The firmware does not supply the _PSS (Performance Supported States)
object that informs the kernel the supported processor performance
states of the system.This explains why cpu scaling does not work for
any kernel you chose.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Tested with bash 4.3-7ubuntu1, and I can't reproduce the issue now,
hence fixed for me. Thanks!
** Tags removed: verification-needed
** Tags added: verification-done
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchp
I fail to see why this is a fwts bug
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1246947
Title:
fwts-efi-runtime-dkms 0.26.08-0ubuntu1: fwts-efi-runtime-dkms kernel
module failed to build
To ma
This "Detected error 'Type'" issues is now fixed in fwts 14.03.01
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1297670
Title:
[Dell XPS13 9333] klog, method: Critical Failures
To manage notificati
Yes, that's a reproducer for me too.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1294669
Title:
bash crashed with SIGABRT in programming_error()
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
http
so it appears the ! token is the culprit at a guess:
ps = {parser_state = 524288, token_state = 0x1629768, token = 0x11f4008 "!",
token_buffer_size = 1520, input_line_terminator = 0, eof_encountered = 0,
prompt_string_pointer = 0x6fc920 , current_command_line_count = 0,
remember_on_history = 1,
** Changed in: ubuntu-power-consumption
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1234289
Title:
accounts-daemon is progressively causing more wakeups over tim
** Changed in: ubuntu-power-consumption
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1199877
Title:
unity-panel-service memory leak and 100% CPU usage
To manage
** Changed in: ubuntu-power-consumption
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1227000
Title:
update-notifier is polling every 5 seconds
To manage notifica
Public bug reported:
hud-service is polling like crazy:
Context Switches:
PID ProcessVoluntary Involuntary Total
Ctxt Sw/Sec Ctxt Sw/Sec Ctxt Sw/Sec
2295 hud-service 46084.6342.94 46127.58 (very high)
2325 hud-se
Hi Pete, how do I look that up?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1300722
Title:
hud-service is eating up 100% of one of my CPUs in a pool loop
To manage notifications about this bug go
What I am seeing is the following poll:
poll([{fd=13, events=POLLIN}], 1, 18813) = 1 ([{fd=13, revents=POLLIN}])
poll([{fd=13, events=POLLIN}], 1, 18813) = 1 ([{fd=13, revents=POLLIN}])
poll([{fd=13, events=POLLIN}], 1, 18813) = 1 ([{fd=13, revents=POLLIN}])
write(3, "\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0", 8)
Can you supply the ACPI dump when it gets stuck in a lower CPU frequency
state too? It does seem curious, but the "faster" CPU configuration
does not supply the _PSS in the tables, which is what was originally
limiting the CPU speed.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member
@JD Rogers, the relevant fix is in Oneiric, commit
3aeb86ea4cd15f728147a3bd5469a205ada8c767, so perhaps you are seeing
another related issue.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/509180
Title
** Changed in: fwts
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/971886
Title:
QA: warning: dereferencing type-punned pointer will break strict-
aliasi
** Summary changed:
- fwts: method test could give references to ACPI specifcation when it detects
non-compliant AML
+ fwts: method test could give references to ACPI specification when it detects
non-compliant AML
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
@Adam, it was verified for 2.6.38-14.58, which was in proposed at the
time of testing. Check that you are using this kernel before filing a
new bug. Thanks.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bu
I've submitted this patch to the mailing list to be applied for Precise
and as a SRU for Oneiric. For the Oneiric SRU I'd like it tested and
verified so that we can be 100% it does the trick, so can somebody test
this for us?
I've put the kernel .debs at: http://zinc.canonical.com/~cking/lp-88344
Oneiric SRU Justification:
Impact:
commit 64b3db22c04586997ab4be46dd5a5b99f8a2d390 (2.6.39),
"Remove use of unreliable FADT revision field" caused a regression
for old P4 systems because now cst_control and other fields are
not reset to 0.
The effect is that acpi_processor_power_init wil
verified on lucid 2.6.32-41.88 -proposed with ext2, ext3, ext4, xfs
lower file systems.
** Tags removed: verification-needed-lucid
** Tags added: verification-done-lucid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.lau
verified on lucid 2.6.32-41.88 -proposed with ext2, ext3, ext4, xfs
lower file systems
** Tags removed: verification-needed-lucid
** Tags added: verification-done-lucid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.laun
Can you edit /etc/default/grub and change:
GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX_DEFAULT="quiet splash"
to
GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX_DEFAULT="quiet splash no_console_suspend"
then run sudo update-grub and reboot.
Then change to a virtual console (e.g. press Ctrl-Alt-F1) and login.
Then run:
sudo pm-suspend
and see an
last line should have read:
"and see if an oops message appears on the console, if it does, can you
take a photo..."
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/987840
Title:
[HP-Pavilion-g6] han
@Parameswaran, just to confirm, with "no_console_suspend" you are now
able to successfully suspend/resume from the destktop and using "sudo
pm-suspend"?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/9
@Brendan, can I get access to this machine so I can debug it further?
Also, we haven't got anything like powernap running during theses tests
have we?
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Precise)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Colin King (colin-king)
--
You received this bug notification bec
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Colin King (colin-king)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/987840
Title:
[HP-Pavilion-g6] hangs during suspend
To man
Just to add, I'm seeing the same issue (no launcher on an external
monitor in mirror mode) on two machines:
Dell Inspiron 1501 (AMD Turion 64 X2 Mobile Technology TL-50, ATI RS482 [Radeon
Xpress 200M] and also
Dell Inspiron 6400 (Intel Core 2 T5200), ATI M52 [Mobility Radeon X1300]
--
You recei
So this bug isn't a kernel issue at all. the culprit is the following
script:
http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~checkbox-
dev/checkbox/trunk/view/head:/scripts/cpu_offlining
This offlines CPU1, and then tries to grep for cpu1 in /proc/interrupts
for some reason that completely escapes me at the moment
Just to say, this is one of those issues where bailing out of a
situation early without restoring the state gets us in one big hole. The
script offlines a CPU, then bails out. When detecting any error
condition, code should try to restore back to the proper pre-test state
where possible, e.g. on-
Back to comment #1, offlining and already offlined CPU is giving you an
invalid argument error. Likewise, onlining and already onlined CPU will
do the same.
The semantics of the interface may have changed between releases, but I
don't think we should class this as a bug since these interfaces do
My intuition is telling me once we have the script fixed it won't be
offlining CPU1 and bailing out and hence we won't see this problem.
Lets get the script sorted out and then re-test.
Incidentally, the semantics of the /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/online
are such that offlining an already offlin
@Brendan, ping me when you have some results, I will dig into this
deeper if we trip the problem.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/926136
Title:
CPU1 on Dell PowerEdge M610, R715 and I
Just for the record, I think the test script needs some more bullet-
proofing.
1. The echos to /sys/devices/system/cpu/$cpu_num/online should be
followed by checks afterwards to make sure EINVAL errors aren't returned
by the kernel. Just a simple bit of sanity checking can't harm.
2. It is wo
Public bug reported:
Installing today's ISO image, following the OEM installation guide
"Install (OEM setup) in Ubuntu Desktop amd64 for Precise Pre-release" on
a HP Mini 210 netbook, testcase:
http://testcases.qa.ubuntu.com/Install/DesktopOem
On test case ID: uoi-003 "End user selection" I enter
I was able to close this error dialog box, and then I got the normal
login prompt and was able to login correctly.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/988517
Title:
oem-config-remove-gtk:
Tried to reproduce on Dell6400, can't seem to easily reproduce this.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/988517
Title:
oem-config-remove-gtk: daemon died message
To manage notifications a
Still cannot reproduce on HPMini210 after several more attempts. Looks
like a sporadic low occurrence bug.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/988517
Title:
oem-config-remove-gtk: daemon d
@Brendan the reason why it fails on machines with 10 or more CPUs is
because one is grep'ing for cpu1 which matches on CPU10, CPU11, CPU12,
CPU13, CPU14, CPU15 on the 16 CPU machine. So the script is broken.
It looks like /proc/interrupts CPU* headed columns end with trailing
spaces, so we could b
Couple of questions to get an idea about your machine:
1 which tools are you using to create a VM, and how.
2. how fast is your HDD?
use the following and run 3 times, please supply the results to the bug.
sudo hdparm -t /dev/sda
sudo hdparm -T /dev/sda
3. Please run:
vmstat 1 > vmstat.log
a
So, I suspect we have some conflicting requirements for the I/O
operations which aren't helping here. If you are running firefox I
suspect it may be issuing occasional fsync() calls which isn't helping.
My current hypothesis is that the virtual memory tuneables may need
tweaking to match your mem
d in: linux (Ubuntu)
Importance: Low => Medium
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Colin King (colin-king)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/988799
Title:
OK, so I hadn't realized the machine was a desktop, hence the vm
settings are fairly low anyhow, so we shall scrub that idea above.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/988799
Title:
Precis
Can you try:
echo "deadline" | sudo tee /sys/block/sda/queue/scheduler
and see if that helps with interactivity while doing the heavy write
I/O activity. Thanks!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpa
verified on oneiric 3.0.0-18.31 -proposed with ext2, ext3, ext4, xfs,
btrfs lower file systems.
** Tags removed: verification-needed-oneiric
** Tags added: verification-done-oneiric
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
htt
@Amber, can you next try:
I understand you did a recent upgrade from Oneiric to Precise. It would
be useful if we can see if this issue occurs running Precise but with
the older Oneiric kernels. If you can boot your machine and press shift
down at boot time to get the one grub boot menu and then
Tony, so a couple of things:
Can you boot with a Oneiric kernel and see if these issues re-occur and
let me know, I just want to first factor out the kernel from the
changes.
Also can you also do:
sudo add-apt-repository ppa:colin-king/powermanagement
sudo apt-get update && sudo apt-get install
Oops, typo, should be:
sudo tp-thermstat 1 > thermstat.log &
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Colin King (colin-king)
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member o
@Tony, since the tp-thermstat gathers data on running processes, you may
want to email the data to me rather than put it in a public bug.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/953205
Title:
Verified with ecryptfs lower on ext2, ext3, ext4, xfs and btrfs for
Oneiric -proposed.
** Tags removed: verification-needed-oneiric
** Tags added: verification-done-oneiric
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs
On 14/03/12 07:36, Daniel van Vugt wrote:
> Sigh. It looks like some new regression is in Unity 5 compared to Unity
> 4. The fix for the autoscroll timer still works, but it doesn't get the
> number of wakeups per second much lower than 40. But that's a different
> issue...
>
I *really* appreciate
SRU justification:
Impact:
statfs() calls on eCryptfs files returned the wrong filesystem type and,
when using filename encryption, the wrong maximum filename length.
If mount-wide filename encryption is enabled, the cipher block size and
the lower filesystem's max filename length will determine
oops, made a typo, make the thermal parameter:
thermal.tzp=10
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/955287
Title:
Ubuntu should handle "hot" CPUs by taking preemptive action and
warning u
"However, the kernel seems to emit an ACPI event when it detects the
CPU(s) are merely "hot". I suggest we consider adding an acpi hook to
attempt to avoid a "critical" scenario."
In fact, I suspect the kernel *will* emit a critical thermal event, but
the temperature zips past this threshold and t
SRU justification for Lucid:
Impact:
The ECRYPTFS_NEW_FILE crypt_stat flag is set upon creation of a new
eCryptfs file. When the flag is set, eCryptfs reads directly from the
lower filesystem when bringing a page up to date. This means that no
offset translation (for the eCryptfs file metadata in
+ SRU for Maverick too.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/745836
Title:
encrypted swap corrupts application stack/heap [was: soffice.bin
SIGSEGV cppu::throwException()]
To manage noti
@James, if you can email me the logs you get with tp-thermstat I can
still analyze them and spot any dubious looking fan control
characteristics.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/955287
T
Note: SRU for Ubuntu Lucid
** Project changed: linux => ubuntu
** No longer affects: ubuntu
** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.lau
Public bug reported:
Ubuntu Lucid:
SRU Justification:
Stacking ecryptfs over ecryptfs can lead to many kinds of errors.
There doesn't seem to be any good usecase for this and we should
follow the upstream policy of disallowing the configuration.
Fix: Without the fix, we can stack ecryptfs over
SRU Justification:
When truncating inodes in the lower filesystem, eCryptfs directly
invoked vmtruncate(). As Christoph Hellwig pointed out, vmtruncate() is
a filesystem helper function, but filesystems may need to do more than
just a call to vmtruncate(). eCryptfs needs to go through
notify_chan
Attached is a truncate soak tester.
** Attachment added: "Soak test source"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ecryptfs/+bug/451368/+attachment/2745474/+files/test.c
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.
SRU Justification:
Impact: Read on an ecryptfs directory should return EISDIR if not
supported however currently EINVAL is being returned rather than
EISDIR.
Fix: With this patch a .read operation for ecryptfs directories is
connected up to generic_read_dir() which then performs the correct
behav
Public bug reported:
If I take a screen shot using Print Screen and I don't have a
/home/$USER/Pictures directory I get a crash pop-up saying "Sorry,
Screenshot closed unexpectedly".
I'm confused - the old mechanism allowed me to save the image, but now
it's being dumped in a directory not of my
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/934187
Title:
gnome screenshot breaks if I don't have ~/Pictures directory
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubun
Hi Sam, thanks,
however, I'm still flagging up the main issue which is:
"If I take a screen shot using Print Screen and I don't have a
/home/$USER/Pictures directory I get a crash pop-up saying "Sorry,
Screenshot closed unexpectedly"."
I'm pretty sure checking if a directory exists is better tha
On 17/02/12 22:32, Sam_ wrote:
> Agree, though I think when 927952 solves the root cause which introduced
> exactly the deliberate move to pictures directory, then there won't be a
> reason to crash. The issue currently is that user has no interactive
> mode to select from a dialog where to save th
Colin King (colin-king)
Status: In Progress
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: New => In Progress
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Colin King (colin-king)
--
Volume keys
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: ubuntuone-client
My colleague shared a folder so I could write to it on Ubuntu One. I
started copying a lot of files to this shared folder and then the folder
got unshared. After this I was unabled to re-sync and I had to kill my
ubuntuone processes and
** Description changed:
Binary package hint: ubuntuone-client
My colleague shared a folder so I could write to it on Ubuntu One. I
- started coping a lot of files to this shared folder and then the folder
+ started copying a lot of files to this shared folder and then the folder
got uns
Also, when I touched (created) files in the shared folder I got conflict
files. Is this a feature?
--
Client stopped working when copying files to another users shared folder which
got unshared during the copying process
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/677525
You received this bug notification b
Attached: Logs
** Attachment added: "gzip'd tar of logs"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntuone-client/+bug/677525/+attachment/1738403/+files/logs.tar.gz
--
Client stopped working when copying files to another users shared folder which
got unshared during the copying process
ht
I believe the noise is the micro capacitors charging/discharging. It's a
physical characteristic of the machines. It's not a kernel bug.
--
Thinkpad T60 high pitch noise Ubuntu 8.10 under no load
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/309493
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
SRU:
Impact: Dell device is lacking volume up/down hotkeys which require
a WMI driver to handle the WMI hotkey events with the GUID
284A0E6B-380E-472A-921F-E52786257FB4.
Fix: Update WMI core driver to support multiple WMI events with the
same GUID, and add in WMI driver for the two up/down volume
Downloaded the propose i386 generic kernel, tested, works fine.
** Tags added: verification-done
** Tags removed: verification-needed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/676997
Title:
Vo
nd to key presses:
event ID: 0xc0 (key-up)
event ID: 0xc1 (key-down).
** Affects: linux (Ubuntu)
Importance: Medium
Assignee: Colin King (colin-king)
Status: In Progress
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Colin King (colin-king)
** Changed i
SRU request:
Impact: Dell device is lacking volume up/down hotkeys which require
a WMI driver to handle the WMI hotkey events with the GUID
02314822-307C-4F66-bf0E-48AEAEB26CC8.
Fix: Update dell WMI driver to support GUID
02314822-307C-4F66-bf0E-48AEAEB26CC8.
and handle firmware bug in _WED meth
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: fwts
A newer version 0.20.19 of the firmware test suite (fwts) tool is now
available:
https://launchpad.net/~firmware-testing-team/+archive/ppa-firmware-test-
suite-natty-stable/+packages
These changes include:
1. tighter integrations of the ACPICA asse
** Attachment added: "debdiff between V0.20.10 and V0.20.19"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fwts/+bug/701843/+attachment/1791793/+files/debdiff-0.20.10-0.20.19
** Description changed:
Binary package hint: fwts
A newer version 0.20.19 of the firmware test suite (fwts) tool i
.
** Changed in: fwts (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Colin King (colin-king)
** Changed in: fwts (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/
@Felix, thanks for sorting this out and also the spotting those two
mistakes - I appreciate your attention to detail.
Colin
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/701843
Title:
Newer version
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: fwts
A newer version 0.20.0 of the fwts tools is now available:
https://launchpad.net/~firmware-testing-team/+archive/ppa-firmware-test-
suite-natty-stable/+packages
This contains most of the new functionality that I was intending to
implement for the N
Public bug reported:
ISO test, image: Ubuntu Desktop amd64 [20101202]:
http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/info/4860
Created USB stick image from ISO, tried the following test case:
Test: http://testcases.qa.ubuntu.com/Install/DesktopOem
Ubiquity OEM Install
Case ID: uoi-001
1. Start your ma
Just to note, I was using a non-3D accelerated graphics system, so I got
by default the "Classic Desktop" and not a "Unity desktop".
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/684073
Title:
Natty
Attached, casper.log
** Attachment added: "casper.log"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/684073/+attachment/1753187/+files/casper.log
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/684073
Tit
Fixed in commit cf313a17617081bbe9c9c177d38405b0490aed30, in fwts
version 0.19.16
** Changed in: fwts (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Committed
** Changed in: fwts (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Low
** Changed in: fwts (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Colin King (c
truncated to fit: R_ARM_THM_JUMP11 against symbol `AcpiOsSignalSemaphore'
defined in .text section in ../src/lib/src/libtestsuite.a(acpica.o)
collect2: ld returned 1 exit
** Affects: fwts (Ubuntu)
Importance: Medium
Assignee: Colin King (colin-king)
Status: In Pro
A newer version 0.20.3 of the fwts tools is now available which
addresses this bug and contains some more features+fixes.
https://launchpad.net/~firmware-testing-team/+archive/ppa-firmware-test-
suite-natty-stable/+packages
Can this be uploaded for me? Thanks.
--
You received this bug notificat
** Changed in: fwts (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/684663
Title:
fwts: fix powerPC and ARM FTBFS
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubu
)
Importance: Low
Assignee: Colin King (colin-king)
Status: New
** Changed in: fwts (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Low
** Changed in: fwts (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Colin King (colin-king)
--
fwts nx test (test 3) reports incorrect CPU number when test
Fix in
http://kernel.ubuntu.com/git?p=cking/fwts/.git;a=commit;h=5539dfef34b77f9df35805fa10cd80682b1ad995
--
fwts nx test (test 3) reports incorrect CPU number when test fails
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/638783
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
A newer version 0.18.4 of the fwts tool is now available to fix this
bug.
0.18.4 also includes a single character typo fix in cpufreq test.
https://launchpad.net/~firmware-testing-team/+archive/ppa-firmware-test-
suite/+sourcepub/1294539/+listing-archive-extra
Can this be uploaded? Thanks
--
f
Oops, please ignore my recent sponsorship request. My mistake on wrong
bug.
--
fwts FADT test is not checking correct table from /sys/firmware
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/627959
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubu
Sorry, I accidentally subscribed Ubuntu Security Sponsors by an
incorrect click. Apologies.
--
fwts nx test (test 3) reports incorrect CPU number when test fails
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/638783
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
Hi Stefano,
Couple of questions, excuse my ignorance here:
1. Pretty minimal diff, no problem. However it doesn't close this bug
with the correct syntax. Fixed in upload.
What does "it doesn't close this bug with the correct syntax" mean? Can
you explain a little more?
2. Can I suggest that you
Thanks, my sincere apologies for that mistake. Is this now acceptable?:
http://kernel.ubuntu.com/git?p=cking/fwts/.git;a=blob;f=debian/changelog;h=d9452886a66ee759fad3bcec830b7c0d5bb6e3b3;hb=HEAD
On Wed, 2010-09-15 at 15:35 +, Stefano Rivera wrote:
> Re the bug closing, I corrected this for
[Test case]
1. Install the updated package on an x86 system.
2. Reboot.
3. Confirm that the machine boots successfully.
Check on Lenovo x220. Works OK. Passed.
4. Install the updated package on a non-maguro arm system.
5. Reboot.
6. Confirm that the machine boots successfully.
Checked on LG Nexu
~10-20% faster than the non-fixed
kernel.
** Affects: linux (Ubuntu)
Importance: Medium
Assignee: Colin King (colin-king)
Status: In Progress
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: New => In Progress
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
**
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1242812
Title:
ext4 random block I/O write performance regression with 3.11 Sa
Public bug reported:
Running today's image on a Samsung Galaxy Nexus I am observing frequent
regular periodic polling by accounts-daemon on an idle system. Running
strace on it I see:
poll([{fd=4, events=POLLIN}, {fd=7, events=POLLIN}], 2, 537) = 0 (Timeout)
clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC, {12270
Public bug reported:
Using today's phablet image on a Samsung Galaxy Nexus I observed that
one of the threads of ubuntuappmanager is polling every 500ms. I am
filing this bug in a vain attempt to try and reduce system wakeups and
hence reduce battery consumption.
Tracing this with strace, I see:
Public bug reported:
Please sync eventstat 0.01.27-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
Changelog entries since current saucy version 0.01.26-1:
eventstat (0.01.27-1) unstable; urgency=low
* Makefile: bump version
* eventstat: fix kernel thread detection issue (LP: #1226787)
-- Colin
1001 - 1100 of 2168 matches
Mail list logo
