*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 228067 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/228067
There are already two (non-duplicate) bugs reported.
Bug 228067 is a bug with LyX that is fixed in version 1.5.5-1. As a
result of "incompatibility" with the latest version of Qt4 (present in
Hardy Backports
The bug still exists in Intrepid as the source package of LyX 1.5.5-1 in
Intrepid failed to build (apparently because of a problem with the boost
dependency). However, a related bug, Bug #242648, was fixed since LyX
1.5.5-1 (with no changes) was uploaded to Hardy Backports and binary
packages were
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 228067 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/228067
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. This particular bug has already been reported and is a
duplicate of bug 228067, so it is being marked as such. Please look at
** Changed in: ubuntu
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
[needs-packaging] Teeworlds
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/184535
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubunt
** Changed in: lyx (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
** Also affects: hardy-backports
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: hardy-backports
Status: New => Confirmed
** Changed in: lyx (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Invalid
--
backport lyx 1.5.5 to hardy
Actually, this should be specifically a request for 1.5.5-1, as that is
the latest Debian/Ubuntu package. Ubuntu Intrepid never had the source
package LyX 1.5.5 in the first place (LyX 1.5.5-1 was auto-synced from
Debian unstable).
Normally, since LyX 1.5.5 is a bugfix, this would not be eligible
Please Bug #242648, a backport request for LyX 1.5.5-1 in Ubuntu Hardy
that will fix this bug.
--
lyx 1.5.3-1 crashes as soon as it starts
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/228067
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-
That's great to hear. As I said before, the build of LyX in Intrepid
should be fixed (currently it fails to build because of a problem with
boost) and LyX 1.5.5-1 can be backported to Hardy.
--
backport lyx 1.5.5-1 to hardy
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/242648
You received this bug notification
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 216322 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/216322
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. This particular bug has already been reported and is a
duplicate of bug 216322, so it is being marked as such. Please look at
** Summary changed:
- SDL applications auto-leave fullscreen if set to native 1280x1024 resolution
and Compiz is enabled.
+ SDL applications auto-leave fullscreen if set to native 1280x1024 or higher
resolution and Compiz is enabled.
** Description changed:
- After recent updates, a few of the
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 228067 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/228067
Is hardy-backports enabled?
What is the output of the following command (in terminal): apt-cache
policy libqt4-core
I am marking this as a duplicate of Bug 228067. If hardy-backports is
not enabled and/or th
** Summary changed:
- lyx 1.5.3.1 crashes as soon as it starts
+ lyx 1.5.3-1 crashes as soon as it starts
--
lyx 1.5.3-1 crashes as soon as it starts
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/228067
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 228067 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/228067
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. This particular bug has already been reported and was
correctly marked as a duplicate of bug 228067. Please look at the other
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 228067 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/228067
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. This particular bug has already been reported and is a
duplicate of bug 228067, so it is being marked as such. Please look at
I am closing this bug.
** Changed in: lyx (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Invalid
--
Lyx not showing up in gnome's main menu
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/228202
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mai
** Changed in: lyx (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
LyX should not embed type 3 fonts in PDFs.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/145445
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lis
Does the problem still exist?
** Changed in: lyx (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
[apport] lyx-qt crashed with SIGSEGV
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/112259
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs ma
Finally, success. Using the source packages from Debian unstable (LyX
1.5.5-1), I was able to build an 8.04 package for 64-bit with Prevu, an
automated backporting utility: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Prevu
A side note, LyX 1.5.5-1 in Debian unstable was released yesterday (May
14), so it has not yet
I just checked, and it is not possible to install the Debian unstable
(Sid) binary package for LyX without modification, because of a
dependency-- libboost-filesystem1.34.1. So the prevu way is the
solution, as it will modify the package's dependencies for Ubuntu.
LyX 1.5.5-1 should be synched int
** Changed in: lyx (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
LyX integration with Gnome
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/210131
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
ht
A side note: Bug 227303 states LyX icon in Applications menu fails to
render (in Hardy).
--
Lyx has several packaging problems
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/186797
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing
Please take a look at Bug 186797. Does the temporary solution specified
there solve your problem?
Christian Göbel: "As a workaround for the missing icon one can add the
following icon by using the System/Preferences/Main Menu:
/usr/share/lyx/images/lyx.xpm"
or
Christian Göbel: "I uninstalled the
This bug is fixed on the release as the b43-fwcutter package in Ubuntu
8.04 (1:011-1) uses the correct binary tarball (4.80.53.0). However, the
update will not fix the problem for people who have upgraded from betas;
they must run install_bcm43xx_firmware.sh manually after updating.
--
restricted
fixed by b43-fwcutter (1:011-1) unstable; urgency=low
** Changed in: b43-fwcutter (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
restricted manager in hardy fails to install correct firmware b43-fwcutter -
solution
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/202567
You received this bug notification
The Debian LyX maintainers strongly advise against using checkinstall
for LyX, and they state that using checkinstall for LyX could have bad
consequences. The best way it seems to fix LyX while keeping the
packaging system intact (no make install) is to use the Prevu tool I
mentioned in my comment
** Also affects: lyx via
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4835
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
lyx 1.5.3-1 crashes as soon as it starts
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/228067
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
Is hardy-backports enabled? You can check at System -> Administration ->
Software Sources. Under the "Updates" tab, is "Unsupported updates
(hardy-backports)" checked?
What is the output of the following command: apt-cache policy
libqt4-core
This is most likely a duplicate of Bug 228067. If hardy
A lot of people have been saying to run make install, but that is not a
good solution IMHO. This would cause problems later on when the LyX
package is updated and one wishes to install that package. If LyX is not
removed via apt, conflicts will emerge. There are really only two
reasonable temporary
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 228067 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/228067
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. This particular bug has already been reported and is a
duplicate of bug 228067, so it is being marked as such. Please look at
Alex La Hurreau, the bug you are experiencing is Bug 228067, which is a
newer bug. This bug occurred starting in May 2008, as a result of LyX's
troubles with the new qt4.4 that has been uploaded to Ubuntu 8.04
("Hardy") backports. I will subscribe you to that bug. If you wish to
fix this bug as ear
Emmanuel: To reverse the package preparation steps, you can uninstall
the Prevu package, remove the Prevu directory, and remove Prevu's apt
cache by following these steps:
1. Uninstall the Prevu package: sudo apt-get remove --purge prevu
2. Remove the Prevu directory: sudo rm -rf /var/cache/prevu
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 216322 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/216322
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. This particular bug has already been reported and is a
duplicate of bug 216322, so it is being marked as such. Please look at
** Changed in: compiz (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
Desktop Effects in 8.04 beta not working
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/220099
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@l
I think you forgot to attach a screenshot. No screenshot has been
attached.
** Changed in: compiz (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
Graphical distortions when enabling compiz
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/225569
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
B
This may be a duplicate of Bug 77736, but it may be due to a different
issue.
--
compiz corruption upon resume
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/219353
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bug
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 224893 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/224893
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. This particular bug being marked as a duplicate of bug
224893. Please look at the other bug report to see if there is any
mis
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 153204 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/153204
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 153204
flickering and strangeness in full screen mode firefox while interacting
with input fields
--
Fullscreen Firefox and compiz problem
https://bugs.laun
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 224893 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/224893
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. This particular bug will be marked as a duplicate of Bug
224893. Please look at the other bug report to see if there is any
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 216322 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/216322
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. This particular bug will be marked as a duplicate of bug
216322. Please look at the other bug report to see if there is any
m
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 216322 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/216322
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. This particular bug will be marked as a duplicate of bug
216322. Please look at the other bug report to see if there is any
m
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 216322 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/216322
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 157759
Compiz causes OpenGL fullscreen games to eventually go windowed.
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 216322
SDL applications auto-leave full
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 216322 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/216322
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. This particular bug has already been reported and is a
duplicate of bug 216322, so it is being marked as such. Please look at
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 63245 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/63245
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. This particular bug has already been reported and is a
duplicate of bug 63245, so it is being marked as such. Please look at
th
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 140860 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/140860
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 140860
Compiz enabled: GNOME Panels overlap the fullscreenmode
--
Panels are visible in fullscreen mode
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/199503
You received t
Perhaps related to Bug #140860 or one of its duplicates.
--
Gnome panel flickers through into fullscreen SDL games
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/237955
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu
Perhaps related to Bug #216322?
--
Fullscreen games flicker in Ubuntu (GNOME only)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/224893
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://l
Perhaps related to Bug #224893?
--
SDL applications auto-leave fullscreen if set to native 1280x1024 resolution
and Compiz is enabled.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/216322
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bug
Perhaps related to Bug #237955?
--
Compiz enabled: GNOME Panels overlap the fullscreenmode
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/140860
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
h
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 140860 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/140860
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 140860
Compiz enabled: GNOME Panels overlap the fullscreenmode
--
panel wrongfully appears on top of fullscreen windows when switching workspaces
https://bug
Maybe this bug is for 1280x1024 and higher resolutions. If possible,
please set your desktop and game to 1024x768. See if this will fix your
problem,
--
SDL applications auto-leave fullscreen if set to native 1280x1024 resolution
and Compiz is enabled.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/216322
You
Perhaps related to Bug #216322?
--
Compiz gets into a state where going fullscreen in apps causes an X11 BadAlloc
error
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194638
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
Perhaps related to Bug #224893?
--
evince flash in full screen mode
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/228194
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com
I have the exact same problem. I have an ATI X800 graphics card and AMD
Athlon64 X2, and X won't start. I have tried Ubuntu 5.10 PC, Ubuntu 5.10
64-bit, Kubuntu 6.06 PC, and Kubuntu 6.06 64-bit.
Ubuntu 5.10 gives the error while Kubuntu 6.06 just hangs right before
KDE should load.
I tried Kubunt
How to fix:
http://www.ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=190133&highlight=x800
--
Ati X800 graphics card not supported
https://launchpad.net/bugs/47219
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
I'm not to sure if this will solve anything, but I'll give it a shot.
I have an AMD Athlon64 processor and PCI-E ATI Radeon X800. Using Kubuntu 6.06
64-bit (not 6.10) Live CD, I get a similar problem (though I tested and got the
same problem with Kubuntu 6.06 32-bit). Right before KDE should load
I use Kubuntu 6.10 64-bit and I don't get this error when I booted using
Kubuntu 6.10 64-bit DVD in my AMD Athlon64 and PCI-E ATI Radeon X800.
However, after a few times booting, I got the same bug when I upgraded
from 6.06 to 6.10 (that was not a fresh install). But now I've installed
6.10 freshly
I will close this bug.
** Changed in: adept (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
Cannot upgrade Kubuntu - 'next' button is disabled
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102782
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 107115 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/107115
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 107115
log out or switch user results in crash
--
Restricted ATI driver ends session badly
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/120837
You received this bug notif
Changing to confirmed status.
** Changed in: ubuntu
Status: New => Confirmed
--
[needs-packaging] UFO:Alien Invasion
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/127341
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mai
I think this would be a great idea, especially for 64-bit users.
--
[needs-packaging] UFO:Alien Invasion
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/127341
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bug
I suggest looking at Bug #107115
--
Restricted ATI driver ends session badly
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/120837
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://l
I confirm this bug. Changing status to confirmed.
This bug caused by the update of OpenOffice.org to 1:2.3.0-1ubuntu5.3 on
December 4, 2007, because this bug did not exist previously. I will test
with version 1:2.3.0-1ubuntu5 of OpenOffice.org and report back.
The changefile is here:
http://launc
I removed the openoffice.org packages and installed version
1:2.3.0-1ubuntu5 via the Ubuntu Gutsy repository. But that did not fix
the problem, and I still have the same issue (although I did not have
this problem before when Ubuntu 7.10 was released).
Therefore I enabled the other gutsy repositor
Finally I found a solution.
I added the hardy repositories and then upgraded the openoffice.org
packages.
The problem appears to have disappeared.
The version I have installed (and is currently in the hardy
repositories) is 1:2.3.1-3ubuntu3.
--
openoffice: Error forking (crash)
https://bugs.la
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: amarok
Ubuntu 7.10 with gutsy-backports enabled
$ sudo apt-get install amarok
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
The following extra packages will be installed:
amarok-xine libifp4 libnjb5 li
I should add that the KDE 4 Repository is not authenticated, that is not
signed by GPG.
--
Amarok Size Mismatch (gutsy-backports)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/193784
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bug
I was able to successfully install Amarok 1.4.8-0ubuntu1~gutsy1 by
temporarily disabling gutsy-backports and adding the Kubuntu Members -
KDE 4 Repository- https://edge.launchpad.net/~kubuntu-members-
kde4/+archive
--
Amarok Size Mismatch (gutsy-backports)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/193784
Y
** Changed in: wesnoth (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
Not so useful descriptions for campaign packages
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/198320
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubunt
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: wesnoth
Please sync wesnoth 1:1.4.1-2 (universe) from Debian unstable (main).
Changelogs since current hardy version 1:1.4-1:
wesnoth (1:1.4.1-2) unstable; urgency=low
* Create postinst hooks to change the (hopefully) empty doc dirs of wesnoth,
This probably will not make it into Ubuntu 8.04 before release, but
hopefully it will be done afterward.
The bug's status should be marked as wishlist, but I cannot change it.
This will also fix Bug 198320.
--
Please sync wesnoth 1:1.4.1-2 (universe) from Debian unstable (main).
https://bugs.la
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 220723 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/220723
Marking as a duplicate of Bug 220723, as that will fix this bug.
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 220723
Please sync wesnoth 1:1.4.1-2 (universe) from Debian unstable (main).
--
Not so usef
** Changed in: firefox-3.0 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
firefox 3.0b5 goes uninterruptible for a few seconds during normal browsing
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/213086
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 201209 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/201209
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 195422
hardy heron 8.04 alpha 5 - flash not installed correctly
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 201209
Firefox fails to see flashplugin-nonfree
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 195422
hardy heron 8.04 alpha 5 - flash not installed correctly
--
Firefox fails to see flashplugin-nonfree (Hardy)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/201209
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
** Changed in: libflash (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Fix Released
--
firefox crash
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/95680
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
h
** Changed in: flashplugin-nonfree (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Fix Released
--
Web browser freezes in Hardy when loading flash video with RT kernel
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/204574
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
I'm sorry, it appears I marked the wrong bug as invalid.
** Changed in: flashplugin-nonfree (Ubuntu)
Status: Invalid => New
--
Firefox API buggy, can cause crash in Firefox
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/184964
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, w
If you start Firefox from the terminal (Applications -> Terminal, type
"firefox" (without quotes), enter) do you have any messages appearing in
the terminal when reproducing the bug.
** Changed in: flashplugin-nonfree (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Confirmed
--
Flash framerate is slower t
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 177856 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/177856
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 177856
Gutsy 64: nspluginwrapper errors with flashplugin-nonfree 9.0.115
--
Flash Stops Responding In 64-bit Firefox
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/212751
Y
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 212877 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/212877
Marking as duplicate of bug 212877
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 212877
[hardy] [regression] Firefox 3 Beta 5 SEGFAULTs constantly when switching
flash pages
--
flash crashes with segfa
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 177856 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/177856
Marking as duplicate of bug 177856
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 177856
Gutsy 64: nspluginwrapper errors with flashplugin-nonfree 9.0.115
--
flashplugin-nonfree fails after one file in F
Bart Verwilst: That is a different bug. It is the "resurgence" of bug
177856 when Firefox 3.0 Beta 5 was added to repository.
--
flash plugin always rendered on top of html
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/49613
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is s
I think this bug is related to bug 212877. Just like this bug, the
people there report having 64-bit SMP (multicore/multiprocessor) systems
and it was brought by Mozilla Firefox 3.0 Beta 5. The difference,
however, is that bug 212877 relates to Mozilla Firefox crashing, not
just Flash alone.
On Ap
revelationman: You can install the package firefox-2 in Ubuntu 8.04 if
you want Firefox 2.
--
[MASTER] Committing to urlclassifier3.sqlite causes excessive CPU usage and
disk I/O
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/215728
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, wh
I know that it will not make it for the 8.04 release, but maybe the new
package could be placed in hardy-updates as it is a bugfix release for
Wesnoth. Otherwise, it could be backported to Ubuntu 8.04 when synced in
Intrepid.
--
Please sync wesnoth 1:1.4.1-2 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
I am not sure I quite understand you. I apologize. This is a bugfix
release for the wesnoth package that is included in Ubuntu at version
1:1.4-1 (same 1.4 branch). It is not a binary-only package, a source
package is available from Debian. See
http://packages.debian.org/sid/wesnoth
According to t
Not uploading wesnoth-tools is a relatively simple fix, as it is not a
required dependency.
And yes, there are a number of packaging changes. But the upstream
release (not Debian) is a simple bugfix release, so it would be good if
1.4.1 could be used. Using the current debian directory is a
possib
That's odd. The bug was fixed for me, so it may be a new bug with the
same errors. Does anyone who had this bug originally now have this bug
again?
Apr 26 00:46:46 Abacus01 kernel: [ 2518.086039] cdrom: This disc doesn't have
any tracks I recognize!
Apr 26 00:46:49 Abacus01 kernel: [ 2521.396833]
Vidar: Please let us know the bug number of your bug report if you open
one. Thanks.
--
[hardy] kernel 2.6.24-3-generic #1 SMP --> ide cdrom hdc: status error:
error=0x00 { }
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/182996
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
I think this is more of an issue that should be brought up with Debian,
but let's see what everyone else says.
--
wesnoth-all metapackage should depend on wesnoth-sound
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/223363
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subs
Like Jan Hoogenraad, this error occurs every time for me using ATI card
with the free driver. But my issue may be different, as I am able to do
a Ctrl-Alt-Backspace.
--
log out or switch user results in crash
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/107115
You received this bug notification because you ar
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 102782 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102782
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 102782
Cannot upgrade Kubuntu - 'next' button is disabled
--
Error in 'Version Upgrade'.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/104542
You received this bug notific
See Bug #104542
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/104542
--
Cannot upgrade Kubuntu - 'next' button is disabled
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102782
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu
Team, which is a bug contact for adept in ubuntu.
--
kubuntu-bugs mai
See this thread on Kubuntu Forums:
http://kubuntuforums.net/forums/index.php?topic=3081566
--
Cannot upgrade Kubuntu - 'next' button is disabled
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102782
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
Using Feisty Beta (fresh install) and have this issue
Anyone who has a similar problem see:
http://kubuntuforums.net/forums/index.php?topic=3081566
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 102782
Cannot upgrade Kubuntu - 'next' button is disabled
** Changed in: adept (Ubuntu)
Status:
** Description changed:
Binary package hint: adept
- After running 'Fetch Updates' in Adept PM it offeres a 'Version
- Upgrade'. When I click 'Next' I get this error:
+ After running 'Fetch Updates' in Adept Package Manager it offers a
+ 'Version Upgrade'. When I click 'Next' THERE IS this er
Perhaps related to or a duplicate of Bug 113184. Can you confirm?
--
Firefox/Epiphany crash at slatev.com
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/187250
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bu
Do other sites that use flash like Youtube work? If not, this is a
duplicate of Bug 173890.
The solution to this problem would be to completely remove flashplugin-
nonfree in Synaptic, the downloaded flashplugin package, and then
reinstall flash.
In Terminal (Applications -> Terminal), run the fo
Yes, I looked at the wishlist bug via flashplugin-nonfree package
notifications and then came here. I agree, we should contact Adobe and
tell them about this issue. At the very minimum, they can avoid updating
the flash plugin without renameing the file (to reflect the version). It
would be ideal i
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 173890 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/173890
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 173890
flashplugin-nonfree fails to install... new version?
--
Reinstallation of flashplugin-nonfree is not possible, it cannot be downloaded.
https://bugs.l
1 - 100 of 332 matches
Mail list logo
