No that's fine. I'm not desiring to keep it open, I was objecting to
the immaterial label. Closed I thought would be more appropriate.
On Jan 18, 2010, at 9:43 PM, Gabe Gorelick wrote:
> @Darren if you, or anyone, can reproduce this bug, then feel free to
> reopen it. It's just that if it is
It wasn't invalid when I was on 9.04 32 bit, I just can't speak to
its validity anymore.
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 3:23 PM, Gabe Gorelick
wrote:
> ** Changed in: wesnoth (Ubuntu)
> Status: Incomplete => Invalid
>
> --
> wesnoth toggles from fullscreen to windowed randomly
> https://bugs.launc
oh wow. Not an issue. I'm onto 9.10 64 bit now, and it plays fine.
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 1:38 AM, Gabe Gorelick
wrote:
> Is this still an issue, or has it been resolved?
>
> ** Changed in: wesnoth (Ubuntu)
> Status: New => Incomplete
>
> --
> wesnoth toggles from fullscreen to windowed
I will have to check on both-currenty on the 32 bit desktop running 9.04 it
seems to be running fine, and I haven't checked on the 64bit laptop. I will
x2 check and let you know.
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 2:18 PM, Gerv wrote:
> Right, but "wesnoth and screensavers are incompatible" is not a
> rea
