[Bug 620751] Re: dvipdf, evince: Illegal entry in bfrange block in ToUnicode CMap

2012-02-14 Thread Chris Dellin
Bump. It seems to me that the fix has been available for some 18 months now, and it's still not fixed in the LTS. Who should I complain to? (-: -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/620751 T

[Bug 1038781] Re: -dev packages are missing alternate depends on -extra packages

2012-12-17 Thread Chris Dellin
Due to some dev dependencies, I altered (and simplified) my script to produce separate debian packages for each broken package. The new script is attached below. ** Attachment added: "mk_libav-extra-dev.sh" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libav/+bug/1038781/+attachment/3462163/+file

[Bug 1038781] Re: -dev packages are missing alternate depends on -extra packages

2013-01-23 Thread Chris Dellin
** Attachment removed: "mk_libav-extra-dev.sh" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libav/+bug/1038781/+attachment/3455045/+files/mk_libav-extra-dev.sh -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net

[Bug 1038781] Re: -dev packages are missing alternate depends on -extra packages

2013-01-23 Thread Chris Dellin
Bump. From my reading of the SRU specs, I'd argue that this represents a "severe regression", since users simply cannot encode videos and develop software at the same time. I'd also argue that the patch [1] is "obviously safe" and does not affect critical infrastructure packages. [1] https://laun

[Bug 1038781] Re: -dev packages are missing alternate depends on -extra packages

2013-01-24 Thread Chris Dellin
Stefan, you should try out my script from comment 22. It doesn't require sudo, and produces debian packages that you can then install on your system. Let me know how it goes. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bu

[Bug 767108] Re: please package new version (3.3.1), include standard C language API

2012-05-27 Thread Chris Dellin
For those still waiting for the C bindings to be packaged, I've added them to my PPA (for lucid and precise) here: https://launchpad.net/~robotics/+archive/ppa Let me know if you have any trouble with them. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is s

[Bug 1038781] Re: -dev packages are missing alternate depends on -extra packages

2012-12-08 Thread Chris Dellin
Since this is such a pain for me, I made a little bash script to automate Maarten Baert's suggestion and create a debian package which can be installed/uninstalled on your system. Feel free to give it a try, and let me know how it goes. ** Attachment added: "mk_libav-extra-dev.sh" https://bug

[Bug 1038781] Re: -dev packages are missing alternate depends on -extra packages

2012-11-16 Thread Chris Dellin
I can confirm that this bug is still affecting me on an up-to-date Quantal. Any estimate when the patch will be applied? Thanks! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1038781 Title: -dev p

[Bug 694405] Re: libgv-python 2.20.2-8ubuntu3 broken link in package

2011-12-05 Thread Chris Dellin
I have the same problem, although my problem is broader. Not only is the symbolic link /usr/lib/pyshared/python2.6/_gv.so incorrect, but it appears that package libgv-python was built against libgvc.so.4, whereas the version installed on my system (from packge libgraphviz4) is /usr/lib/libgvc.so.6