"You can't look at the length of the returned string as the buffer is
already corrupted at that point and memcached_response does not return
the length either."
For you to understand why what your saying is off, you will need to
spend sometime understanding how memcached_response(), which internal
Hi,
>From the code:
memcached_return_t rc= memcached_response(server, mech, sizeof(mech), NULL);
if (memcached_failed(rc))
memcached_response() adds NULL to strings if memcached_response() successful,
otherwise the code follows the error path. The author of this report mentions:
libmemcached/r
Please provide a test case clearly showing the bug in the upstream
project.
Calling memset() would be incorrect in this case even if you were
concerned about a NULL character ( i.e. the minimal change would be to
insert a NULL character in the buffer after looked at the length of the
returned stri
** Changed in: libmemcached
Assignee: (unassigned) => Brian Aker (brianaker)
** Changed in: libmemcached
Importance: Undecided => Low
** Changed in: libmemcached
Status: New => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
Public bug reported:
Latest collectd is version 5 (http://collectd.org/news.shtml#news89).
** Affects: collectd (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.lau
Can you post your config.log?
Sent from my Ti85
On Dec 15, 2012, at 8:25, cono <883...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote:
> I guess the same issue:
>
> % cat memcached.c
> #include
> #include
> #include
>
> int main() {
>memcached_create(NULL);;
>return 0;
> }
>
> % gc
** Changed in: libmemcached
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/922098
Title:
getServerByKey doesn't returned a cloned structure
To manage not
This should be fixed in trunk.
** Changed in: libmemcached
Assignee: (unassigned) => Brian Aker (brianaker)
** Changed in: libmemcached
Status: Triaged => Fix Released
** Changed in: libmemcached
Importance: Undecided => Medium
** No longer affects: autoconf-archive
*
New => Fix Released
** Changed in: libmemcached
Assignee: (unassigned) => Brian Aker (brianaker)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/881983
Title:
libmemcached resets continuum
Thanks, I will take a look at it.
Making it a new behavior makes it much more likely that I can accept it.
Cheers,
-Brian
On Dec 12, 2011, at 1:36 PM, Trevor North wrote:
> I have a branch which more or less achieves what is described above by
> way of a new dead server retry timeout be
BTW we are getting a couple of test failures after this applied. I am
going to look at it myself and see what the issue might be. We have this
slated for 1.0.3
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/
That build is to old, you need to use the latest version of lib drizzle
found in the Drizzle trunk.
** Changed in: gearmand
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpa
** Changed in: libmemcached
Status: New => Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/883267
Title:
1.0.2 (and 0.53) build fails on ubuntu oneiric
To manage notifications about th
BTW this needs to be flagged for the autoconf-archive maintainers since
this is their code.
** Also affects: autoconf-archive
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: libmemcached (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification beca
For this behavior you need to create a new behavior type, and add a test
case.
If we were to apply this patch as is, we would break anyone who is
expecting the current behavior (which comes into play when servers are
replaced in place, or having flapping network service).
** Changed in: libmemcac
** Changed in: gearmand
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/815796
Title:
0.24 make fails on 32-bit installs
To manage notifications about thi
** Changed in: gearmand
Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/815796
Title:
0.24 make fails on 32-bit installs
To manage notifications about this b
Hi!
Updating this is on the list, which is long.
On Aug 3, 2011, at 2:15 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
> Excerpts from Micah Gersten's message of Wed Aug 03 20:09:33 UTC 2011:
>> @Monty Taylor
>> Since this affects drizzle, I was wondering if this is ok to upgrade.
>>
>
> It actually doesn't affe
Thanks for getting a new release out!
On Jul 21, 2011, at 7:43 AM, Jean-Louis Dupond wrote:
> ** Summary changed:
>
> - New upstream release, gearmand 0.17
> + New upstream release, gearmand 0.23
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are a member of Gearman-
> developers, whi
** Changed in: drizzle
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/740583
Title:
drizzled --user does not actually set the uid
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubun
20 matches
Mail list logo
