@jervin
This is a different issue and has been fixed in the version you are running.
On 05/10/2010 07:48 PM, jervin wrote:
> there was a report that flash was causing problems like this and that
> dom.ipc.plugins.enabled.libflashplayer.so needed to be set to false.
> This has been done on my syste
Hi,
John Vivirito schreef:
> "Annoying" is not what decided importance but if
> it was to be a security risk or impedes the using
> of the browser, this meets neither. ...
Being unable to open a browser window doesn't impede using the browser??
> On 04/28/2010 05:24 AM, David Nyström wrote:
>>
"Annoying" is not what decided importance but if
it was to be a security risk or impedes the using
of the browser, this meets neither. As i recall
(doing this from email since i dont have a browser
at this time.) this has been reported upstream and
should be fixed by Mozilla.
On 04/28/2010 05:24 A
I still have this problem (on Ubuntu Karmic), but it is more rare.
2009/10/31 ptitpoul
> No more problem on kubuntu Karmic.
>
> --
> [MASTER]Firefox is already running message
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/308605
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of
of course
On Thu, 25 Jun 2009 13:09:44 +0100, Sjors Gielen
wrote:
> Of course, that was "moving the contents over*". Sorry.
>
--
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client
--
[MASTER]Firefox is already running message
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/308605
You received this bug notificatio
who are you
On Thu, 25 Jun 2009 13:09:44 +0100, Sjors Gielen
wrote:
> Of course, that was "moving the contents over*". Sorry.
>
--
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client
--
[MASTER]Firefox is already running message
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/308605
You received this bug notifica
On 05/09/2009 10:13 PM, ptitpoul wrote:
> Me too in Kubuntu Jaunty.
>
> My backtrace is not very useful as most symbols are missing:
> (gdb) bt
> #0 0xb7feb430 in __kernel_vsyscall ()
> #1 0xb7fc5cf9 in __lll_lock_wait () from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libpthre
On 04/06/2009 12:44 PM, keepitsimpleengr wrote:
> Please read the bug report before marking it as a duplicate.
>
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/308605 is not related at all to
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox-3.0/+bug/246010.
>
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fi
