On Mon, Mar 07, 2011, Matt Sealey wrote:
> The reason I want this in there is because right now, we run Ubuntu.
Or rather you base on Ubuntu; let's call that some kind of mini Ubuntu
derivative.
>We do not want to wait around
> while Canonical, Linaro
When will this resync occur? I keep hearing it being thrown around a s
a reason to not implement features but nothing seems to be being done to
make it happen. The other reason we are proposing this change here is
because linaro supports like 3 boards and Debian supports ~40. We can
make the chang
On Thu, Mar 03, 2011, Loïc Minier wrote:
> Debian #601789 describes related issue around running flash-kernel at
> the right time. I think we want to dpkg-trigger flash-kernel from
> update-initramfs and perhaps from linux' postinsts.
Sorry, that's Debian #550584
--
Loïc Minier
--
You rec
On Thu, Mar 03, 2011, Matt Sealey wrote:
> For reference this is my untested hook for the Efika..
In general, I find patches easier to review; will you test this new
version?
--
Loïc Minier
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
Just a note: I think this is getting off topic for this bug; we should
only exchange on resolving this particular bug in a relatively simple
way; flash-kernel design discussions should be held elsewhere IMO.
On Thu, Mar 03, 2011, Matt Sealey wrote:
> I was under the impression that flash-kernel,
Hey
On Thu, Mar 03, 2011, Matt Sealey wrote:
> Okay I have some problems with the support committed to flash-kernel,
> namely
> * it doesn't differentiate between kernel versions, so uImage and
> uInitrd will overwrite any older uImage and uInitrd version. This is
> unfriendly and it is impossible
