Re: [Bug 95670] Re: [needs-packaging] Jabbin

2008-10-29 Thread Sarah Hobbs
oss_test_launchpad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Quite obviously the one who produces a mess has the obligation to do > everything to tidy it up. Thus I strongly reject this rebuke. Then to solve this issue, I'd like to ask the launchpad guys to remove all traces of your launchpad account, so none

Re: [Bug 95670] Re: [needs-packaging] Jabbin

2008-10-28 Thread Saša Bodiroža
Hello, On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 7:43 PM, oss_test_launchpad wrote: > Saša, we are still waiting for you to contact the launchpad admins and > have the address removed. You produced this mess, so tidy it up. No > change on this issue so far. I posted a question [1] on Launchpad answer tracker and o

Re: [Bug 95670] Re: [needs-packaging] Jabbin

2008-06-20 Thread Saša Bodiroža
Sorry, I am replying directly from the e-mail. As far as I know, the e-mail address can't be deleted now. But that shouldn't worry you, as only registered users are able to see e-mail addresses in the comments. You may check it for yourself by logging out and refreshing this bug report. As for the

Re: [Bug 95670] Re: [needs-packaging] Jabbin

2008-06-20 Thread Saša Bodiroža
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 4:36 PM, oss_test_launchpad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Cool! Does that mean it's legal to use it? Sure. You could use it legally before. The problem was that few source files were missing licensing information in their headers, so it wasn't appropriate for Ubuntu's archiv

Re: [Bug 95670] Re: [needs-packaging] Jabbin

2008-06-20 Thread Saša Bodiroža
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 12:07 PM, oss_test_launchpad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is this going to be in 8.10? I consider this quite interesting, since > IMHO Ubuntu lacks a proper and easily working internet telephony > solution. I think that missing licensing information should be sorted out no