Re: [Bug 627608] Re: Got a 401 on a fresh purchase

2010-11-08 Thread Julian Edwards
On Wednesday 03 November 2010 05:40:45 you wrote: > This took a while to QA - we had to setup stuff on qastaging properly. > Please to be QAing on landing! > > ** Tags added: qa-ok > ** Tags removed: qa-needstesting I suspect it was already QAed on dogfood, but the tagging process gives us no wa

Re: [Bug 627608] Re: Got a 401 on a fresh purchase

2010-09-16 Thread Robert Collins
You may wish to get this fast track deployed to loganberry / wherever it runs; as long as no SPOF services are replaced it should be doable mid-cycle. -Rob -- Got a 401 on a fresh purchase https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/627608 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubunt

Re: [Bug 627608] Re: Got a 401 on a fresh purchase

2010-09-04 Thread Julian Edwards
On Friday 03 September 2010 09:58:55 you wrote: > Michael, have you considered having a work queue in parallel/instead > of the cron job? > > The queue could simply say 'reevaluate PPA XXX', and would do one PPA. > That should get the latency down fairly low. That's pretty much what I said in com

Re: [Bug 627608] Re: Got a 401 on a fresh purchase

2010-09-03 Thread Michael Nelson
On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 10:58 AM, Robert Collins <627...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > Michael, have you considered having a work queue in parallel/instead > of the cron job? > > The queue could simply say 'reevaluate PPA XXX', and would do one PPA. > That should get the latency down fairly low. Yea

Re: [Bug 627608] Re: Got a 401 on a fresh purchase

2010-09-03 Thread Robert Collins
Michael, have you considered having a work queue in parallel/instead of the cron job? The queue could simply say 'reevaluate PPA XXX', and would do one PPA. That should get the latency down fairly low. -- Got a 401 on a fresh purchase https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/627608 You received this bug