On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 5:35 AM, F-3582 wrote:
> I read that on Heise a month ago, just prior to those announcements that
> AMD were to drop support for those chips entirely.
Then it looks like we will be leaving them out cold as far as OpenGL 2.1
support then. None of the existing FOSS drivers
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 12:34:43AM -, F-3582 wrote:
> That would be nice, but unfortunately impossible because of the
> previously mentioned incompatibility with XServer 1.6 which will be
> introduced in Ubuntu 9.04.
>
> Didn't I read somewhere that AMD had intended to keep a legacy branch
> t
I would suggest that if possible we could hold in catalyst 9.3 for r300-r500
support, since those were dropped in 9.4.
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 5:06 PM, Hanno Meyer-Thurow
wrote:
> I wonder if it is too hard to do name-version packages like for nvidia
> packages. :)
> See:
> http://packages.ubunt
They can actually stay with 8.10.
At least for my mobility radeon 9600 everything is ok with this last
driver (except dual monitor support)...
Ingomar Wesp wrote:
> Since it will be a long time until the OSS ati driver delivers
> reasonable OpenGL support on r300-based cards, this really is a bu
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 2:10 AM, Noiano wrote:
> stomlin wrote:
> > 9.2 fixed the problem for me. I have a Asus z80k with a mobile 9700 pro
> (rv350)
> > I installed them manually using the install method here...
> http://wiki.cchtml.com/index.php/Ubuntu_Intrepid_Installation_Guide
> > Hooorraaay
stomlin wrote:
> 9.2 fixed the problem for me. I have a Asus z80k with a mobile 9700 pro
> (rv350)
> I installed them manually using the install method here...
> http://wiki.cchtml.com/index.php/Ubuntu_Intrepid_Installation_Guide
> Hooorraaay!
Everything is ok also with ati radeon 9500 pro. On
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 01:09:10AM -, Neal Gompa wrote:
> Nope. Its a target of stupidity at most,
This is not an appropriate tone to take in bug reports. Please refrain from
such remarks in the future; they will only serve to get you ignored.
> None of the FOSS drivers support OpenGL 2(.1)
7500 chip has been, and is still supported in the Windows driver. Not sure
what your talking about.
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 3:58 AM, F-3582 wrote:
> Sorry to tell you, but support for your card has been dropped aeons ago
> and I don't think ATI plans to bring back support. Even the Windows
> driv
omega wrote:
> catalyst 9.1 out: no R300 support
I got the same error: (EE) No devices detected...I used the manual
method with 2.6.27-11-generic kernel
I have attached the full xorg log
That's gettin annoying :-(
Noiano
** Attachment added: "Xorg.0.log"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/2179
Can you post a full set of instructions ?
> Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 20:00:20 +
> From: nikola.le...@gmail.com
> To: sah...@hotmail.com
> Subject: [Bug 284408] Re: r3xx Hardware does not work with fglrx [EPR#257839]
>
> works here on my laptop with mobility radeon 9700 - but the regular
> in
Friends... I'm a newbee... and I have some simple questions. I'm using
the fglrx driver with a ATI Radeon FireGL Mobility card on an IBM Thinkpad
T42.
I want to upgrade from 8.04 to 8.10 and I am assuming that I need to go back
to the opensource driver before I upgrade, else a bug in the upgrad
Hi,
I have tried your suggestion, and for my computer it didn´t work , well it´s
"work", but without 3d hardware accelaration - when i say without 3d
hardware accelarion i means than 3D games, 3d programs the work really slow.
Fglrx is the official driver from ATI , so i think we need to focus in i
Hi,
It´s true, this works, but it doesn´t add hardware acceleration for 3d as
fglrx does.
Merry Christmas and Happy new year.
On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 9:40 PM, Felix wrote:
> Removing fglrx and re-installing xserver-xorg-video-ati worked for my
> Mobility 9600 (r350). Thanks.
>
> --
> r3xx Har
1. sudo sh /usr/share/ati/fglrx-uninstall.sh
2. sudo apt-get install --reinstall xserver-xorg-driver-ati
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 11:39 AM, Hali <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> After I installed the latest catalyst Driver I cannot successfully
> switch back to the free driver ATI catalyst control cen
Moses Moore wrote:
> Maybe building a new fglrx-2:8.543 (aka version 8-11) package with
> linux-headers-2.6.24 might give us something that works with xorg-7.4
> and linux-image-2.6.24 I'll give it a shot when I get home tonight (or
> someone please tell me why this won't work.)
Does not work.
h wrote:
> maybe its the new ubuntu-kernel, which causes the problems
> see "2.6.24-22 kernel broke up ati drivers"
> http://ati.cchtml.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1373
The 8.10 "intrepid" repositories are 2.6.27-7 and 2.6.27-9.
The 8.04 "hardy" repositories hold 2.6.24-{16,18,19,21,22}.
Don't forget tha
correction: $ /etc/init.d/gdm restart should read
$ sudo /etc/init.d/gdm restart
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 9:58 PM, Cole Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just attempted the install with the "proposed" version 8.11 and the
> issue persists on mine as well.
>
> 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller:
I just attempted the install with the "proposed" version 8.11 and the
issue persists on mine as well.
01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc RV350
[Mobility Radeon 9600 M10]
aticonfig --list-adapters reports that there are no adapters found
after the reboot.
The following is how
OK:
Then it sounds like 8-11 didn't really solve the problem for all r3xx
users.
It will still be good data though if it did solve it for anyone with
r3xx.
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 11:02, matthew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I had removed them as my computer only booted in failsafe mode. I
> rei
The release notes describes many of the cards discussed as supported
and working.
https://a248.e.akamai.net/f/674/9206/0/www2.ati.com/drivers/linux/catalyst_811_linux.pdf
Regards,
Cole
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 6:30 PM, ByteJuggler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, the new 8.11 ATI driver releas
20 matches
Mail list logo
