Public bug reported:
The patch for bug 1158668 installs cpupower_$(abi_version) command-line
tool as well as libcpupower.so.$(abi_version).
This isn't particularly suitable for projects that previously used
libcpufreq and intend to migrate to libcpupower, because the
libcpupower.so symlink is no
The debdiff is built against Debian version and it doesn't touch
SConstruct directly (there is a patch for SConstruct from an earlier
Ubuntu build).
And yes, bug 869420 is fixed upstream too.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ub
On a clean Saucy install (Russian layout selected during setup) with the
attente PPA, I have the same behaviour as Valery Kozlov described in
comment #122. No matter if the switch hotkeys are enabled or disabled in
the GUI, I can still switch layouts with ALT+SHIFT.
Strangely, this layout configur
Switching layouts in gnome-screensaver dialog doesn't work. Bug report:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-screensaver/+bug/1244548
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1218322
Popov (artfwo)
Status: In Progress
** Changed in: libffado (Ubuntu)
Status: New => In Progress
** Changed in: libffado (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Artem Popov (artfwo)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscri
Debian already has rev 2019, so I've opened a merge request under bug
930570. Building that on my system made the bug disappear.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/855438
Title:
[Oneiric]
Bug 855438 doesn't seem to occur with this version of FFADO on my
system, so it can probably be marked as a dupe of this one or closed,
when this is uploaded.
** Changed in: libffado (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Confirmed
** Changed in: libffado (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Art
** Branch linked: lp:~artfwo/ubuntu/precise/libffado/bug-930570
** Patch added: "libffado_2.0.99+svn2019-1ubuntu1.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libffado/+bug/930570/+attachment/2731160/+files/libffado_2.0.99%2Bsvn2019-1ubuntu1.debdiff
--
You received this bug notificatio
** Changed in: adplug (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/912016
Title:
libadplug-dev does not depend on libbinio-dev
To manage notifications abou
** Also affects: indicator-cpufreq (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1079864
Title:
The indicator graph dose not go down to minimum
** Also affects: indicator-cpufreq (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1008438
Title:
double frequency option (1.2 ghz)
To manage noti
debian/rules.
* Fix remaining lintian warnings (LP: #1082259).
-- Artem Popov Fri, 25 Jan 2013 21:47:41 +0700
** Affects: indicator-cpufreq (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
** Patch added: "014__0.2-0ubuntu1.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/indicator-cpufreq/+bug/1105609/+attachment/3500818/+files/014__0.2-0ubuntu1.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.
Merge proposal created, just in case the sponsor prefers it:
https://code.launchpad.net/~artfwo/ubuntu/raring/indicator-cpufreq/bug-1105609/+merge/145047
** Branch linked: lp:~artfwo/ubuntu/raring/indicator-cpufreq/bug-1105609
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubu
Public bug reported:
Debian changes:
libffado (2.1.0+svn2240-1) experimental; urgency=low
* Imported Upstream version 2.1.0+svn2240
* Drop all local patches (all integrated upstream)
-- Adrian Knoth Thu, 04 Oct 2012 18:40:22
+0200
** Affects: libffado (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Debdiff against merged Debian revision.
** Patch added: "debian_ubuntu.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libffado/+bug/1105818/+attachment/3500969/+files/debian_ubuntu.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
Debdiff against previous Ubuntu revision.
** Patch added: "ubuntu_ubuntu.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libffado/+bug/1105818/+attachment/3500970/+files/ubuntu_ubuntu.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribe
** Patch added: "ubuntu_ubuntu.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libffado/+bug/1105818/+attachment/3500972/+files/ubuntu_ubuntu.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bug
** Patch removed: "debian_ubuntu.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libffado/+bug/1105818/+attachment/3500969/+files/debian_ubuntu.debdiff
** Patch removed: "ubuntu_ubuntu.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libffado/+bug/1105818/+attachment/3500970/+files/ub
** Changed in: libffado (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/855438
Title:
[Oneiric] Need to upgrade package with revision 1995 to fix jack
** Changed in: jackd2 (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/860705
Title:
jackd assert failure: jackd: tpp.c:63: __pthread_tpp_change_priori
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/690010
Title:
RT_GROUP_SCHED kernel option makes JACK and Rtkit unusable in U
** Changed in: libffado (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/624514
Title:
ffado-diag needs listirqinfo from ffado-mixer-qt4
To manage not
** Changed in: indicator-cpufreq
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1079864
Title:
The indicator graph dose not go down to minimum
To manage
** Changed in: indicator-cpufreq
Status: Fix Committed => Won't Fix
** Changed in: indicator-cpufreq
Status: Won't Fix => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/10084
A debdiff against raring-proposed.
** Patch added: "libffado_2.1.0+svn2240-1ubuntu2.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libffado/+bug/1110187/+attachment/3507231/+files/libffado_2.1.0%2Bsvn2240-1ubuntu2.debdiff
** Description changed:
libffado fails to build from source in r
Public bug reported:
libffado fails to build from source in raring, missing inclusion of
ByteSwap.h.
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libffado/2.1.0+svn2240-1ubuntu1/+build/4252403
Affects upstream and Debian, patch forwarded upstream.
** Affects: ffado
Importance: Unknown
Sta
** Branch linked: lp:~artfwo/ubuntu/raring/libffado/ftbfs-1110187
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1110187
Title:
libffado FTBFS in raring (powerpc)
To manage notifications about this
The update results in an FTBFS, which is resolved in bug 1110187.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1105818
Title:
Merge libffado 2.1.0+svn2240-1 (main) from Debian experimental (main)
Strange, I thought I fixed this in this version.
Andrei, can you tell me the output of cpufreq-info | grep stats on your
machine?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1110429
Title:
indica
Right. However, cpufrequtils (cpufreqd) may conflict with the indicator,
so I suggest it's okay to remove cpufrequtils now.
Apparently, the frequencies are wrongly convolved into a set in Python,
so can you also do the following? Run python3 in a terminal and run the
following commands within the
I also wonder what happens if you clock the CPU to either frequency and
run a benchmark. Andrei, would you be willing to perform such a test?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1110429
Titl
So, you've got a frequency of 2201000 KHz, which is roughly equal to
2.20 GHz. Hmm, is this some kind 'slightly overclocked' CPU option or
some other special processor feature?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bu
** Changed in: indicator-cpufreq
Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1110429
Title:
indicator-cpufreq 0.2-0ubuntu1: 2.20 frequency shows up twice
Public bug reported:
indicator-cpufreq has a new upstream release:
- Correctly display turbo mode option in menu (LP: #1110429).
- Install hicolor icons (LP: #1125598).
The new release is packaged and this bug is for sponsoring the upload.
** Affects: indicator-cpufreq (Ubuntu)
Impo
** Patch added: "indicator-cpufreq_0.2.1-0ubuntu1.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/indicator-cpufreq/+bug/1130508/+attachment/3537617/+files/indicator-cpufreq_0.2.1-0ubuntu1.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subsc
** Changed in: indicator-cpufreq
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1110429
Title:
indicator-cpufreq 0.2-0ubuntu1: 2.20 frequency shows up twi
** Changed in: indicator-cpufreq
Status: New => Invalid
** Changed in: indicator-cpufreq (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/973779
Titl
Hmm, I'm still considering this a bug and a pretty confusing one. But
unfortunately, I can't change the importance for the Ubuntu task back
from Wishlist, because I'm not in bugcontrol :)
Anyway. I haven't done any CPU benchmarking on Linux and I am still
unsure how to do it, but nbench (no packag
Michael, can you also look at bug 1110429 and run the same test as in
comment #4? Please post your results here or there. Thanks!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1008438
Title:
double
Well, in your case the system uses 2201000 quite often judging by the
cpufreq-info output, so by "dropping lesser one" I actually meant to
exclude the smaller one, which is 220. However, I'd like to make
sure that there is no real world performance difference, that's what
nbench is for.
--
Yo
oh, that file is found in linux-headers package: linux-
headers-3.8.0-3-generic seems to be the latest one for raring.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1110429
Title:
indicator-cpufreq
Hmm, I see. It's got it's own pointer.h. The solution seems to run:
echo "#define LONG64" >pointer.h
and rerun 'make'. Not sure why make didn't create the file for you.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.lau
This is something I found by quick Googling:
http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0812.1/02670.html
> (btw why do I have two states - 2201000 and 220 ??)
2201000 is the marketing speed of your processor, plus 1MHz.
This is used by the ACPI BIOS to enable "Turbo Mode",
aka Intel Dyn
Word. I've been too thinking of doing this very thing.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1110429
Title:
indicator-cpufreq 0.2-0ubuntu1: 2.20 frequency shows up twice [raring]
To manage
Yep, currently working on a solution in bug 1110429.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1008438
Title:
double frequency option (1.2 ghz)
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
htt
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1124941 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1124941
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1124941
[raring] Python appindicators broken by the latest libappindicator update
(12.10.1daily13.02.13-0ubuntu1) with "ERROR:root:Could not find any typeli
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1124941 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1124941
Thanks guys, this bug has already been reported and affects many
indicators, so I'm marking it as a dupe.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
Public bug reported:
No changes in the new upstream tarball, but the translations update.
** Affects: indicator-cpufreq (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://
** Patch added: "0.2.1_to_0.2.2.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/indicator-cpufreq/+bug/1152566/+attachment/3563614/+files/indicator-cpufreq_0.2.2-0ubuntu1.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
h
** Visibility changed to: Public
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/860705
Title:
jackd assert failure: jackd: tpp.c:63: __pthread_tpp_change_priority:
Assertion `new_prio == -1 || (new
** Changed in: ubuntu
Assignee: (unassigned) => Artem Popov (artfwo)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/815283
Title:
[needs-packaging] indicator-cpufreq
To manage notificati
Very likely this happens, when cpufreqd is installed and running. Is the
behaviour same after uninstalling cpufreqd?
** Changed in: indicator-cpufreq (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
** Changed in: ubuntu
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/815283
Title:
[needs-packaging] indicator-cpufreq
To manage notifications about this
: Undecided
Assignee: Artem Popov (artfwo)
Status: In Progress
** Changed in: jackd2 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => In Progress
** Changed in: jackd2 (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Artem Popov (artfwo)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubunt
Attaching old style debdiff as well (bzr diff -r tag:1.9.8~dfsg-1).
** Patch added: "jackd2-fix-911342.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/jackd2/+bug/911342/+attachment/2655652/+files/jackd2-fix-911342.debdiff
** Changed in: jackd2 (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Artem Pop
)
Importance: Undecided
Assignee: Artem Popov (artfwo)
Status: In Progress
** Changed in: modemmanager (Ubuntu)
Status: New => In Progress
** Changed in: modemmanager (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Artem Popov (artfwo)
--
You received this bug notification becau
Attaching a debdiff too.
** Changed in: modemmanager (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Confirmed
** Changed in: modemmanager (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Artem Popov (artfwo) => (unassigned)
** Patch added: "modemmanager-fix-910736.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.ne
debdiff updated against the updated branch.
** Patch added: "modemmanager-fix-910736-fixed.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/modemmanager/+bug/910736/+attachment/2653756/+files/modemmanager-fix-910736-fixed.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a memb
** Description changed:
When connecting an Arduino or any Arduino-based device (like monome)
modemmanager immediately starts exchanging data with the device, causing
problems for software that works with these devices, namely serialosc
and the Arduino IDE.
+
+ Blacklisting the affected de
Attaching old-style simple debdiff, because of the messed up merge
proposal.
** Patch added: "modemmanager-oldstyle-fix-for-910736.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/modemmanager/+bug/910736/+attachment/2654134/+files/modemmanager-oldstyle-fix-for-910736.debdiff
--
You receiv
** Project changed: indicator-cpufreq => indicator-cpufreq (Ubuntu)
** Changed in: indicator-cpufreq (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => High
** Changed in: indicator-cpufreq (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
** Changed in: indicator-cpufreq (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned)
** Patch added: "dfsg.1-1_ubuntu.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/jackd2/+bug/911342/+attachment/2729451/+files/dfsg.1-1_ubuntu.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bu
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 949240 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/949240
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 949240
indicator-cpufreq will not start
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https:/
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 893842 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/893842
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 893842
Move "admin" group to "sudo"
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bug
** Also affects: indicator-cpufreq (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/893842
Title:
Move "admin" group to "sudo"
To manage notificati
indicator-cpufreq is affected as well. Working as intended with this
little patch, please sponsor the upload.
** Patch added: "indicator-cpufreq_0.1.4-0ubuntu2.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/indicator-cpufreq/+bug/893842/+attachment/2952741/+files/indicator-cpufreq_0.1.4-0u
Alan, are you sure that bug 776862 is the duplicate of this one?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/716064
Title:
Cpufreq doesn't assume my commands
To manage notifications about this bu
** Tags added: sync upgrade
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/865334
Title:
Sync p7zip-rar 9.20.1~ds.1-3 (multiverse) from Debian unstable (non-
free)
To manage notifications about th
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 865334 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/865334
Happens because of dependency mismatch, needs sync.
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 865334
Sync p7zip-rar 9.20.1~ds.1-3 (multiverse) from Debian unstable (non-free)
--
You received this bu
Public bug reported:
p7zip-rar cannot be installed in oneiric because of version mismatch
with p7zip-full. Syncing from Debian solves the problem, compare bug
407619.
Binary package hint: p7zip-rar
p7zip-rar (9.20.1~ds.1-3) unstable; urgency=low
* Make package autobuildable. (Closes: #633639
** Patch added: "changelog.diff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/p7zip-rar/+bug/865334/+attachment/2501170/+files/changelog.diff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/865334
Titl
Extra info for the FeatureFreeze exception follows.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/865334
Title:
[ffe] Sync p7zip-rar 9.20.1~ds.1-3 (multiverse) from Debian unstable
(non-free)
To
Install log:
dpkg -i p7zip-rar_9.20.1~ds.1-3_i386.deb
Selecting previously deselected package p7zip-rar.
(Reading database ... 167114 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking p7zip-rar (from p7zip-rar_9.20.1~ds.1-3_i386.deb) ...
Setting up p7zip-rar (9.20.1~ds.1-3) ...
--
You recei
** Attachment added: "p7zip-rar_9.20.1~ds.1-3_i386.build"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/p7zip-rar/+bug/865334/+attachment/2501172/+files/p7zip-rar_9.20.1%7Eds.1-3_i386.build
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubunt
Test results:
p7zip-rar (9.20.1~ds.1-3) from Debian unstable works, I've successfully
opened RAR archives with file-roller, when p7zip-rar is installed.
** Summary changed:
- Sync p7zip-rar 9.20.1~ds.1-3 (multiverse) from Debian unstable (non-free)
+ [ffe] Sync p7zip-rar 9.20.1~ds.1-3 (multivers
The entire debdiff, if still required.
** Patch added: "debian->debian.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/p7zip-rar/+bug/865334/+attachment/2501342/+files/debian-%3Edebian.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscrib
Resubscribing sponsors, since Precise is open.
** Changed in: ubuntu
Assignee: Artem Popov (artfwo) => (unassigned)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/815283
Title:
[ne
cense: GPL-3
** Affects: ubuntu
Importance: Undecided
Assignee: Artem Popov (artfwo)
Status: In Progress
** Tags: needs-packaging
** Changed in: ubuntu
Assignee: (unassigned) => Artem Popov (artfwo)
** Changed in: ubuntu
Status: New => In Progress
--
You re
Package now in REVU:
http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/p/indicator-cpufreq
** Changed in: ubuntu
Status: In Progress => Confirmed
** Changed in: ubuntu
Assignee: Artem Popov (artfwo) => (unassigned)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, wh
Issues mentioned on REVU are fixed, resubscribing sponsors.
** Changed in: ubuntu
Status: Incomplete => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/815283
Title:
[needs-packaging
Michael, I'm the upstream author, comments acknowledged.
indicator-cpufreq.pkla is a required file for giving noauth CPU
frequency control to the local users in "admin" group. This is
compatible with the original behaviour of Gnome applet in Ubuntu -
allows local admins to toggle frequency/governo
Installation path for *.pkla updated in the latest REVU upload.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/815283
Title:
[needs-packaging] indicator-cpufreq
To manage notifications about this bu
83 matches
Mail list logo
