Hi Felipe,
> do you think maybe it would be best to develop hubackup off the
> distribution, and re-include it in the archive when it's ready?
Hubackup was removed from jaunty, see bug #320797 . So that is already
done.
> This doesn't explain why the restore GUI refuses to start. Why does it
> h
Martin Bergner escreveu:
> It was a bad decision to promote hubackup (which works in most cases)
> and hurestore as a main backup tool since they are not finished. I tried
> to help Sivan getting hurestore to work, but didn't succed.
>
Martin,
do you agree it would be best to develop hubackup o
Felipe
Try using this link. it worked for me.
http://dar.linux.free.fr/doc/index.html
and download dar gui
The hu should be deleted from Ubuntu and Linux.
On Fri, 2009-01-23 at 21:47 +, Felipe Figueiredo wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 5:55 PM, tdflanders wrote:
> > I marked mine as a dupli
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 5:55 PM, tdflanders wrote:
> I marked mine as a duplicate (320421), please change importance to
> critical and fix or remove this package ASAP. I have significant data
> loss. Is there anyway to retrieve data from it? It did the validation in
> hubackup and it was marked as
Martin Bergner wrote:
> It was a bad decision to promote hubackup (which works in most cases)
> and hurestore as a main backup tool since they are not finished. I tried
> to help Sivan getting hurestore to work, but didn't succed.
>
> Maybe someone else has a better idea, so I will create some back
I agree. Between sbackup which "appears" to be working correctly, and
hubackup/restore which doesn't work at all, I'm just about ready to
start scripting my own backup scheme which I don't want to do, but I
agree, hu* shouldn't even be mentioned and should be removed from the
repos until it does w
