oh, for procedure's sake, here is the patch, however small it is.
** Patch added: "firejail_0.9.64.4-2_0.9.64.4-2ubuntu20.10.1.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firejail/+bug/1948480/+attachment/5535425/+files/firejail_0.9.64.4-2_0.9.64.4-2ubuntu20.10.1.debdiff
--
You receiv
> There isn't any need to add the debdiff to the bug report if the updated
> version of the package has already been uploaded to the SRU queue. Is
> this documented somewhere that I've forgotten or don't know about?
Mh, that has been my interpretation of the procedure for the last 5+
years I've be
Rather than that, please try the Scribus PPA. If it behaves wrongly in
that build as well, please consider sending the bug upstream or writing
to Scribus' support mailing list for more details.
Honestly, I don't think there is much value in following bugs like this
downstream: it's *very* unlikel
.etc.pure-ftpd.db.mysql.conf: [modified]
mtime.conffile..etc.pure-ftpd.db.mysql.conf: 2019-05-03T23:51:59.782344
** Changed in: pure-ftpd (Ubuntu Bionic)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Mattia Rizzolo (mapreri)
** Changed in: pure-ftpd (Ubuntu Bionic)
Status: Confirmed => In P
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1832998 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1832998
marking as duplicate of #1832998 since the text is really mostly about
that one bug.
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1832998
Pure-FTPd Breaks with OpenSSL v1.1.1
--
You received this bug
Well, better late than never, I'm going to SRU this.
debdiff attached, and package uploaded.
for the SRU reviewers: note that this is 1.0 source, so even if I added
the patches separately in d/patches, they are in fact directly applied
to the tree; I didn't want to convert it to 3.0, or add a bui
** Changed in: limnoria (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Mattia Rizzolo (mapreri)
** Changed in: limnoria (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Committed
** Changed in: limnoria (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => High
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
** Information type changed from Private to Public
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/983281
Title:
vdetelweb crashed with SIGABRT in __libc_message()
To manage notifications about this
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 983281 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/983281
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 983281
vdetelweb crashed with SIGABRT in __libc_message()
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
Quite sure this was fixed in the meantime
** Changed in: vdetelweb (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/983281
Title:
vdetelweb crashed wi
would you be able to get a traceback somehow?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1939213
Title:
scribus 1.5.7+dfsg-3 segfaults on impish
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
htt
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1939213 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1939213
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1939213
scribus 1.5.7+dfsg-3 segfaults on impish
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubun
** Also affects: telegram-desktop (Ubuntu Hirsute)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: libtgowt (Ubuntu Hirsute)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: telegram-desktop (Ubuntu Impish)
Importance: Undecided
Assignee: Nicholas Guriev (mymedia)
@serge-hallyn: we can all agree, but to date I only failed to grab the
attention of any SRU member; even pinging on IRC resulted useless
apparently.
All the packages have been in the queue for months, but ignored.
I'll thank you in advance if you manage to get anybody to look at them
and provide
snap packages bugs are not of concern for the ubuntu specific package,
so marking invalid.
** Changed in: inkscape (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net
please remember to subscribe ~ubuntu-backporters for BPO bugs...
As a backports team member learning about this bug from a ubuntu-devel-
discuss mail felt odd :3
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.n
> Is that mentioned at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuBackports ?
u.U - somehow, despite the plenty of reviews we made to the drafts of
that page we still managed to miss it.
thank you!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
> Looking at that queue is somewhat scary, I see an entry from
2021-10-28
that's for the proposed pocked (i.e. SRUs), for backports yours is the
only package in the queue...
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs
embedded lib2geom (which I'm using
in ubuntu/i386 as it's not in the i386 whitelist), however I prefer to keep the
split for policy reasons if I can.
** Affects: lib2geom (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Assignee: Mattia Rizzolo (mapreri)
Status: Invalid
** Affects
Looking at the diff, I also find it odd that you are changing d/watch
(according to the changelog, to please lintian?). That's totally
useless and just noisy (nobody is going to run uscan on this...), so I
recommend you don't do that at the next backport update.
Likewise I'm not sure why you didn
Yeah, it's fine, those are really small details that just raises a small
eyebrow but do nothing else :)
You are right, the process is completed. The package also already built, and
will be available in the archive in a matter of minutes/hours when the
publisher runs :)
--
You received this b
ah! I didn't notice this bug...
@alexghiti: for the next time, please consider adding LP:# to the
changelog. Even if uploaded in debian launchpad would pick it up
automatically when the package is synced.
I'll let you close the bug manually once that happens. (please don't forget
it.. la
** Summary changed:
- update backportpackage script to behave according to new backport process
+ update backportpackage and requestbackport scripts to behave according to new
backport process
** Description changed:
- The 'backportpackage' script needs to be updated to work according to the ne
this has been reportedly long fixed in 21.04, and 20.10 went EOL in the
meantime (and nowadays 21.04 too). so I'm closing this bug.
** Changed in: scribus (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is su
I'm uploading now version 1.1.1-3ubuntu1~bpo20.04.1 to focal-backports,
so that the team can review it.
** Changed in: inkscape (Ubuntu Focal)
Status: Triaged => In Progress
** Summary changed:
- [new upstream]Inkscape 1.0
+ [BPO] inkscape/1.1.1-3ubuntu1 from jammy
--
You received this
currently, with cppunit 1.15.1, this works flawleslly, and I also doubt
this had been a problem for long since --as-need has been default gcc
behaviour in ubuntu for years already.
** Changed in: cppunit (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because yo
aye, this happened a couple of months after this bug was filed.
** Changed in: cppunit (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1022317
Title:
cppun
this was naturally fixed with the flow when 1.15 was imported.
** Changed in: cppunit (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1820816
Title:
** Changed in: libxml2 (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Mattia Rizzolo (mapreri)
** Changed in: libxml2 (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
from my (devscripts) side, no idea. also I have no clue how a command
that has || in there can even "return an error code".
I'm strongly convinced there is nothing special in devscripts that could
cause this, so I'm not considering it a bug in there.
** Changed in: devscripts (Ubuntu)
Sta
n the distribution.
** Bug watch added: Scribus Mantis Bug Tracker #16637
https://bugs.scribus.net/view.php?id=16637
** Changed in: scribus (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed
** Changed in: scribus (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Mattia Rizzolo (mapreri)
--
You re
reuploaded, sorry for the delay.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1942699
Title:
SRU: Update Telegram Desktop to 2.9.2
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launch
As a member of the Debian LibreOffice Team, and also as an Ubuntu
Developer, I'm likewise not convinced that starting to build and ship
graphite2's static library is a really useful thing to do.
I'm personally generically against static libraries, since I regularly see
grief caused by poor trackin
"1.0.2+r75+1~ubuntu18.04.1" is not a version that comes from the ubuntu
archive, besides it's an higher version that what's in focal anyway.
It's not a configuration we can support officially, so I recommend you
go ask user support instead of opening a bug.
** Changed in: inkscape (Ubuntu)
besides, the bug report said "DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04" but the
package version you are getting an error against says "18.04", so I
suppose you also have some PPA or such with the wrong distribution set.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is su
So to conclude your questions: during the backporters meeting we decided
that
(for now, of course things might change going forward if/when there is a
need for them to change)
* about assigning to somebody/someteam when it's ready for review: not
required, as we just follow all bugs we are subsc
trusty is now EOL, so I'm closing the bug.
** Changed in: xtables-addons (Ubuntu Trusty)
Status: Incomplete => Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1414482
Title:
Backport
ogress
** Changed in: debhelper (Ubuntu Bionic)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Mattia Rizzolo (mapreri)
** Changed in: debhelper (Ubuntu Focal)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Mattia Rizzolo (mapreri)
** Changed in: debhelper (Ubuntu Hirsute)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Mattia Rizzo
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. We are sorry that we do not always have the capacity to
look at all reported bugs in a timely manner.
Both ubuntu 12.04 and 12.10 reached their EOL, and as you mentioned
13.04 works. Therefore, I'm closing this bu
It seems to me that you are trying to get this through an SRU, and not
into BPO.
Therefore, I'm unsubscribing the Backporters team. If this is an error,
please see https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuBackports about the new BPO
process, and resubscribe us.
--
You received this bug notification becaus
Now that the BPO process has been renewed I'm going to follow through it
(also, the SRU team never answered here, proof that they only look at
bugs when uploads get into the queue…).
Although, I'm currently quite busy, so it'll take a bit of time.
--
You received this bug notification because yo
I'm closing this old bug, since oneric has been long EOLed.
** Changed in: gedit-latex-plugin (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/897346
Title:
ge
FYI, the Backports project restarted. Although we have yet to announce
it formally, you can find the new process here
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuBackports
I'm unsubscribing the backporters team from this bug since to me it
seems there is nothing to do by us, but if and when somebody is going t
Status: Triaged => In Progress
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu Focal)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Mattia Rizzolo (mapreri)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1862372
Title
I uploaded the said fix to focal.
After all it's a crash, so it should be fixed as such :)
** Patch added: "debdiff.patch"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1862372/+attachment/5545461/+files/debdiff.patch
** Summary changed:
- ubuntu-upload-permission TypeErro
So, I just tested with 1.0.46-1ubuntu18.04.1 and I confirm I can happily
connect.
** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-bionic
** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-bionic
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subs
ack, doing so.
** Changed in: telegram-desktop (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1891976
Title:
Telegram desktop suddenly not taking any user keyb
** Changed in: debhelper (Ubuntu Focal)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1728423
Title:
[BPO] debhelper/13.5+
To manage notifications about
=> Invalid
** Changed in: debhelper (Ubuntu Xenial)
Status: Triaged => Won't Fix
** Changed in: dwz (Ubuntu Bionic)
Status: New => In Progress
** Changed in: dwz (Ubuntu Bionic)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Mattia Rizzolo (mapreri)
--
You received this bug notific
Can't do xenial anymore since it's EOL.
** Description changed:
+ [Impact]
+
+ * This package is included amongst the "special cases".
+ * dwz is needed in bionic as debhelper grew a versioned dependency there.
+I preferred to backport it as well, rather than dropping the
+restriction
x Committed
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu Focal)
Status: Fix Released => Fix Committed
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu Focal)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Mattia Rizzolo (mapreri)
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu Bionic)
Assignee: (unassigned) => M
root@warren:/# apt install ubuntu-dev-tools/focal-proposed
...
Selected version '0.176ubuntu20.04.1' (Ubuntu:20.04/focal-proposed [all]) for
'ubuntu-dev-tools'
...
Setting up ubuntu-dev-tools (0.176ubuntu20.04.1) ...
...
root@warren:/# ubuntu-upload-permission --list-uploaders cloud-init
Please op
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
Status: Invalid => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1004579
Title:
[pbuilder-dist] overwrite OTHERMIRROR set in ~/.pbuilderrc
I've uploaded telegram-desktop/3.1.1+ds-1~ubuntu20.04.1 to focal.
libtgowt (in NEW) wasn't rejected and it's still good, so I'm not
touching it, but please remember it's a dependency.
** Patch added: "telegram-desktop_3.1.1+ds-1~ubuntu20.04.1.diff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tel
it's not "fix committed" if you are talking about a repository that is
not the main one…
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Committed => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs
actually it is, sorry for the noise.
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1945349
Title:
mk-sbuild has
Inkscape version 1:1.1+202109281949+c3084ef5ed~ubuntu20.04.1 doesn't
come from the Ubuntu archive.
We can't provide upgrade paths from packages that come from who knows where.
Besides, looking at that error, I assume that inkscape binary you got
already contains the tutorials, so I don't think y
Probably you were in a release before libreoffice-dictionaries took over
and is now shipping mythes-es. At least ubuntu 16.04 (xenial, released
a month after your bug report) has it.
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/xenial/+package/mythes-es
** Package changed: mythes (Ubuntu) => libreoffice-diction
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1942699 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1942699
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1942699
SRU: Update Telegram Desktop to 3.1.1
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
** Changed in: telegram-desktop (Ubuntu Focal)
Importance: Undecided => High
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1942699
Title:
SRU: Update Telegram Desktop to 3.1.1
To manage notifica
Actually, forget it, I see this is a new package, so it's fine. diff
also looks ok, so I approved it.
(the comment still stands for when jammy will be stable though)
** Changed in: focal-backports
Status: New => Fix Released
** Project changed: focal-backports => gallery-dl (Ubuntu)
--
FTR, I handled this in debian this way:
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/devscripts/-/commit/fd21a8c8e05e0158756e9b8954c6c01a1f2f2bfe
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1885766
Title:
Ver
Mind specifying how long you've waited on the lintian stage before claiming
that it "never finishes"?
On Tue, 1 Feb 2022, 12:10 am fossfreedom, <1959...@bugs.launchpad.net>
wrote:
> Public bug reported:
>
> Uplifting to the latest lintian on jammy
>
> a debuild -S -k0xkey on a package, the debuil
"right now"
thanks for the ping :)
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu Jammy)
Status: New => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1959541
Title:
pull-lp-source cr
meh, I didn't notice that, thank you.
Looking at the germinate-output file, it looks like gtkspell3 is included in
the seed starting with groovy only because of it being a build-dep of inkscape
(it's a new build-dep starting with inkscape 1.x, focal has 0.92.x).
This also means that a no-change
If possible I'd prefer to avoid an extra bpo diff just for this, so I'd
rather accept it as it is.
(Also, ragel is fine to skip because it doesn't change anything in
practice, it only used to rebuild something that is otherwise pre-
compiled in the tarball; whereas disabling gspell would effective
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1876996
Title:
[BPO] inkscape/1.1.1-3ubuntu1 from jammy
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/inkscape
Debhelper 13 is available in focal-backports already.
Please make sure your build environment enables the backports pocket (and
that your dependency solver handles it appropriately).
If you are building in a PPA, there is an extra flag to check in the PPA
settings.
On Sun, 13 Feb 2022, 9:45 pm Ro
Which version have you tested? backportpackge in u-d-t 0.187+ should
already be using the ~bp suffix.
Notably, note that 0.187 is available in focal-bpo.
On Sun, 13 Feb 2022, 8:35 pm Ross Gammon, <1959...@bugs.launchpad.net>
wrote:
> Regarding the requestbackport package, it is really only the t
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Alex Murray (alexmurray)
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs
https://git.launchpad.net/ubuntu-dev-
tools/commit/?id=ceb020d0fae34549a3f21c6900c12c09e53eff5d + parent
commit with a bit of code reflow.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1862372
Title:
I don't plan to backport this to focal fwiw, so somebody should feel
free to pick that piece up if they want to.
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Committed
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Mattia Rizzolo (maprer
We would be fine with this backport, but I don't see it in the queue.
Also, the text is not mentioning anything about what testing has been
done to it, which we expect.
Please note that we (backports team) do *not* sponsor backports, so you
should find a sponsor for it yourself.
** Also affects:
The backports team does not prepare nor sponsor uploads to backports,
only review them. You should find somebody interested in doing the
work, testing it, and maintain it, as well as a sponsor for it.
** Also affects: obfs4proxy (Ubuntu Focal)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Chang
Do you have a sponsor lined up for this? The backporters team by
themselves don't do it.
** Also affects: ipmctl (Ubuntu Focal)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: ipmctl (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
then you should prepare the change (likely in the form of a debdiff
against what's currently in jammy, or an upload to a ppa) and attach it
here, then subscribe the ~ubuntu-sponsors team.
(also note that we expect your backports to have been tested in the
target release, I'll assume you've done th
I just synced it.
** Changed in: entangle (Ubuntu Jammy)
Status: In Progress => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1716656
Title:
Plugins not loading
To manage notif
Something like this normally indicates a previously interrupted
installation or something of the like.
Please contact user support for more help.
** Changed in: libxslt (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
You are right that scribus needs them in what is the "wrong" location
for the Debian policy, but I remember doing things so that it would work
for both.
The package ships everything in /usr/share/scribus/doc and then sets up
symlinks from e.g. /usr/share/doc/scribus/de to ../../scribus/doc/de
(i.e
ISTR I had a good reason to have the symlinks that way instead of
installing in usr/share/doc amd symlinking on usr/share/scribus, but i
could always try again, as that's likely the easier workaround to those
blocks.
On Sat, 23 Mar 2024, 9:50 pm Ian Bruntlett, <2058...@bugs.launchpad.net
great for me, approved!
** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu Jammy)
Status: In Progress => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2077391
Title:
[BPO] libreoffice 24.2.5 fo
I'm afraid I'll have to say no to versions that have the goal or fixing
crashes of freezes, as backports is not the pocket to fix those.
Please do an SRU to fix those bugs instead.
On Tue, 1 Mar 2022, 8:48 pm Launchpad Bug Tracker, <
1962...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote:
> You have been subscribed
** Also affects: freeipmi (Ubuntu Focal)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: freeipmi (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1
** Changed in: memtest86+ (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1962614
Title:
[BPO] memtest86+/5.31b+dfsg-4 from Jammy to Focal
To manage notific
** Summary changed:
- [BPO] backport 0.1.0-48-gb936edd4-0ubuntu1 to bionic, focal
+ [BPO] simplestreams/0.1.0-48-gb936edd4-0ubuntu1 from Jammy to bionic, focal
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net
The thing is, that patch is also fixing a crash in some cases (more
importantly, when run with --batch as part of the build process of some
other packages), so I'm kind of unhappy to push it and regress that,
although I see the point of this being a "worse" bug.
On Thu, 10 Mar 2022, 7:40 pm Erich
Bug tracker #1006697
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1006697
** Also affects: inkscape (Debian) via
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1006697
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
** Changed in: inkscape (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Mattia Rizzolo (map
** Changed in: xca (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2071361
Title:
[BPO] xca 2.6.0-1 to noble, jammy
To manage notifications about this bug go to
FWIW, this is the change that Thomas mentions:
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/xca/-/commit/bbce8d50361bd0593ba4be88c3442fcc0527a400
I'm a bit confused: why are you referencing an explicit library package
in build-dep instead of using a -dev package (in this case,
qtbase5-dev)?
In any case, go ah
just remember that in Debian alternative build-depends are count *only*
in backports, meaning that the first alternative should be what's in
actual use in sid at the time.
I recommend you do have a deeper look at qtbase5-dev, as you said it's
very odd for it to not work in xca's case.
--
You rec
Thank you for your contribution!
** Changed in: lsp-plugins (Ubuntu Noble)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2065359
Title:
[BPO] lsp-plugins/1.2.15-2
** Changed in: far2l (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2065491
Title:
[BPO] far2l/2.6.0~beta+ds-1ubuntu0.1 from noble-updates
To manage notific
Public bug reported:
I don't know why inkscape was kept in i386, but honestly I don't think
it has any reason to stay in an arch that is more and more dead and not
really cared of in Ubuntu.
reverse-depends -r impish -a i386 src:inkscape
is not giving me anything, so please consider dropping
This is the fixing patch:
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/hexchat/-/commit/a5687dbd864d495d01f8c1a054f5830bc1127ada
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1920974
Title:
Underscore is not vis
This was fixed in hexchat/2.14.3-5; affected release is probably only
focal right now.
** Also affects: hexchat (Ubuntu Hirsute)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: hexchat (Ubuntu Focal)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: hexchat (Ubuntu Impish
** Description changed:
+ [Impact]
+
+ * Using monospace fonts, some parts of the glyphs might not be visible
+(this is especially evident using some monospsace fonts, there the
+underscore is not visible).
+
+ * This came due to a change in behaviour in Pango 1.44.
+ * The fix makes
Here is a fixing debdiff.
Now, the "problem" is that I don't seem to match the conditions to
trigger this bug myself, so I'm unable to verify if it actually works.
If somebody is affected, please fill in the "Test plan" section of the
description, and if you could also verify that the package ava
All of those reverse-depends are arch:all, that's what I meant with "not
giving me anything" (sorry, I should have been clearer).
Now, I didn't know the i386 whitelist comes from germinate, thanks for
pointing that out.
so it seems that inkscape/i386 is kept because it's needed to build
game-data
** Also affects: gtk+3.0 (Ubuntu Focal)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: gtk+3.0 (Ubuntu Hirsute)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** No longer affects: gtk+3.0 (Ubuntu Hirsute)
** Changed in: gtk+3.0 (Ubuntu Focal)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You
@seb128: but is the patch that you uploaded with 3.24.25-1ubuntu4 (i.e.
this
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/532459482/gtk+3.0_3.24.25-1ubuntu3_3.24.25-1ubuntu4.diff.gz
) really that inappropriate for a SRU on top of the current version in
focal-updates?
--
You received this bug notification becaus
1501 - 1600 of 1619 matches
Mail list logo
