Re: [Bug 621927] Re: Embedded Terminal Emulator isn't giving a TERM variable

2010-11-13 Thread Joel Berger
gnome-terminal sets TERM for you. And Guake never set it, libvte did, which is what changed. I made some instructions on how to work around this before it was fixed in GDM. Assuming you use Ubuntu (or other flavor which has profile.d) follow them: http://joelslinux.blogspot.com/2010/10/ubuntu-maver

Re: [Bug 621927] Re: Embedded Terminal Emulator isn't giving a TERM variable

2010-09-27 Thread Alejandro Díaz-Caro
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 11:36 PM, Julien Lavergne wrote: > The 0.26 of vte is available in Maverick, could you test and report back > if the problem is fixed ? I just updated and upgraded my Maverick and the problem is still there. -- Embedded Terminal Emulator isn't giving a TERM variable http

Re: [Bug 621927] Re: Embedded Terminal Emulator isn't giving a TERM variable

2010-09-24 Thread Alejandro Díaz-Caro
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 4:01 PM, Sylvestre Ledru <621...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > Alejandro Díaz-Caro: could you send me the content of /usr/bin/guake ? > thanks Here you are: #!/bin/bash # # Copyright (C) 2007 Gabriel Falcão # Copyright (C) 2007 Lincoln de Sousa # # This program is free so

Re: [Bug 621927] Re: Embedded Terminal Emulator isn't giving a TERM variable

2010-09-24 Thread Alejandro Díaz-Caro
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 12:00 PM, Sylvestre Ledru <621...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > This upload fixes this issue: > https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/maverick/+source/guake/0.4.2-2ubuntu1 I confirm that I still have the issue with this package version. -- Embedded Terminal Emulator isn't giving a

Re: [Bug 621927] Re: Embedded Terminal Emulator isn't giving a TERM variable

2010-09-21 Thread Dario Bertini
On 21 September 2010 13:46, Victor <621...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > if not self.get_emulation() or self.get_emulation() == '': >      self.set_emulation('xterm') > work! > I confirm: the patch seems to work... actually there's something strange: launching guake from terminal it works, but by