A new upstream release -0.127- has been released, this is the .diff.gz for
upgrading.
Compiled binaries are available on my PPA as well:
https://edge.launchpad.net/~c.falco/+archive
To build the source package use
zcat sdlmame_0.127-0ubuntu1.diff.gz | patch -p0
cd sdlmame-0.127
chmod +x debian
Public bug reported:
A new upstream release is available.
** Affects: sdlmame (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
[upgrade] New upstream release 0.132
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/390157
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
This is the .diff file for the new upstream release - sdlmame 0.132.
To build the source package use
zcat sdlmame_0.132-0ubuntu1.diff.gz | patch -p0
cd sdlmame-0.132
chmod +x debian/rules
debian/rules get-orig-source
mv sdlmame_0.132.orig.tar.gz ../
cd ..
tar xvfz sdlmame_0.132.orig.tar.gz
and t
Released tagged with a "u" are unstable ones, very similar to beta.
I'm not going to package them as they seldom even break working code.
--
[upgrade] New upstream release 0.132
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/390157
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, whic
ee: (unassigned) => Cesare Falco (c.falco)
--
Update BTPD version to 0.15
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/335440
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.co
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: sdlmame
As suggested in [1] I'd like to ask for a FF for new SDLMAME, because:
* it fixes a LP bug
* it also fixes the annoying mailing complaining it doesn't build on
exotic platforms
* it's really outdated: 5 (five!) major releases have occured sinc
** Attachment added: "PPA build log for amd64"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18648903/buildlog_ubuntu-intrepid-amd64.sdlmame_0.128-0ubuntu1_FULLYBUILT.txt.gz
--
[FeatureFreeze] New upstream: SDLMAME 0.128
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/285204
You received this bug notification because you a
** Attachment added: "PPA build log for i386"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18648918/buildlog_ubuntu-intrepid-i386.sdlmame_0.128-0ubuntu1_FULLYBUILT.txt.gz
--
[FeatureFreeze] New upstream: SDLMAME 0.128
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/285204
You received this bug notification because you are
** Attachment added: "diffstat for FF request"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18648926/diffstat.txt
--
[FeatureFreeze] New upstream: SDLMAME 0.128
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/285204
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
** Attachment added: "diff for changelog (whatsnew.txt) as per FF request"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18648950/changelog.diff
--
[FeatureFreeze] New upstream: SDLMAME 0.128
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/285204
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, wh
** Attachment added: "installation log on my ubuntu box (hardy)"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18648964/install.log
--
[FeatureFreeze] New upstream: SDLMAME 0.128
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/285204
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscr
** Description changed:
Binary package hint: sdlmame
As suggested in [1] I'd like to ask for a FF for new SDLMAME, because:
* it fixes a LP bug
* it also fixes the annoying mailing complaining it doesn't build on
exotic platforms
* it's really outdated: 5 (five!) major r
This is the .diff file for the new upstream release - sdlmame 0.128.
To build the source package use
zcat sdlmame_0.128-0ubuntu1.diff.gz | patch -p0
cd sdlmame-0.128
chmod +x debian/rules
debian/rules get-orig-source
mv sdlmame_0.128.orig.tar.gz ../
cd ..
tar xvfz sdlmame_0.128.orig.tar.gz
and
Please also close this bug as a FF is no longer needed.
Thanks,
Cesare.
--
[FeatureFreeze] New upstream: SDLMAME 0.128
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/285204
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
I see jaunty has already been branched.
Could please someone upload the updated package?
Thanks,
Cesare.
--
[upgrade] sdlmame new upstream 0.128
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/231223
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
- Each new release usually adds previously unsupported games or improves
support for the already emulated ones.
- Mame(TM) has its own bug reporting site (MAMETesters), and each
release fixes a number of them (listed in whastnew.txt)
- At some point since 0.123 a new utility for laserdisc games
I've never done a backport before.
Is this the right place to start from?
https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UbuntuBackports/
--
[FeatureFreeze] New upstream: SDLMAME 0.128
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/285204
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
This is the .diff.gz obtained with debuild -S.
Is that what you meant?
** Attachment added: "sdlmame_0.125-0ubuntu1.diff.gz"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/14893544/sdlmame_0.125-0ubuntu1.diff.gz
--
[upgrade] sdlmame new upstream 0.125
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/231223
You received thi
This is not properly a bug, it's related to how btpd works in Ubuntu
(see /usr/share/doc/btpd/README.Debian).
btpd runs as a system daemon with its own user, you should use the init
script to control it:
sudo /etc/init.d/btpd stop -> kill
sudo /etc/init.d/btpd start -> launch
sudo /etc/init.d/bt
A new upstream release (0.128) is expected next week so I'll upload a diff for
it as soon as it's released.
In the meantime, I'll have a look at the Freeze Exception Process.
Thanks!
Cesare.
--
[upgrade] sdlmame new upstream 0.127
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/231223
You received this bug no
Ok, forget about the .diff files posted, I've missed this:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/2008-January/024913.html
Here's the .diff.gz I've just used to build sdlmame 0.125 source package with
following commands:
zcat sdlmame_0.125-0ubuntu1.diff.gz | patch -p0
cd sdlmame-0.125
ch
I'm sorry, I'm still confused a bit about fix committing process. :(
You should be able to apply the first .diff.gz file commited (the >4mb
one) to the 0.123 source with the same procedure used upgrading 0.122 to
0.123 in hardy:
apt-get source sdlmame
wget http://launchpadlibrarian.net/14565553/s
Ooops!
You can't run uscan or it will download latest unstable release!
However, get-orig-source works for me. Could you post a log, please?
Thanks!
--
[upgrade] sdlmame new upstream 0.125
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/231223
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubun
** Attachment added: "Upgrades sdlmame source from 0.123 to 0.125"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/14565553/sdlmame_0.125.diff.gz
--
[upgrade] sdlmame new upstream 0.125
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/231223
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is s
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: sdlmame
First update after Hardy release, this is a patch to latest SDLMame stable
release.
** Affects: sdlmame (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
[upgrade] sdlmame new upstream 0.125
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/231223
Yo
** Changed in: sdlmame (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Cesare Falco (c.falco)
** Changed in: sdlmame (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Cesare Falco (c.falco) => (unassigned)
--
[upgrade] sdlmame new upstream 0.126
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/231223
You received this bug notification b
Fix committed with upgrade to release 0.126: see
https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sdlmame/+bug/231223
** Changed in: sdlmame (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Fix Committed
** Changed in: sdlmame (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Cesare Falco (c.falco)
--
package
The attached diff.gz:
- upgrades sdlmame to latest stable release 0.126
- fixes conflicting dep with xmame-tools (I can't fix xmame-tools too as I'm
not the maintainer):
https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sdlmame/+bug/245318
To build the source package use
zcat sdlmame_0.126-0ubuntu1
OK, just to report I have the same problem with a Philips DVDR1640P,
which worked until I upgraded my HD to a SATA one, putting the dvd
burner as Master on channel 0 (i.e. it was /dev/hdb, now it's /dev/hda).
--
hdc: status error: status=0x59 { DriveReady SeekComplete DataRequest Error }
https://
** Changed in: sdlmame (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Committed
--
[upgrade] sdlmame new upstream 0.129
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/318304
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@l
** Changed in: sdlmame (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Committed => Confirmed
--
[upgrade] sdlmame new upstream 0.129
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/318304
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-
Public bug reported:
A new upstream has been released.
** Affects: sdlmame (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
[upgrade] sdlmame new upstream 0.129
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/318304
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
This is the .diff file for the new upstream release - sdlmame 0.128.
To build the source package use
zcat sdlmame_0.129-0ubuntu1.diff.gz | patch -p0
cd sdlmame-0.129
chmod +x debian/rules
debian/rules get-orig-source
mv sdlmame_0.129.orig.tar.gz ../
cd ..
tar xvfz sdlmame_0.129.orig.tar.gz
and t
Here's some explanation:
> - ARCHOPTS=-march=pentium-mmx \
> + ARCHOPTS=-march=pentium2 \
sdlmame requires fast machines or it runs so slow it's unusable; optimization
for i686 offers some performance improvement (comment put in changelog)
> -Standards-Version: 3.7.3
> +Standards-Version: 3.8.0
Could anyone please sponsor sdlmame 0.129?
Feature Freeze is approaching and I'm concerned it could miss it... :)
Thanks!
Cesare.
--
[upgrade] sdlmame new upstream 0.129
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/318304
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is s
Please don't change either description or tags, they are used by sponsors to
process sponsoring queue.
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU/Sponsorship/SponsorsQueue
** Summary changed:
- [karmic] Please update btpd to 0.15 version
+ [upgrade] Please update btpd to 0.15 version
** Tags added: patch
Status: New => Confirmed
** Changed in: btpd (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => New
** Changed in: btpd (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Cesare Falco (c.falco) => (unassigned)
** Changed in: btpd (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
Update BTPD version to 0.15
https://bugs.lau
** Summary changed:
- Update BTPD version to 0.15
+ [upgrade] Update BTPD version to 0.15
--
[upgrade] Update BTPD version to 0.15
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/335440
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs ma
Could anyone please close this bug?
SDLMAME is now in the multiverse repository. ;-)
Thanks!
Cesare.
--
[needs-packaging] SDLMAME
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/135879
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs ma
Public bug reported:
A new upstream release is available.
** Affects: sdlmame (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Summary changed:
- New upstream release 0.133
+ [upgrade] New upstream release 0.133
** Summary changed:
- [upgrade] New upstream release 0.133
+ [upgrade]
This is the .diff file for the new upstream release - sdlmame 0.133.
To build the source package use
zcat sdlmame_0.133-0ubuntu1.diff.gz | patch -p0
cd sdlmame-0.133
chmod +x debian/rules
debian/rules get-orig-source
mv sdlmame_0.133.orig.tar.gz ../
cd ..
tar xvfz sdlmame_0.133.orig.tar.gz
and t
The bug still affects gutsy.
My G550 is an older one with the standard VGA connector as the first
output and the DVI connector (which I use with my Samsung SyncMaster
152T LCD monitor) is the second one. Each time I installed Ubuntu from
scratch or updated it, I ran into same problem: blank screen
Public bug reported:
This bug is very similar to Bug #8107, which is reported as fixed. But
AFAIK it's not the same neither it has been fixed in gutsy.
I have two cards on my PC: the onboard one and a PCI SB Live! and I use
them both: the onboard one for voip, and the SB for all other purposes.
W
Unfortunately, you can't post a review unless you are a MOTU reviewer.
This is part of the process which leads to inclusion in the official
repositories (both for universe and multiverse components), to ensure
packages are built "the right way". MOTUs have been really busy during
the last days, due
t/~c.falco/+archive
* or in REVU: http://revu.tauware.de/details.py?package=btpd
** Affects: ubuntu
Importance: Undecided
Assignee: Cesare Falco (c.falco)
Status: New
** Changed in: ubuntu
Assignee: (unassigned) => Cesare Falco (c.falco)
--
[needs-packagin
Falco (c.falco)
Status: In Progress
** Changed in: ubuntu
Assignee: (unassigned) => Cesare Falco (c.falco)
Status: New => In Progress
--
[needs-packaging] shorten
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/158451
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubunt
** Changed in: ubuntu
Status: New => In Progress
--
[needs-packaging] btpd
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/158447
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
http
You can find them either
* on my PPA: https://edge.launchpad.net/~c.falco/+archive
* on REVU: http://revu.tauware.de/details.py?package=sdlmame
Ehm... well... you can also download them from the link you mentioned as I *am*
wallyweek... :)
I must admit the site is quite ugly, but I have no time t
I own an 1386 machine, I can't build amd64 packages at home, neither I
can test them.
I started uploading sdlmame on my PPA to check correctness of my rules
for amd64, but I'm still considering it some kind of beta release, as I
only had some positive feedbacks from one user. I may assume happy us
Yes, the Xmame site itself suggests migration to SDLMAME as big core
changes in baseline MAME(tm) made maintenance too difficult.
As for SDLMAME, see Bug #135879
--
xmame: incorrect key mapping with french keyboard
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/106805
You received this bug notification because
views, but I need more of them.
** Changed in: ubuntu
Assignee: (unassigned) => Cesare Falco (c.falco)
** Changed in: ubuntu
Status: Triaged => In Progress
--
[needs-packaging] SDLMAME
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/135879
You received this bug notification because you are a
See bug #135879
https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/135879
--
Please update xmame-sdl to version 0.117
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/125738
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubu
** Changed in: ubuntu
Status: In Progress => Fix Released
--
[needs-packaging] SDLMAME
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/135879
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubu
** Attachment added: "sdlmame_0.123-0ubuntu1.diff.gz"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/11817650/sdlmame_0.123-0ubuntu1.diff.gz
** Tags added: upgrade
--
[upgrade] sdlmame new upstream 0.123
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190041
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubu
Public bug reported:
A new upstream release is out.
The new .diff.gz is attached, please use get-orig-source to retrieve
source tarball.
** Affects: sdlmame (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Tags: upgrade
--
[upgrade] sdlmame new upstream 0.123
https://bugs.launchpa
Just in case, here's the .dsc too.
** Attachment added: "sdlmame_0.123-0ubuntu1.dsc"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/11817656/sdlmame_0.123-0ubuntu1.dsc
--
[upgrade] sdlmame new upstream 0.123
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190041
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
I know there's trouble with upstream site every now and then, however I
would expect to see sdlmame0123.zip as the file name to be retrieved.
Looks like the $(VER) has the old value. I'm also puzzled with the
warning messages.
It's likely I've done something wrong with the .diff file, I'll check i
Here it is.
I successfully applied it with the same procedure stated above.
** Attachment added: "sdlmame_0.123.diff.gz"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/11841637/sdlmame_0.123.diff.gz
--
[upgrade] sdlmame new upstream 0.123
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190041
You received this bug notific
Ok, I apologize, I definitely got it wrong and attached a bad .diff file
(i.e. the one obtained with dpkg-buildpackage).
I'll upload the right one this evening, together with some fixes which
hopefully should make it build on unofficial archs too.
--
[upgrade] sdlmame new upstream 0.123
https://
Sorry, I meant examples _in the manpage_.
--
uscan: option --user-agent doesn't work properly
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/179563
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubu
I'm really puzzled as your example seems to work. :|
Just FYI, I sometimes received the "no matching hrefs for watch line"
message, and sometimes not at all. I can't tell how many attempts I
made, with both version mangling and url regexp. I dare say, example
could be more clear. ;)
BTW, unless
This is a duplicate of Bug #119412
--
[needs-packaging] MAC-PORT
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/105461
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.
My 2-cent contribution.
After a long thought, I believe it shoud be included in multiverse,
perhaps depending from a meta-package like "media-codec-ugly-
multiverse", in a similar way as the "gstreamer0.10-plugins-ugly-
multiverse" is done. We should consider that .ape format is quite
popular, and
The latest xmame release (0.106) is already in the repositories.
Project is in a frozen state at present, and it's like to be discontinued.
See xmame homepage for details: http://x.mame.net/
I feel this should be not considered a real bug.
** Changed in: xmame (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed =>
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: devscripts
I'm trying to write a watch file for sdlmame, hoste on a web server
requiring the User-Agent header.
Easier to try than to explain:
$ wget -U "Debian uscan" http://rbelmont.mameworld.info/sdlmame0122.zip
works fine, whilst
$ uscan --user-agen
** Changed in: ubuntu
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
[needs-packaging] shorten
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/158451
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ub
** Changed in: ubuntu
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
[needs-packaging] btpd
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/158447
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubunt
** Changed in: ubuntu
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
[needs-packaging] SDLMAME
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/135879
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ub
This is the .diff file for the new upstream release - sdlmame 0.136.
To build the source package use
zcat sdlmame_0.136-0ubuntu1.diff.gz | patch -p0
cd sdlmame-0.136
chmod +x debian/rules
debian/rules get-orig-source
mv sdlmame_0.136.orig.tar.gz ../
cd ..
tar xvfz sdlmame_0.136.orig.tar.gz
and th
Hello Fabrice,
the NOASM make variable selects which emulation engine to use. For all
the targets currently supported by Ubuntu is recommended unsetting it,
to take full advantage of the Assembly core when available. On the other
hand, there are other targets (e.g. ARM or MIPS, according to the
u
verify.1
-- Cesare FalcoSat, 03 Apr 2010 09:51:27 +0200
Just in case, I also would suggest to refresh source orig tarball, as it
currently expands to sdlmame0136 instead of sdlmame-0.136. You can both
download the original .zip and repack it manually or use the get-orig-
source target unpac
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: sdlmame
Nothing more to say, recently SDLMame has been renamed to MAME upstream.
** Affects: sdlmame (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Summary changed:
- [needs renaming] sdlmame became mame
+ [needs renaming] sdlmame to mame
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: sdlmame
A new upstream release of MAME is available, 0.137.
This replaces SDLMAME, after projects merging.
See also bug #538367
** Affects: sdlmame (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Description changed:
Binary package hint:
** Summary changed:
- [upgrade] mame new upstream 0.137
+ [upgrade] mame new upstream 0.138
** Description changed:
Binary package hint: sdlmame
- A new upstream release of MAME is available, 0.137.
+ A new upstream release of MAME is available, 0.138.
This replaces SDLMAME, after project
This is the .debian.tar.gz for the new release 0.138.
To build the package you can either:
- use the get-orig-source target after untarring the debian/ directory
- download the .orig.tar.gz from MAME PPA, where you can also find binaries
built for maverick:
https://edge.launchpad.net/~c.falco
Fix committed, see bug #538369.
Cesare.
** Changed in: sdlmame (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
[needs renaming] sdlmame to mame
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/538367
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ub
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 403212 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/403212
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 403212
[upgrade] sdlmame new upstream release 0.134
--
sdlmame new upstream: 0.134
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/444792
You received this bug notification
untu1.diff.gz
** Changed in: btpd (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Confirmed
** Changed in: btpd (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Incomplete
** Changed in: btpd (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Cesare Falco (c.falco) => (unassigned)
** Changed in: btpd (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete
I know work is in progress to let sdlmame enter the official debian
repository, and when it's done we can see whether diversion is needed.
In the meantime, I see no reason to sync the official package with an
unofficial repository for debian.
--
[upgrade] sdlmame new upstream release 0.133
https
Please DON'T upload Artur Rona's package.
SDLMAME 0.134u1 is a beta release, it can be even broken at some extent,
and speaking as the official maintainer, I strongly believe only major
releases are safe enough to reach the repository.
I'll upload 0.134 as soon as possible. With feature freeze i
Hello Fabrice,
and thanks for your help.
1. I agree, the watch file should not track "u"nstable releases. I'll
put it very high in my to-do list. :)
2. No, 0.133 and 0.134 are so called "stable" (major) releases. Mame
developers agreed to a tight development cycle, with each release
planned in
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: sdlmame
New SDLMAME upstream 0.136 needs packaging.
** Affects: sdlmame (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
[upgrade] sdlmame new upstream release 0.136
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/502191
You received this bug notification
This is the .diff file for the new upstream release - sdlmame 0.135.
A fixed watch file as suggested by Fabrice is included.
To build the source package use:
zcat sdlmame_0.135-0ubuntu1.diff.gz | patch -p0
cd sdlmame-0.135
chmod +x debian/rules
debian/rules get-orig-source
mv sdlmame_0.135.orig.ta
Hello Fabrice,
retrieving whatsnew.txt from the net is just a quick fix for the current
release. Upstream maintainers didn't bother to repack the zipfile, but
it will be back with 0.137. Putting whatsnew.txt in debian would require
some changes in debian/rules. If you feel it would be cleaner, ho
Hello Fabrice,
here's the new diff.gz, including fixes to changelog entry and
debian/control file, as well as whatsnew.txt now in debian (rules
updated accordingly).
Package builds on both karmic (pbuilder on my box) and lucid (see my
PPA, I had to bump to 0ubuntu2 to avoid conflict with previous
Public bug reported:
Mame now depends on rapidjson >= 1.0 in Debian unstable.
Please sync the package in bionic to help syncing Mame as well.
Thanks!
** Affects: rapidjson (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: rapidjson (Ubuntu)
Milestone: None => ubuntu-1
This is by design: hidden directory like .mame are for configuration and
run-time data purposes.
For resource files (roms, samples etc.) a subdirectory is more
appropriate.
** Changed in: mame (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Cesare Falco (c.falco)
** Changed in: mame (Ubu
> ifeq ($(DEB_HOST_ARCH),ppc64)
> PTR64=1
> i didnt set it because ubuntu on ppc is 32bit, kernels only are 64bit.
> and this make issue on libsdl too.
Please note architecture size is a different matter from pointer size.
You're right for the former, whilst pointer size on ppc64 is 8 byte:
http:
This matter has been long debated within Mame packagers, and has finally
been agreed that:
- configuration and runtime files and subdirectories must lie in the
hidden directory ~/.mame. The reason is that the user doesn't need to
see them though he/she may like to (e.g. to share the snapshot take
ment/1734840/+files/mame_0.140-0ubuntu1.debian.tar.gz
** Changed in: mame (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Confirmed
** Changed in: mame (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Cesare Falco (c.falco) => (unassigned)
--
[upgrade] New upstream release 0.140
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/671358
You recei
Changed in: mame (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Confirmed
** Changed in: mame (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Cesare Falco (c.falco) => (unassigned)
--
[upgrade] New upstream release 0.140
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/671358
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubunt
ed by Cesare Falco
dpkg-source --before-build mame-0.140
fakeroot debian/rules clean
dh clean
dh_testdir
debian/rules override_dh_auto_clean
make[1]: ingresso nella directory «/home/cesare/tmp/mame140/mame-0.140»
/usr/bin/make OPT_FLAGS="-D'INI_PATH=\"/etc/mame\"&#x
Verbatim from your DpkgTerminalLog.txt
Unpacking mame (0.152-0ubuntu2) ...
dpkg-deb (subprocess): decompressing archive member: lzma error: compressed
data is corrupt
dpkg-deb: error: subprocess returned error exit status 2
dpkg: error processing archive
/var/cache/apt/archives/mame_0.152-0ubun
+1
Could be video driver related tough.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/994508
Title:
-window option doesn't work
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad
Unfortunately, I've never been able to reproduce the bug. Also please
note the mame-common package was superseded by mame/mess/mess-data
series long ago.
Could we please consider this closed?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ub
** Changed in: mame (Ubuntu Quantal)
Status: New => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1063993
Title:
mame crashes with illegal instruction
To manage notifications a
Colin: I see. The right version number is awkward matter either.
I can't use 0.146-5ubuntu1 because it would be greater than raring version to
dpkg.
I can't use 0.146-4.99ubuntu1 because it's not true.
Do you reckon 0.146-5~ubuntu12.10 could be a good choice?
--
You received this bug notificat
I have the same problem with the package in the main repository for
quantal.
I've built it on my quantal box and it works.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1068466
Title:
none of the e
My guess is bad processor optimization.
Could you please try the new build from my PPA?
https://launchpad.net/~c.falco/+archive/ppa/+packages
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1063993
Tit
Uploaded fix to precise-proposed.
** Changed in: mame (Ubuntu)
Status: New => In Progress
** Changed in: mame (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Cesare Falco (c.falco)
** Changed in: mame (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => High
** Patch added: "Replace -march with
1 - 100 of 153 matches
Mail list logo
