Re: [Bug 252094] Re: MASTER: Poor graphics performance on Intel

2011-01-18 Thread salemboot
This page was last modified on 20 May 2009, at 14:08. 2-Year old page bro! Even the radeon driver has matured significatly since then. On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 12:31 AM, actionparsnip < andrew.woodhead...@googlemail.com> wrote: > I'd just like to add: > http://wiki.cchtml.com/index.php/Glxgears

Re: [Bug 252094] Re: MASTER: Poor graphics performance on Intel

2009-08-06 Thread salemboot
Figured I'd make an update. Mesa git fixed some issues for me. unreal tournament isn't hoping around anymore. Actually is pretty smooth now. Blender's latest available build still renders outside the container window but some of the glitches were fixed. You still can't see the selection window.

Re: [Bug 252094] Re: MASTER: Poor graphics performance on Intel

2009-08-04 Thread salemboot
http://anholt.livejournal.com/41306.html ()_- [ We do use ut2004. It does stutter with 2.6.31rc (unstable code) due to a performance improvement that requires a Mesa fix to avoid the stuttering. The Mesa fix has been undergoing review.]-_() }-._ He never mentions the fix. I haven't had time to loo

Re: [Bug 252094] Re: MASTER: Poor graphics performance on Intel

2009-06-29 Thread salemboot
I updated 9.10 again today A new kernel and Intel driver got installed. 2.6.30-10 has lowered performance considerably. The new upgrades to Xorg have a few issues with external LCD's. Stepping back to 2.6.30-9 stablized things as long as I didn't push past the resolution of my laptop's onboard dis

Re: [Bug 252094] Re: MASTER: Poor graphics performance on Intel

2009-06-29 Thread JoseLVG
Last time I tested with last intel, X and kernel 2.6.30 (rc7?) versions available the results were poor and not stable. Has anyone got it working fine? (no render errors and good fps on googleearth and tux racer?) Has anyone got it working fine on a eee 901? Jose 2009/6/28 Bryce Harrington > I

Re: [Bug 252094] Re: MASTER: Poor graphics performance on Intel

2009-06-04 Thread Dmitrijs Ledkovs
2009/6/5 Radu Cristian Fotescu : > 1. The freedesktop bug #18389 was closed with NOTOURBUG, which does NOT > solve it. > > 2. The freedesktop bug #18389 was opened for openSUSE, so this does NOT > solve Ubuntu's bug. > > 3. As long as Jaunty is affected by this bug, the bug status can NOT be > Inva

Re: [Bug 252094] Re: MASTER: Poor graphics performance on Intel

2009-05-26 Thread Ace Suares
J.P. wrote: > FWIW my ThinkPad R61i had a drastic improvement after upgrading the kernel to > the 2.6.29 line following the 'optimal' config per this HOWTO: > http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1130582 > > Unfortunately, the text will garble up after suspending/hibernating or > switching us

Re: [Bug 252094] Re: MASTER: Poor graphics performance on Intel

2009-05-20 Thread salemboot
Sounds like the kde session manager may have crashed, stalled and another copy got loaded. I'm not experienced enough with the internals of KDE to give you a deffinate hypothesis. A lot has changed from 3.5 up to 4.2. Buntu is starting to become more like Slackware. On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 6:38

Re: [Bug 252094] Re: MASTER: Poor graphics performance on Intel

2009-05-16 Thread salemboot
My performance gains reverted after I allowed updates. I did see that one was xf86-intel-2.6.4 or something to that nature. I had no freezing on my 945GM. This is a Sony Vaio laptop so for those that are interested. It's was a clean Kubuntu 9.04 install with only the kernel added in. I'm not sure

Re: [Bug 252094] Re: MASTER: Poor graphics performance on Intel

2009-05-15 Thread salemboot
http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/mainline/v2.6.30-rc5/linux- image-2.6.30-020630rc5-generic_2.6.30-020630rc5_i386.deb http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/mainline/v2.6.30-rc5/linux- headers-2.6.30-020630rc5_2.6.30-020630rc5_all.deb 19fps in Neverwinter Nights and ut2004 runs smooth as it did

Re: [Bug 252094] Re: MASTER: Poor graphics performance on Intel

2009-05-04 Thread JoseLVG
Jaunty results on a eee 901 with 'out-of-thebox' configuration. *NO COMPIZ: glxgears 600fps+ NO rendering errors, GoogleEarth smooth (sun & atmosphere off) ppracer 18fps COMPIZ ON: glxgears 570fps + rendering erros when moving the window, GoogleEarth less smooth (sun & atmosphere off) ppracer 18f

Re: [Bug 252094] Re: MASTER: Poor graphics performance on Intel

2009-05-04 Thread Gnurou
@Radu: UXA (at least on vanilla Jaunty) is known to be unstable for some configurations (including mine). Your mileage may vary, but in no way this could be considered a fix. -- MASTER: Poor graphics performance on Intel https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252094 You received this bug notification be

Re: [Bug 252094] Re: MASTER: Poor graphics performance on Intel

2009-05-03 Thread Bryce Harrington
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 12:45:14PM -, James Strother wrote: > But, have you considered supplying a package with an older version of > xserver that could run the i810 driver? To be honest, we're stretched pretty thin already just maintaining one version of X.org. At over 180 separate packages,

Re: [Bug 252094] Re: MASTER: Poor graphics performance on Intel

2009-04-30 Thread Bryce Harrington
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 06:26:46AM -, Tom Chiverton wrote: > Bryce: The notice was yup, the link to page with step-by-steps for new > X, kernel and MTRR wasn't, and should have been, ideal world permitting. In the future, I hope we'll have your help in drafting release note entries for remaini

Re: [Bug 252094] Re: MASTER: Poor graphics performance on Intel

2009-04-13 Thread JoseLVG
Tried ForceEnablePipeA + UXA on Juanty beta over an eee 901. Results: - Rendering errors on Compiz went away. - Glxgears FPSs dro from 600 to 150. - GoogleEarth crash due to libssl 0.9.8 error (couldn't test performance) - Planetpenguin racer: not very smooth 3-4 fps at 1024x600 - Tremulous didn't

Re: [Bug 252094] Re: MASTER: Poor graphics performance on Intel

2009-04-13 Thread Jordan Wilberding
When I try to enable UXA, startx just freezes during startup. I have also noticed, when I run glxgears, it says "Failed to initialize GEM." Could this because I am using the 2.6.28 *server* version of the kernel? On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 3:44 PM, andrehsiqueira wrote: > On my notebook Toshiba U20

Re: [Bug 252094] Re: MASTER: Poor graphics performance on Intel

2009-04-12 Thread andrehsiqueira
On Jaunty 9.04 beta. Atenciosamente André Henrique de Siqueira "O mundo precisa mais de atitudes do que de lamentações." 2009/4/12 JoseLVG > On Jaunty or Ibex? > > I tried it (ForceEnablePipeA + UXA) on a eee 901 with 8.10 Intrepid Ibex > and > it did not fix anything. >

Re: [Bug 252094] Re: MASTER: Poor graphics performance on Intel

2009-04-12 Thread Geir Ove Myhr
> My eee 901 has an Intel 945GME, no one else has this chipset? There are many who have that chipset. Some of them have reported various bugs related to it and some of those bugs have even been tagged as such: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bugs?field.tag=945gme I would guess that for issues rela

Re: [Bug 252094] Re: MASTER: Poor graphics performance on Intel

2009-04-12 Thread JoseLVG
On Jaunty or Ibex? I tried it (ForceEnablePipeA + UXA) on a eee 901 with 8.10 Intrepid Ibex and it did not fix anything. My eee 901 has an Intel 945GME, no one else has this chipset? Jose 2009/4/12 andrehsiqueira > On my notebook Toshiba U205 S5034 - with Intel VGA compatible > controller: In

Re: [Bug 252094] Re: MASTER: Poor graphics performance on Intel

2009-04-11 Thread Matthias Himber
On Saturday 11 April 2009 17:15:13 Jordan Wilberding wrote: > [snip] > > I tried: > Option "AccelMethod" "XAA" > In my xorg.conf, but that just makes xorg crash. Same here. I also have a GM45 (Lenovo Thinkpad T500). -- MASTER: Poor graphics performance on Intel https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/25

Re: [Bug 252094] Re: MASTER: Poor graphics performance on Intel

2009-04-11 Thread Geir Ove Myhr
> I hope, this report helps somehow. I'm sorry, but this information in this place won't help. If you file a new bug report, attach Xorg.0.log, the output of `lspci -vvnn` and the information above, it may help. If you use the ubuntu-bug program, it will attach a lot of useful information to the b

Re: [Bug 252094] Re: MASTER: Poor graphics performance on Intel

2009-03-19 Thread JoseLVG
I forgot! The system freezes with UXA after a while. Good luck to Ubuntu in the Netbook market, they are going to need it! Jose 2009/3/19 Jose Luis Vazquez > With Sync Vblank unchecked... (and AFTER installing a universe or > multiverse package NOT enabled by default...) > > - glxgears 230fps!

Re: [Bug 252094] Re: MASTER: Poor graphics performance on Intel

2009-03-19 Thread JoseLVG
With Sync Vblank unchecked... (and AFTER installing a universe or multiverse package NOT enabled by default...) - glxgears 230fps (great!! amazing!) - BUT NO RENDERING ERRORS I am still very unimpressed. If I want to use the full capabilities of this eee 901 graphics hardware the only way is

Re: [Bug 252094] Re: MASTER: Poor graphics performance on Intel

2009-03-19 Thread JoseLVG
Wonderful! ... now is so slow it takes 30seconds to display a key when I type it! Its great this UXA DECELERATION METHOD! Shuld be renamed UXD! After 10minutes of a completely irresponsible GUI I could type glxgears to see number below 300fps... but I could NOT see them moving they where just fix

Re: [Bug 252094] Re: MASTER: Poor graphics performance on Intel

2009-03-19 Thread JoseLVG
Latest Jaunty tested on an Asus eee901 (945GME I think) Results: - glxgears arround 600fps (not very spectacular) - SAME RENDERING ERRORS as usual when moving the glxgears window arround (compiz effects on) I think Jaunty will still have this problems. (If it takes them so much time to stabilize

Re: [Bug 252094] Re: MASTER: Poor graphics performance on Intel

2009-03-15 Thread JoseLVG
Have you tried GoogleEarth? Does it work again? Jose 2009/3/15 bingo > Finally some good news. I tested ubuntu 9.04 alpha-6, and the results > are back to where I would like to see them. > > Bryce, to reflect your comments, I tested with flightgear and got frame > rates between 15 and 23 fps de

Re: [Bug 252094] Re: MASTER: Poor graphics performance on Intel

2009-01-28 Thread Hans
To answer "the question": You can't. And what Bryce was saying was, "You never really could". The glxgears score was never anything more than a rough metric for 3D performance. The solution is to move to new tools, and test previous versions with those new tools, and then test later versions

Re: [Bug 252094] Re: MASTER: Poor graphics performance on Intel

2009-01-28 Thread JoseLVG
The problem with this is that you started testing glxgears because, for instance, GoogleEarth started to crown when in the previous Linux version it flyed (my case, good GE performance with Xandros on my eee and unsuable GE on ubuntu 8.10). You end up with some idea of the performance loss when th

Re: [Bug 252094] Re: MASTER: Poor graphics performance on Intel

2009-01-28 Thread Hans
I believe that in the past, Bryce has stated that 3D applications that report frame-rates will do. Such as Tux Racer. In order for this to be useful though, you have to be careful to capture your system configuration: XXorg.0.log, glxinfo, xdpyinfo,, etc. Phoronix also has a test suite that