Re: [Bug 238143] Re: bug status "triaged" is ambiguous

2009-11-22 Thread Dean Sas
Tom Berger wrote: > The term 'Triaged' may be ambiguous in the broad use of language (almost > all words, including 'yes' and 'no', are ambiguous in some contexts) but > it has a unique meaning within the context of the Launchpad bug tracker. It does seem that people think that that unique meaning

Re: [Bug 238143] Re: bug status "triaged" is ambiguous

2008-11-08 Thread Dean Sas
johndescs wrote: > In addition I thought that the fact of containing all informations > needed for developers was included in being a valid bug… By valid bug I meant it is actually a bug and not someone mis-configuring an application or something. -- bug status "triaged" is ambiguous https://bu

Re: [Bug 238143] Re: bug status "triaged" is ambiguous

2008-11-08 Thread johndescs
Dean Sas a écrit : > johndescs wrote: >> Dean Sas said: >> "triaged" means that it is a valid bug >> Why not merely "valid" then? It is much more known and means what should be, >> isn't it? > > You missed off the rest of my sentence, it's more than just being a > valid bug, it's valid, plus "it

Re: [Bug 238143] Re: bug status "triaged" is ambiguous

2008-11-06 Thread Dean Sas
johndescs wrote: > Dean Sas said: > "triaged" means that it is a valid bug > Why not merely "valid" then? It is much more known and means what should be, > isn't it? You missed off the rest of my sentence, it's more than just being a valid bug, it's valid, plus "it has been properly prioritised a