Try purging the gdm2 configuration tool via
sudo apt-get purge packagename
or, if it doesn't work
sudo dpkg -P packagename
If you installed it from the repos or a .deb package, it should remove it.
Then do a
sudo apt-get --purge autoremove
and
sudo apt-get clean
which will remove all packages tha
unsubscribe
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 9:18 AM, Sebastien Bacher
wrote:
> > Who thinks up this crazy ideas?
>
> Hi,
>
> Could you stay correct and respect people doing work for free there on
> softwares you are can decide to use or not?
> It's also judged polite to subscribe to bugs you comment on s
I can't see the Thorsten or anyone point since there is no option to change
the gdm in windows and mac too and why would you like to change the gdm
anyways? is it ugly? everyone who thinks that gdm in karmic is ugly, fill a
new bug and allow close this bug.
--
gdm 2.26 has no graphical configurat
Thorsten Gross wrote:
> I am a Linux-Trainer and use to show my students how to configure Linux. I
> just can't believe that a new release is pushing Linux-Newbies to the
> terminal for such a simple thing as the configuration of the login screen.
> Why??
> If Linux is supposed to become more li
How can you change the gdm or whatever is called in Windows? The only thing
you can change in windows is wallpaper
--
gdm 2.26 has no graphical configuration tool
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/395299
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
why all this minimalism all of a sudden?
what happened to the gdm configuration app?
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 00:35, emarkay wrote:
> "The Karmic GDM now has a configuration tool therefore this bug is
> resolved" - I don't see the same level of configurability as of today,
> as there was in Jaunt
Couldn't we fix this by letting the user set the Appearance preferences
of user gdm in the same fashion of that under Preferences? I don't know
whether it's doable or a good idea in general to do it this way, just a
thought.
--
gdm 2.26 has no graphical configuration tool
https://bugs.launchpa
What I meant was (and remember that I have never put an eye in GDM code)
that if we can use he old configuration tool graphics as a base for building
the ew configuration tool, it would help users in understanding how to work
with the config tool.
What worries me is the fact that if old GDM and new
Can't it be merged from the same app that was in Jaunty and older?
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 19:30, Pako wrote:
> manzur, I agree
>
> --
> gdm 2.26 has no graphical configuration tool
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/395299
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
manzur, I agree
--
gdm 2.26 has no graphical configuration tool
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/395299
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mai
Would be too difficult only use the same window that old gnome?, could
be with less options by now
2009/7/24, Tumble :
> What about other features of gdmconfig like allowing remote X and
> configuring xdmcp. Are there alternative guis for configuring these? I know
> they're important to me, does a
What do you mean by "double login"?
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 06:09, Ricardo Arrue wrote:
> I dont' want to overload of problems but what about the double login in the
> new GDM?
>
> 2009/7/8 surlyjake
>
> > gdm doesn't seem to respond to any of the file-based configurations I
> make
> > either. I
I dont' want to overload of problems but what about the double login in the
new GDM?
2009/7/8 surlyjake
> gdm doesn't seem to respond to any of the file-based configurations I make
> either. Isn't that a bigger issue than the lack of a GUI tool?
>
> On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 6:28 PM, perfectska04
gdm doesn't seem to respond to any of the file-based configurations I make
either. Isn't that a bigger issue than the lack of a GUI tool?
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 6:28 PM, perfectska04
wrote:
> I think the new GDM is more accessible and perhaps better at dealing
> with keyboard layouts and differe
But what about the "Killing the usernames, works defenetly NOT, search
google ;) we are not alone..."?
On your PC no usernames are shown if you tick the "disable_user_list"
checkbox?
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 19:00, Starfly wrote:
> Yes thats it...
>
> many people are talking about, that the user ic
Fedora has the same 'login screen' that you are hating now, and
unfortunately havent the configuration application neither, of course.
I dont hate the new gdm, the red one was beautiful, but i think that
we only must have patience since is a new version and we just have to
wait until it be polished
16 matches
Mail list logo