repository .. and that apparently just
builds.
Cheers,
Steffen
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Sun, 13 May 2012 20:45:54 -
> Von: Thomas Ward
> An: steffen_moel...@gmx.de
> Betreff: Re: [Bug 991179] Re: 7.0.24 "computation error" bug
> That was the c
That was the confusion, because Locutus referred to a different patch.
On May 13, 2012, at 3:31 PM, Dave wrote:
> Just for clarification. I believe that patch Thomas refers to was believed
> to be causing issues building the package for Ubuntu.
> The patch found to cause the computation error w
Just for clarification. I believe that patch Thomas refers to was believed
to be causing issues building the package for Ubuntu.
The patch found to cause the computation error was
moreinformativeappstart.patch or something like that.
On May 13, 2012 3:25 PM, "Thomas Ward" wrote:
> Steffen, the pa
Hello,
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Sun, 13 May 2012 16:54:19 -
> Von: Thomas Ward
> An: steffen_moel...@gmx.de
> Betreff: [Bug 991179] Re: 7.0.24 "computation error" bug
> I confirmed with MOTUs and the archives that the version from Debian is
> imported already.
>
> You c
Hello, yes, and I had one report from Debian in the meantime, too, who
had already confirmed this version to be fine with him (and SETI).
Cheers, Steffen
> debian/changelog for the version being synced to quantal (notice where
> it closes this bug, which is number 991179):
>
> boinc (7.0.27+dfsg-
And it's verified that package doesn't have the "bad" patch enabled?
On May 11, 2012 3:20 PM, "Thomas Ward" wrote:
> Sync request from Debian Sid to Quantal for 7.0.27+dfsg-3 (in Debian):
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/boinc/+bug/998195
>
> Once this goes through, i'll look into gett
The MOTU SRU team isn't going to support an SRU in this case (because of
a version change, according to the MOTUs I spoke to yesterday). They
are more likely to be willing to support a sync to Quantal for the
Debian version of the package, and then a backport of that to Precise
(the repository tha
Dave,
I did what you recommended below and installed Boinc. After a couple of
hours Seti@home finally connected and I got the following message:
Seti@home: Notice from Server
Your app_info.xml file doesn’t have a usable version of Seti@home
enhanced
Thanks,
Ben
-Original Message-
Hello,
On 05/10/2012 05:16 PM, Ben Giacalone wrote:
> I just installed 7.0.27+dfsg-0~827~precise1 onto a Dell 630 laptop which
> had been running fine until 12.04 LTS upgrade. I am still getting
> "computation error" on (9) work units that just downloaded.
This is unexpected. I presume this is th
On 05/10/2012 04:49 PM, Ben Giacalone wrote:
> Just tried to run your 7.27 on Dell 630 laptop which had no problem
> before 12.04 upgrade and I get computation error on all work units for
> Seti@home.
>
Hi Ben,
somewhere in this thread there is hidden a pointer to
https://launchpad.net/~costamagna
Just tried to run your 7.27 on Dell 630 laptop which had no problem
before 12.04 upgrade and I get computation error on all work units for
Seti@home.
Thanks,
Ben
-Original Message-
From: boun...@canonical.com [mailto:boun...@canonical.com] On Behalf Of Dave
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2012 9
Hello,
On 05/10/2012 04:05 PM, Thomas Ward wrote:
> New Updates:
>
> It may be prudent to deal with the Quantal side first.
>
> The issue on Quantal is that 7.0.27 has an issue of FTBFS (Fails to
> build from Source). It may be prudent to talk to the MOTUs and see
> whether they'd support a sync
It seems like there is a plan here kind-of.
-Steffen compiles 7.0.27 without the patch affecting ubuntu.
-Locutus figures out how to get it to build for quantal.
-It gets put in as quantal's boinc package.
-We then file the SRU, and push this to Precise with good cause.
Am I missing anything?
On
Between you and I, I agree 7.0.27 should be in Precise.
But the process for updating stable versions is complex, in that unless
the fixes also exist in the latest development version, they will rarely
push the stable release update.
I ran into this with six other packages, so I speak from experie
Well, I can't really comment on thatbecause I haven't been able to get
12.04 Release to install on such a system. The desktop installer panics right
away, the alternate installer panics on first boot after its done.
Its supposed to be my Windows desktop, but I had envisioned virtualizing
it..
On 05/10/2012 06:19 AM, Thomas Ward wrote:
> 7.0.26 isn't in Debian, so I'd have to poke around with the MOTUs to get
> that into Quantal, if not take the source and repackage it for quantal-
> proposed.
>
> Once Locutus can confirm whether or not 7.0.27 builds in Quantal, I'll
> go poke the MOTUs
On 05/10/2012 06:48 AM, Rocky37 wrote:
> Just checked for updates and was surprised to find 7.0.27
>
> Many thanks to you all for this wonderful fix -- Hugs to all
>
Hey, great! Nice to "see" you happy. Thanks also from my side to
Lotus, Dave and the folks behind the PPA build demons.
Is it
Well, my bug #985622 was reported against 12.04 beta 2.
On 05/09/2012 02:12 PM, Dave wrote:
> Its too bad this bug didn't show in 12.04 before its final release,
> otherwise I would have reported it before 12.04 got locked. But for
> whatever reason it worked fine until 12.04 was final and I reins
Its too bad this bug didn't show in 12.04 before its final release,
otherwise I would have reported it before 12.04 got locked. But for
whatever reason it worked fine until 12.04 was final and I reinstalled
boinc, it was only then that the bug showed
On May 9, 2012 2:55 PM, "Thomas Ward" wrote:
>
Well. I'd hope an "Sru" would be approved considering you currently have a
boinc package that doesn't work for one of the most used projects and at
least one other.
On May 9, 2012 1:45 PM, "Thomas Ward" wrote:
> The Precise repos can't be updated without an SRU. SRU(s) are not
> always approved.
On 05/08/2012 11:56 PM, Dave wrote:
> So I don't wanna push anyone here, but can't we just put a 7.0.24
> without the "bad" patch into the Ubuntu repository while we play with
> the 7.0.27?
7.0.24 is bad for many reasons, especially for an incompatibility with
decent NVidia cards, no, please jump t
On 05/09/2012 03:12 AM, Dave wrote:
> Indeed. The am64 also has the bug. So that patch is definitely still an
> issue with 7.0.27, at least with Ubuntu.
This is not expected. Have many thanks for identifying that.
Steffen
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
B
On 05/08/2012 07:12 PM, Dave wrote:
> Seti@home is down for its Tuesdsay maintenance. Should be up in a few
> hours.
>
> If your next build goes through Locutus I'll test it as soon as the
> project comes online.
>
> Good luck.
>
Docking@Home was also affected.
Cheers,
Steffen
--
You received t
On 05/08/2012 11:02 AM, LocutusOfBorg wrote:
> According to this [1] which is based on your git [2] the patch isn't
> included, I see a
> #convinceDavid# MoreInformativeAppStartFailure.patch
> which is clearly commented.
Right. I had not pushed. Sorry for that.
> I thought this patch was includ
On 05/08/2012 10:30 AM, LocutusOfBorg wrote:
> Unfortunately sometimes I have to sleep :)
> I'm building right now 7.0.27 with the patch "parse_issues.patch" disabled,
> since it doesn't build with it included (and as far as I can tell the patch
> has no problem), I have already filled a bug agai
On 05/07/2012 05:24 PM, Dave wrote:
> MoreInformativeAppStartFailure.patch is the culprit of the computation
> error issue. :-)
>
> I'm relieved that that one worked. .
>
Please update to 7.0.27. I have the client working and that patch is in.
Steffen
--
You received this bug notification be
On 05/07/2012 04:03 PM, LocutusOfBorg wrote:
> So based on your last information seems to be
> MoreInformativeAppStartFailure.patch that causes this problem.
This is weird. I have just compiled my 7.0.27 version with that patch in
and this works nicely from what I see. Anyway. Jump over to 7.0.27 a
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Sun, 06 May 2012 20:21:37 -
> Von: LocutusOfBorg
> An: steffen_moel...@gmx.de
> Betreff: [Bug 991179] Re: 7.0.24 "computation error" bug
> Hi to all, unfortunately I cannot build the .27 from steffen git in
> launchpad. Previously I have thought t
That download speed is normal anywhere. Unfortunately. :-)
Ill test whatever you guys decide to compile and put in locutus' ppa.
On May 6, 2012 1:35 PM, "Steffen Möller" wrote:
> Original-Nachricht
> > Datum: Sun, 06 May 2012 16:03:30 -
> > Von: Dave
> > An: steffen_moel..
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Sun, 06 May 2012 16:03:30 -
> Von: Dave
> An: steffen_moel...@gmx.de
> Betreff: [Bug 991179] Re: 7.0.24 "computation error" bug
> @ Locutus
>
> If this ppa has the patch Steffen thought was breaking it, we made need
> to re-think things a lit
And I just read Dave's reply that this would be just fine, indeed.
If it is not the order of lines, then my hunch is that it is the size of the
buffer that I had increased, which may create larger (too large) files for the
client to read.
I will split that patch in two halves - buffer and reorde
Hello,
Have many thanks for all your energies going into it. The patches are listed in
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-boinc/boinc.git;a=blob;f=debian/patches/series
and of those my personal hunch is the have a second look at the
app_ipc_uninitialised.patch, where I had improved (so I thou
Hello,
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Fri, 04 May 2012 17:22:10 -
> Von: Dave
> An: steffen_moel...@gmx.de
> Betreff: [Bug 991179] Re: 7.0.24 "computation error" bug
> and interesting, in the changelog for 7.0.27 I read "compile fix"...
> Don't really know what that means for
Hello,
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Thu, 03 May 2012 16:11:35 -
> Von: Dave
> An: steffen_moel...@gmx.de
> Betreff: [Bug 991179] Re: 7.0.24 "computation error" bug
> @Locutus. Will do, happily! It's just gonna take about 12 hours til some
> AP units finish up, I don't wanna
Hello,
I can confirm this problem. I have only a hunch what may be wrong, most
likely the boinc-client now produces lines in its communication with the
scientific app that are complete - but too long. But I have to prove
that, still. The problem occurred while I was excluding potential issues
with
35 matches
Mail list logo
