Re: [Bug 272746] Re: Please removed bookmarksftp from Jaunty

2009-04-14 Thread John Vivirito
On 04/13/2009 08:41 AM, Steve Langasek wrote: > 2009-04-13 12:38:44 INFORemoving candidates: > 2009-04-13 12:38:44 INFObookmarksftp 1.0.2-6ubuntu2 in jaunty > 2009-04-13 12:38:44 INFOmozilla-bookmarksftp 1.0.2-6ubuntu2 in jaunty > amd64 > 2009-04-13 12:38:44 INFOmozilla

Re: [Bug 272746] Re: Please removed bookmarksftp from Jaunty

2009-04-13 Thread John Vivirito
On 04/11/2009 12:25 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote: > OK: Please remove > Thanks I will see if this pakcage is even worth the trouble to fix but i doubt it, I have yet come to a package that is like this one that is under free license, If anyone has any idea please let me know and i wills see about pac

Re: [Bug 272746] Re: Please removed bookmarksftp from Jaunty

2009-04-11 Thread Scott Kitterman
OK: Please remove -- Please removed bookmarksftp from Jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/272746 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailma

Re: [Bug 272746] Re: Please removed bookmarksftp from Jaunty

2009-04-08 Thread John Vivirito
On 04/08/2009 01:25 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote: > This discussion is all about a different package, right? AFAIK we still > want bookmarksftp removed. > Well if we use mine it doesn't have to be removed since its an upgrade. I am looking for Asac's package in him PPA to see what he did that i didn

Re: [Bug 272746] Re: Please removed bookmarksftp from Jaunty

2009-04-08 Thread Scott Kitterman
This discussion is all about a different package, right? AFAIK we still want bookmarksftp removed. -- Please removed bookmarksftp from Jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/272746 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubu

Re: [Bug 272746] Re: Please removed bookmarksftp from Jaunty

2009-04-08 Thread John Vivirito
On 04/08/2009 07:59 AM, John Vivirito wrote: > It seems Alexander got to it before me and renamed package. I have > updated the orig package with same name to support 3.0.* I havent tried >> 3.0 yet so i will wait to see what Alexander wants to do first. > The final line should be greater than 3.0