[Bug 1341944] Re: 32-Bit UEFI bootloader support needed

2016-06-01 Thread ClairelyClaire
As far as other distros go - can anyone confirm if any distros other than Ubuntu have the signed kernel and UEFI bootloader required to ensure Secure Boot can remain enabled on the machine? Not everyone will necessarily be bothered by needing to disable Secure Boot, but some OEMs make it pretty ard

[Bug 1341944] [NEW] 32-Bit UEFI bootloader support needed

2014-07-14 Thread ClairelyClaire
*** This bug is a security vulnerability *** Public security bug reported: As of now, Ubuntu and other major Linux distributions do not support the use of a 32-bit EFI bootloader on UEFI machines. This has become extremely problematic due to the popularity of Intel Atom-based tablets and compact

[Bug 1341944] Re: 32-Bit UEFI bootloader support needed

2015-08-20 Thread ClairelyClaire
@jokker: You can boot 64-bit Ubuntu on the Switch 10 (or any other Bay Trail Atom device) using 32-bit GRUB. You will need to compile GRUB yourself. The easiest way to accomplish this is to copy the 32-bit UEFI bootloader from a GParted LiveCD to your Ubuntu LiveUSB media, turn off Secure Boot on y

[Bug 1341944] Re: 32-Bit UEFI bootloader support needed

2015-08-30 Thread ClairelyClaire
The 32-bit image will only work with Secure Boot turned off and legacy or CSM boot enabled in your device's UEFI. I don't remember off the top of my head if the X205TA offers this ability, but I'm pretty sure it does. You might be better off using Windows until 64-bit Ubuntu is stable, tbh. Window

[Bug 1341944] Re: 32-Bit UEFI bootloader support needed

2014-11-18 Thread ClairelyClaire
I have an Acer Switch 10 with a 32-bit UEFI. I installed 32-bit UEFI GRUB and was able to boot 64-bit Ubuntu. It definitely was not 32-bit Ubuntu - I was specifically using a 64-bit installer/LiveCD. I can confirm definitively that a machine with 32-bit firmware can absolutely boot a 64-bit operat

[Bug 1341944] Re: 32-Bit UEFI bootloader support needed

2014-11-18 Thread ClairelyClaire
ETA: whether or not the 64-bit OS can make calls to the 32-bit UEFI doesn't prevent the OS from booting. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1341944 Title: 32-Bit UEFI bootloader support n

[Bug 1341944] Re: 32-Bit UEFI bootloader support needed

2014-11-18 Thread ClairelyClaire
That's what we've been saying since this ticket - and others like it - was filed. It is *confirmed* to be possible to install a 32-bit UEFI GRUB and install and boot a 64-bit kernel. It's been done multiple times, right now by manually compiling and using a 32-bit UEFI GRUB bootloader. I can't spe

[Bug 1341944] Re: 32-Bit UEFI bootloader support needed

2014-09-25 Thread ClairelyClaire
This is going to continue to be a problem. Its breadth will increase as more and more people attempt to install Ubuntu on any Atom-based device. The Intel Atom platform by design uses a 32-bit UEFI environment. These devices ship with 32-bit Windows 8.1 installed, because 64-bit Windows uses signi