Ehm? Why is a patch to poppler needed in any way?
(this is also basically the same as #509408, but that is known ...)
As far as I can tell the only issue is that poppler-python is missing the
(caller-owns-return #t)
all over the place in the poppler.defs file. This means that while the python
Hm, just a note. I don't think that the python version of the function
should even have the "length" parameter, unfortunately, it might be hard
to remove it at this point (it could instead be just ignored, and made
optional).
The bindings should just call len(data) themselves, instead of leaving
i
I would strongly suggest everyone to move to the GObject Introspection
based bindings. These bindings basically make the static bindings
obsolete.
Though it looks like the "array length" annotation is missing for the
data input. But it does work already.
>>> from gi.repository import Poppler
>>>
Well, you could try to use the introspection bindings for the other
packages too (in this case, I think it is only rsvg that needs to be
changed)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/312462
T
I have had the same issue (on debian). And it was a thermal problem of
the laptop (T410s). I simply phoned the support and they replaced the
fan (it is nice to have on site service). After the fan was replaced the
laptop is usually below 70°C again even if it is loaded.
I expect that everyone else
I don't know of any formal heat test. I did sometimes have the
impression that the problem wasn't as bad at times, but it did get worst
in general. It is a bit of a mystery to me what exactly was wrong with
the laptop. The fan itself seemed fine, maybe it was the thermal paste
or whatever.
The fan
Seriously. It *is* a hardware issue. Why else would it not work right
before a fan replacement, but work fine right after the replacement. I
guess that it might simply be a bad thermal paste connection between the
cpu die and the heatsink; but I don't know the reason as I was lucky
enough to have o
On Do, 2013-08-01 at 13:58 +, Christopher Barrington-Leigh wrote:
> Thanks. Could be, but the fan control has never worked ideally under
> GNU/Linux on this machine. Besides, shouldn't the processors be throttled
> down based on the CPU temperature, even if I simply forced the fan to stay
>
