in: aptitude
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/884945
Title:
aptitude show wrong package state
To manage notifications about this
Looks like this might be a multi-arch issue: #651748 (bugs.d.o), which
is fixed in 0.6.6. Please confirm whether this is resolved once that
version reaches Ubuntu.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 831768 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/831768
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 975898
Package wine1.4 fails to install on 12.04 64-bit due to package conflicts
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 831768
aptitude cannot handle c
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 831768 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/831768
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 831768
aptitude cannot handle conflicts with multiarch enabled
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscr
cjwatson wrote:
> I'm uploading 0.6.6-1ubuntu1 to precise now. However, I'm not closing
> this bug at this point, because I'm not convinced it entirely fixes it
> (and upstream doesn't appear to truly claim that it does).
Correct -- as previously mentioned, the problem resolver is not
intelligent
Needs backtrace
** Changed in: aptitude (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/727812
Title:
aptitude segfault
To manage notifications about this b
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #468897
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=468897
** Also affects: aptitude via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=468897
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
> what can i do now
Provide more details -- a log of the installation, etc.
** Changed in: aptitude (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/84902
** Changed in: aptitude (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/828681
Title:
aptitude complains about "pinentry-gtk2 has an invalid dependency
ty
libapt-pkg does this.
Also, maybe don't unmount the cwd (or any other directory) while
updating your system.
** Package changed: aptitude (Ubuntu) => apt (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpa
Provide log of output from safe-upgrade, perhaps also your apt/aptitude
conf files.
** Changed in: aptitude (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/9757
Not an issue with aptitude; more likely user broke their own system
configuration.
** Package changed: aptitude (Ubuntu) => ubuntu
** Changed in: ubuntu
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu
limcore wrote:
> Ok, the bug seems to be because I just installed "Ubuntu"
> and then added krusader kmail and so on;
Yes, and those packages (krusader, kmail) are *not* in the listing of
packages for removal you posted. So this is not a bug with aptitude.
> So I do not have kubuntu-desktop pack
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 831768
aptitude cannot handle conflicts with multiarch enabled
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/899709
Title:
does not work on multiarch s
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 831768
aptitude cannot handle conflicts with multiarch enabled
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/892701
Title:
aptitude-gtk lists packages
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 831768
aptitude cannot handle conflicts with multiarch enabled
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/892074
Title:
aptitude show does not show
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 845136 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/845136
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 845136
Forget new packages doesn't save its action
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubun
** Description changed:
TEST CASE:
1. Enable multiarch (should be automatic on new oneiric systems)
2. Install an i386 package on amd64 (like flashplugin-installer:i386)
3. Mark something with a lot of dependencies for installation
4. On the confirmation screen, try to remove on of the d
> This is not specific to multiarch.
Agreed, though this test case is. I have only included the workaround
in the description as many users are likely to land here due to the
release notes.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubu
** Changed in: aptitude
Importance: Unknown => Undecided
** Changed in: aptitude
Status: Fix Released => New
** Changed in: aptitude
Remote watch: Debian Bug tracker #661744 => None
** Changed in: aptitude (Debian)
Importance: Unknown => Undecided
** Changed in: aptitude (Debian)
Also, this report does not need more comments about:
- the mention in 12.04 release notes, including the wording;
- whether the resolver is generally working or not working; or
- whether aptitude works or not with multi-arch.
I have today unmerged ~4 bugs which were not related to the issue
ident
so somehow libsigc on your system was broken. This is a support issue,
not a bug in aptitude.
** Changed in: aptitude (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/b
So this is not reproducible on more recent releases?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/506415
Title:
aptitude+trickle crashes if there is another copy of it running in
background. libc
> 3. each available architecture of packages that are available only in
> foreign architectures as ":"
Ok, this may prove more useful than what I was considering (only show
the first such architecture).
> The reason for this is that the order in which
> they are specified in the /etc/dpkg/dpkg.co
> I symlinked /usr/bin/python to Python2.6 instead of
> the installed Python2.7: "ValueError: /usr/bin/python
> does not match the python default version. It must
> be reset to point to python2.7"
Files in /usr/bin are system managed. A user should not change them.
If you do, you have broken your
Do not modify files in /usr/bin.
> ValueError: /usr/bin/python does not match the python
> default version. It must be reset to point to python2.6
This is not a bug, but a safety check.
See here for solution:
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1143614
** Changed in: python-setuptools (U
Do not modify files in /usr/bin.
> ValueError: /usr/bin/python does not match the python
> default version. It must be reset to point to python2.7
This is not a bug, rather, a safety check. Do as this message says
and reset the symlink. See here:
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=114361
> Setting up python-setuptools (0.6c9-0ubuntu1) ...
> pycentral: pycentral pkginstall: not overwriting local files
> pycentral pkginstall: not overwriting local files
> dpkg: error processing python-setuptools (--configure):
> subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1
This
Do not modify files in /usr/bin.
> ValueError: /usr/bin/python does not match the python
> default version. It must be reset to point to python2.6
This is not a bug, rather, a safety check. Do as the message says
and reset the symlink:
# ln -sf python2.6 /usr/bin/python
** Changed in: python-
** Changed in: envyng-core (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/410690
Title:
package envyng-core 2.0.1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess
> After using update-alternatives to switch between python versions
> recently, the update of software-center failed.
/usr/bin/python is not managed by alternatives. This is a symlink which
belongs to the python-minimal package.
You have used alternatives and changed this file. It is *not* supp
> Use needs alternate python for project. Which causes problem with
> denyhosts install.
Then that project can use /usr/bin/python2.N or a local install in
/usr/local/bin.
> Denyhost won't configure when using alternate python install -
> should it really be that picky?
Yes, it should.
It is no
Do not modify files in /usr/bin.
> ValueError: /usr/bin/python does not match the python
> default version. It must be reset to point to python2.6
This is not a bug, rather, a safety check. Do as the message says
and reset the symlink:
# ln -sf python2.6 /usr/bin/python
** Changed in: python-
> My problem is now fixed. I will try and explain what happened.
>
> I had a broken soft link that was preventing me from doing
> the updates. (as you can see in the term.log)
Changing symlinks in /usr/bin is user error.
The ValueError from the log is a safety check against such
a user error. No
> Packages from different architectures should definitely be displayed
> as individual packages because:
> ...
That was my reasoning also. This is much easier to implement and
practically already done.
> What if I care? What if I want to see, in a search result or a
> filtered view, both native
Do not modify files in /usr/bin.
> ValueError: /usr/bin/python does not match the python
> default version. It must be reset to point to python2.6
This is not a bug, rather, a safety check. Do as the message says
and reset the symlink:
# ln -sf python2.6 /usr/bin/python
** Changed in: bicycle
> Sure, I'll file a request against APT.
Never mind that. I will have a patch ready shortly.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/831768
Title:
aptitude cannot handle conflicts with multi
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 75332 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/75332
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 75332
Held back packages not ignored by update-manager
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ub
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 454941 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/454941
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 454941
thinks that package information is 8 days old even after updating an hour
ago (aptitude does not write update-stamp)
--
You received this bug notific
** Changed in: aptitude (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/247778
Title:
aptitude manual does not provide a doc-base entry
To manage notificat
Files have always been installed to /usr/share/doc/aptitude/html/en
** Changed in: aptitude (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/146314
Title:
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #412830
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=412830
** Also affects: aptitude via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=412830
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
** Changed in: aptitude (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/188008
Title:
aptitude shows "1 packages upgraded
To manage notifications abo
Applies when using Aptitude::Pkg-Display-Limit.
** Changed in: aptitude (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/381507
Title:
Install / Remove Package
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #659079
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=659079
** Also affects: aptitude via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=659079
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 904486 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/904486
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 904486
UI does not show multi-arch packages well
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu
This is a debconf dialog.
** Package changed: aptitude (Ubuntu) => debconf (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/389035
Title:
Strange dialog during upgrade
To manage notification
problem lies in users network hardware
** Changed in: aptitude (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/562641
Title:
hash sum mismatch error
To manage
** Package changed: aptitude (Ubuntu) => plymouth (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/769250
Title:
plymouth no logo and progress bar on nvidia card
To manage notifications about
commit fd28ea8c2af0786d3a426d06ea3527aa48de96ac
Author: Daniel Hartwig
Date: Sat Mar 17 01:01:52 2012 +0800
Respect DPkg::Options when calling dpkg to recover failed installs
Usually we use APT to call dpkg, which handles all sorts of nice
option parsing. However, if an
@ b-schliessmann
> I'd really like to help and bisect the problem, but the upstream aptitude
> maintainer doesn't seem to use any public source control.
git clone http://anonscm.debian.org/git/aptitude/aptitude.git
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, wh
** Also affects: aptitude via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=307583
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/550858
Title:
apt
> If anybody cares, in oneiric's aptitude it seems fixed. Aptitude behaves as
> expected again.
** Changed in: aptitude (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.lau
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #658271
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=658271
** Also affects: aptitude via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=658271
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 904486 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/904486
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 904486
UI does not show multi-arch packages well
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 904486 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/904486
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 904486
UI does not show multi-arch packages well
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 831768 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/831768
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 831768
aptitude cannot handle conflicts with multiarch enabled
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscr
** Changed in: aptitude (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/823953
Title:
aptitude ignores preferences files in /etc/apt/preferences.d/
To mana
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #583201
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=583201
** Also affects: aptitude via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=583201
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 727716 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/727716
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 727716
Aptitude does not support downloading source package
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribe
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 831768 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/831768
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 831768
aptitude cannot handle conflicts with multiarch enabled
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscr
> Please add package lp-solve to dependency list.
Which package to add it to?
** Changed in: aptitude (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/928774
** Changed in: aptitude (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/610558
Title:
aptitude debian/control file has obsolete VCS-* paths
To manage noti
** Package changed: aptitude (Ubuntu) => ppa-purge (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/924570
Title:
Rename (alias) ppa-purge to fit apt counterpart
To manage notifications about
commit 097f91e9846634bef4f3e01b8dfa101bb298d0ee
Author: Daniel Hartwig
Date: Thu Mar 15 23:06:08 2012 +0800
Use full name (i.e. architecture) with ?name sort policy
A package's full name includes the architecture, so consider
this when using sort policies.
** Also af
Problem was aptitude considering multi-arch packages to be the same.
You would get varying results for the status based upon which package it
encountered first in the search.
Here libc-bin was reported incorrectly:
$ aptitude-0.6.5 search libc-bin$ libc6$
p libc-bin- Emb
** Also affects: synaptic (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: aptitude (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/257279
Ti
> My
> current idea is that we could do this by running 'aptitude --schedule-only'
> via the terminal plugin,
To clarify, '--schedule-only' is only intended for command-line actions.
It has no effect on the interactive mode, you are better to just run
'aptitude' and not deceive yourself about the
apache2-mpm-worker is recommended by trac (through 'provides'):
$ apt-cache show trac | grep Recommends
Recommends: apache2 | httpd, ...
$ apt-cache show apache2-mpm-worker | grep Provides
Provides: apache2, apache2-mpm, httpd, httpd-cgi
so it is expected that having trac installed prevents apach
Please provide some samples or confirm the issue is no longer present.
** Changed in: aptitude (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/66074
Title:
u
** Changed in: aptitude (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/879683
Title:
recommends are listed before reverse depends
To manage notifications abo
Actually the order is somewhat random (for curses only) depending on the
order that APT lists the given dependencies. On the cmdline it is not
random, but still could be cleaned up a bit.
In any case, this will be changed to a fixed order. At the moment there
is an implicit "strength" order avai
http://www.debuntu.org/how-to-manage-services-with-update-rc.d
> # update-rc.d -f apache2 remove
>
> The use of -f is to force the removal of the symlinks even
> if there is still /etc/init.d/apache2.
>
> Note: This command will only disable the service until next
> time the service is upgraded. I
** Changed in: aptitude (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/610558
Title:
aptitude debian/control file has obsolete VCS-* paths
To ma
** Changed in: aptitude (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/563155
Title:
Add support for 3rd party repository changelogs
To manage notifications
RedSingularity (redsingularity) wrote on 2012-03-11:
> Moving package, though I doubt it is the fault of the apt system.
Indeed. The unpacking line indicates that control has passed to dpkg at
this point.
** Package changed: aptitude (Ubuntu) => dpkg (Ubuntu)
** Summary changed:
- Apt-get unb
remove unneeded Baltix task
** Changed in: baltix
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/845136
Title:
Forget new packages doesn't save its action
To manage no
remove unneeded Baltix task
** Changed in: baltix
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/831768
Title:
aptitude cannot handle conflicts with multiarch enabled
Previous fix reverted. It was somewhat of a hack and more work required
to accurately and *safely* invoke dpkg.
** Changed in: aptitude
Status: Fix Committed => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https:/
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #651748
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=651748
** Also affects: aptitude via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=651748
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
> Well, in the case of failing dependencies, it seems like any choice at
> the prompt gives a 0 return value. Is the rationale that 'aptitude
> managed to abort successfully' equals success? If that is the intended
> functionality, then I cannot trust aptitude to give any meaningful
> return value.
On 23 February 2014 14:39, Tomas Pospisek wrote:
>> Bug Watch Updater (bug-watch-updater) on 2014-02-08
>> Changed in aptitude:
>> status: New → Incomplete
>
> Robots without brains -> contraproductive, automatically wasting
> peoples' time
>
> I'm changing status back now
>
LP status chang
On 26/08/2013 3:15 PM, "Sworddragon" <1216...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote:
>
> Public bug reported:
>
> I'm using Ubuntu 13.10 dev with apt 0.9.9.1~ubuntu2. Trying to use the
> option -t with apt-get download will result as if the option -t was not
> given. Here is an example which shows that the wro
0.6.3-3.2ubuntu1is currently in Natty, and Maverick is no longer
supported.
** Changed in: aptitude (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/795602
Due to the internal processing model of command-line actions, this
applies to most warnings and status messages that can occur during
install, upgrade, remove, forbid-version, etc.
Other examples:
Couldn't find any package whose name or description matched "foo"
Package foo is not upgradable, can
> Aptitude uses the environment variables $http_proxy and
> $ftp_proxy for its proxy configuration, but seems to ignore the
> variable $no_proxy.
[These settings are handled by apt]
If you are using sudo to run apt-get then the problem is that
sudo only passed http_proxy, and not no_proxy. This
** Package changed: aptitude (Ubuntu) => unity (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/994504
Title:
Special + W duplicates functionality of the keyboard binding Alt +
Shift + Up cu
** Changed in: aptitude (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/633947
Title:
Please merge aptitude (main) 0.6.3-3.2 from Debian testing (main)
To
On 6 May 2012 17:16, Thomas Schweikle <995...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote:
> Public bug reported:
>
> apptitude wants to remove 90 packages, because it finds one update,
> which breaks one package only.
>
Is this a multi-arch system?
>From the screenshot:
> --- New Packages (40394)
and the list o
** Bug watch added: distcc bugs in google code #111
http://code.google.com/p/distcc/issues/detail?id=111
** Also affects: distcc via
http://code.google.com/p/distcc/issues/detail?id=111
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification because you are a me
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 975793 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/975793
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 975793
'aptitude safe-upgrade -d -y' enters infinite loop
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
1 - 100 of 730 matches
Mail list logo
