Re: [Bug 56125] Re: apt-get moo doesnt look like a cow

2008-07-31 Thread Toma
Paul, stop milking the joke! :) 2008/7/31 Paul C. Bryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Please, don't have a cow. The issue of how it looks is moot. This > continued debate is udderly ridiculous. We should instead be focusing on > how to beef up security. > > -- > apt-get moo doesnt look like a cow > https

Re: [Bug 56125] Re: apt-get moo doesnt look like a cow

2008-07-31 Thread Vadim Peretokin
Did you mean an armoured cow? (and this isn't wasting too much time, don't worry) -- apt-get moo doesnt look like a cow https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/56125 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list u

Re: [Bug 56125] Re: apt-get moo doesnt look like a cow

2008-07-16 Thread KarlGoetz
On Thu, 2008-07-17 at 00:46 +, Toma wrote: > To be honest, when this got on the reddit front page, the comments > were less stupid. > Now that its been recycled to digg, its full of stupid comments. > That explains it (I wondered about the sudden new intrest). kk -- apt-get moo doesnt look

Re: [Bug 56125] Re: apt-get moo doesnt look like a cow

2008-07-16 Thread KarlGoetz
On Wed, 2008-07-16 at 20:23 +, shingalated wrote: > If this feature is not fixed I am switching back to windows. This is a > very crucial feature, and without it I can not get anything done. hehehe. kk -- apt-get moo doesnt look like a cow https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/56125 You received

Re: [Bug 56125] Re: apt-get moo doesnt look like a cow

2008-07-16 Thread Toma
To be honest, when this got on the reddit front page, the comments were less stupid. Now that its been recycled to digg, its full of stupid comments. Also, try to address the bug, rather than suggesting other things (Tareeq), you could always for fork cowsay and make an Admiral Ackbar program. If