Re: [Bug 208770] Re: Hardy beta boot sequence: Network mounts in fstab is done before network is ready.

2008-12-03 Thread DanN
No. I use a "cifs" network share. As I understand "_netdev" is only valid for nfs. Regards, Dan Litrik De Roy skrev: > Is any of you using the "_netdev" mount parameter in /etc/fstab? > This thread indicates that should avoid the delay during boot: > http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=78

[Bug 208770] Re: Hardy beta boot sequence: Network mounts in fstab is done before network is ready.

2008-05-17 Thread DanN
Thanks a lot. It fixed the shut-down-hang on both my Hardy-PC and Fiesty-PC. -- Hardy beta boot sequence: Network mounts in fstab is done before network is ready. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/208770 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribe

[Bug 215328] [NEW] Crash while saving a Word file from a web site

2008-04-10 Thread DanN
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: firefox-3.0 Firefox 3b5 crashes when saving a word file from a https site. A bug reporting procedure starts automatically but is not able to proceed because Firefox does not open launchpad. In addition to the crash, Firefox lost all bookmarks and has th

[Bug 215328] Re: Crash while saving a Word file from a web site

2008-04-10 Thread DanN
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13339953/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "ExtensionSummary.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13339954/ExtensionSummary.txt ** Attachment added: "profiles.ini.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13339955/profiles

[Bug 208770] Re: Hardy beta boot sequence: Network mounts in fstab is done before network is ready.

2008-04-14 Thread DanN
I also see the shutdown hang with "CIFS...". It appeared already in Gutsy when I changed the mounts in fstab from smbfs to cifs. -- Hardy beta boot sequence: Network mounts in fstab is done before network is ready. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/208770 You received this bug notification because

[Bug 207308] Re: Firefox bookmarks lost when upgrading to Hardy beta

2008-03-27 Thread DanN
I got around the problem by deleting the old .mozilla folder (mounted to a NAS) that was used by a Swedish version of Firefox 2. I could then import the old bookmarks without problems. Regards, Dan -- Firefox bookmarks lost when upgrading to Hardy beta https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/207308 You

[Bug 208770] [NEW] Hardy beta boot sequence

2008-03-29 Thread DanN
Public bug reported: Network mounts in fstab is done before network is ready. I have redirected documents, desktop etc to samba share on a NAS. After logging in it takes about 30 seconds to open documents on the mounted samba share. My guess is that the mount failed during boot and therefore it

[Bug 207308] [NEW] Firefox bookmarks lost when upgrading to Hardy beta

2008-03-26 Thread DanN
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: firefox-3.0 Firefox 3 beta 4 shows no bookmarks or home page. Firefox 2 shows bookmars and home page when using the same settings folder (.mozilla). The following error is in the ”Error Console” after startup: Error: uncaught exception: [Exception... "Co

[Bug 207308] Re: Firefox bookmarks lost when upgrading to Hardy beta

2008-03-26 Thread DanN
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12907095/Dependencies.txt -- Firefox bookmarks lost when upgrading to Hardy beta https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/207308 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubun

[Bug 257190] Re: Setting status to 'Hidden' changes status to 'Busy' instead

2009-10-11 Thread DanN
I still have the busy instead of hidden problem for the YM account and I am using Empathy 2.28.0.1 in Karmic Beta. -- Setting status to 'Hidden' changes status to 'Busy' instead https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/257190 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, whic

[Bug 432688] [NEW] laptop battery discharges on AC power

2009-09-18 Thread DanN
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-power-manager Ubuntu 9.04 gnome-power-manager: Installed: 2.24.2-2ubuntu8 Version: *** 2.24.2-2ubuntu8 0 When the laptop is on and the OS running the battery discharges when on AC power. It does charge when the computer is off and in Windows X

[Bug 1663727] Re: 16.04.2 LTS (4.4.0-62-generic) now spewing EDID vga radeon errors

2017-12-20 Thread dann
I've recently installed Ubuntu 16.04.2 Server Edition on DELL Poweredge 2950 and the syslog is filling up with, "[drm:radeon_vga_detect [radeon]] *ERROR* VGA-1: probed a monitor but no|invalid EDID" above message every 10 sec. Just reading through I noticed that Joseph Salisbury wanted reporter

[Bug 1663727] Re: 16.04.2 LTS (4.4.0-62-generic) now spewing EDID vga radeon errors

2017-12-20 Thread dann
While waiting for any one of you guys to return, I'm going to go ahead and test out the upstream kernel by downloading below files, linux-headers-4.15.0-041500rc4_4.15.0-041500rc4.201712172330_all.deb linux-headers-4.15.0-041500rc4-generic_4.15.0-041500rc4.201712172330_amd64.deb linux-image-4.15.0

[Bug 1663727] Re: 16.04.2 LTS (4.4.0-62-generic) now spewing EDID vga radeon errors

2017-12-20 Thread dann
I tried the upstream kernel 4.15 but no luck. Error still exists. By the way, how to I tag it "kernel-bug-exists-upstream" and mark it "Confirmed" ? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/16637

[Bug 1663727] Re: 16.04.2 LTS (4.4.0-62-generic) now spewing EDID vga radeon errors

2017-12-20 Thread dann
TAG: kernel-bug-exists-upstream ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Expired => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1663727 Title: 16.04.2 LTS (4.4.0-62-generic) now spe

[Bug 1663727] Re: 16.04.2 LTS (4.4.0-62-generic) now spewing EDID vga radeon errors

2018-01-03 Thread dann
I went ahead and tried to file an upstream bug at bugzilla but apparently this bug has previously been reported and fixed. Anydoby interested can go and read the link below. https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34457 Basically this is what you have to do. QUOTE "Either upgrade your system

[Bug 246572] [NEW] Desktop too large on E-Systems 3088 laptop (VN800)

2008-07-08 Thread John Dann
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: app-install-data-edubuntu A default install of Ubuntu 8.04 (and then fully updated) on to an E-Systems 3088 laptop. (This has a VN800 graphics chip and a 1024x768 LCD screen). The bug is that the desktop is sized larger than 1024x768 (it may be 1280x800

[Bug 490290] Re: Karmic HP blade 460c generation 1 hp support pack hpacucli error

2009-12-14 Thread dann frazier
I was able to reproduce using kernel.org 2.6.31, but not able to reproduce on latest git. I bisected the two and hit this commit: commit 617e1344229d22ea9ecb6538e50808541618ed2b Author: Stephen M. Cameron Date: Thu Sep 17 13:47:14 2009 -0500 cciss: Dynamically allocate struct device for ea

[Bug 490290] Re: Karmic HP blade 460c generation 1 hp support pack hpacucli error

2009-12-10 Thread dann frazier
Thanks for that information, I can reproduce this using Ubuntu 9.10 in livecd mode. I'll attach the kern.log, which contains a kernel backtrace. ** Attachment added: "kern.log" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36663034/kern.log -- Karmic HP blade 460c generation 1 hp support pack hpacucli erro

[Bug 490290] Re: Karmic HP blade 460c generation 1 hp support pack hpacucli error

2009-12-07 Thread dann frazier
You appear to be accessing logical disk c0d0 (filesystem mounted), at the time you delete it. Can you confirm? If this is the case, then this looks like expected behavior - akin to yanking out your boot disk at runtime. -- Karmic HP blade 460c generation 1 hp support pack hpacucli error https:/

[Bug 546885] Re: glxinfo crashed with SIGSEGV in XF86DRIQueryVersion()

2010-04-12 Thread Dann O
@Felix: Yes! I didn't have an /etc/ati/signature. But I did have a /etc/ati/signature.dpkg-bak. Also, I just did an update and there were changes to the fglrx packages and they looked like they were installing all the files I was missing. Hopefully we are getting closer. -- glxinfo crashed wi

[Bug 546885] Re: glxinfo crashed with SIGSEGV in XF86DRIQueryVersion()

2010-04-10 Thread Dann O
I seem to have have made progress on my crashes of glxinfo. The output of my fglrxinfo is: display: :0.0 screen: 0 OpenGL vendor string: ATI Technologies Inc. OpenGL renderer string: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4500 Series OpenGL version string: 3.2.9737 Compatibility Profile Context Previously the

[Bug 556935] Re: fglrx not working

2010-04-10 Thread Dann O
I think this sounds like the same problem as I was seeing until my playing this morning. Previously my fglrxinfo would SIGSEGV like you are talking about. Along with the segfault I would get errors about config files missing. I tried the aticonfig --initial and it would also fail. The output of

[Bug 549152] Re: Cannot access HP MSA disks on Karmic due to cciss driver bug, regression from Jaunty

2010-03-26 Thread dann frazier
This is fixed upstream by the following commit. I'll attach a tested backport for 2.6.31. commit 39ccf9a645dbca7f9866317380912327570787c0 Author: Stephen M. Cameron Date: Thu Sep 17 13:48:00 2009 -0500 cciss: Preserve all 8 bytes of LUN ID for logical drives. Preserve all 8 bytes

[Bug 1905336] [NEW] sha1_ce and sha2_ce modules no longer load on arm64

2020-11-23 Thread dann frazier
Public bug reported: [Impact] The sha{1,2}_ce modules no longer load on arm64, preventing the use of the hardware accelerated ARMv8 crypto extensions for SHA1, SHA-224/SHA-256. [Test Case] sudo modprobe sha1_ce Currently fails: [ 33.838295] module sha1_ce: unsupported RELA relocation: 275 [Fi

[Bug 1905336] Re: sha1_ce and sha2_ce modules no longer load

2020-11-23 Thread dann frazier
Reported upstream: https://www.spinics.net/lists/stable/msg429412.html ** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Xenial) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Xenial) Status: New => Confirmed ** Summary

[Bug 1905452] [NEW] blockdev: ioctl error on BLKRRPART: Device or resource busy

2020-11-24 Thread dann frazier
Public bug reported: [Impact] grml2usb autopkgtest frequently fail in Ubuntu's CI. For example: https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-hirsute/hirsute/amd64/g/grml2usb/20201116_194744_cbe0f@/log.gz An excerpt showing the error: 202

[Bug 1905336] Re: sha1_ce and sha2_ce modules no longer load on arm64

2020-11-24 Thread dann frazier
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Xenial) Status: Confirmed => In Progress ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Xenial) Assignee: (unassigned) => dann frazier (dannf) ** Description changed: [Impact] The sha{1,2}_ce modules no longer load on arm64, preventing the use of the ha

Re: [Bug 1858590] Re: fwupaa64.efi crashes on startup

2020-11-25 Thread dann frazier
eption: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/firmware-updates It currently states that only "fwupd releases in the 1.0.x series." can be SRU'd back to bionic. But bionic is currently at 1.2.x now. Mario - since it looks like you authored that exception, would you be able to help clarify? -dann -- You

[Bug 1858590] Re: fwupaa64.efi crashes on startup

2020-11-25 Thread dann frazier
Actually, it looks like there's been a queued fix for this in the bionic SRU queue for several months now. See bug 1884788. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1858590 Title: fwupaa64.efi

[Bug 1852677] Re: sbuild focal python3 import errors

2020-11-25 Thread dann frazier
= groovy verification = (EPERMs are due to running under lxd) root@groovy:~# sbuild-launchpad-chroot create -n $(lsb_release -cs) -s $(lsb_release -cs) -a $(dpkg --print-architecture) [groovy] Creating config Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information..

[Bug 1852677] Re: sbuild focal python3 import errors

2020-11-25 Thread dann frazier
= focal verification = root@focal:~# sbuild-launchpad-chroot create -n $(lsb_release -cs) -s $(lsb_release -cs) -a $(dpkg --print-architecture) [focal] Creating config Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done The following additional packages

[Bug 1858590] Re: fwupaa64.efi crashes on startup

2020-11-25 Thread dann frazier
Thanks Mario. Do you know what the status of the SRU for bug 1884788 is? The only issue I see mentioned in the bug is mine where I suggest correcting the changelog entry for this bug. If that's the only issue, would you mind uploading a fix and noting it there? -- You received this bug notificati

[Bug 1905634] [NEW] Update to version 0.17

2020-11-25 Thread dann frazier
ance: Undecided Status: Fix Released ** Affects: sbuild-launchpad-chroot (Ubuntu Bionic) Importance: Undecided Assignee: dann frazier (dannf) Status: In Progress ** Affects: sbuild-launchpad-chroot (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided Assignee: dann

[Bug 1905634] Re: Update to version 0.17

2020-11-25 Thread dann frazier
** Description changed: [Impact] Currently sbuild-launchpad-chroot fails to build/run in bionic because of bug 1892879, where a backport of ubuntu-dev-tools to bionic accidentally dropped the python2 bindings this package uses. Since this package has been collaterally damaged for months, I

[Bug 1905452] Re: blockdev: ioctl error on BLKRRPART: Device or resource busy

2020-11-28 Thread dann frazier
Verification: https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-groovy/groovy/amd64/g/grml2usb/20201127_165906_ea94b@/log.gz ** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-groovy ** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-groovy

[Bug 1905336] Re: sha1_ce and sha2_ce modules no longer load on arm64

2020-11-28 Thread dann frazier
Verification: ubuntu@bestovius:~$ lsmod | grep sha sha2_ce16384 0 sha1_ce16384 0 ubuntu@bestovius:~$ cat /proc/version Linux version 4.4.0-197-generic (buildd@bos02-arm64-056) (gcc version 5.4.0 20160609 (Ubuntu/Linaro 5.4.0-6ubuntu1~16.04.12) ) #229-Ubuntu SMP W

[Bug 1871268] Re: Installation fails due to useless immediate configuration error when "Install Third-Party Drivers" is selected

2020-11-30 Thread dann frazier
** Changed in: ubuntu-cdimage Assignee: enes (ekko52) => (unassigned) ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Assignee: enes (ekko52) => (unassigned) ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Bionic) Assignee: enes (ekko52) => (unassigned) ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Focal) Assignee: enes (ekko52) => (u

[Bug 1905634] Re: Update to version 0.17

2020-11-30 Thread dann frazier
** Description changed: [Impact] Currently sbuild-launchpad-chroot fails to build/run in bionic because of bug 1892879, where a backport of ubuntu-dev-tools to bionic accidentally dropped the python2 bindings this package uses. Since this package has been collaterally damaged for months, I

[Bug 1877533] Re: [20.10 FEAT] Increase the crashkernel setting if the root volume is luks2-encrypted

2021-02-25 Thread dann frazier
** Also affects: kdump-tools (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: makedumpfile (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Invalid ** Changed in: kdump-tools (Ubuntu Focal) Status: New => Invalid ** Changed in: kdump-tools (Ubuntu Groovy) Status: New => In

[Bug 1917516] [NEW] unstable with more than 2 screens

2021-03-02 Thread dann frazier
Public bug reported: [Impact] With more than 2 screens, openbox becomes unstable, calling XQueryPointer() in an infinite loop. ** Affects: openbox (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: openbox (Debian) Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Bug watc

[Bug 1925075] Re: Gigabyte R120-T33 (ARM ThunderX SoC) fails to boot in ACPI mode

2021-05-15 Thread dann frazier
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Impish) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Impish) Importance: Undecided => High -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/192

[Bug 1902898] Re: power-button action inconsistent between user session and greeter

2021-05-15 Thread dann frazier
Verified - I do now get the prompt! Thanks laney & didrocks! ** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-focal ** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-focal -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https

[Bug 1925075] Re: Gigabyte R120-T33 (ARM ThunderX SoC) fails to boot in ACPI mode

2021-05-15 Thread dann frazier
Verified: ubuntu@dawes:~$ cat /proc/version Linux version 5.11.0-18-generic (buildd@bos02-arm64-039) (gcc (Ubuntu 10.3.0-1ubuntu1) 10.3.0, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Ubuntu) 2.36.1) #19-Ubuntu SMP Fri May 7 14:21:20 UTC 2021 ubuntu@dawes:~$ cat /proc/cmdline BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-5.11.0-18-gen

[Bug 1929868] [NEW] Should nvidia-driver-XXX-server stop recommending nvidia-settings?

2021-05-27 Thread dann frazier
Public bug reported: The nvidia-driver-* packages have a Recommends on nvidia-settings. Installing them w/ recommends enabled therefore ends up bringing in the whole X stack, including gdm3. gdm3 will do things like suspend systems if the login screen is idle - not behavior server users would expe

[Bug 1929868] Re: Should nvidia-driver-XXX-server stop recommending nvidia-settings?

2021-05-27 Thread dann frazier
** Description changed: The nvidia-driver-* packages have a Recommends on nvidia-settings. - Installing them w/ recommends enabled ends up bringing in the whole X - stack, including gdm3. gdm3 will do things like suspend systems if the - login screen is idle - not behavior server users would ex

[Bug 1931171] [NEW] kernel_lockdown(7) describes removed SysRq for lifting lockdown

2021-06-07 Thread dann frazier
Public bug reported: [Impact] Documentation tells users they can lift lockdown locally via a SysRq, when in fact we do not support this (confirmed w/ @sforshee on kernel team). [Test Case] man kernel_lockdown - look for documentation of the SysRq feature. [Fix] https://github.com/alejandro-colo

[Bug 1931171] Re: kernel_lockdown(7) describes removed SysRq for lifting lockdown

2021-06-07 Thread dann frazier
** Changed in: manpages (Ubuntu Impish) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: manpages (Ubuntu Hirsute) Status: New => Confirmed ** Changed in: manpages (Ubuntu Impish) Assignee: (unassigned) => dann frazier (dannf) ** Changed in: manpages (Ubuntu Hirsute)

[Bug 1931171] Re: kernel_lockdown(7) describes removed SysRq for lifting lockdown

2021-06-10 Thread dann frazier
** Changed in: manpages (Ubuntu Hirsute) Status: Confirmed => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1931171 Title: kernel_lockdown(7) describes removed SysRq for lifting l

[Bug 1931171] Re: kernel_lockdown(7) describes removed SysRq for lifting lockdown

2021-06-11 Thread dann frazier
Verification: ubuntu@dannf-hirsute:~$ man kernel_lockdown | grep -i sysrq ubuntu@dannf-hirsute:~$ dpkg -l manpages Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold | Status=Not/Inst/Conf-files/Unpacked/halF-conf/Half-inst/trig-aWait/Trig-pend |/ Err?=(none)/Reinst-required (Status,Err: uppercase=bad) ||/

[Bug 1931728] Re: [scalingstack bos01] bionic (arm64) instances always fail to boot on eMAGs in this cloud

2021-06-11 Thread dann frazier
This is very strange. It looks like the guest has managed to start /init in the initramfs. /init is a simple shell script that just creates a few directories/mounts sysfs/proc, before printing "Loading, please wait" - which we do not see. I've tried to simulate this by removing /init from the i

[Bug 1931728] Re: [scalingstack bos01] bionic (arm64) instances always fail to boot on eMAGs in this cloud

2021-06-11 Thread dann frazier
I don't have access to an eMAG system at the moment, but I tried and failed to reproduce on ThunderX 2 box by running xenial + hwe kernel + cloud-archive:queens. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.ne

[Bug 1925075] Re: Gigabyte R120-T33 (ARM ThunderX SoC) fails to boot in ACPI mode

2021-06-14 Thread dann frazier
= Verification = This bug wasn't "unmasked" at the time of the focal kernel, so the crash was not reproducible there. But I've verified that after fixing this bug, the focal kernel still does not crash on this platform: ubuntu@dawes:~$ cat /proc/version Linux version 5.4.0-75-generic (buildd@bos

[Bug 1931886] [NEW] show-regs can cause some samsung controllers to go offline

2021-06-14 Thread dann frazier
Public bug reported: [Impact] nvme show-regs has been found to cause certain Samsung controllers (MZ1L21T9HCLS in particular) to go offline. [Test Case] Run `nvme show-regs` on an effected controller device. Messages similar to this will appear in dmesg: [963314.311332] nvme nvme2: controller is

[Bug 1931886] Re: show-regs can cause some samsung controllers to go offline

2021-06-14 Thread dann frazier
** Description changed: [Impact] nvme show-regs has been found to cause certain Samsung controllers (MZ1L21T9HCLS in particular) to go offline. [Test Case] Run `nvme show-regs` on an effected controller device. Messages similar to this will appear in dmesg: [963314.311332] nvme nvm

[Bug 1931886] Re: show-regs can cause some samsung controllers to go offline

2021-06-14 Thread dann frazier
** Changed in: nvme-cli (Ubuntu Impish) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: nvme-cli (Ubuntu Impish) Assignee: (unassigned) => dann frazier (dannf) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1931728] Re: [scalingstack bos01] bionic (arm64) instances always fail to boot on eMAGs in this cloud

2021-06-14 Thread dann frazier
IS gave me a copy of the libvirt xml for the guest, and I used it to build a VM as similar as possible (minus some details about storage/NIC). However I was still unable to reproduce on a ThunderX2 host. I asked a contact over at Ampere Computing to see if this symptom was something they'd seen bef

[Bug 1928010] Re: Occasionally crashes in _relocate() on arm64

2021-06-16 Thread dann frazier
fyi, there's a patch posted upstream that looks promising: https://github.com/rhboot/shim/issues/371#issuecomment-862170542 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1928010 Title: Occasionall

[Bug 1931728] Re: [scalingstack bos01] bionic (arm64) instances always fail to boot on eMAGs in this cloud

2021-06-16 Thread dann frazier
I've got access to an eMAG system now, so I'm going to try to reproduce there. I see the MDS mitigation setting, so I can try flipping that as well. I don't have any theory as to why that would help/hurt, but no reason not to try it. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Bug 1931728] Re: [scalingstack bos01] bionic (arm64) instances always fail to boot on eMAGs in this cloud

2021-06-17 Thread dann frazier
I've confirmed that enabling MDS mitigation causes the problem to occur - it does not occur with it disabled. Firmware version 11.05.116 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1931728 Title:

[Bug 1908452] Re: MAAS stops working and deployment fails after `Loading ephemeral` step

2021-06-22 Thread dann frazier
= hirsute verification = # Start by showing we can still reproduce the problem w/o the -proposed packages: ubuntu@avoton02:~$ sudo iptables -A INPUT -p tcp -s 91.189.88.136 -m string --string maas.io --algo bm -j DROP ubuntu@avoton02:~$ python3 ./repro.py & sleep 60 [1] 3386 # 60 seconds have pas

[Bug 1908452] Re: MAAS stops working and deployment fails after `Loading ephemeral` step

2021-06-22 Thread dann frazier
= groovy verification = # Start by showing we can still reproduce the problem w/o the -proposed packages: ubuntu@avoton07:~$ sudo iptables -A INPUT -p tcp -s 91.189.88.136 -m string --string maas.io --algo bm -j DROP ubuntu@avoton07:~$ cat > repro.py #!/usr/bin/env python3 from simplestreams.con

[Bug 1908452] Re: MAAS stops working and deployment fails after `Loading ephemeral` step

2021-06-22 Thread dann frazier
= focal verification = # Start by showing we can still reproduce the problem w/o the -proposed packages: ubuntu@avoton07:~$ sudo iptables -A INPUT -p tcp -s 91.189.88.136 -m string --string maas.io --algo bm -j DROP ubuntu@avoton07:~$ cat > repro.py #!/usr/bin/env python3 from simplestreams.cont

[Bug 1931728] Re: [scalingstack bos01] bionic (arm64) instances always fail to boot on eMAGs in this cloud

2021-06-22 Thread dann frazier
I suppose the next step is to see if we can figure out why this only seems to impact bionic guests. I'll see if I can get access to the system again and try and identify the relevant difference. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 1928010] Re: Occasionally crashes in _relocate() on arm64

2021-06-23 Thread dann frazier
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #990082 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=990082 ** Also affects: shim (Debian) via https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=990082 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because yo

[Bug 1931728] Re: [scalingstack bos01] bionic (arm64) instances always fail to boot on eMAGs in this cloud

2021-06-23 Thread dann frazier
I found that booting an upstream 4.18 kernel in the guest trips this problem, while an upstream 5.4 does not. I bisected and found that this commit seems to be the relevant change: commit 3b7142752e4bee153df6db4a76ca104ef0d7c0b4 (refs/bisect/bad) Author: Mark Rutland Date: Wed Jul 11 14:56:45 2

[Bug 1931728] Re: [scalingstack bos01] bionic (arm64) instances always fail to boot on eMAGs in this cloud

2021-06-24 Thread dann frazier
** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: qemu (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1931728 Title: [

[Bug 1931728] Re: [scalingstack bos01] bionic (arm64) instances always fail to boot on eMAGs in this cloud

2021-06-24 Thread dann frazier
The changeset referenced in Comment #8 was part of a 21-part changeset shown here: https://patches.linaro.org/cover/141739/ I was able to backport these changes to our 4.15 kernel and get it booting w/ the MDS workaround enabled. One option is to SRU those (and a number of follow-up Fixes: chan

[Bug 1931136] Re: Don't unhook ExitBootServices() when EBS protection is disabled

2021-06-24 Thread dann frazier
>From inside the properly booting hirsute instance mentioned in the prior comment: ubuntu@ubuntu:~$ lsb_release -c Codename: hirsute ubuntu@ubuntu:~$ sudo mokutil --sb-state SecureBoot enabled ** Tags removed: verification-needed-hirsute ** Tags added: verification-done-hirsute -- You re

[Bug 1931136] Re: Don't unhook ExitBootServices() when EBS protection is disabled

2021-06-24 Thread dann frazier
I was able to reproduce this w/o any chainloading. Just booting a hirsute image in QEMU w/ SecureBoot enabled was enough. I verified that I'm still seeing this issue w/ the current hirsute cloud image: BdsDxe: loading Boot0001 "UEFI Misc Device" from PciRoot(0x0)/Pci(0x1,0x2)/Pci(0x0,0x0) BdsDxe:

[Bug 1931136] Re: Don't unhook ExitBootServices() when EBS protection is disabled

2021-06-25 Thread dann frazier
I'm not sure we've seen this problem with a xenial guest. However, I did regression test and verify that xenial guests still boot in secureboot mode w/ the shim-signed package in -proposed: ubuntu@ubuntu:~$ dpkg -l | grep shim-signed ii shim-signed 1.33.1~16.04.9+15.4-0ubuntu

[Bug 1931728] Re: [scalingstack bos01] bionic (arm64) instances always fail to boot on eMAGs in this cloud

2021-06-25 Thread dann frazier
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: New => Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1931728 Title: [scalingstack bos01] bionic (arm64) instances always fail to boot on eMAGs

[Bug 1931136] Re: Don't unhook ExitBootServices() when EBS protection is disabled

2021-06-28 Thread dann frazier
As with xenial (see Comment #11), my focal verification just shows that booting under SB still works: ubuntu@dannf-shim-f:~$ dpkg-query -W shim-signed shim-signed 1.40.5+15.4-0ubuntu5 ubuntu@dannf-shim-f:~$ sudo mokutil --sb-state SecureBoot enabled ** Tags removed: verification-needed-focal

[Bug 1926985] Re: linux-version sort: argv and stdin behaviors differ

2021-06-28 Thread dann frazier
** Changed in: linux-base (Ubuntu Hirsute) Assignee: (unassigned) => dann frazier (dannf) ** Changed in: linux-base (Ubuntu Focal) Assignee: (unassigned) => dann frazier (dannf) ** Changed in: linux-base (Ubuntu Groovy) Assignee: (unassigned) => dann frazier (dannf) ** C

[Bug 1766728] Re: update linux-base on xenial and earlier

2021-06-28 Thread dann frazier
Marking the devel release fixed as well, since backport versions are by definition already fixed there. ** Changed in: linux-base (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https:

[Bug 1933402] Re: net card set VF and altname display blurred character

2021-06-28 Thread dann frazier
** Also affects: systemd (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1933402 Title: net card set VF and altname display blurred character To

[Bug 1933402] Re: net card set VF and altname display blurred character

2021-06-28 Thread dann frazier
** Also affects: systemd (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: systemd (Ubuntu Groovy) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: systemd (Ubuntu Hirsute) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: systemd (Ubuntu Impish)

[Bug 1933402] Re: net card set VF and altname display blurred character

2021-06-28 Thread dann frazier
Reproducibility] - 100% - - [Additional information] - (Firmware version, kernel version, affected hardware, etc. if required): - - [Resolution] + [What Could Go Wrong] + TBD ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Focal) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Focal) Assignee: (un

[Bug 1933402] Re: net card set VF and altname display blurred character

2021-06-28 Thread dann frazier
** Description changed: [Impact] - When running with the HWE kernel (5.4 didn't support altnames), altnames containing garbage (uninitialized memory) may get assigned to a NIC. This is 100% reproducible on arm64. + When running with the HWE kernel (5.4 didn't support altnames), altnames conta

[Bug 1933402] Re: net card set VF and altname display blurred character

2021-06-28 Thread dann frazier
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Focal) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1933402 Title: net card set VF and altname display blurred character

Re: [Bug 1933402] Re: net card set VF and altname display blurred character

2021-06-29 Thread dann frazier
On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 10:28:00PM -, Dan Streetman wrote: > systemd doesn't use iproute2 tooling to set the altnames, it sets them > directly with netlink. You're right. The problem is that it does so w/ possibly uninitialized memory. I added the following patch to demonstrate: --- systemd-2

[Bug 1926985] Re: linux-version sort: argv and stdin behaviors differ

2021-06-29 Thread dann frazier
** Changed in: linux-base (Ubuntu Hirsute) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: linux-base (Ubuntu Groovy) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: linux-base (Ubuntu Focal) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: linux-base (Ubuntu Bionic) Status: New => In P

[Bug 1926985] Re: linux-version sort: argv and stdin behaviors differ

2021-06-29 Thread dann frazier
** Description changed: [Impact] Systems that use flash-kernel may end up installing the wrong kernel image. `linux-version sort` can provide different answers depending on how it is called (see Test Case). The stdin behavior appears to be a bug, and this is the mode flash-kernel uses

[Bug 1933402] Re: net card set VF and altname display blurred character

2021-06-29 Thread dann frazier
** Changed in: kunpeng920 Status: New => Fix Committed ** Changed in: kunpeng920/ubuntu-20.04-hwe Status: New => Fix Committed ** Changed in: kunpeng920/ubuntu-20.04-hwe Milestone: None => ubuntu-20.04.3 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 1918427] Re: curtin: install flash-kernel in arm64 UEFI unexpected

2021-06-29 Thread dann frazier
** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: curtin (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Hirsute) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: curtin (Ubuntu Hirsute) Imp

[Bug 1908452] Re: MAAS stops working and deployment fails after `Loading ephemeral` step

2021-06-29 Thread dann frazier
Restoring verification-needed-focal tag; bdmurray correctly points out my focal verification was actually done on groovy :( ** Tags removed: verification-done verification-done-focal ** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-focal -- You received this bug notification because you ar

[Bug 1908452] Re: MAAS stops working and deployment fails after `Loading ephemeral` step

2021-06-29 Thread dann frazier
= focal verification = # Start by showing we can still reproduce the problem w/o the -proposed packages: ubuntu@dannf-test:~$ sudo iptables -A INPUT -p tcp -s 91.189.88.136 -m string --string maas.io --algo bm -j DROP ubuntu@dannf-test:~$ cat > repro.py #!/usr/bin/env python3 from simplestreams.

[Bug 1918427] Re: curtin: install flash-kernel in arm64 UEFI unexpected

2021-06-29 Thread dann frazier
tem is arm/arm64 without UEFI. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Focal) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Focal) Assignee: (unassigned) => dann frazier (dannf) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed t

[Bug 1928010] Re: Occasionally crashes in _relocate() on arm64

2021-06-30 Thread dann frazier
s/successfully/successfully reboot/ -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1928010 Title: Occasionally crashes in _relocate() on arm64 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://b

[Bug 1928010] Re: Occasionally crashes in _relocate() on arm64

2021-06-30 Thread dann frazier
Yeah, but doesn't hurt to verify the official build either. I've put 16 VMs in reboot loops w/ the updated shim and they've cumulatively successfully approximately 1000 times - so I think we're good :) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscri

[Bug 1934192] [NEW] regression between 2.04-1ubuntu44 and 2.04-1ubuntu44.2 breaks netboot on arm64

2021-06-30 Thread dann frazier
Public bug reported: We noticed today that 2 arm64 nodes in our MAAS server are failing to Commission/Deploy. Both happen to be Ampere Altra systems. We have not (yet) noticed a problem with other systems - a Cavium ThunderX system I tested seems unaffected. The symptom is that they successfull

[Bug 1934192] Re: regression between 2.04-1ubuntu44 and 2.04-1ubuntu44.2 breaks netboot on arm64

2021-06-30 Thread dann frazier
Turns out the *unsigned* 2.04-1ubuntu44.2 binary boots fine - the issue only seems to occur w/ the signed one. I also tried the 2.04ubuntu44.2 grubnetaa64.efi.signed from -updates, which has a different checksum (different sig?), and the failure also occurs there. To be clear, this system does not

[Bug 1934192] Re: regression between 2.04-1ubuntu44 and 2.04-1ubuntu44.2 breaks netboot on arm64

2021-07-01 Thread dann frazier
@juliank pointed out that 2.04-1ubuntu44 was built w/ the hirsute toolchain, 2.04-1ubuntu44.2 with focal's toolchain. I'll run some experiments to see if the issue follows the toolchain. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1934192] Re: regression between 2.04-1ubuntu44 and 2.04-1ubuntu44.2 breaks netboot on arm64

2021-07-01 Thread dann frazier
Another datapoint - the system that sees this issue is a Gigabyte G242-P30-JG. But I can not reproduce on an Ampere Mt. Jade system. Both use the Ampere Altra SoC. Gigabyte firmware: F07 03/22/2021 14:48:30 Mt. Jade firmware: 2021/05/26 17:35:33 Ver: 0ACOI 1.6.20210526 -- You received this bug n

[Bug 1862378] Re: libsystemd-shared broken in Multi-Arch

2021-07-01 Thread dann frazier
Yes, it still exists as of systemd 248.3-1ubuntu1: ubuntu@howzit:~$ sudo dpkg --add-architecture armhf ubuntu@howzit:~$ sudo apt update > /dev/null 2>&1 ubuntu@howzit:~$ sudo apt install systemd:armhf systemd-container:arm64 [...] Setting up systemd:armhf (248.3-1ubuntu1) ... Setting up systemd-co

[Bug 1862378] Re: libsystemd-shared broken in Multi-Arch

2021-07-01 Thread dann frazier
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #990547 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=990547 ** Also affects: systemd (Debian) via https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=990547 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because

[Bug 1934192] Re: regression between 2.04-1ubuntu44 and 2.04-1ubuntu44.2 breaks netboot on arm64

2021-07-01 Thread dann frazier
Rebuilding in focal, but with hirsute's binutils makes the issue go away. Now to dig into binutils changes -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1934192 Title: regression between 2.04-1u

[Bug 1934192] Re: regression between 2.04-1ubuntu44 and 2.04-1ubuntu44.2 breaks netboot on arm64

2021-07-02 Thread dann frazier
binutils 2.35.50.20210106-1ubuntu2 = BAD binutils 2.35.90.20210120-1ubuntu1 = GOOD So possibly a change between 2.35.50 and 2.35.90 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1934192 Title: regr

[Bug 1931886] Re: show-regs can cause some samsung controllers to go offline

2021-07-06 Thread dann frazier
** Changed in: nvme-cli (Ubuntu Impish) Status: In Progress => Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1931886 Title: show-regs can cause some samsung controllers to go offline

[Bug 1931886] Re: show-regs can cause some samsung controllers to go offline

2021-07-07 Thread dann frazier
This is fixed in the 1.14 upstream release which I've now sync'd from Debian experimental. ** Changed in: nvme-cli (Ubuntu Impish) Status: Triaged => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.la

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >