Andrew Pollock [2010-02-17 17:20 -]:
> Martin, do you know if it's going to appear in the partner repository
> before Lucid ships?
As I said, that was the plan at least.
Martin
--
Martin Pitt| http://www.piware.de
Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Developer
Wesley Schwengle [2010-02-17 9:46 -]:
> The removal of Sun's Java from Ubuntu saddens me. I don't understand the
> reason behind it either.
We have OpenJDK in main since 9.04, which is the platform Ubuntu
supports.
> Does anyone know if there are plans to include the package in the
> partner
On Tue, 2009-10-13 at 10:27 +, Martin Pitt wrote:
> TK [2009-10-13 10:06 -]:
> > Ubuntu Desktop users should take responsibility for building their own
> > systems and insuring that they are secure.
>
> They should just use openjdk in this case (which is the default JDK
> nowadays, so if
TK [2009-10-13 10:06 -]:
> Ubuntu Desktop users should take responsibility for building their own
> systems and insuring that they are secure.
They should just use openjdk in this case (which is the default JDK
nowadays, so if you install any java app, it will be pulled in by
default if you do
Pjotr12345 [2009-10-12 9:55 -]:
> I think Canonical has made a good decision: apparently, there's not
> enough manpower available, for keeping JRE safe with security updates in
> Karmic.
Rather, OpenJDK is available since 9.04, and we only want to (and do)
support that instead of the propriet
