Thierry Carrez wrote:
> Please let me know if all reporters run SELinux, so that I can comment
> on the upstream bug.
>
Installed but default config (which I interpret to means 'effectively
disabled'.
I haven't managed to try the patched version yet - been at the UKUUG
conference.
Keith
--
On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 03:01:40AM -, Paul Dufresne wrote:
> It look a bit stupid, but maybe it is trying to become a deleted user.
> For ZDS (original poster) it would have means he would have deleted the
> "nobody" user (normally nobody have id 65534 in /etc/passwd, but I
> remember a time w
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 02:39:53AM -, Paul Dufresne wrote:
> I now tend to think this is caused by the -1 not being casted to appropriate
> type in:
> setresgid(-1,gid,-1);
> and in:
> assert_uid(-1, uid);
> in lib/sec_util.c as I said in bug #314657 causing problems on 64 bits
> machines.
Ab
