Re: [Bug 761131] Re: winpdb 1.4.6 fails, needs upgrade to version 1.4.8

2011-04-30 Thread Bernd Zeimetz
Hi! On 04/29/2011 05:18 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote: > I did notice that Debian sid still has winpdb 1.4.6 so it might be more > fruitful to get the update into Debian so that it can be automatically > sync'd into Oneiric. Bernd Zeimetz is the Debian > maintainer. I've subs

[Bug 761131] Re: winpdb 1.4.6 fails, needs upgrade to version 1.4.8

2011-04-30 Thread Bernd Zeimetz
Uploading to ftp-master (via ftp to ftp.upload.debian.org): Uploading winpdb_1.4.8-1.dsc: done. Uploading winpdb_1.4.8.orig.tar.gz: done. Uploading winpdb_1.4.8-1.diff.gz: done. Uploading winpdb_1.4.8-1_all.deb: done. Uploading winpdb_1.4.8-1_amd64.changes: done. Successfully uploaded pac

[Bug 666828] Re: task jbd2/cciss!c0d0:258 blocked for more than 120 seconds

2011-05-22 Thread Bernd Zeimetz
Sounds like https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=615543 ** Bug watch added: Red Hat Bugzilla #615543 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=615543 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.n

[Bug 666828] Re: task jbd2/cciss!c0d0:258 blocked for more than 120 seconds

2011-05-23 Thread Bernd Zeimetz
Is anybody using arrayprobe, the hp-health tools or similar programs to monitor the raid arrays health? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/666828 Title: task jbd2/cciss!c0d0:258 blocked f

[Bug 755968] Re: radiance version 4R0+20100729-1 failed to build on i386

2011-04-10 Thread Bernd Zeimetz
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #565085 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=565085 ** Also affects: radiance (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=565085 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because

[Bug 755968] Re: radiance version 4R0+20100729-1 failed to build on i386

2011-04-10 Thread Bernd Zeimetz
Either fix by using 4R0+20110410-1 from unstable which contains various changes but should be fine to use - or apply http://goo.gl/BPvFr -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/755968 Title: r

[Bug 770813] Re: radiance version 4R0+20100729-1 failed to build on amd64 with GCC-4.6/oneiric

2011-04-26 Thread Bernd Zeimetz
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 755968 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/755968 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 755968 radiance version 4R0+20100729-1 failed to build on i386 * You can subscribe to bug 755968 by following this link: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+s

[Bug 770961] Re: gimp-plugin-registry version 3.5.1-1 failed to build on amd64 with GCC-4.6/oneiric

2011-04-26 Thread Bernd Zeimetz
Sync 3.5.2-2 form Debian to fix this and some other bugs. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/770961 Title: gimp-plugin-registry version 3.5.1-1 failed to build on amd64 with GCC-4.6/one

[Bug 658827] Re: package gimp-plugin-registry (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/gimp/2.0/plug-ins/file-xmc', which is also in package gimp 2.7.3-2010082601~mm

2010-10-14 Thread Bernd Zeimetz
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 641052 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/641052 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 641052 package gimp-plugin-registry (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/gimp/2.0/plug-ins/file-xmc', which is also in pa

[Bug 572551] Re: merkaartor loses top of application if maximised

2010-10-26 Thread Bernd Zeimetz
Could you add a link to the bug in the upstream bug tracker? -- merkaartor loses top of application if maximised https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/572551 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-b

[Bug 434109] Re: Merkaartor in jaunty not compatable with 0.6 api

2010-10-26 Thread Bernd Zeimetz
Please upgrade to a recent version of Ubuntu. ** Changed in: merkaartor (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- Merkaartor in jaunty not compatable with 0.6 api https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/434109 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subs

[Bug 418694] Re: going from jaunty to karmic pulls in 25MB of fresh dependencies

2010-10-26 Thread Bernd Zeimetz
That is expected. More features, more libraries Merkaartor needs to depend on. And some more will come. ** Changed in: merkaartor (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- going from jaunty to karmic pulls in 25MB of fresh dependencies https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/418694 You received this bug

[Bug 418694] Re: going from jaunty to karmic pulls in 25MB of fresh dependencies

2010-10-26 Thread Bernd Zeimetz
Depends: libc6 (>= 2.2.5), libexiv2-9, libgcc1 (>= 1:4.1.1), libgdal1-1.6.0, libgps19 (>= 2.90.1~svn6819), libqt4-network (>= 4:4.5.3), libqt4-svg (>= 4:4.5.3), libqt4-webkit (>= 4:4.5.3), libqt4-xml (>= 4:4.5.3), libqtcore4 (>= 4:4.6.1), libqtgui4 (>= 4:4.6.1), libstdc++6 (>= 4.4.0), libzbar0 (>=

[Bug 418694] Re: going from jaunty to karmic pulls in 25MB of fresh dependencies

2010-10-26 Thread Bernd Zeimetz
Ah and I forgot libgps19 with: Installed-Size: 412. It depends on libbluetooth and libusb, which are installed on your system anyway, I'd guess. -- going from jaunty to karmic pulls in 25MB of fresh dependencies https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/418694 You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 572551] Re: merkaartor loses top of application if maximised

2010-10-26 Thread Bernd Zeimetz
** Also affects: merkaartor Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: merkaartor Status: New => Confirmed -- merkaartor loses top of application if maximised https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/572551 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 418694] Re: going from jaunty to karmic pulls in 25MB of fresh dependencies

2010-10-26 Thread Bernd Zeimetz
So you did not update your whole system from jaunty to Karmic? That won't work. -- going from jaunty to karmic pulls in 25MB of fresh dependencies https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/418694 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. --

[Bug 660265] Re: package gimp-plugin-registry (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/gimp/2.0/plug-ins/file-xmc', which is also in package gimp 2.7.3-2010082601~mm

2010-10-26 Thread Bernd Zeimetz
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 641052 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/641052 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 641052 package gimp-plugin-registry (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/gimp/2.0/plug-ins/file-xmc', which is also in pa

[Bug 641052] Re: package gimp-plugin-registry (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/gimp/2.0/plug-ins/file-xmc', which is also in package gimp 2.7.3-2010072701~mm

2010-10-26 Thread Bernd Zeimetz
gimp 2.7.3-2010072701~mm was never released with Ubuntu or Debian. ** Changed in: gimp-plugin-registry (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- package gimp-plugin-registry (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/gimp/2.0/plug-ins/file-xmc', which is also in pa

[Bug 631434] Re: Very old version, could you please sync with sid/squeeze to 3.5.1?

2010-10-16 Thread Bernd Zeimetz
** Changed in: gimp-plugin-registry (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- Very old version, could you please sync with sid/squeeze to 3.5.1? https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/631434 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 645028] Re: gpsd reports error on SKY or POLL requests

2010-09-22 Thread Bernd Zeimetz
That bug is fixed in 2.95-6 See http://git.recluse.de/?p=debian/pkg-gpsd.git;a=blob;f=debian/patches/0004-this-extra-is-not-longer-needed.patch;h=21e9975ccb7338a2b4d6102b9f1ab1ca71f233d5;hb=HEAD http://git.recluse.de/?p=debian/pkg-gpsd.git;a=blob;f=debian/patches/0005-fix-the-way-skyview-json-is-p

[Bug 604521] Re: Please add OpenRaster import/export plugin (just one .py file) to gimp-plugin-registry package

2010-07-12 Thread Bernd Zeimetz
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #545398 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=545398 ** Also affects: gimp-plugin-registry (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=545398 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- Please add OpenRaster import/ex

[Bug 367197] Re: gpsd depends on nonexistent /lib/udev/hotplug.functions

2010-08-30 Thread Bernd Zeimetz
No need for it any more, the code was ripped out. -- gpsd depends on nonexistent /lib/udev/hotplug.functions https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/367197 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@

Re: [Bug 608839] [NEW] package libgps19 2.92-4 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2

2010-07-23 Thread Bernd Zeimetz
wrong with your system here, sorry. As this is the first and only report my guess your systems is somewhat broken, or Ubuntu fails to update a system properly (again). -- Bernd ZeimetzDebian GNU/Linux Developer http://bzed.dehttp

[Bug 608839] Re: package libgps19 2.92-4 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2

2010-07-23 Thread Bernd Zeimetz
** Changed in: gpsd (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- package libgps19 2.92-4 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/608839 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubu

[Bug 621496] Re: package gimp-plugin-registry (n ot installed) failed to install/upgrade: intentando so breescribir «/usr/share/locale/ru/LC_MESSAGES/gimp2 0-save-for-web.mo», que está también en el

2010-08-21 Thread Bernd Zeimetz
Don't use getdeb bullshit. ** Changed in: gimp-plugin-registry (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- package gimp-plugin-registry (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: intentando sobreescribir «/usr/share/locale/ru/LC_MESSAGES/gimp20-save-for-web.mo», que está también en el paquete g

[Bug 622278] Re: package gimp-plugin-registry (n ot installed) failed to install/upgrade: tentative de remplacement de « /usr/lib/gimp/2.0/plug-ins/s eparate », qui appartient aussi au paquet gimp -s

2010-08-23 Thread Bernd Zeimetz
gimp-seperate+ is not in Ubuntu, so its not our fault that you have this conflict. Remove the gimp-seperate+ package. ** Changed in: gimp-plugin-registry (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- package gimp-plugin-registry (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: tentative de remplacement d

Re: [Bug 1790855] Re: [MIR] gpsd

2020-01-10 Thread Bernd Zeimetz
m64, > armhf, ppc64el, s390x Please note that this missed an soname bump, upstream forgot it and I didn't spot the changes. There will be -3 with libgps26 soon. -- Bernd ZeimetzDebian GNU/Linux Developer http://bzed.dehttp://www

[Bug 1938730] Re: GPSD time will jump back 1024 weeks at after week=2180 (23-October-2021)

2021-08-02 Thread Bernd Zeimetz
** Bug watch added: gitlab.com/gpsd/gpsd/-/issues #144 https://gitlab.com/gpsd/gpsd/-/issues/144 ** Also affects: gpsd via https://gitlab.com/gpsd/gpsd/-/issues/144 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #991739 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bi

[Bug 1938730] Re: GPSD time will jump back 1024 weeks at after week=2180 (23-October-2021)

2021-08-03 Thread Bernd Zeimetz
That bug is fixed upstream and also in Debian. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1938730 Title: GPSD time will jump back 1024 weeks at after week=2180 (23-October-2021) To manage noti

[Bug 1938730] Re: GPSD time will jump back 1024 weeks at after week=2180 (23-October-2021)

2021-08-04 Thread Bernd Zeimetz
Hi Marc, what you can check: - do the regression tests run trough (failures are ignored at build time, as its fails sometims on the more "special" architectures, forgot to enable tests again for bullseye). You are looking for scons check and the following output. - if they are not happy, che

<    1   2   3