Public bug reported:
This bug has reappeard. Googling shows this error going back to 2.6.17
but having a fix committed in 8.04.1. I am using 8.04.1 with a kernel
updated to 2.6.26-5.
Solved by setting via terminal the MAC : sudo ifconfig eth0 hw ether
00:1c:25:1e:0f:e6 or by putting this comm
Also fails under Alpha 5 Ubuntu 8.10 with the dmesg error below:
e1000e: Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Driver - 0.4.1.7
[2.501559] e1000e: Copyright (c) 1999-2008 Intel Corporation.
[2.501591] e1000e :00:19.0: PCI INT A -> GSI 20 (level, low) -> IRQ 20
[2.501606] e1000e :00:19.
I have this problem with both 2.6.26-5 and with Alpha 5 Ubuntu 8.10
(2.5.27-3). Solving it with a work around at the moment on 2.6.26 by
using the terminal command ... sudo ifconfig eth0 hw ether
00:1c:25:1e:0f:e6 or by putting the command in the rc.local file.
I have not tried a work-around for
** Description changed:
This bug has reappeard. Googling shows this error going back to 2.6.17
but having a fix committed in 8.04.1. I am using 8.04.1 with a kernel
updated to 2.6.26-5.
Solved by setting via terminal the MAC : sudo ifconfig eth0 hw ether
00:1c:25:1e:0f:e6 or by pu
** Description changed:
This bug has re-appeared. Googling shows this error going back to
2.6.17 but having a fix committed in 8.04.1. I am using 8.04.1 with a
kernel updated to 2.6.26-5.
- Solved by setting via terminal the MAC : sudo ifconfig eth0 hw ether
- 00:1c:25:1e:0f:e6 or by
you may want to try the fix I describe in bug #272630
--
Ibex alpha 5 renders Pro/1000 ethernet non functional
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/267952
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bug
Colin,
Seems that a warning may be insufficient. I would think most of the
folks testing a pre-release may not know they have an e1000e driver or
affected NIC.
Maybe blacklist e1000e asap and then re-instate e1000e after a fix is
found.
Perhaps have the "warning" state something about the e1000
I had the duplicate bug 272630 and consider myself lucky. I had the
Intel NIC but had used Alpha 5. I only had the dmesg error and not the
hardware eeprom failure. I had Alpha 6 ready to test until I found this
bug thread. For folks like me, it will be a good decision to blacklist
e1000e pendin
Nice progress, Bryce.
Yes, for me on Tribe 5 and on safe video (otherwise, I get a blank screen),
I get edidfail for the ddcprobe command.so, I am one of the lucky ones.
By the way, is there a new web site for bug 3731? My old bookmarks for bug
3731 have disappeared.
Thanks.
John Locke
-
Just tested tribe 5 Ubuntu and hoped the new GUI for screen resolution
would finally assist in recognizing my 1028 x 768 LCD intel 810/815
screen resolution.
Did not work. Only worked at low resolution on the safe video mode
start up. Then use the terminal and the sudo dpkg-reconfigure xserver-
Many thanks, Bryce, for investing so much in this solution. I love
testing a wide range of Linux live CDs and find that a % recognize my
i810 1024/768 laptop monitor and a % do not recognize it. My question
is not part of the wiki spec discussion but more general. Can I ask if,
in your mind, the
Byce,
Not sure if I should post this here or add to the wiki solution but I
have attached the boot screen for the MEPIS solution to the Ubuntu #3731
bug. The MEPIS 6.0 Linux distro is actually based on Ubuntu packages
but they added this front end capability to resolve the monitor
resolution prob
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: firefox
For 10.04RC, added three different users (admin and desktop) with
password required for each. Used the System admin "users and groups"
function. But, at boot-up, no log-in requirement occurs and o/s boots
up automatically.
I expected ubuntu to
This also shows up in the remastersys process. A remastersys iso from
Ubuntu 10.04RC boots up but then results in a log-in requirement which
has an authentication failure. I am assuming the two issues are
related.
--
no log-in required for multiple users
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/569495
Y
For further claification, I did a full Ubuntu 10.04 RC installation on
to an 8GB usb flash (which I have done with a number of previous Ubuntu
versions).
--
no log-in required for multiple users
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/569495
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Thanks so mucha little embarrasing! Is that a new menu itemthe
Login Screen? In any case, that fixed the issue. Sorry to bother you
busy professional developers! Thanks again.
--
no log-in required for multiple users
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/569495
You received this bug notifica
16 matches
Mail list logo
